Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.
Identifieur interne : 000648 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000647; suivant : 000649Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.
Auteurs : C. Dahlin ; L. Andersson ; A. LindeSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1991-10.
Abstract
Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (p <0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><author><name sortKey="Dahlin, C" sort="Dahlin, C" uniqKey="Dahlin C" first="C." last="Dahlin">C. Dahlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, L" sort="Andersson, L" uniqKey="Andersson L" first="L." last="Andersson">L. Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linde, A" sort="Linde, A" uniqKey="Linde A" first="A." last="Linde">A. Linde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000648</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000648</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><author><name sortKey="Dahlin, C" sort="Dahlin, C" uniqKey="Dahlin C" first="C." last="Dahlin">C. Dahlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, L" sort="Andersson, L" uniqKey="Andersson L" first="L." last="Andersson">L. Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Linde, A" sort="Linde, A" uniqKey="Linde A" first="A." last="Linde">A. Linde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="165">165</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-10">1991-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (p <0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>C. Dahlin</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>L. Andersson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Linde</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone regeneration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osteogenesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periosteum</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>PTFE</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>artifical membrane</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR020401</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-CX38QNFH-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (p >0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>207</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1405</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><score>4.534</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>566 x 767 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><pmid><json:string>8597617</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>159</first><last>165</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1991</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-CX38QNFH-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1991</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x</json:string></doi><id>0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><title level="a" type="short">Bone augmentation at titanium implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">C.</forename><surname>Dahlin</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">L.</forename><surname>Andersson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Linde</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CX38QNFH-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR020401</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR020401.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1991.2.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="165">165</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="italic">p</hi><:t>Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (</:t><:t><0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.</:t></p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone regeneration</term><term xml:id="k2">osteogenesis</term><term xml:id="k3">periosteum</term><term xml:id="k4">titanium implant</term><term xml:id="k5">PTFE</term><term xml:id="k6">artifical membrane</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1991.2.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="2">2</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1991-10">October 1991</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0015900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR020401"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-01-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="159">159</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="165">165</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Christer Dahlin, Department of Oral Biochemistry, P.O. Box 33031, S‐400 33 Gothenburg. Sweden</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR020401.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 19 Semptember 1991</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title><title type="shortAuthors">Dahlin et al.</title><title type="short">Bone augmentation at titanium implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>C.</givenNames><familyName>Dahlin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>L.</givenNames><familyName>Andersson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Linde</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone regeneration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">osteogenesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">periosteum</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">titanium implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">PTFE</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">artifical membrane</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (<i>p</i> <0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Bone augmentation at titanium implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Dahlin</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Andersson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Central Hospital, Väaterås, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Linde</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Biochemistry, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, and</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991-10</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 19 Semptember 1991</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1991</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Lack of bone in localized areas of the jaws frequently poses a problem when placing oral implants. In this clinical study, we have tested an osteopromotive membrane technique for its ability to create bone over buccal fenestrations after fixture installation in the maxilla. 7 patients were selected by the use of CT‐scan. Criteria for patient selection were that the alveolar crest should have a vertical height >I3 mm and a facial‐palatal concavity, where exposure at the central portion of the fixture could be anticipated. One fenestration, randomly chosen, in each patient was covered with an e‐PTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)(Gore‐Tex GTAM™) membrane. Contralateral fenestrations served as controls (without the placement of a membrane). The amount of newly formed bone was calculated by photometric assessments. The results showed that the fixture fenestrations, treated with the membrane technique, demonstrated a significantly (p <0.005) higher amount of new bone formation compared to the controls, where little or no improvement had taken place at the fenestrations. The study conclusively shows that the membrane technique is a reconstructive technique, able to create new bone at localized bone fenestrations at titanium fixtures. Additionally. the study also demonstrates that the periosteum alone, in adult humans. is not capable of generating new bone at exposed titanium implants.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>osteogenesis</topic><topic>periosteum</topic><topic>titanium implant</topic><topic>PTFE</topic><topic>artifical membrane</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1991</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>2</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>159</start><end>165</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CX38QNFH-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR020401</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0D82C646C6C1265507ED0CA516A3D042C140F939
|texte= Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |