RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations
Identifieur interne : 000603 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000602; suivant : 000604RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations
Auteurs : N. Van Assche ; W. Coucke ; W. Teughels ; I. Naert ; M. V. Cardoso ; M. QuirynenSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Assche, Biocare, Bone loss, Bone response, Branemark, Branemark system implants, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Connective tissue width, Cumulative percentage, Dental implants, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Friberg, Friberg jemt, Healing abutments, Healing phase, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant stability, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implant systems, Implant therapy, Implant types, Implants research, Initial healing, Insertion, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, More bone loss, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Plaque, Pocket depth, Prospective study, Quirynen, Rough implants, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Subgroup, Surface roughness, Susceptible patients, Systematic review, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Tiunite surface.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Assche, Biocare, Bone loss, Bone response, Branemark, Branemark system implants, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Connective tissue width, Cumulative percentage, Dental implants, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Friberg, Friberg jemt, Healing abutments, Healing phase, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant stability, Implant surface roughness, Implant surfaces, Implant systems, Implant therapy, Implant types, Implants research, Initial healing, Insertion, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, More bone loss, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Plaque, Pocket depth, Prospective study, Quirynen, Rough implants, Rough surfaces, Roughness, Subgroup, Surface roughness, Susceptible patients, Systematic review, Titanium implants, Tiunite, Tiunite surface.
Abstract
This 1‐year prospective RCT compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite®) implant surfaces.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University LeuvenKapucijnenvoer 333000 LeuvenBelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax: +32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, W" sort="Coucke, W" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="W." last="Coucke">W. Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, W" sort="Teughels, W" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="W." last="Teughels">W. Teughels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cardoso, M V" sort="Cardoso, M V" uniqKey="Cardoso M" first="M. V." last="Cardoso">M. V. Cardoso</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000603</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, N" sort="Van Assche, N" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="N." last="Van Assche">N. Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University LeuvenKapucijnenvoer 333000 LeuvenBelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax: +32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Coucke, W" sort="Coucke, W" uniqKey="Coucke W" first="W." last="Coucke">W. Coucke</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teughels, W" sort="Teughels, W" uniqKey="Teughels W" first="W." last="Teughels">W. Teughels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cardoso, M V" sort="Cardoso, M V" uniqKey="Cardoso M" first="M. V." last="Cardoso">M. V. Cardoso</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="617">617</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="624">624</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-05">2012-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Assche</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Connective tissue width</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Friberg jemt</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial healing</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Susceptible patients</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite surface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Assche</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Connective tissue width</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Friberg</term><term>Friberg jemt</term><term>Healing abutments</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant surface roughness</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implant types</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Initial healing</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Rough implants</term><term>Rough surfaces</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Susceptible patients</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Tiunite</term><term>Tiunite surface</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This 1‐year prospective RCT compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite®) implant surfaces.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>tiunite</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>rough implants</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>assche</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>friberg</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>clinical attachment level</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>tiunite surface</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>cumulative percentage</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>rough surfaces</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>connective tissue width</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>susceptible patients</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>implant surface roughness</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>friberg jemt</json:string><json:string>healing phase</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>healing abutments</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>branemark system implants</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>initial healing</json:string><json:string>bone response</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant types</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>N. Van Assche</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University LeuvenKapucijnenvoer 333000 LeuvenBelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax: +32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Coucke</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Teughels</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. V. Cardoso</name><affiliations><json:string>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical evaluation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surface roughness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>TiUnite®</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>turned</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2256</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-NB2T931W-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This 1‐year prospective RCT compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite®) implant surfaces.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.192</score><pdfWordCount>6200</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40509</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>16</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>120</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title><pmid><json:string>22117732</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>617</first><last>624</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>2005</json:string><json:string>2011-06-24</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Key</json:string><json:string>Nele Van Assche Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium M</json:string><json:string>Ethical Committee of the Catholic University Leuven</json:string><json:string>Department of Clinical Biology, Scienti</json:string><json:string>Integration Diagnostics</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium I</json:string><json:string>Veeco Metrology Inc., Tucson</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>BO Ab-Impl</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>BO Ab</json:string><json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string><json:string>W. Teughels</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string><json:string>BO Impl</json:string><json:string>Patient</json:string><json:string>V. Cardoso</json:string><json:string>N. Van Assche</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Bad Very</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>Helsinki</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Barcelona</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Spain</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Fransson et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Shalabi et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Apse et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005b</json:string><json:string>Renvert & Persson 2009</json:string><json:string>Xiropaidis et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Friberg & Jemt 2008</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Rompen et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Røynesdal et al. 1998, 1999</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2005a</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Van Assche et al</json:string><json:string>Teughels et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Hardt et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Karbach et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Papaioannou et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Subramani et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Watzak et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Di Iorio et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Balshi et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Friberg et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Schou 2008</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Shibli et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Oh et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson and Wennerberg (2004)</json:string><json:string>Bratu et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Degidi et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Quirynen & Van Assche 2011</json:string><json:string>Vandeweghe & De Bruyn 2011</json:string><json:string>Al Nawas et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Van der Weijden et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Jungner et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Hager 2006</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>De Boever et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Ivanoff et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Michalowicz et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Huynh-Ba et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Hultin et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Turkyilmaz & Tumer 2007</json:string><json:string>Friberg & Jemt 2010</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Quirynen & Listgarten 1990</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Meffert 1993</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-NB2T931W-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x</json:string></doi><id>0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">N.</forename><surname>Assche</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven</orgName><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Nele Van Assche Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer 33 3000 Leuven Belgium Tel.: +32 16 33 24 83 Fax: +32 16 33 24 84 e‐mail: nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">W.</forename><surname>Coucke</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Clinical Biology</orgName><orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Brussels</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">W.</forename><surname>Teughels</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven</orgName><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>BIOMAT Research Cluster</orgName><orgName>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">M. V.</forename><surname>Cardoso</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>BIOMAT Research Cluster</orgName><orgName>Department of Conservative Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven</orgName><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Leuven</settlement><country key="BE">Belgium</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NB2T931W-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2256</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2256.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="617">617</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="624">624</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2012-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2256-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>This 1‐year prospective <hi rend="fc">RCT</hi> compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) implant surfaces.</p>
Material and methods
<p>Two subgroups of patients were formed; one group (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 10) where all teeth had been extracted due to severe periodontitis, another group (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 8) with teeth in the antagonistic jaw with a history of periodontitis and some remaining medium pockets (4–6 mm). Implants (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 85, 43 turned & 42 TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi>) were installed randomly in each patient. After 3–6 months of submerged healing, healing abutments were connected, followed by final abutments 2 weeks later, all with the same surface characteristics as the supporting implant. Peri‐implant parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded up to 1 year after abutment connection.</p>
Results
<p>Two turned implants failed in the partial edentulous group during the initial healing period (<hi rend="fc">CSR</hi>: 95%) and none of the TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> (<hi rend="fc">CSR</hi>: 100%) surface. No statistically significant differences in clinical parameters could be observed between both surfaces. The partial edentulous subgroup showed more bone loss compared to the full edentulous subgroup.</p>
Conclusion
<p>Moderately rough implants have a similar clinical outcome (at 1 year of loading in periodontitis susceptible patients) compared to minimally rough implants.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0001">bone loss</term><term xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0002">clinical evaluation</term><term xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0003">implant surface roughness</term><term xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0004">TiUnite<hi rend="superscript">®</hi></term><term xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0005">turned</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2256" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-5</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="23" type="journalVolume">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-05">May 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="14" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2256"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2011-05-19" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-06-24" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-11-25"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-11-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">617</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">624</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><i>Nele Van Assche</i></line><line>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven</line><line>Kapucijnenvoer 33</line><line>3000 Leuven</line><line>Belgium</line><line>Tel.: +32 16 33 24 83</line><line>Fax: +32 16 33 24 84</line><line>e‐mail: <email>nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2256-cit-0067">Van Assche N, Coucke W, Teughels W, Naert I, Cardoso MV, Quirynen M. RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</i> <b>23</b>, 2012, 617–624</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2256.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title><title type="shortAuthors">Van Assche et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>N.</givenNames> <familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix> <familyName>Assche</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>W.</givenNames> <familyName>Coucke</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>W.</givenNames> <familyName>Teughels</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames> <familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>M. V.</givenNames> <familyName>Cardoso</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2256-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2256-cr-0006"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames> <familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2256-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2256-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Clinical Biology</orgDiv> <orgName>Scientific Institute of Public Health</orgName> <address><city>Brussels</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2256-aff-0003"><orgDiv>BIOMAT Research Cluster</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName> <address><city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2256-aff-0004"><orgDiv>BIOMAT Research Cluster</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Department of Conservative Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgName>Catholic University Leuven</orgName><address> <city>Leuven</city> <country>Belgium</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0001">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0002">clinical evaluation</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0003">implant surface roughness</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0004">TiUnite<sup>®</sup></keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2256-kwd-0005">turned</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenborg, Sweden</fundingAgency><fundingNumber>2003‐144</fundingNumber></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2256-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2256-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>This 1‐year prospective <fc>RCT</fc> compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite<sup>®</sup>) implant surfaces.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2256-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>Two subgroups of patients were formed; one group (<i>n</i> = 10) where all teeth had been extracted due to severe periodontitis, another group (<i>n</i> = 8) with teeth in the antagonistic jaw with a history of periodontitis and some remaining medium pockets (4–6 mm). Implants (<i>n</i> = 85, 43 turned & 42 TiUnite<sup>®</sup>) were installed randomly in each patient. After 3–6 months of submerged healing, healing abutments were connected, followed by final abutments 2 weeks later, all with the same surface characteristics as the supporting implant. Peri‐implant parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded up to 1 year after abutment connection.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2256-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Two turned implants failed in the partial edentulous group during the initial healing period (<fc>CSR</fc>: 95%) and none of the TiUnite<sup>®</sup> (<fc>CSR</fc>: 100%) surface. No statistically significant differences in clinical parameters could be observed between both surfaces. The partial edentulous subgroup showed more bone loss compared to the full edentulous subgroup.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2256-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>Moderately rough implants have a similar clinical outcome (at 1 year of loading in periodontitis susceptible patients) compared to minimally rough implants.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University LeuvenKapucijnenvoer 333000 LeuvenBelgiumTel.: +32 16 33 24 83Fax: +32 16 33 24 84e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: nele_van_assche@hotmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Coucke</namePart><affiliation>Department of Clinical Biology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Teughels</namePart><affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. V.</namePart><namePart type="family">Cardoso</namePart><affiliation>BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Research Group for Microbial Adhesion Leuven, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-06-24</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2011-05-19</dateValid><edition>Van Assche N, Coucke W, Teughels W, Naert I, Cardoso MV, Quirynen M. RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012, 617–624</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>This 1‐year prospective RCT compared the outcome of minimally (turned) and moderately rough (TiUnite®) implant surfaces.</abstract><abstract>Two subgroups of patients were formed; one group (n = 10) where all teeth had been extracted due to severe periodontitis, another group (n = 8) with teeth in the antagonistic jaw with a history of periodontitis and some remaining medium pockets (4–6 mm). Implants (n = 85, 43 turned & 42 TiUnite®) were installed randomly in each patient. After 3–6 months of submerged healing, healing abutments were connected, followed by final abutments 2 weeks later, all with the same surface characteristics as the supporting implant. Peri‐implant parameters and intra‐oral radiographs were recorded up to 1 year after abutment connection.</abstract><abstract>Two turned implants failed in the partial edentulous group during the initial healing period (CSR: 95%) and none of the TiUnite® (CSR: 100%) surface. No statistically significant differences in clinical parameters could be observed between both surfaces. The partial edentulous subgroup showed more bone loss compared to the full edentulous subgroup.</abstract><abstract>Moderately rough implants have a similar clinical outcome (at 1 year of loading in periodontitis susceptible patients) compared to minimally rough implants.</abstract><note type="funding">Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenborg, Sweden - No. 2003‐144; </note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>clinical evaluation</topic><topic>implant surface roughness</topic><topic>TiUnite®</topic><topic>turned</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>617</start><end>624</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-NB2T931W-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02256.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2256</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000603 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000603 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0C958BC990DA53F23EAB347399CCFE22D097576C
|texte= RCT comparing minimally with moderately rough implants. Part 1: clinical observations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |