Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 000532 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000531; suivant : 000533Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial
Auteurs : E. M. Boerrigter ; M. E. Geertman ; R. P. Van Oort ; J. Bouma ; G. M. Raghoebar ; M. A. J. Van Waas ; M. A. Van'T Hof ; G. Boering ; W. KalkSource :
- British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery [ 0266-4356 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aesthetics, Baseline, Baseline data, Better scores, Bone height, British journal, Clinical trials, Complete dentures, Control group, Dent, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints questionnaire, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous period, Functional comfort, Functional complaints, Functional problems, General satisfaction rate, Groningen, High quality, Implant, Implant support, Lateral cephalogram, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillary denture, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Neutral space, Oral function, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Satisfaction rate, Significant differences, Standard deviation, Treatment outcome, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Upper dentures, Waas.
- Teeft :
- Aesthetics, Baseline, Baseline data, Better scores, Bone height, British journal, Clinical trials, Complete dentures, Control group, Dent, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints questionnaire, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous period, Functional comfort, Functional complaints, Functional problems, General satisfaction rate, Groningen, High quality, Implant, Implant support, Lateral cephalogram, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillary denture, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Neutral space, Oral function, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Satisfaction rate, Significant differences, Standard deviation, Treatment outcome, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Upper dentures, Waas.
Abstract
Abstract: Objectives—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). Design—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Subjects—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. Main outcome measures—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. Results—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. Conclusion—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Boerrigter, E M" sort="Boerrigter, E M" uniqKey="Boerrigter E" first="E. M." last="Boerrigter">E. M. Boerrigter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, J" sort="Bouma, J" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="J." last="Bouma">J. Bouma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M. A. J." last="Van Waas">M. A. J. Van Waas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M. A." last="Van'T Hof">M. A. Van'T Hof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G." last="Boering">G. Boering</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" sort="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W" first="W." last="Kalk">W. Kalk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000532</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000532</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title><author><name sortKey="Boerrigter, E M" sort="Boerrigter, E M" uniqKey="Boerrigter E" first="E. M." last="Boerrigter">E. M. Boerrigter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, J" sort="Bouma, J" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="J." last="Bouma">J. Bouma</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M. A. J." last="Van Waas">M. A. J. Van Waas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, M A" sort="Van T Hof, M A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="M. A." last="Van'T Hof">M. A. Van'T Hof</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G." last="Boering">G. Boering</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" sort="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W" first="W." last="Kalk">W. Kalk</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YBJOM</title><idno type="ISSN">0266-4356</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995">1995</date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="282">282</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="288">288</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0266-4356</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0266-4356</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline data</term><term>Better scores</term><term>Bone height</term><term>British journal</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous period</term><term>Functional comfort</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Functional problems</term><term>General satisfaction rate</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High quality</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant support</term><term>Lateral cephalogram</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillary denture</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Neutral space</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Satisfaction rate</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper dentures</term><term>Waas</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aesthetics</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Baseline data</term><term>Better scores</term><term>Bone height</term><term>British journal</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints questionnaire</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous period</term><term>Functional comfort</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Functional problems</term><term>General satisfaction rate</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High quality</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant support</term><term>Lateral cephalogram</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillary denture</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Neutral space</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Satisfaction rate</term><term>Significant differences</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Treatment outcome</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper dentures</term><term>Waas</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Objectives—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). Design—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Subjects—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. Main outcome measures—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. Results—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. Conclusion—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>functional complaints</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>groningen</json:string><json:string>upper denture</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>waas</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>general satisfaction rate</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>edentulous period</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>baseline data</json:string><json:string>neutral space</json:string><json:string>aesthetics</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>upper dentures</json:string><json:string>significant differences</json:string><json:string>maxillary denture</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>high quality</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>functional problems</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>better scores</json:string><json:string>functional comfort</json:string><json:string>denture complaints questionnaire</json:string><json:string>satisfaction rate</json:string><json:string>lateral cephalogram</json:string><json:string>university hospital groningen</json:string><json:string>implant support</json:string><json:string>treatment outcome</json:string><json:string>british journal</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>E.M. Boerrigter</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M.E. Geertman</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>R.P. Van Oort</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J. Bouma</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G.M. Raghoebar</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M.A.J. van Waas</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M.A. van't Hof</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. Boering</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>W. Kalk</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-M14649D4-0</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Objectives—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). Design—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Subjects—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. Main outcome measures—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. Results—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. Conclusion—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>202</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1441</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><score>8.148</score><pdfWordCount>3724</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27998</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 835 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title><pmid><json:string>8555143</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0266-4356(95)90038-1</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><title>Phd Thesis</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language></serie><host><title>British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0266-4356</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0266-4356(00)X0095-2</json:string></pii><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>282</first><last>288</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1995</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University Hospital Groningen</json:string><json:string>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands SUMMARY</json:string><json:string>University of Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>National Health Insurance Council</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string><json:string>Senior Research Assistant of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>Northern Centerfor Healthcare Research, University of Groningen</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Mr B. Stegenga</json:string><json:string>G. Boering</json:string><json:string>J. Bouma</json:string><json:string>Informed</json:string><json:string>R. P. Van Oort</json:string><json:string>M. A. J. van Waas</json:string><json:string>Journal</json:string><json:string>G. M. Raghoebar</json:string><json:string>M. E. Geertman</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Groningen</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Johns et al.</json:string><json:string>Enquist et al.</json:string><json:string>Vervoorn et al.</json:string><json:string>Naert et aL</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-M14649D4-0</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - surgery</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Otorhinolaryngology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1</json:string></doi><id>0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1995</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">E.M.</forename><surname>Boerrigter</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence and requests for offprints to Elisabeth M. Boerrigter, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.</p></note><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M.E.</forename><surname>Geertman</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">R.P.</forename><surname>Van Oort</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">J.</forename><surname>Bouma</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">G.M.</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">M.A.J.</forename><surname>van Waas</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">M.A.</forename><surname>van't Hof</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0007"><persName><forename type="first">G.</forename><surname>Boering</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0008"><persName><forename type="first">W.</forename><surname>Kalk</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1</idno><idno type="PII">0266-4356(95)90038-1</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YBJOM</title><idno type="pISSN">0266-4356</idno><idno type="PII">S0266-4356(00)X0095-2</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995"></date><biblScope unit="volume">33</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="282">282</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="288">288</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1995</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objectives—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). Design—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Subjects—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. Main outcome measures—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. Results—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. Conclusion—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1995">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YBJOM</jid><aid>95900381</aid><ce:pii>0266-4356(95)90038-1</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1995"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>E.M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boerrigter</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>M.E.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Geertman</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>R.P.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Van Oort</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>J.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Bouma</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Raghoebar</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>M.A.J.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van Waas</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>M.A.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>van't Hof</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boering</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>W.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kalk</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF3"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:textfn>Northern Center for Healthcare Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF4"><ce:label>d</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>Correspondence and requests for offprints to Elisabeth M. Boerrigter, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:date-received day="4" month="7" year="1994"></ce:date-received><ce:date-accepted day="7" month="11" year="1994"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para><ce:italic>Objectives</ce:italic>—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). <ce:italic>Design</ce:italic>—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. <ce:italic>Subjects</ce:italic>—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. <ce:italic>Main outcome measures</ce:italic>—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. <ce:italic>Results</ce:italic>—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. <ce:italic>Conclusion</ce:italic>—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Boerrigter</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><description>Correspondence and requests for offprints to Elisabeth M. Boerrigter, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Geertman</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Oort</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Bouma</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.A.J.</namePart><namePart type="family">van Waas</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.A.</namePart><namePart type="family">van't Hof</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Boering</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Kalk</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Objectives—The aim of this study was to establish the treatment outcome of full denture treatment with or without implant support, in which the outcome assessment focuses on the patient's subjective evaluation (‘denture-satisfaction’). Design—A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Subjects—Thirty-two men and 118 women (mean age 56±9, range 35–84 years) participated in the study. The mean height of the mandible was 13±2 mm, measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The patients were randomly assigned to either a group treated with implant-retained mandibular overdentures and a new maxillary denture, or to a control group treated with a new set of complete dentures. Main outcome measures—Denture satisfaction was assessed using questionnaires focusing on denture-related complaints and ‘a general satisfaction rate’. Results—Based on the baseline data, from the ‘denture complaints’ questionnaire six interpretable factors could be extracted. One factor did not vary following treatment and was excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation three out of five factors showed significantly better scores for the group treated with implants than for the control-group. The same was found for the general satisfaction rate. Conclusion—For patients with a severely resorbed mandible, overdentures retained by dental implants appear to provide a more satisfactory solution to their denture-related problems.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YBJOM</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199510</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0266-4356</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0266-4356(00)X0095-2</identifier><part><date>199510</date><detail type="volume"><number>33</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>5</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>272</start><end>340</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>282</start><end>288</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-M14649D4-0</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0266-4356(95)90038-1</identifier><identifier type="PII">0266-4356(95)90038-1</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000532 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000532 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0B1ADC27FDE23A682C93132A6F897615580EF790
|texte= Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants— a multicentre randomized clinical trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |