Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque
Identifieur interne : 000396 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000395; suivant : 000397Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque
Auteurs : Joke Duyck ; Livía Corpas ; Stephanie Vermeiren ; Toru Ogawa ; Marc Quirynen ; Katleen Vandamme ; Reinhilde Jacobs ; Ignace NaertSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adverse effects, Animal study, Biological width, Bone, Bone behaviour, Bone defect area, Bone defect depth, Bone density, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Contact density, Control implant, Control implants, Crest module, Crestal, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different test conditions, Direct contact, Duyck, Experimental implant, Experimental implant design, Experimental implants, High insertion torque, Histological, Histomorphometric, Histomorphometrical, Histomorphometrical analyses, Host bone, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant diameter, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant neck, Implant placement, Implant shoulder, Implant success, Implants research, Insertion, Insertion torque, International journal, John wiley sons, Katholieke universiteit leuven, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone, Marginal bone behaviour, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Minipig, Minipig mandible, Minipigs, More bone loss, Naert, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseocompression, Osseointegration, Periodontology, Primary stability, Prosthetic dentistry, Rabbit tibiae, Radiological, Radiological evaluation, Resorption, Surgical, Titanium implants, Vandamme, Vander sloten.
- Teeft :
- Adverse effects, Animal study, Biological width, Bone, Bone behaviour, Bone defect area, Bone defect depth, Bone density, Bone formation, Bone fraction, Bone loss, Bone resorption, Clin, Contact density, Control implant, Control implants, Crest module, Crestal, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different test conditions, Direct contact, Duyck, Experimental implant, Experimental implant design, Experimental implants, High insertion torque, Histological, Histomorphometric, Histomorphometrical, Histomorphometrical analyses, Host bone, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant diameter, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant neck, Implant placement, Implant shoulder, Implant success, Implants research, Insertion, Insertion torque, International journal, John wiley sons, Katholieke universiteit leuven, Leuven, Mandible, Marginal bone, Marginal bone behaviour, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Minipig, Minipig mandible, Minipigs, More bone loss, Naert, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseocompression, Osseointegration, Periodontology, Primary stability, Prosthetic dentistry, Rabbit tibiae, Radiological, Radiological evaluation, Resorption, Surgical, Titanium implants, Vandamme, Vander sloten.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech© implant (control).
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Corpas, Livia" sort="Corpas, Livia" uniqKey="Corpas L" first="Livía" last="Corpas">Livía Corpas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vermeiren, Stephanie" sort="Vermeiren, Stephanie" uniqKey="Vermeiren S" first="Stephanie" last="Vermeiren">Stephanie Vermeiren</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ogawa, Toru" sort="Ogawa, Toru" uniqKey="Ogawa T" first="Toru" last="Ogawa">Toru Ogawa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000396</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000396</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Corpas, Livia" sort="Corpas, Livia" uniqKey="Corpas L" first="Livía" last="Corpas">Livía Corpas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vermeiren, Stephanie" sort="Vermeiren, Stephanie" uniqKey="Vermeiren S" first="Stephanie" last="Vermeiren">Stephanie Vermeiren</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ogawa, Toru" sort="Ogawa, Toru" uniqKey="Ogawa T" first="Toru" last="Ogawa">Toru Ogawa</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vandamme, Katleen" sort="Vandamme, Katleen" uniqKey="Vandamme K" first="Katleen" last="Vandamme">Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="877">877</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="884">884</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-08">2010-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adverse effects</term><term>Animal study</term><term>Biological width</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone behaviour</term><term>Bone defect area</term><term>Bone defect depth</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Contact density</term><term>Control implant</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Crest module</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different test conditions</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental implant design</term><term>Experimental implants</term><term>High insertion torque</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histomorphometric</term><term>Histomorphometrical</term><term>Histomorphometrical analyses</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant neck</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Katholieke universiteit leuven</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone behaviour</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Minipig</term><term>Minipig mandible</term><term>Minipigs</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseocompression</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Rabbit tibiae</term><term>Radiological</term><term>Radiological evaluation</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adverse effects</term><term>Animal study</term><term>Biological width</term><term>Bone</term><term>Bone behaviour</term><term>Bone defect area</term><term>Bone defect depth</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone fraction</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Clin</term><term>Contact density</term><term>Control implant</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Crest module</term><term>Crestal</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different test conditions</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Duyck</term><term>Experimental implant</term><term>Experimental implant design</term><term>Experimental implants</term><term>High insertion torque</term><term>Histological</term><term>Histomorphometric</term><term>Histomorphometrical</term><term>Histomorphometrical analyses</term><term>Host bone</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant diameter</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant neck</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Katholieke universiteit leuven</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone behaviour</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Minipig</term><term>Minipig mandible</term><term>Minipigs</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Naert</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseocompression</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Rabbit tibiae</term><term>Radiological</term><term>Radiological evaluation</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Vandamme</term><term>Vander sloten</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech© implant (control).</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>duyck</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>control implant</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>experimental implants</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>control implants</json:string><json:string>radiological</json:string><json:string>experimental implant design</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>crestal</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>high insertion torque</json:string><json:string>osseocompression</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>experimental implant</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>minipigs</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>vandamme</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>histological</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>minipig</json:string><json:string>histomorphometric</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>histomorphometrical</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>implant diameter</json:string><json:string>crest module</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>bone fraction</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>minipig mandible</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>vander sloten</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>contact density</json:string><json:string>bone defect depth</json:string><json:string>bone behaviour</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>histomorphometrical analyses</json:string><json:string>bone defect area</json:string><json:string>implant neck</json:string><json:string>marginal bone</json:string><json:string>insertion torque</json:string><json:string>katholieke universiteit leuven</json:string><json:string>rabbit tibiae</json:string><json:string>different test conditions</json:string><json:string>animal study</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>adverse effects</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>host bone</json:string><json:string>radiological evaluation</json:string><json:string>marginal bone behaviour</json:string><json:string>biological width</json:string><json:string>implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>direct contact</json:string><json:string>bone</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Joke Duyck</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Livía Corpas</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stephanie Vermeiren</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Toru Ogawa</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Katleen Vandamme</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Reinhilde Jacobs</name><affiliations><json:string>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>histology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>histomorphometry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>insertion torque</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>minipig</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implant design</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseocompression</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>strain</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1895</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SPL5F1P1-G</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech© implant (control).</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.312</score><pdfWordCount>5197</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33640</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>170</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>8</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title><pmid><json:string>20528892</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><pages><first>877</first><last>884</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>17S</json:string><json:string>53S</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Norbrook Laboratories Ltd</json:string><json:string>Oral Imaging Center</json:string><json:string>Exakt Technologies Inc.</json:string><json:string>Kenkyujo Co., Tokyo, Japan</json:string><json:string>Working Group 1.</json:string><json:string>Incorporation</json:string><json:string>Belgium Toru Ogawa, Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan Marc Quirynen, Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Corresponding</json:string><json:string>Research Flanders</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry BIOMAT Research Group Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>International Congress</json:string><json:string>Dental Clinics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Von Gieson</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>A.B. Jr</json:string><json:string>Consensus</json:string><json:string>W. Teughels</json:string><json:string>J. Duyck</json:string><json:string>B. Vandekerckhove</json:string><json:string>Stephanie Vermeiren</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string><json:string>Katleen Vandamme</json:string><json:string>Prof</json:string><json:string>Joke Duyck</json:string><json:string>I. Histological</json:string><json:string>M. Jr</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Stanford</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>Australia</json:string><json:string>Pisa</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Brussels</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Denmark</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Ireland</json:string><json:string>Wetzlar</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Mechelen</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Vandamme et al. 2007a, 2007b, 2008</json:string><json:string>Slaets et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Turkyilmaz et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Gulsahi et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Kold et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Ottoni et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Shin et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Koka 1998</json:string><json:string>Sugiura et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Natali et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Hobkirk et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Hermann et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Valen & Locante 2000</json:string><json:string>Qahash et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Shalabi et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Misch et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al</json:string><json:string>Duyck et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Lee et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Frost 2004</json:string><json:string>Yoshida et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Oh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Isidor (2006)</json:string><json:string>Turkyilmaz et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Shin et al.</json:string><json:string>Lazzara & Porter 2006</json:string><json:string>Cehreli et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Puleo & Thomas 2006</json:string><json:string>Natali et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Laurell & Lundgren 2009</json:string><json:string>Nkenke et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Wang et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Steigenga et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Novaes et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Stanford 2008</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Book 1996</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SPL5F1P1-G</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x</json:string></doi><id>08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title><title level="a" type="short">Evaluation of experimental implant design with high insertion torque</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Joke</forename><surname>Duyck</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Livía</forename><surname>Corpas</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Stephanie</forename><surname>Vermeiren</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Toru</forename><surname>Ogawa</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan<address><country key="JP"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Katleen</forename><surname>Vandamme</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0006"><persName><forename type="first">Reinhilde</forename><surname>Jacobs</surname></persName><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0007"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SPL5F1P1-G</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1895</idno><idno type="supplier">1895</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1895.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-8</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="877">877</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="884">884</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech<hi rend="superscript">©</hi> implant (control).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> In ten 18‐month‐old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone‐to‐implant contact density, and peri‐implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri‐implant bone fraction around the experimental implants.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri‐implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, Jacobs R, Naert I. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 877–884.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone</term><term xml:id="k2">histology</term><term xml:id="k3">histomorphometry</term><term xml:id="k4">insertion torque</term><term xml:id="k5">minipig</term><term xml:id="k6">oral implant design</term><term xml:id="k7">osseocompression</term><term xml:id="k8">strain</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08108"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-8</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="8">8</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-08">August 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="14" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1895"></id><id type="supplier" value="1895"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-05-26"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-07-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-05-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.25 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-10-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="877">877</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="884">884</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Prof. Dr Joke Duyck</i>
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
BIOMAT Research Group
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Kapucijnenvoer 7
B‐3000 Leuven
Belgium
Tel.: +32 16 332 468
Fax: +32 16 332 309
e‐mail: <email normalForm="joke.duyck@med.kuleuven.be">joke.duyck@med.kuleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1895.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 6 November 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="42"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6436"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="50"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title><title type="shortAuthors">Duyck et al.</title><title type="short">Evaluation of experimental implant design with high insertion torque</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Joke</givenNames><familyName>Duyck</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Livía</givenNames><familyName>Corpas</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Stephanie</givenNames><familyName>Vermeiren</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3"><personName><givenNames>Toru</givenNames><familyName>Ogawa</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Katleen</givenNames><familyName>Vandamme</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Reinhilde</givenNames><familyName>Jacobs</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr8" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="JP"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">histology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">histomorphometry</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">insertion torque</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">minipig</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">oral implant design</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">osseocompression</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">strain</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech<sup>©</sup> implant (control).</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> In ten 18‐month‐old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone‐to‐implant contact density, and peri‐implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri‐implant bone fraction around the experimental implants.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri‐implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, Jacobs R, Naert I. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 877–884.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of experimental implant design with high insertion torque</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joke</namePart><namePart type="family">Duyck</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Livía</namePart><namePart type="family">Corpas</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephanie</namePart><namePart type="family">Vermeiren</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Toru</namePart><namePart type="family">Ogawa</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>Division of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Katleen</namePart><namePart type="family">Vandamme</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Reinhilde</namePart><namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart><affiliation>Oral Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, BIOMAT Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 6 November 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">8</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">42</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">50</extent><extent unit="words">6436</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech© implant (control).</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: In ten 18‐month‐old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone‐to‐implant contact density, and peri‐implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically.</abstract><abstract>Results: Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri‐implant bone fraction around the experimental implants.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri‐implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, Jacobs R, Naert I. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 877–884.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone</topic><topic>histology</topic><topic>histomorphometry</topic><topic>insertion torque</topic><topic>minipig</topic><topic>oral implant design</topic><topic>osseocompression</topic><topic>strain</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>8</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>877</start><end>884</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SPL5F1P1-G</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1895</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:08418C43D28BDA8B96086158F6DE01B160FE8AF6
|texte= Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |