Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss
Identifieur interne : 000374 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000373; suivant : 000375Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss
Auteurs : M. Vercruyssen ; M. QuirynenSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Albrektsson, Annual bone loss, Approximal pockets, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone quantity, Bone regeneration, Bone remodelling, Cigarette smoking, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameter, Clinical periodontology, Dehiscence, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different time intervals, Edentulous, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Frequency distribution, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Karoussis, Lang, Last visit, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Medical history, Meijer, More bone loss, Nemark, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdentures, Periodontal, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Retrospective, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Site level, Small number, Steenberghe, Study population, Survival rate, Systematic review, Vercruyssen, Vercruyssen quirynen overdentures, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Albrektsson, Annual bone loss, Approximal pockets, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone quantity, Bone regeneration, Bone remodelling, Cigarette smoking, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical parameter, Clinical periodontology, Dehiscence, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different time intervals, Edentulous, Endosseous, Endosseous implants, Frequency distribution, Immediate implant placement, Immediate placement, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant therapy, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, Karoussis, Lang, Last visit, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofacial, Medical history, Meijer, More bone loss, Nemark, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdentures, Periodontal, Periodontitis, Periodontology, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Radiograph, Retrospective, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Site level, Small number, Steenberghe, Study population, Survival rate, Systematic review, Vercruyssen, Vercruyssen quirynen overdentures, Zarb.
Abstract
Objective: In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, M" sort="Vercruyssen, M" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="M." last="Vercruyssen">M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000374</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000374</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title><author><name sortKey="Vercruyssen, M" sort="Vercruyssen, M" uniqKey="Vercruyssen M" first="M." last="Vercruyssen">M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="466">466</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="472">472</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05">2010-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Approximal pockets</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone remodelling</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameter</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different time intervals</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Karoussis</term><term>Lang</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Medical history</term><term>Meijer</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nemark</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Site level</term><term>Small number</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Study population</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Vercruyssen</term><term>Vercruyssen quirynen overdentures</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Approximal pockets</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone quantity</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone remodelling</term><term>Cigarette smoking</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical parameter</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different time intervals</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>Immediate implant placement</term><term>Immediate placement</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Karoussis</term><term>Lang</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Medical history</term><term>Meijer</term><term>More bone loss</term><term>Nemark</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Site level</term><term>Small number</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Study population</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Vercruyssen</term><term>Vercruyssen quirynen overdentures</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>vercruyssen</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>dehiscence</json:string><json:string>annual bone loss</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>karoussis</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>nemark</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>endosseous</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>meijer</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>site level</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>vercruyssen quirynen overdentures</json:string><json:string>last visit</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>study population</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>bone remodelling</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>retrospective evaluation</json:string><json:string>bone quantity</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>different time intervals</json:string><json:string>more bone loss</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>clinical parameter</json:string><json:string>cigarette smoking</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>immediate implant placement</json:string><json:string>small number</json:string><json:string>approximal pockets</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>medical history</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>immediate placement</json:string><json:string>endosseous implants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M. Vercruyssen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>attachment loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandible</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>pockets</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>susceptibility</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1902</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-TLT7XQ57-M</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.456</score><pdfWordCount>5415</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35613</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>38</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>253</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>8</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title><pmid><json:string>20443799</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>466</first><last>472</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1051</json:string><json:string>1969</json:string><json:string>8</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the University Hospitals Leuven</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Implant</json:string><json:string>M. Vercruyssen</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Stoker</json:string><json:string>M. Quirynen</json:string><json:string>G.T. Jr</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Lund</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Bergen op Zoom</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Quebec</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Lachmann et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. (2009b)</json:string><json:string>Davis 1998</json:string><json:string>Cooper et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>RoosJansaker et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Haas et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Jansson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Isidor 1994</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Rosenberg et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Cawood & Howell 1988</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Berglundh 2008</json:string><json:string>Hardt et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Mombelli & Lang 1994</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Mengel & Floresde-Jacoby 2005</json:string><json:string>Wilson & Nunn 1999</json:string><json:string>Engquist et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Wedgwood et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Telleman et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2004a, 2004b</json:string><json:string>Schou et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Schou 2008</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Whinery 1975</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 2009a</json:string><json:string>Nitzan et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Vercruyssen et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Carlsson et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Feloutzis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Van der Weijden et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>van der Weijden et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. (1999)</json:string><json:string>Galindo-Moreno et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Strietzel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Laine et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Spiekermann et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Ferreira et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Visser et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Wismeijer et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Karoussis et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Penarrocha et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Evian et al. 2004</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-TLT7XQ57-M</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x</json:string></doi><id>07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title><title level="a" type="short">Overdentures in mandible: bone loss</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Vercruyssen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TLT7XQ57-M</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1902</idno><idno type="supplier">1902</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1902.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="466">466</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="472">472</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> For all 495 patients with an overdenture in the mandible at least 5 years in function, data up to their last follow‐up visit had been collected, including long‐cone radiographs (taken at the abutment connection and after years 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 16 of loading) and probing data at their last evaluation. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. Two hundred and forty‐eight patients had been clinically examined recently. For the others, information on bone level and probing depths were retrieved from the patient's files, as all patients had been enrolled in our annual follow‐up schedule.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The mean annual bone loss on a site level (without considering the first year of bone remodelling) after 3 years of loading was 0.08 mm/year (SD=0.22, <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=1105), after 5 years of loading 0.07 mm/year (SD=0.14, <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=892), after 8 years of loading 0.06 mm/year (SD=0.12, <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=598), after 12 years 0.04 mm/year (SD=0.07, <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=370) and 0.05 mm/year (SD=0.05, <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=154) after 16 years of loading. Ongoing bone loss was seen in a number of implants (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=26) with the annual bone loss exceeding 0.2 mm. Some factors clearly showed a significant impact on bone loss: smoking (≥10 cigarettes/day), GBR, the presence of dehiscence and bone quantity(the latter only during the first year). The probing data showed a favourable condition, with <1.2% of the approximal pockets being ≥6 mm, and 4.1%=5 mm.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> The mean annual bone loss over the study period was <0.1 mm/year after the first year of loading. However, a small number (2.5%) of the implants showed continuing bone loss.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article</hi>:
Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 466–472.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01902.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">attachment loss</term><term xml:id="k2">bone loss</term><term xml:id="k3">implants</term><term xml:id="k4">mandible</term><term xml:id="k5">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k6">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k7">pockets</term><term xml:id="k8">susceptibility</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-05">May 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1902"></id><id type="supplier" value="1902"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2010-04-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="466">466</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="472">472</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>M. Vercruyssen</i>, Department of Periodontology
Catholic University Leuven
Kapucijnenvoer 33
B‐3000
Leuven
Belgium
Tel.: +00 32 1633 2483
Fax: +00 32 1633 2484
e‐mail: <email normalForm="marjo_vercruyssen@yahoo.com">marjo_vercruyssen@yahoo.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1902.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 21 November 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="65"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8128"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="49"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title><title type="shortAuthors">Vercruyssen & Quirynen</title><title type="short">Overdentures in mandible: bone loss</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Vercruyssen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">attachment loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">mandible</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">pockets</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">susceptibility</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> For all 495 patients with an overdenture in the mandible at least 5 years in function, data up to their last follow‐up visit had been collected, including long‐cone radiographs (taken at the abutment connection and after years 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 16 of loading) and probing data at their last evaluation. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. Two hundred and forty‐eight patients had been clinically examined recently. For the others, information on bone level and probing depths were retrieved from the patient's files, as all patients had been enrolled in our annual follow‐up schedule.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The mean annual bone loss on a site level (without considering the first year of bone remodelling) after 3 years of loading was 0.08 mm/year (SD=0.22, <i>n</i>=1105), after 5 years of loading 0.07 mm/year (SD=0.14, <i>n</i>=892), after 8 years of loading 0.06 mm/year (SD=0.12, <i>n</i>=598), after 12 years 0.04 mm/year (SD=0.07, <i>n</i>=370) and 0.05 mm/year (SD=0.05, <i>n</i>=154) after 16 years of loading. Ongoing bone loss was seen in a number of implants (<i>n</i>=26) with the annual bone loss exceeding 0.2 mm. Some factors clearly showed a significant impact on bone loss: smoking (≥10 cigarettes/day), GBR, the presence of dehiscence and bone quantity(the latter only during the first year). The probing data showed a favourable condition, with <1.2% of the approximal pockets being ≥6 mm, and 4.1%=5 mm.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The mean annual bone loss over the study period was <0.1 mm/year after the first year of loading. However, a small number (2.5%) of the implants showed continuing bone loss.</p><p> <b>To cite this article</b>:
Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 466–472.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01902.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Overdentures in mandible: bone loss</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vercruyssen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-05</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 21 November 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">65</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">49</extent><extent unit="words">8128</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: In part 2 of this long‐term, retrospective study on the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: For all 495 patients with an overdenture in the mandible at least 5 years in function, data up to their last follow‐up visit had been collected, including long‐cone radiographs (taken at the abutment connection and after years 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 16 of loading) and probing data at their last evaluation. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. Two hundred and forty‐eight patients had been clinically examined recently. For the others, information on bone level and probing depths were retrieved from the patient's files, as all patients had been enrolled in our annual follow‐up schedule.</abstract><abstract>Results: The mean annual bone loss on a site level (without considering the first year of bone remodelling) after 3 years of loading was 0.08 mm/year (SD=0.22, n=1105), after 5 years of loading 0.07 mm/year (SD=0.14, n=892), after 8 years of loading 0.06 mm/year (SD=0.12, n=598), after 12 years 0.04 mm/year (SD=0.07, n=370) and 0.05 mm/year (SD=0.05, n=154) after 16 years of loading. Ongoing bone loss was seen in a number of implants (n=26) with the annual bone loss exceeding 0.2 mm. Some factors clearly showed a significant impact on bone loss: smoking (≥10 cigarettes/day), GBR, the presence of dehiscence and bone quantity(the latter only during the first year). The probing data showed a favourable condition, with <1.2% of the approximal pockets being ≥6 mm, and 4.1%=5 mm.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The mean annual bone loss over the study period was <0.1 mm/year after the first year of loading. However, a small number (2.5%) of the implants showed continuing bone loss.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M. Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implants‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 466–472.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01902.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>attachment loss</topic><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>pockets</topic><topic>susceptibility</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>466</start><end>472</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TLT7XQ57-M</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1902</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000374 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000374 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:07B476C47A15278CDE9310A52D7E614F0EC41BD3
|texte= Long‐term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient‐centred outcome) of the two‐implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |