Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery
Identifieur interne : 000348 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000347; suivant : 000349Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery
Auteurs : Luca Francetti ; Massimo Del Fabbro ; Matteo Basso ; Tiziano Testori ; Silvio Taschieri ; Roberto WeinsteinSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2004-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Addy, Blackwell munksgaard, Chlorhexidine, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Chlorhexidine spray, Clin periodontol, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical study, Clinical trial, Control group, Delivery system, Dental implants, Dental plaque, Dental research, Francetti, Gingival index, Handicapped children, Hygiene, Hygiene procedure, Implant, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant surgery, Implant therapy, Implants research, Infectious complications, International journal, Local delivery, Mouthwash, Null hypothesis, Observational period, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Other hand, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal research, Periodontal surgery, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque control, Plaque index, Present study, Probability value, Rinse, Rinse group, Rinse group spray group, Side effects, Single examiner, Spray form, Spray group, Stain index, Statistical comparison, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical area, Surgical site, Surgical sites, Taste alteration, Teeth teeth, Test group, Tooth pigmentation, Tooth staining, Tooth surfaces, Total dose, Total sites.
- Teeft :
- Addy, Blackwell munksgaard, Chlorhexidine, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Chlorhexidine spray, Clin periodontol, Clinical parameters, Clinical periodontology, Clinical study, Clinical trial, Control group, Delivery system, Dental implants, Dental plaque, Dental research, Francetti, Gingival index, Handicapped children, Hygiene, Hygiene procedure, Implant, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant surgery, Implant therapy, Implants research, Infectious complications, International journal, Local delivery, Mouthwash, Null hypothesis, Observational period, Oral hygiene, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Other hand, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal research, Periodontal surgery, Periodontology, Plaque, Plaque accumulation, Plaque control, Plaque index, Present study, Probability value, Rinse, Rinse group, Rinse group spray group, Side effects, Single examiner, Spray form, Spray group, Stain index, Statistical comparison, Surgery, Surgical, Surgical area, Surgical site, Surgical sites, Taste alteration, Teeth teeth, Test group, Tooth pigmentation, Tooth staining, Tooth surfaces, Total dose, Total sites.
Abstract
Background/purpose: This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Francetti, Luca" sort="Francetti, Luca" uniqKey="Francetti L" first="Luca" last="Francetti">Luca Francetti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fabbro, Massimo Del" sort="Fabbro, Massimo Del" uniqKey="Fabbro M" first="Massimo Del" last="Fabbro">Massimo Del Fabbro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Basso, Matteo" sort="Basso, Matteo" uniqKey="Basso M" first="Matteo" last="Basso">Matteo Basso</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Testori, Tiziano" sort="Testori, Tiziano" uniqKey="Testori T" first="Tiziano" last="Testori">Tiziano Testori</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taschieri, Silvio" sort="Taschieri, Silvio" uniqKey="Taschieri S" first="Silvio" last="Taschieri">Silvio Taschieri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weinstein, Roberto" sort="Weinstein, Roberto" uniqKey="Weinstein R" first="Roberto" last="Weinstein">Roberto Weinstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000348</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000348</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Francetti, Luca" sort="Francetti, Luca" uniqKey="Francetti L" first="Luca" last="Francetti">Luca Francetti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fabbro, Massimo Del" sort="Fabbro, Massimo Del" uniqKey="Fabbro M" first="Massimo Del" last="Fabbro">Massimo Del Fabbro</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Basso, Matteo" sort="Basso, Matteo" uniqKey="Basso M" first="Matteo" last="Basso">Matteo Basso</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Testori, Tiziano" sort="Testori, Tiziano" uniqKey="Testori T" first="Tiziano" last="Testori">Tiziano Testori</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Taschieri, Silvio" sort="Taschieri, Silvio" uniqKey="Taschieri S" first="Silvio" last="Taschieri">Silvio Taschieri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weinstein, Roberto" sort="Weinstein, Roberto" uniqKey="Weinstein R" first="Roberto" last="Weinstein">Roberto Weinstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="857">857</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="862">862</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-10">2004-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Addy</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Chlorhexidine</term><term>Chlorhexidine digluconate</term><term>Chlorhexidine spray</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Delivery system</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental plaque</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Francetti</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Handicapped children</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Hygiene procedure</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Infectious complications</term><term>International journal</term><term>Local delivery</term><term>Mouthwash</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Observational period</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontal surgery</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque control</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Present study</term><term>Probability value</term><term>Rinse</term><term>Rinse group</term><term>Rinse group spray group</term><term>Side effects</term><term>Single examiner</term><term>Spray form</term><term>Spray group</term><term>Stain index</term><term>Statistical comparison</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical area</term><term>Surgical site</term><term>Surgical sites</term><term>Taste alteration</term><term>Teeth teeth</term><term>Test group</term><term>Tooth pigmentation</term><term>Tooth staining</term><term>Tooth surfaces</term><term>Total dose</term><term>Total sites</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Addy</term><term>Blackwell munksgaard</term><term>Chlorhexidine</term><term>Chlorhexidine digluconate</term><term>Chlorhexidine spray</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Control group</term><term>Delivery system</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental plaque</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Francetti</term><term>Gingival index</term><term>Handicapped children</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Hygiene procedure</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Infectious complications</term><term>International journal</term><term>Local delivery</term><term>Mouthwash</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Observational period</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontal surgery</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque accumulation</term><term>Plaque control</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Present study</term><term>Probability value</term><term>Rinse</term><term>Rinse group</term><term>Rinse group spray group</term><term>Side effects</term><term>Single examiner</term><term>Spray form</term><term>Spray group</term><term>Stain index</term><term>Statistical comparison</term><term>Surgery</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical area</term><term>Surgical site</term><term>Surgical sites</term><term>Taste alteration</term><term>Teeth teeth</term><term>Test group</term><term>Tooth pigmentation</term><term>Tooth staining</term><term>Tooth surfaces</term><term>Total dose</term><term>Total sites</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background/purpose: This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>chlorhexidine</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>mouthwash</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>spray group</json:string><json:string>addy</json:string><json:string>francetti</json:string><json:string>plaque control</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>surgical site</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>dental plaque</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>stain index</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>rinse group</json:string><json:string>periodontal surgery</json:string><json:string>tooth staining</json:string><json:string>periodontal research</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>taste alteration</json:string><json:string>statistical comparison</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>total dose</json:string><json:string>chlorhexidine spray</json:string><json:string>side effects</json:string><json:string>plaque accumulation</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>surgical sites</json:string><json:string>handicapped children</json:string><json:string>gingival index</json:string><json:string>implant site</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>surgical area</json:string><json:string>observational period</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>probability value</json:string><json:string>chlorhexidine digluconate</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>hygiene procedure</json:string><json:string>surgery</json:string><json:string>null hypothesis</json:string><json:string>blackwell munksgaard</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>tooth pigmentation</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>total sites</json:string><json:string>rinse group spray group</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>infectious complications</json:string><json:string>teeth teeth</json:string><json:string>tooth surfaces</json:string><json:string>local delivery</json:string><json:string>spray form</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>delivery system</json:string><json:string>single examiner</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>hygiene</json:string><json:string>rinse</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Luca Francetti</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Massimo Del Fabbro</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Matteo Basso</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tiziano Testori</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Silvio Taschieri</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Roberto Weinstein</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>chlorhexidine</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mouthwash</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>spray</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>plaque index</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>stain index</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE566</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-HXF1CZBD-7</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background/purpose: This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.282</score><pdfWordCount>3958</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25488</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>27</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>204</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title><pmid><json:string>15367189</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>857</first><last>862</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1012</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Massimo Del</json:string><json:string>Patients</json:string><json:string>Silvio Taschieri</json:string><json:string>Matteo Basso</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Felo et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lambert et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Esposito et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Nyman et al. 1975</json:string><json:string>Addy et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Gjermo 1989</json:string><json:string>Francetti et al.</json:string><json:string>Jones 1997</json:string><json:string>Mongardini et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Francetti et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Gristina et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Lavigne et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Soskolne et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Francis et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Francetti et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Kalaga et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Addy & Moran 1997</json:string><json:string>Van Steenberghe et al. (1990)</json:string><json:string>Eriksen et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Rosling et al. 1976</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Loe et al. 1976</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 1982</json:string><json:string>Newman et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Siegrist et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Mankodi et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-HXF1CZBD-7</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2004</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x</json:string></doi><id>0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title><title level="a" type="short">CHX spray after implant surgery</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Luca</forename><surname>Francetti</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Massimo Del</forename><surname>Fabbro</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Matteo</forename><surname>Basso</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Tiziano</forename><surname>Testori</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Silvio</forename><surname>Taschieri</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto</forename><surname>Weinstein</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-HXF1CZBD-7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE566</idno><idno type="supplier">566</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE566.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.2004.31.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="857">857</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="862">862</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background/purpose: </hi> This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods: </hi> Twenty patients selected for implant therapy were randomly divided into two groups: 10 subjects used 15 ml of 0.12% CHX mouthrinse (control group) and 10 used 0.2% CHX spray (test group). Professional oral hygiene was carried out immediately before surgery. During the 14 days following surgery mechanical oral hygiene was performed only at the teeth not surgically involved. Plaque index (PI), stain index (SI), modified gingival index and taste alteration were assessed on the 7th and 14th day after surgery. The clinical parameters were evaluated at four tooth surfaces by a single examiner. Teeth proximal to surgical site and teeth not involved were statistically compared.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> In both groups, the PI increased similarly, with respect to the baseline, at days 7 and 14. There was no significant difference between the two groups at either time point. On the contrary, in the control group, the SI increased significantly when compared with baseline over the 14 days both at teeth nearest to surgical sites and at not‐involved sites. In the test group pigmentation was consistent only at teeth proximal to the surgical site. When considering not‐involved sites, tooth staining was significantly lower in the test with respect to the control group.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> The present study indicates that the efficacy of CHX spray in the post‐surgical control of dental plaque is similar to that of CHX mouthwash. Tooth staining, however, is significantly lower in the spray group at sites not surgically involved. These effects might be related to the route of CHX delivery, as well as the total dose administered that was significantly lower in the spray group with respect to the rinse group.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">chlorhexidine</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k3">mouthwash</term><term xml:id="k4">spray</term><term xml:id="k5">plaque index</term><term xml:id="k6">stain index</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10010"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.2004.31.issue-10</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="31">31</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="10">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2004-10">October 2004</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE566"></id><id type="supplier" value="566"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-08-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-08-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="857">857</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="862">862</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Address:
<i>Dr. Luca Francetti</i>
<i>Department of Odontology</i>
<i>Faculty of Medicine</i>
<i>University of Milano Istituto Ortopedico</i>
<i>R. Galeazzi</i>
<i>Via Riccardo</i>
<i>Galeazzi, 4</i>
<i>20161</i><i>Milano</i>
<i>Italy</i>
Fax: +39 02 66214770
E‐mail: <email normalForm="luca.francetti@unimi.it">luca.francetti@unimi.it</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE566.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 22 December 2003</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="35"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5999"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="34"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title><title type="shortAuthors">Francetti et al.</title><title type="short">CHX spray after implant surgery</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Luca</givenNames><familyName>Francetti</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Massimo Del</givenNames><familyName>Fabbro</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Matteo</givenNames><familyName>Basso</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Tiziano</givenNames><familyName>Testori</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Silvio</givenNames><familyName>Taschieri</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Roberto</givenNames><familyName>Weinstein</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">chlorhexidine</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mouthwash</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">spray</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">plaque index</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">stain index</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!--
Francetti L, Fabbro Del M, Basso M, Testori T, Taschieri S, Weinstein R: Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2004; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004.
--><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Background/purpose: </b> This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods: </b> Twenty patients selected for implant therapy were randomly divided into two groups: 10 subjects used 15 ml of 0.12% CHX mouthrinse (control group) and 10 used 0.2% CHX spray (test group). Professional oral hygiene was carried out immediately before surgery. During the 14 days following surgery mechanical oral hygiene was performed only at the teeth not surgically involved. Plaque index (PI), stain index (SI), modified gingival index and taste alteration were assessed on the 7th and 14th day after surgery. The clinical parameters were evaluated at four tooth surfaces by a single examiner. Teeth proximal to surgical site and teeth not involved were statistically compared.</p><p><b>Results: </b> In both groups, the PI increased similarly, with respect to the baseline, at days 7 and 14. There was no significant difference between the two groups at either time point. On the contrary, in the control group, the SI increased significantly when compared with baseline over the 14 days both at teeth nearest to surgical sites and at not‐involved sites. In the test group pigmentation was consistent only at teeth proximal to the surgical site. When considering not‐involved sites, tooth staining was significantly lower in the test with respect to the control group.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The present study indicates that the efficacy of CHX spray in the post‐surgical control of dental plaque is similar to that of CHX mouthwash. Tooth staining, however, is significantly lower in the spray group at sites not surgically involved. These effects might be related to the route of CHX delivery, as well as the total dose administered that was significantly lower in the spray group with respect to the rinse group.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>CHX spray after implant surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Luca</namePart><namePart type="family">Francetti</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Massimo Del</namePart><namePart type="family">Fabbro</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Matteo</namePart><namePart type="family">Basso</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tiziano</namePart><namePart type="family">Testori</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Silvio</namePart><namePart type="family">Taschieri</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart><namePart type="family">Weinstein</namePart><affiliation>Department of Odontology, Galeazzi Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-10</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 22 December 2003</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">35</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">34</extent><extent unit="words">5999</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background/purpose: This randomized clinical trial was aimed at comparing two different means of delivering chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) for plaque control during the 2 weeks following implant surgery.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Twenty patients selected for implant therapy were randomly divided into two groups: 10 subjects used 15 ml of 0.12% CHX mouthrinse (control group) and 10 used 0.2% CHX spray (test group). Professional oral hygiene was carried out immediately before surgery. During the 14 days following surgery mechanical oral hygiene was performed only at the teeth not surgically involved. Plaque index (PI), stain index (SI), modified gingival index and taste alteration were assessed on the 7th and 14th day after surgery. The clinical parameters were evaluated at four tooth surfaces by a single examiner. Teeth proximal to surgical site and teeth not involved were statistically compared.</abstract><abstract>Results: In both groups, the PI increased similarly, with respect to the baseline, at days 7 and 14. There was no significant difference between the two groups at either time point. On the contrary, in the control group, the SI increased significantly when compared with baseline over the 14 days both at teeth nearest to surgical sites and at not‐involved sites. In the test group pigmentation was consistent only at teeth proximal to the surgical site. When considering not‐involved sites, tooth staining was significantly lower in the test with respect to the control group.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The present study indicates that the efficacy of CHX spray in the post‐surgical control of dental plaque is similar to that of CHX mouthwash. Tooth staining, however, is significantly lower in the spray group at sites not surgically involved. These effects might be related to the route of CHX delivery, as well as the total dose administered that was significantly lower in the spray group with respect to the rinse group.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>mouthwash</topic><topic>spray</topic><topic>plaque index</topic><topic>stain index</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2004</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>31</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>857</start><end>862</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-HXF1CZBD-7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00566.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE566</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000348 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000348 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0707A203852D7EEA95AA6BA0F50EE75581A7B904
|texte= Chlorhexidine spray versus mouthwash in the control of dental plaque after implant surgery
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |