Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study
Identifieur interne : 000157 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000156; suivant : 000158Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study
Auteurs : R. Burkhardt ; N. P. LangSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2010-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment connection, Bone regeneration, Burkhardt, Burkhardt lang role, Closure, Cohort, Complete closure, Complete coverage, Connective tissue grafts, Control sites, Dehiscence, Esthetic priority, Flap, Hong kong, Implant, Implant installation, Implant installations, Implant surgery, Implants research, Incision, Incisions periosteal splitting, John wiley sons, Lang, Mucoperiosteal, Oral impl, Original defect size, Pini prato, Present study, Primary outcome, Primary wound closure, Regenerative procedures, Root coverage, Statistical analysis, Suture, Suture diameters, Suture removal, Suture tension, Tensile strength, Test sites, Ultrasonic device, Undisturbed wound healing, Wound closure, Wound dehiscence, Wound dehiscences, Wound margins.
- Teeft :
- Abutment connection, Bone regeneration, Burkhardt, Burkhardt lang role, Closure, Cohort, Complete closure, Complete coverage, Connective tissue grafts, Control sites, Dehiscence, Esthetic priority, Flap, Hong kong, Implant, Implant installation, Implant installations, Implant surgery, Implants research, Incision, Incisions periosteal splitting, John wiley sons, Lang, Mucoperiosteal, Oral impl, Original defect size, Pini prato, Present study, Primary outcome, Primary wound closure, Regenerative procedures, Root coverage, Statistical analysis, Suture, Suture diameters, Suture removal, Suture tension, Tensile strength, Test sites, Ultrasonic device, Undisturbed wound healing, Wound closure, Wound dehiscence, Wound dehiscences, Wound margins.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title><author><name sortKey="Burkhardt, R" sort="Burkhardt, R" uniqKey="Burkhardt R" first="R." last="Burkhardt">R. Burkhardt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000157</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000157</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title><author><name sortKey="Burkhardt, R" sort="Burkhardt, R" uniqKey="Burkhardt R" first="R." last="Burkhardt">R. Burkhardt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, N P" sort="Lang, N P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="N. P." last="Lang">N. P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="50">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="54">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01">2010-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Burkhardt</term><term>Burkhardt lang role</term><term>Closure</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complete closure</term><term>Complete coverage</term><term>Connective tissue grafts</term><term>Control sites</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Esthetic priority</term><term>Flap</term><term>Hong kong</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant installations</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Incision</term><term>Incisions periosteal splitting</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Mucoperiosteal</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Original defect size</term><term>Pini prato</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary outcome</term><term>Primary wound closure</term><term>Regenerative procedures</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Suture</term><term>Suture diameters</term><term>Suture removal</term><term>Suture tension</term><term>Tensile strength</term><term>Test sites</term><term>Ultrasonic device</term><term>Undisturbed wound healing</term><term>Wound closure</term><term>Wound dehiscence</term><term>Wound dehiscences</term><term>Wound margins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Burkhardt</term><term>Burkhardt lang role</term><term>Closure</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complete closure</term><term>Complete coverage</term><term>Connective tissue grafts</term><term>Control sites</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Esthetic priority</term><term>Flap</term><term>Hong kong</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant installations</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Incision</term><term>Incisions periosteal splitting</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Mucoperiosteal</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Original defect size</term><term>Pini prato</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary outcome</term><term>Primary wound closure</term><term>Regenerative procedures</term><term>Root coverage</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Suture</term><term>Suture diameters</term><term>Suture removal</term><term>Suture tension</term><term>Tensile strength</term><term>Test sites</term><term>Ultrasonic device</term><term>Undisturbed wound healing</term><term>Wound closure</term><term>Wound dehiscence</term><term>Wound dehiscences</term><term>Wound margins</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>dehiscence</json:string><json:string>suture</json:string><json:string>closure</json:string><json:string>cohort</json:string><json:string>primary wound closure</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>incision</json:string><json:string>burkhardt</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>wound dehiscences</json:string><json:string>mucoperiosteal</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>flap</json:string><json:string>suture tension</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>wound closure</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>wound margins</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>root coverage</json:string><json:string>burkhardt lang role</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>regenerative procedures</json:string><json:string>primary outcome</json:string><json:string>connective tissue grafts</json:string><json:string>ultrasonic device</json:string><json:string>incisions periosteal splitting</json:string><json:string>undisturbed wound healing</json:string><json:string>suture removal</json:string><json:string>wound dehiscence</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>complete closure</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>original defect size</json:string><json:string>esthetic priority</json:string><json:string>implant installations</json:string><json:string>pini prato</json:string><json:string>test sites</json:string><json:string>control sites</json:string><json:string>hong kong</json:string><json:string>complete coverage</json:string><json:string>tensile strength</json:string><json:string>suture diameters</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>R. Burkhardt</name><affiliations><json:string>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mucogingival surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>primary wound closure</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>wound dehiscence</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1829</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XHJTVNZX-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.862</score><pdfWordCount>2682</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>16725</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>15</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>93</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title><pmid><json:string>20070747</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>50</first><last>54</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>0</json:string><json:string>0 and 7-0</json:string><json:string>7</json:string><json:string>2010</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Zurich Switzerland Tel</json:string><json:string>Krupp Corporation, Essen, Germany</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Yvonne Burkhardt-Zellweger</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>N. P. Lang</json:string><json:string>Rino Burkhardt</json:string><json:string>Cigarette</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Zurich</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Burkhardt et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Fugazotto 1999</json:string><json:string>Lorenzoni et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Pini Prato et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Werfully et al. 2002</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XHJTVNZX-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x</json:string></doi><id>03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2010-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title><title level="a" type="short">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>Burkhardt</surname></persName><affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong<address><country key="HK"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">N. P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong<address><country key="HK"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XHJTVNZX-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1829</idno><idno type="supplier">1829</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1829.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="50">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="54">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim: </hi> To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> Sixty patients, scheduled for a single implant installation, were recruited. Before suturing, the wound closing forces were measured with an electronic tension device. One week after the surgery, the wounds were inspected with regard to complete closure.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The applied tension varied between 0.01 and 0.4 N. In 72% a tension of 0.01–0.1 N was applied, resulting in few dehiscences (10%). Higher closing forces (>0.1 N) increased the percentage of wound dehiscences significantly (≥40%).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> It appears necessary to control flap tension at the time of wound closure to achieve a primary closure.</p><p>
<hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">21</hi>, 2010; 50–54.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant surgery</term><term xml:id="k2">mucogingival surgery</term><term xml:id="k3">primary wound closure</term><term xml:id="k4">wound dehiscence</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2010.21.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="21">21</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2010-01">January 2010</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1829"></id><id type="supplier" value="1829"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-12-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-12-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="50">50</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="54">54</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Dr Rino Burkhardt</i>
Weinbergstrasse 98
CH‐8006 Zurich
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 44 360 50 50
Fax: +41 44 360 50‐55
e‐mail: <email normalForm="rino.burkhardt@bluewin.ch">rino.burkhardt@bluewin.ch</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1829.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 26 July 2009</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="6"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3315"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Burkhardt & Lang</title><title type="short">Role of flap tension in primary wound closure</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>Burkhardt</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>N. P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="HK"><unparsedAffiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">mucogingival surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">primary wound closure</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">wound dehiscence</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Aim: </b> To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> Sixty patients, scheduled for a single implant installation, were recruited. Before suturing, the wound closing forces were measured with an electronic tension device. One week after the surgery, the wounds were inspected with regard to complete closure.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The applied tension varied between 0.01 and 0.4 N. In 72% a tension of 0.01–0.1 N was applied, resulting in few dehiscences (10%). Higher closing forces (>0.1 N) increased the percentage of wound dehiscences significantly (≥40%).</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> It appears necessary to control flap tension at the time of wound closure to achieve a primary closure.</p><p> <b>To cite this article:</b>
Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>21</b>, 2010; 50–54.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Role of flap tension in primary wound closure</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Burkhardt</namePart><affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N. P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-01</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 26 July 2009</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">6</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">12</extent><extent unit="words">3315</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the role of suture tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: Sixty patients, scheduled for a single implant installation, were recruited. Before suturing, the wound closing forces were measured with an electronic tension device. One week after the surgery, the wounds were inspected with regard to complete closure.</abstract><abstract>Results: The applied tension varied between 0.01 and 0.4 N. In 72% a tension of 0.01–0.1 N was applied, resulting in few dehiscences (10%). Higher closing forces (>0.1 N) increased the percentage of wound dehiscences significantly (≥40%).</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: It appears necessary to control flap tension at the time of wound closure to achieve a primary closure.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 50–54.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant surgery</topic><topic>mucogingival surgery</topic><topic>primary wound closure</topic><topic>wound dehiscence</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>50</start><end>54</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XHJTVNZX-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01829.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1829</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:03261EA8998C45F7536FE76F2C76927A23882898
|texte= Role of flap tension in primary wound closure of mucoperiosteal flaps: a prospective cohort study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |