Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté - Checkpoint (Istex)

Index « Titre (en) » - entrée « conventional »
Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.
convention < conventional < conventionally  Facettes :

List of bibliographic references

Number of relevant bibliographic references: 47.
[0-20] [0 - 20][0 - 47][20-40]
Ident.Authors (with country if any)Title
000080 (2014) Anja Zembic [Pays-Bas, Suisse] ; Daniel Wismeijer [Pays-Bas]Patient‐reported outcomes of maxillary implant‐supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures
000091 (2014) Manita Grover [Inde] ; Anand Kumar Vaidyanathan [Inde] ; Padmanabhan Thallam Veeravalli [Inde]OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single‐implant, magnet‐retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch
000141 (2014) Tiziano Testori [Italie] ; Francesco Zuffetti [Italie] ; Matteo Capelli [Italie] ; Fabio Galli [Italie] ; Roberto L. Weinstein [Italie] ; Massimo Del Fabbro [Italie]Immediate versus Conventional Loading of Post‐Extraction Implants in the Edentulous Jaws
000259 (2014) Marjolein Vercruyssen [Belgique] ; Antoon De Laat [Belgique] ; Wim Coucke [Belgique] ; Marc Quirynen [Belgique]An RCT comparing patient‐centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement
000397 (2013) Abdulaziz M. Albaker [Arabie saoudite]The oral health‐related quality of life in edentulous patients treated with Conventional complete dentures
000850 (2013) Volkan Arisan [Turquie] ; Zihni Cüneyt Karabuda [Turquie] ; Hakan Avsever [Turquie] ; Tayfun Özdemir [Turquie]Conventional Multi‐Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone‐Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer‐Assisted Implant Placement. Part I: Relationship of Radiographic Gray Density and Implant Stability
000851 (2013) Volkan Arisan [Turquie] ; Zihni Cüneyt Karabuda [Turquie] ; Bülent Pi Kin [Turquie] ; Tayfun Özdemir [Turquie]Conventional Multi‐Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone‐Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer‐Aided Implant Placement. Part II: Reliability of Mucosa‐Supported Stereolithographic Guides
000861 (2013) Daniela Rickert [Pays-Bas] ; Arjan Vissink [Pays-Bas] ; James J. R. Huddleston Slater ; Henny J. A. Meijer [Pays-Bas] ; Gerry M. Raghoebar [Pays-Bas]Comparison between Conventional and Piezoelectric Surgical Tools for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
000970 (2013) David Harris [Irlande (pays)] ; Stefan Höfer [Autriche] ; Ciaran A. O'Boyle [Irlande (pays)] ; Sean Sheridan [Royaume-Uni] ; John Marley [Royaume-Uni] ; Ian C. Benington [Royaume-Uni] ; Tom Clifford [Royaume-Uni] ; Frank Houston [Irlande (pays)] ; Brian O'Connell [Irlande (pays)]A comparison of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within‐subject controlled clinical trial
000971 (2013) Meetal Dave [Royaume-Uni] ; Jonathan Davies [Royaume-Uni] ; Ron Wilson [Royaume-Uni] ; Richard Palmer [Royaume-Uni]A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri‐implant bone defects
000991 (2013) Yadollah Soleimani Shayesteh [Iran] ; Arash Khojasteh [Iran] ; Hakimeh Siadat [Iran] ; Abbas Monzavi [Iran] ; Seyed Hossein Bassir [Iran] ; Mehran Hossaini [États-Unis] ; Marzieh Alikhasi [Iran]A Comparative Study of Crestal Bone Loss and Implant Stability between Osteotome and Conventional Implant Insertion Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study
000D30 (2012) Justin A. Baker [États-Unis] ; Shweta Vora [États-Unis] ; Latifa Bairam [États-Unis] ; Hyeong-Il Kim [États-Unis] ; Elaine L. Davis [États-Unis] ; Sebastiano Andreana [États-Unis]Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: ex vivo implant primary stability
000E39 (2012) Moustafa Abdou Elsyad [Égypte] ; Yasmeen Fathy Al-Mahdy [Égypte] ; Mohammed Mohammed Fouad [Égypte]Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial
000F28 (2012) Othman Shibly [États-Unis] ; Ahmad Kutkut [États-Unis] ; Nishith Patel [États-Unis] ; Jasim M. Albandar [États-Unis]Immediate Implants with Immediate Loading vs. Conventional Loading: 1‐Year Randomized Clinical Trial
000F94 (2012) Atul A. Bajoria [Inde] ; Sharon Saldanha [Inde] ; Vidya K. Shenoy [Inde]Evaluation of satisfaction with masticatory efficiency of new conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients ‐ a survey
001041 (2012) K-E. Kahnberg [Suède] ; L. Vannas-Löfqvist [Suède] ; M. Hakeberg [Suède]Early loading of Astra Tech implants in the lower jaw. I. A comparison between immediate placement of implants in fresh extraction sockets and conventional implant surgery
001100 (2012) Rodrigo L Pez [Danemark] ; Vibeke Baelum [Danemark]Contesting conventional periodontal wisdom: implications for periodontal classifications
001116 (2012) K. Van Lierde ; H. Browaeys [Belgique] ; P. Corthals ; P. Mussche ; E. Van Kerkhoven ; H. De Bruyn [Belgique, Suède]Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single‐tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses
001117 (2012) Onur Geckili [Turquie] ; Hakan Bilhan ; Emre Mumcu ; Cagatay Dayan ; Ali Yabul ; Necat Tuncer [Turquie]Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant‐supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years
001490 (2011) Susanne Heberer [Allemagne] ; Sevtap Kilic [Allemagne] ; Jaber Hossamo [Allemagne] ; Jan-Dirk Raguse [Allemagne] ; Katja Nelson [Allemagne]Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid‐etched implants: preliminary results of a split‐mouth study
001859 (2011) Lars Schropp [Danemark] ; Andreas Stavropoulos [Danemark] ; Erik Gotfredsen [Danemark] ; Ann Wenzel [Danemark]Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross‐sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/Title.i -k "conventional" 
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/Title.i  \
                -Sk "conventional" \
         | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd 

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    indexItem
   |index=    Title.i
   |clé=    conventional
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022