Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
Identifieur interne : 003893 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003892; suivant : 003894Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
Auteurs : A. Visser ; M. E. Geertman ; H. J. A. Meijer ; G. M. Raghoebar ; J. M. Kwakman [Pays-Bas] ; N. H. J. Creugers ; R. P. Van OortSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2002-02.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Groningue.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aftercare, Blackwell science, Bone level, Branemark, Branemark implant system, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical trial, Complete denture, Conventional dentures, Denture, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implant systems, Endosseous implants, Evaluation period, Groningen, High number, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant loss, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Minor complications, Nijmegen, Nijmegen group, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdenture vestibulumplasty, Overdentures, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Superstructure, Surgical, Surgical aftercare, Survival rate, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Transmandibular implant group, Transmandibular implant system, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
- Teeft :
- Aftercare, Blackwell science, Bone level, Branemark, Branemark implant system, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical trial, Complete denture, Conventional dentures, Denture, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implant systems, Endosseous implants, Evaluation period, Groningen, High number, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant loss, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Minor complications, Nijmegen, Nijmegen group, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdenture vestibulumplasty, Overdentures, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Superstructure, Surgical, Surgical aftercare, Survival rate, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Transmandibular implant group, Transmandibular implant system, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
Abstract
The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre‐prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP‐scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP‐score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26˙1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00834.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00834.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003893</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003893</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Nimègue</settlement><region type="province" nuts="2">Gueldre</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="120">120</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-02">2002-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aftercare</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant system</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implant systems</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High number</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Nijmegen</term><term>Nijmegen group</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture vestibulumplasty</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Superstructure</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical aftercare</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Transmandibular implant group</term><term>Transmandibular implant system</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aftercare</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant system</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implant systems</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High number</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Nijmegen</term><term>Nijmegen group</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture vestibulumplasty</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Superstructure</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical aftercare</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Transmandibular implant group</term><term>Transmandibular implant system</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Groningue</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre‐prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP‐scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP‐score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26˙1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country><region><li>Gueldre</li></region><settlement><li>Nimègue</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Gueldre"><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003893 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003893 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C
|texte= Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |