Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Immediate Loading of Brånemark Implants: a 24‐Month Follow‐Up of a Comparative Prospective Pilot Study between Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conical® Transmucosal and Standard MK II Implants

Identifieur interne : 003878 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003877; suivant : 003879

Immediate Loading of Brånemark Implants: a 24‐Month Follow‐Up of a Comparative Prospective Pilot Study between Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conical® Transmucosal and Standard MK II Implants

Auteurs : Claudio Gatti [Italie] ; Matteo Chiapasco [Italie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:5A50CD27174E46075676FB6A6E69AF1A10CC1895

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the long‐term outcome of immediately loaded implantretained mandibular overdentures supported by four screw‐type one‐piece transmucosal implants with that of four screw‐type two‐piece implants inserted in the interforaminal area of the mandible and rigidly connected by a U‐shaped curved Materials and Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted with 10 patients receiving an implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the control group (five patients), four standard Brånemark implants (MK II; Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 3.75 mm large and at least 10 mm long, were sited anterior to the mental foramina, and four standard abutments (Nobel Biocare AB) for bar construction were immediately screwed to the implants. In the test group (five patients), four conical transmucosal implants (Nobel Biocare AB), 3.75 mm large and at least 9 mm long in the threaded part, were sited anterior to the mental foramina. Immediately after implant placement, a U‐shaped gold or titanium bar was fabricated and implants were immediately loaded (within 24 h) in both groups with an implant‐retained overdenture. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Implants were evaluated at the time of immediate loading and at 12 and 24 months after prosthetic loading, with the following parameters: modified plaque index (MPI), modified bleeding index (MBI), and probing depth (PD). Periimplant bone resorption was evaluated on panoramic radiographs taken 12 and 24 months after the beginning of prosthetic loading. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to MPI, MBI, PD, and periimplant bone resorption at 12 and 24 months. The cumulative success rate of implants according to the criteria proposed by Albrektsson and colleagues was 100% in both groups after 2 years of functional loading. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrated that the success rate for immediately loaded mandibular implants is similar to that obtained in cases of delayed loading and that there are no significant differences between results with two‐piece implants and one‐piece transmucosal implants.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00171.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:5A50CD27174E46075676FB6A6E69AF1A10CC1895

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Immediate Loading of Brånemark Implants: a 24‐Month Follow‐Up of a Comparative Prospective Pilot Study between Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conical® Transmucosal and Standard MK II Implants</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gatti, Claudio" sort="Gatti, Claudio" uniqKey="Gatti C" first="Claudio" last="Gatti">Claudio Gatti</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chiapasco, Matteo" sort="Chiapasco, Matteo" uniqKey="Chiapasco M" first="Matteo" last="Chiapasco">Matteo Chiapasco</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5A50CD27174E46075676FB6A6E69AF1A10CC1895</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00171.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5A50CD27174E46075676FB6A6E69AF1A10CC1895/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002C42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002C42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002C42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003878</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003878</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Immediate Loading of Brånemark Implants: a 24‐Month Follow‐Up of a Comparative Prospective Pilot Study between Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conical® Transmucosal and Standard MK II Implants</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gatti, Claudio" sort="Gatti, Claudio" uniqKey="Gatti C" first="Claudio" last="Gatti">Claudio Gatti</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Private practice, Milan</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Milan</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Lombardie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Italie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chiapasco, Matteo" sort="Chiapasco, Matteo" uniqKey="Chiapasco M" first="Matteo" last="Chiapasco">Matteo Chiapasco</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Assistant professor, Unit of Oral Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, University of Milan, Milan</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Milan</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Lombardie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="190">190</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="199">199</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-12">2002-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Albrektsson</term>
<term>Beagle dogs</term>
<term>Biomed mater</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Bone resorption values</term>
<term>Brinemark</term>
<term>Brinemark implants</term>
<term>Carico immediato</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Conical</term>
<term>Connective tissue</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Control group measurement</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Functional loading</term>
<term>Gingival health</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant mobility</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant surface</term>
<term>Implantretained mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Implants implants</term>
<term>Interforaminal area</term>
<term>Interquartile range</term>
<term>Lateral cephalometric radiography</term>
<term>Local inflammation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Marginal bone</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mental foramina</term>
<term>Mesial</term>
<term>Molar area</term>
<term>Months postoperatively</term>
<term>Multicenter study</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral surgery</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture mandibolari</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Panoramic radiographs</term>
<term>Periapical radiographs</term>
<term>Periimplant</term>
<term>Periimplant bone resorption</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Plaque index</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic loading</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Resorption</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Rigid connection</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Standard abutments</term>
<term>Sterile saline</term>
<term>Success criteria</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Success rates</term>
<term>Test group</term>
<term>Test groups</term>
<term>Tissue differentiation</term>
<term>Tissue integration</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium implants</term>
<term>Transfer copings</term>
<term>Transmucosal</term>
<term>Transmucosal implants</term>
<term>Vertical bone loss</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Albrektsson</term>
<term>Beagle dogs</term>
<term>Biomed mater</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Bone resorption values</term>
<term>Brinemark</term>
<term>Brinemark implants</term>
<term>Carico immediato</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Conical</term>
<term>Connective tissue</term>
<term>Control group</term>
<term>Control group measurement</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Endosseous implants</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Functional loading</term>
<term>Gingival health</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant insertion</term>
<term>Implant mobility</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant surface</term>
<term>Implantretained mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Implants implants</term>
<term>Interforaminal area</term>
<term>Interquartile range</term>
<term>Lateral cephalometric radiography</term>
<term>Local inflammation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Marginal bone</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mental foramina</term>
<term>Mesial</term>
<term>Molar area</term>
<term>Months postoperatively</term>
<term>Multicenter study</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral surgery</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdenture mandibolari</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Panoramic radiograph</term>
<term>Panoramic radiographs</term>
<term>Periapical radiographs</term>
<term>Periimplant</term>
<term>Periimplant bone resorption</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Plaque index</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic loading</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Resorption</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Rigid connection</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Standard abutments</term>
<term>Sterile saline</term>
<term>Success criteria</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Success rates</term>
<term>Test group</term>
<term>Test groups</term>
<term>Tissue differentiation</term>
<term>Tissue integration</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium implants</term>
<term>Transfer copings</term>
<term>Transmucosal</term>
<term>Transmucosal implants</term>
<term>Vertical bone loss</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Titane</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the long‐term outcome of immediately loaded implantretained mandibular overdentures supported by four screw‐type one‐piece transmucosal implants with that of four screw‐type two‐piece implants inserted in the interforaminal area of the mandible and rigidly connected by a U‐shaped curved Materials and Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted with 10 patients receiving an implant‐supported overdenture in the mandible. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the control group (five patients), four standard Brånemark implants (MK II; Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 3.75 mm large and at least 10 mm long, were sited anterior to the mental foramina, and four standard abutments (Nobel Biocare AB) for bar construction were immediately screwed to the implants. In the test group (five patients), four conical transmucosal implants (Nobel Biocare AB), 3.75 mm large and at least 9 mm long in the threaded part, were sited anterior to the mental foramina. Immediately after implant placement, a U‐shaped gold or titanium bar was fabricated and implants were immediately loaded (within 24 h) in both groups with an implant‐retained overdenture. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Implants were evaluated at the time of immediate loading and at 12 and 24 months after prosthetic loading, with the following parameters: modified plaque index (MPI), modified bleeding index (MBI), and probing depth (PD). Periimplant bone resorption was evaluated on panoramic radiographs taken 12 and 24 months after the beginning of prosthetic loading. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to MPI, MBI, PD, and periimplant bone resorption at 12 and 24 months. The cumulative success rate of implants according to the criteria proposed by Albrektsson and colleagues was 100% in both groups after 2 years of functional loading. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrated that the success rate for immediately loaded mandibular implants is similar to that obtained in cases of delayed loading and that there are no significant differences between results with two‐piece implants and one‐piece transmucosal implants.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Italie</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Lombardie</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Milan</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Italie">
<region name="Lombardie">
<name sortKey="Gatti, Claudio" sort="Gatti, Claudio" uniqKey="Gatti C" first="Claudio" last="Gatti">Claudio Gatti</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Chiapasco, Matteo" sort="Chiapasco, Matteo" uniqKey="Chiapasco M" first="Matteo" last="Chiapasco">Matteo Chiapasco</name>
<name sortKey="Gatti, Claudio" sort="Gatti, Claudio" uniqKey="Gatti C" first="Claudio" last="Gatti">Claudio Gatti</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003878 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003878 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:5A50CD27174E46075676FB6A6E69AF1A10CC1895
   |texte=   Immediate Loading of Brånemark Implants: a 24‐Month Follow‐Up of a Comparative Prospective Pilot Study between Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Conical® Transmucosal and Standard MK II Implants
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022