EdenteV2, Istex, Checkpoint, bibRecord, 003734

Undignifying institutions

Identifieur interne : 003734 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 003733; suivant : 003735

Undignifying institutions

Auteurs : D. Seedhouse [Nouvelle-Zélande] ; A. Gallagher [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

Journal of Medical Ethics [ 0306-6800 ] ; 2002-12.

RBID : ISTEX:5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Auckland university, Australian nursing council, Brian smith, Competency, Condition behaviour, Control site, Devastating loss, Dignity, Dignity loss, Dignity promotion, Educational intervention, Elderly care institutions, Experience dignity, Health care assistant, Health care assistants, Health care environment, Health professionals, Health workers, Inappropriate circumstances, Indignity, International council, Intuitive understanding, Lack dignity, Middlesex university, Midwifery council, Noble idea, Older patients, Older people, Patient capabilities, Patient dignity, Pilot study, Professional conduct, Resource levels, Respect dignity, Seedhouse, Serious loss, Social ethics, Staff behaviour, Traditional practices, Undignifying, Undignifying institutions, codes of ethics, dignity, practical application of philosophy.
Teeft :
- Auckland university, Australian nursing council, Brian smith, Competency, Condition behaviour, Control site, Devastating loss, Dignity, Dignity loss, Dignity promotion, Educational intervention, Elderly care institutions, Experience dignity, Health care assistant, Health care assistants, Health care environment, Health professionals, Health workers, Inappropriate circumstances, Indignity, International council, Intuitive understanding, Lack dignity, Middlesex university, Midwifery council, Noble idea, Older patients, Older people, Patient capabilities, Patient dignity, Pilot study, Professional conduct, Resource levels, Respect dignity, Seedhouse, Serious loss, Social ethics, Staff behaviour, Traditional practices, Undignifying, Undignifying institutions.

Abstract

Declarations of the importance of dignity in health care are commonplace in codes of practice and other mission statements, yet these documents never clarify dignity’s meaning. Their vague aspirations are compared to comments from staff and patients about opportunities for and barriers against the promotion of dignity in elderly care institutions. These suggest that while nurses and health care assistants have an intuitive understanding of dignity, they either do not or cannot always bring it about in practice. Thus, despite stated intentions to promote dignity, it appears that the circumstances of at least some elderly care institutions cause patients to experience avoidable indignities. Such institutions are “undignifying institutions” because they fail to acknowledge dignity’s basic components, focus excessively on quantifiable priorities, and have insufficient resources available to assure consistently dignifying care. As a partial solution, we argue that health workers should be taught to understand and specify the components of dignity, which will better prepare them to challenge undignifying practices and to recognise opportunities for dignity promotion.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.6.368

Affiliations:

Nouvelle-Zélande, Royaume-Uni

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002A94
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002A94

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Undignifying institutions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Seedhouse, D" sort="Seedhouse, D" uniqKey="Seedhouse D" first="D" last="Seedhouse">D. Seedhouse</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gallagher, A" sort="Gallagher, A" uniqKey="Gallagher A" first="A" last="Gallagher">A. Gallagher</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1136/jme.28.6.368</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002A94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002A94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002A94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003734</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003734</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Undignifying institutions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Seedhouse, D" sort="Seedhouse, D" uniqKey="Seedhouse D" first="D" last="Seedhouse">D. Seedhouse</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Nouvelle-Zélande</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Health and Social Ethics, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Auckland</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gallagher, A" sort="Gallagher, A" uniqKey="Gallagher A" first="A" last="Gallagher">A. Gallagher</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Central Lancashire</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Medical Ethics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">J Med Ethics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1473-4257</idno>
<imprint><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2002-12">2002-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="368">368</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Auckland university</term>
<term>Australian nursing council</term>
<term>Brian smith</term>
<term>Competency</term>
<term>Condition behaviour</term>
<term>Control site</term>
<term>Devastating loss</term>
<term>Dignity</term>
<term>Dignity loss</term>
<term>Dignity promotion</term>
<term>Educational intervention</term>
<term>Elderly care institutions</term>
<term>Experience dignity</term>
<term>Health care assistant</term>
<term>Health care assistants</term>
<term>Health care environment</term>
<term>Health professionals</term>
<term>Health workers</term>
<term>Inappropriate circumstances</term>
<term>Indignity</term>
<term>International council</term>
<term>Intuitive understanding</term>
<term>Lack dignity</term>
<term>Middlesex university</term>
<term>Midwifery council</term>
<term>Noble idea</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Older people</term>
<term>Patient capabilities</term>
<term>Patient dignity</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Professional conduct</term>
<term>Resource levels</term>
<term>Respect dignity</term>
<term>Seedhouse</term>
<term>Serious loss</term>
<term>Social ethics</term>
<term>Staff behaviour</term>
<term>Traditional practices</term>
<term>Undignifying</term>
<term>Undignifying institutions</term>
<term>codes of ethics</term>
<term>dignity</term>
<term>practical application of philosophy</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Auckland university</term>
<term>Australian nursing council</term>
<term>Brian smith</term>
<term>Competency</term>
<term>Condition behaviour</term>
<term>Control site</term>
<term>Devastating loss</term>
<term>Dignity</term>
<term>Dignity loss</term>
<term>Dignity promotion</term>
<term>Educational intervention</term>
<term>Elderly care institutions</term>
<term>Experience dignity</term>
<term>Health care assistant</term>
<term>Health care assistants</term>
<term>Health care environment</term>
<term>Health professionals</term>
<term>Health workers</term>
<term>Inappropriate circumstances</term>
<term>Indignity</term>
<term>International council</term>
<term>Intuitive understanding</term>
<term>Lack dignity</term>
<term>Middlesex university</term>
<term>Midwifery council</term>
<term>Noble idea</term>
<term>Older patients</term>
<term>Older people</term>
<term>Patient capabilities</term>
<term>Patient dignity</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Professional conduct</term>
<term>Resource levels</term>
<term>Respect dignity</term>
<term>Seedhouse</term>
<term>Serious loss</term>
<term>Social ethics</term>
<term>Staff behaviour</term>
<term>Traditional practices</term>
<term>Undignifying</term>
<term>Undignifying institutions</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Declarations of the importance of dignity in health care are commonplace in codes of practice and other mission statements, yet these documents never clarify dignity’s meaning. Their vague aspirations are compared to comments from staff and patients about opportunities for and barriers against the promotion of dignity in elderly care institutions. These suggest that while nurses and health care assistants have an intuitive understanding of dignity, they either do not or cannot always bring it about in practice. Thus, despite stated intentions to promote dignity, it appears that the circumstances of at least some elderly care institutions cause patients to experience avoidable indignities. Such institutions are “undignifying institutions” because they fail to acknowledge dignity’s basic components, focus excessively on quantifiable priorities, and have insufficient resources available to assure consistently dignifying care. As a partial solution, we argue that health workers should be taught to understand and specify the components of dignity, which will better prepare them to challenge undignifying practices and to recognise opportunities for dignity promotion.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Nouvelle-Zélande</li>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Nouvelle-Zélande"><noRegion><name sortKey="Seedhouse, D" sort="Seedhouse, D" uniqKey="Seedhouse D" first="D" last="Seedhouse">D. Seedhouse</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
<country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Gallagher, A" sort="Gallagher, A" uniqKey="Gallagher A" first="A" last="Gallagher">A. Gallagher</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003734 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 003734 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:5751D4A7F00179964EC6F457324CB96FFB4319EC
   |texte=   Undignifying institutions
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Undignifying institutions

Undignifying institutions

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri