Conventional Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: The Impact on Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction
Identifieur interne : 002997 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002996; suivant : 002998Conventional Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: The Impact on Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction
Auteurs : Janice S. Ellis [Royaume-Uni] ; Nanita D. Pelekis [Royaume-Uni] ; J. Mark Thomason [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Prosthodontics [ 1059-941X ] ; 2007-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ability comfort esthetics stability, American college, Appropriate technique, Community dent, Complete dentures, Conventional denture group, Conventional dentures, Conventional group, Conventional rehabilitation, Dent, Dental sciences, Denture, Denture group, Disability handicap, Duplication technique, Duplication techniques, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Functional limitation, Impact dentures, Inclusion criteria, Limitation pain, Mandibular, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Ohip scores, Oral health impact, Oral health impact community dent health allen, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Other studies, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Posttreatment, Posttreatment changes, Posttreatment patient satisfaction scores, Previous dentures, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Psychological disability, Psychological discomfort, Review period, Social disability, Surface shape, Treatment groups, Useful measures, Value pretreatment posttreatment, Visual analogue scale, Withinsubject comparisons.
- Teeft :
- Ability comfort esthetics stability, American college, Appropriate technique, Community dent, Complete dentures, Conventional denture group, Conventional dentures, Conventional group, Conventional rehabilitation, Dent, Dental sciences, Denture, Denture group, Disability handicap, Duplication technique, Duplication techniques, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Functional limitation, Impact dentures, Inclusion criteria, Limitation pain, Mandibular, Mandibular implant overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Ohip scores, Oral health impact, Oral health impact community dent health allen, Oral impacts, Oral quality, Other studies, Patient satisfaction, Patient satisfaction instrument, Posttreatment, Posttreatment changes, Posttreatment patient satisfaction scores, Previous dentures, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Psychological disability, Psychological discomfort, Review period, Social disability, Surface shape, Treatment groups, Useful measures, Value pretreatment posttreatment, Visual analogue scale, Withinsubject comparisons.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined patient satisfaction and oral health‐related impacts on the quality of life of patients restored with complete conventional or duplicate dentures. Materials and Methods: Forty patients (aged 55 to 85 years) were assigned to receive new complete maxillary and mandibular dentures using either a conventional or duplication technique according to clinical need. Patients rated their satisfaction with their dentures on 100‐mm visual analogue scales before treatment and 1 month after delivery of their new dentures. Their oral health‐related quality of life was determined by completion of an Oral Health‐Related Impacts on Quality of Life questionnaire (OHIP‐20) at the same time points. Results: Both groups of patients had similar satisfaction and OHIP ratings at the beginning of the study and 1 month after delivery of their new dentures. The two groups were comparable with regard to age and gender. Statistically significant improvement in the OHIP domains of functional limitation and physical and psychological disability was seen in both groups. The conventional group also showed significant improvement with regard to handicap, whereas the duplicate denture group showed significant improvement in the patients' rating of pain and psychological discomfort. Patient satisfaction improved significantly in both groups across all variables except ease of cleaning and ability to speak. The duplication technique resulted in patients being less satisfied with the esthetics of their new dentures. Conclusion: In this study, the provision of new dentures either with a conventional technique or with a duplication technique resulted in an overall improvement in oral health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. These improvements were statistically significant for some domains, which varied depending on the technique used for construction of the new dentures. Neither technique was seen to be superior, which may be a reflection of the patients' treatment expectations at the outset. Patients' reported satisfaction with their dentures and the impact that dentures have on their quality of life may not be useful measures for determining the most appropriate technique for providing new dentures.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3A145094D25ABF867C4B8F4D0126A2BE176475C6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Conventional Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: The Impact on Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ellis, Janice S" sort="Ellis, Janice S" uniqKey="Ellis J" first="Janice S." last="Ellis">Janice S. Ellis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pelekis, Nanita D" sort="Pelekis, Nanita D" uniqKey="Pelekis N" first="Nanita D." last="Pelekis">Nanita D. Pelekis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomason, J Mark" sort="Thomason, J Mark" uniqKey="Thomason J" first="J. Mark" last="Thomason">J. Mark Thomason</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3A145094D25ABF867C4B8F4D0126A2BE176475C6</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3A145094D25ABF867C4B8F4D0126A2BE176475C6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001C43</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001C43</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001C43</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002997</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002997</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Conventional Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: The Impact on Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ellis, Janice S" sort="Ellis, Janice S" uniqKey="Ellis J" first="Janice S." last="Ellis">Janice S. Ellis</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Senior Lecturer, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pelekis, Nanita D" sort="Pelekis, Nanita D" uniqKey="Pelekis N" first="Nanita D." last="Pelekis">Nanita D. Pelekis</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Postgraduate Student, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomason, J Mark" sort="Thomason, J Mark" uniqKey="Thomason J" first="J. Mark" last="Thomason">J. Mark Thomason</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Professor, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Newcastle upon Tyne</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Prosthodontics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-849X</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">16</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="37">37</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="42">42</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-01">2007-01</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1059-941X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability comfort esthetics stability</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Appropriate technique</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Conventional denture group</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional group</term>
<term>Conventional rehabilitation</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental sciences</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture group</term>
<term>Disability handicap</term>
<term>Duplication technique</term>
<term>Duplication techniques</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Functional limitation</term>
<term>Impact dentures</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Limitation pain</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term>
<term>Mandibular prostheses</term>
<term>Ohip scores</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral health impact community dent health allen</term>
<term>Oral impacts</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term>
<term>Posttreatment</term>
<term>Posttreatment changes</term>
<term>Posttreatment patient satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Previous dentures</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Psychological disability</term>
<term>Psychological discomfort</term>
<term>Review period</term>
<term>Social disability</term>
<term>Surface shape</term>
<term>Treatment groups</term>
<term>Useful measures</term>
<term>Value pretreatment posttreatment</term>
<term>Visual analogue scale</term>
<term>Withinsubject comparisons</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability comfort esthetics stability</term>
<term>American college</term>
<term>Appropriate technique</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Conventional denture group</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional group</term>
<term>Conventional rehabilitation</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental sciences</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture group</term>
<term>Disability handicap</term>
<term>Duplication technique</term>
<term>Duplication techniques</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Functional limitation</term>
<term>Impact dentures</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Limitation pain</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term>
<term>Mandibular prostheses</term>
<term>Ohip scores</term>
<term>Oral health impact</term>
<term>Oral health impact community dent health allen</term>
<term>Oral impacts</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Other studies</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction instrument</term>
<term>Posttreatment</term>
<term>Posttreatment changes</term>
<term>Posttreatment patient satisfaction scores</term>
<term>Previous dentures</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Psychological disability</term>
<term>Psychological discomfort</term>
<term>Review period</term>
<term>Social disability</term>
<term>Surface shape</term>
<term>Treatment groups</term>
<term>Useful measures</term>
<term>Value pretreatment posttreatment</term>
<term>Visual analogue scale</term>
<term>Withinsubject comparisons</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: This study examined patient satisfaction and oral health‐related impacts on the quality of life of patients restored with complete conventional or duplicate dentures. Materials and Methods: Forty patients (aged 55 to 85 years) were assigned to receive new complete maxillary and mandibular dentures using either a conventional or duplication technique according to clinical need. Patients rated their satisfaction with their dentures on 100‐mm visual analogue scales before treatment and 1 month after delivery of their new dentures. Their oral health‐related quality of life was determined by completion of an Oral Health‐Related Impacts on Quality of Life questionnaire (OHIP‐20) at the same time points. Results: Both groups of patients had similar satisfaction and OHIP ratings at the beginning of the study and 1 month after delivery of their new dentures. The two groups were comparable with regard to age and gender. Statistically significant improvement in the OHIP domains of functional limitation and physical and psychological disability was seen in both groups. The conventional group also showed significant improvement with regard to handicap, whereas the duplicate denture group showed significant improvement in the patients' rating of pain and psychological discomfort. Patient satisfaction improved significantly in both groups across all variables except ease of cleaning and ability to speak. The duplication technique resulted in patients being less satisfied with the esthetics of their new dentures. Conclusion: In this study, the provision of new dentures either with a conventional technique or with a duplication technique resulted in an overall improvement in oral health‐related quality of life and satisfaction. These improvements were statistically significant for some domains, which varied depending on the technique used for construction of the new dentures. Neither technique was seen to be superior, which may be a reflection of the patients' treatment expectations at the outset. Patients' reported satisfaction with their dentures and the impact that dentures have on their quality of life may not be useful measures for determining the most appropriate technique for providing new dentures.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Ellis, Janice S" sort="Ellis, Janice S" uniqKey="Ellis J" first="Janice S." last="Ellis">Janice S. Ellis</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Pelekis, Nanita D" sort="Pelekis, Nanita D" uniqKey="Pelekis N" first="Nanita D." last="Pelekis">Nanita D. Pelekis</name>
<name sortKey="Thomason, J Mark" sort="Thomason, J Mark" uniqKey="Thomason J" first="J. Mark" last="Thomason">J. Mark Thomason</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002997 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002997 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:3A145094D25ABF867C4B8F4D0126A2BE176475C6 |texte= Conventional Rehabilitation of Edentulous Patients: The Impact on Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |