Child well‐being through different lenses: why concept matters
Identifieur interne : 002321 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002320; suivant : 002322Child well‐being through different lenses: why concept matters
Auteurs : Nick Axford [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Child & Family Social Work [ 1356-7500 ] ; 2009-08.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adequate life, Axford, Axford table, Basic items, Better understanding, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Bradshaw, Breadline britain, Bristol, British journal, Cabinet london, Case paper, Certain level, Child child, Child lives, Child maltreatment, Child poverty, Child welfare, Child wellbeing, Childhood poverty, Children fare, Comparative analysis, Congruent services, Different concepts, Different groups, Different lenses, Different perspectives, Doyal gough, European union, Exclusion, Health department, Health inequalities, High threshold, Human rights, Inclusive society, International society, Jessica kingsley, Joseph rowntree foundation, Labour market, Legal entitlements, Levitas, Life studies, Mainstream society, Material goods, Material resources, Millennium survey, Moore lippman, National statistics, Other buzzwords, Other hand, Oxford university press, Pantazis, Policy press, Political philosophy, Poor people, Positive development, Poverty, Recent years, Research unit, Rural affairs, School exclusion, Second language, Social exclusion, Social exclusion taskforce, Social exclusion unit, Social policy, Social services, Social ties, Social welfare, Social work, Stationery london, Subjective views, Third conference, Third parties, Third party, Unmet need, Unpublished paper, Young people.
- Teeft :
- Adequate life, Axford, Axford table, Basic items, Better understanding, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Bradshaw, Breadline britain, Bristol, British journal, Cabinet london, Case paper, Certain level, Child child, Child lives, Child maltreatment, Child poverty, Child welfare, Child wellbeing, Childhood poverty, Children fare, Comparative analysis, Congruent services, Different concepts, Different groups, Different lenses, Different perspectives, Doyal gough, European union, Exclusion, Health department, Health inequalities, High threshold, Human rights, Inclusive society, International society, Jessica kingsley, Joseph rowntree foundation, Labour market, Legal entitlements, Levitas, Life studies, Mainstream society, Material goods, Material resources, Millennium survey, Moore lippman, National statistics, Other buzzwords, Other hand, Oxford university press, Pantazis, Policy press, Political philosophy, Poor people, Positive development, Poverty, Recent years, Research unit, Rural affairs, School exclusion, Second language, Social exclusion, Social exclusion taskforce, Social exclusion unit, Social policy, Social services, Social ties, Social welfare, Social work, Stationery london, Subjective views, Third conference, Third parties, Third party, Unmet need, Unpublished paper, Young people.
Abstract
‘Well‐being’ has entered policy rhetoric in children's services in the UK and other Western developed countries as a companion to other buzzwords of recent years. In order to improve children's well‐being, we need not only a better understanding of what it is and how services can improve it, but also the ability to measure child well‐being in order to evaluate success. This paper explores conceptually and empirically the ‘lenses’ through which child well‐being is often viewed. It considers the relationships between these perspectives, the added value that each one brings and the implications for services.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00611.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DC3FD4B3E920DF93755A175FE9103DB650521395Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Child well‐being through different lenses: why concept matters</title>
<author><name sortKey="Axford, Nick" sort="Axford, Nick" uniqKey="Axford N" first="Nick" last="Axford">Nick Axford</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DC3FD4B3E920DF93755A175FE9103DB650521395</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00611.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DC3FD4B3E920DF93755A175FE9103DB650521395/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006D30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002321</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002321</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Child well‐being through different lenses: why concept matters</title>
<author><name sortKey="Axford, Nick" sort="Axford, Nick" uniqKey="Axford N" first="Nick" last="Axford">Nick Axford</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Researcher, Dartington Social Research Unit, Dartington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Dartington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Child & Family Social Work</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CHILD FAMILY SOCIAL WORK</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2206</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="372">372</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="383">383</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-08">2009-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adequate life</term>
<term>Axford</term>
<term>Axford table</term>
<term>Basic items</term>
<term>Better understanding</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bradshaw</term>
<term>Breadline britain</term>
<term>Bristol</term>
<term>British journal</term>
<term>Cabinet london</term>
<term>Case paper</term>
<term>Certain level</term>
<term>Child child</term>
<term>Child lives</term>
<term>Child maltreatment</term>
<term>Child poverty</term>
<term>Child welfare</term>
<term>Child wellbeing</term>
<term>Childhood poverty</term>
<term>Children fare</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Congruent services</term>
<term>Different concepts</term>
<term>Different groups</term>
<term>Different lenses</term>
<term>Different perspectives</term>
<term>Doyal gough</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>Exclusion</term>
<term>Health department</term>
<term>Health inequalities</term>
<term>High threshold</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Inclusive society</term>
<term>International society</term>
<term>Jessica kingsley</term>
<term>Joseph rowntree foundation</term>
<term>Labour market</term>
<term>Legal entitlements</term>
<term>Levitas</term>
<term>Life studies</term>
<term>Mainstream society</term>
<term>Material goods</term>
<term>Material resources</term>
<term>Millennium survey</term>
<term>Moore lippman</term>
<term>National statistics</term>
<term>Other buzzwords</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Pantazis</term>
<term>Policy press</term>
<term>Political philosophy</term>
<term>Poor people</term>
<term>Positive development</term>
<term>Poverty</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Rural affairs</term>
<term>School exclusion</term>
<term>Second language</term>
<term>Social exclusion</term>
<term>Social exclusion taskforce</term>
<term>Social exclusion unit</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social services</term>
<term>Social ties</term>
<term>Social welfare</term>
<term>Social work</term>
<term>Stationery london</term>
<term>Subjective views</term>
<term>Third conference</term>
<term>Third parties</term>
<term>Third party</term>
<term>Unmet need</term>
<term>Unpublished paper</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adequate life</term>
<term>Axford</term>
<term>Axford table</term>
<term>Basic items</term>
<term>Better understanding</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bradshaw</term>
<term>Breadline britain</term>
<term>Bristol</term>
<term>British journal</term>
<term>Cabinet london</term>
<term>Case paper</term>
<term>Certain level</term>
<term>Child child</term>
<term>Child lives</term>
<term>Child maltreatment</term>
<term>Child poverty</term>
<term>Child welfare</term>
<term>Child wellbeing</term>
<term>Childhood poverty</term>
<term>Children fare</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Congruent services</term>
<term>Different concepts</term>
<term>Different groups</term>
<term>Different lenses</term>
<term>Different perspectives</term>
<term>Doyal gough</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>Exclusion</term>
<term>Health department</term>
<term>Health inequalities</term>
<term>High threshold</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Inclusive society</term>
<term>International society</term>
<term>Jessica kingsley</term>
<term>Joseph rowntree foundation</term>
<term>Labour market</term>
<term>Legal entitlements</term>
<term>Levitas</term>
<term>Life studies</term>
<term>Mainstream society</term>
<term>Material goods</term>
<term>Material resources</term>
<term>Millennium survey</term>
<term>Moore lippman</term>
<term>National statistics</term>
<term>Other buzzwords</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Pantazis</term>
<term>Policy press</term>
<term>Political philosophy</term>
<term>Poor people</term>
<term>Positive development</term>
<term>Poverty</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Rural affairs</term>
<term>School exclusion</term>
<term>Second language</term>
<term>Social exclusion</term>
<term>Social exclusion taskforce</term>
<term>Social exclusion unit</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social services</term>
<term>Social ties</term>
<term>Social welfare</term>
<term>Social work</term>
<term>Stationery london</term>
<term>Subjective views</term>
<term>Third conference</term>
<term>Third parties</term>
<term>Third party</term>
<term>Unmet need</term>
<term>Unpublished paper</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse comparative</term>
<term>Droits de l'homme</term>
<term>Marché du travail</term>
<term>Statistique nationale</term>
<term>Philosophie politique</term>
<term>Pauvreté</term>
<term>Politique sociale</term>
<term>Service social</term>
<term>Travail social</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">‘Well‐being’ has entered policy rhetoric in children's services in the UK and other Western developed countries as a companion to other buzzwords of recent years. In order to improve children's well‐being, we need not only a better understanding of what it is and how services can improve it, but also the ability to measure child well‐being in order to evaluate success. This paper explores conceptually and empirically the ‘lenses’ through which child well‐being is often viewed. It considers the relationships between these perspectives, the added value that each one brings and the implications for services.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Axford, Nick" sort="Axford, Nick" uniqKey="Axford N" first="Nick" last="Axford">Nick Axford</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002321 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002321 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:DC3FD4B3E920DF93755A175FE9103DB650521395 |texte= Child well‐being through different lenses: why concept matters }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |