Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.
Identifieur interne : 000B27 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000B26; suivant : 000B28Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.
Auteurs : In-Sung Yeo [Corée du Sud]Source :
- The open biomedical engineering journal [ 1874-1207 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
Screw-shaped endosseous implants that have a turned surface of commercially pure titanium have a disadvantage of requiring a long time for osseointegration while those implants have shown long-term clinical success in single and multiple restorations. Titanium implant surfaces have been modified in various ways to improve biocompatibility and accelerate osseointegration, which results in a shorter edentulous period for a patient. This article reviewed some important modified titanium surfaces, exploring the in vitro, in vivo and clinical results that numerous comparison studies reported. Several methods are widely used to modify the topography or chemistry of titanium surface, including blasting, acid etching, anodic oxidation, fluoride treatment, and calcium phosphate coating. Such modified surfaces demonstrate faster and stronger osseointegration than the turned commercially pure titanium surface. However, there have been many studies finding no significant differences in in vivo bone responses among the modified surfaces. Considering those in vivo results, physical properties like roughening by sandblasting and acid etching may be major contributors to favorable bone response in biological environments over chemical properties obtained from various modifications including fluoride treatment and calcium phosphate application. Recently, hydrophilic properties added to the roughened surfaces or some osteogenic peptides coated on the surfaces have shown higher biocompatibility and have induced faster osseointegration, compared to the existing modified surfaces. However, the long-term clinical studies about those innovative surfaces are still lacking.
DOI: 10.2174/1874120701408010114
PubMed: 25400716
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000B27
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25400716Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.</title><author><name sortKey="Yeo, In Sung" sort="Yeo, In Sung" uniqKey="Yeo I" first="In-Sung" last="Yeo">In-Sung Yeo</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25400716</idno><idno type="pmid">25400716</idno><idno type="doi">10.2174/1874120701408010114</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B27</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000B27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000B27</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000B27</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.</title><author><name sortKey="Yeo, In Sung" sort="Yeo, In Sung" uniqKey="Yeo I" first="In-Sung" last="Yeo">In-Sung Yeo</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The open biomedical engineering journal</title><idno type="ISSN">1874-1207</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Screw-shaped endosseous implants that have a turned surface of commercially pure titanium have a disadvantage of requiring a long time for osseointegration while those implants have shown long-term clinical success in single and multiple restorations. Titanium implant surfaces have been modified in various ways to improve biocompatibility and accelerate osseointegration, which results in a shorter edentulous period for a patient. This article reviewed some important modified titanium surfaces, exploring the in vitro, in vivo and clinical results that numerous comparison studies reported. Several methods are widely used to modify the topography or chemistry of titanium surface, including blasting, acid etching, anodic oxidation, fluoride treatment, and calcium phosphate coating. Such modified surfaces demonstrate faster and stronger osseointegration than the turned commercially pure titanium surface. However, there have been many studies finding no significant differences in in vivo bone responses among the modified surfaces. Considering those in vivo results, physical properties like roughening by sandblasting and acid etching may be major contributors to favorable bone response in biological environments over chemical properties obtained from various modifications including fluoride treatment and calcium phosphate application. Recently, hydrophilic properties added to the roughened surfaces or some osteogenic peptides coated on the surfaces have shown higher biocompatibility and have induced faster osseointegration, compared to the existing modified surfaces. However, the long-term clinical studies about those innovative surfaces are still lacking.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25400716</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1874-1207</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>8</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The open biomedical engineering journal</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Open Biomed Eng J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>114-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.2174/1874120701408010114</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Screw-shaped endosseous implants that have a turned surface of commercially pure titanium have a disadvantage of requiring a long time for osseointegration while those implants have shown long-term clinical success in single and multiple restorations. Titanium implant surfaces have been modified in various ways to improve biocompatibility and accelerate osseointegration, which results in a shorter edentulous period for a patient. This article reviewed some important modified titanium surfaces, exploring the in vitro, in vivo and clinical results that numerous comparison studies reported. Several methods are widely used to modify the topography or chemistry of titanium surface, including blasting, acid etching, anodic oxidation, fluoride treatment, and calcium phosphate coating. Such modified surfaces demonstrate faster and stronger osseointegration than the turned commercially pure titanium surface. However, there have been many studies finding no significant differences in in vivo bone responses among the modified surfaces. Considering those in vivo results, physical properties like roughening by sandblasting and acid etching may be major contributors to favorable bone response in biological environments over chemical properties obtained from various modifications including fluoride treatment and calcium phosphate application. Recently, hydrophilic properties added to the roughened surfaces or some osteogenic peptides coated on the surfaces have shown higher biocompatibility and have induced faster osseointegration, compared to the existing modified surfaces. However, the long-term clinical studies about those innovative surfaces are still lacking.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yeo</LastName><ForeName>In-Sung</ForeName><Initials>IS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>31</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Open Biomed Eng J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101507900</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1874-1207</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Biomater. 2013 Dec;9(12):9538-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23973389</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Bone. 2009 Jul;45(1):17-26</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19332166</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Dec;24(12):1375-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22925006</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Mar;6(1):24-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7669864</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2008 Oct;79(10):1857-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18834239</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 1996 Feb;30(2):251-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9019491</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7246093</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):1041-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23782316</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(6):805-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9857591</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov;84(5):522-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11105008</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Dent. 2012;2012:236409</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22505895</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):844-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19604281</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2013 Dec;22(6):596-603</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24113553</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Nov;87(2):303-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18435399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Feb;9(1):11-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9590940</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(4):305-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20735267</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):341-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12814308</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23 (1):35-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21443587</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1136-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22092806</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 May;60(2):333-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11857441</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Biomater. 2010 Mar;6(3):1025-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19778643</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2011 Sep 05;3:59-67</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23674916</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):963-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23869353</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont. 2013 Dec;22(8):641-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23725293</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):790-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23748310</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Periodontol 2000. 1998 Jun;17:36-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10337311</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Sep-Oct;17(5):625-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12381062</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Jun;102(6):1921-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23853058</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Vet Res. 2009 Nov;70(11):1416-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19878025</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):79-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19681935</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):148-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18067598</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Apr;11(2):116-28</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11168202</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Dec;22(12 ):1354-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21382092</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2009 Feb;30(5):736-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19022499</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):853-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22168601</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Apr;24(4):355-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23126337</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):896-904</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21414131</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Adv Prosthodont. 2010 Dec;2(4):142-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21264193</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(5):570-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11505433</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Dec;58(12):1372-9; discussion 1379-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11117685</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Apr;14(2):150-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12656873</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):349-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12814309</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Feb;(395):81-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11937868</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 Fall;7(3):302-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1289255</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):57-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23377048</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2006 Feb;27(6):926-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16112191</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1144-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22762251</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):840-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21198901</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):349-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15973946</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):546-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21121960</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 1996 Mar;17(6):605-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8652779</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jan;34(1):78-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17137467</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Quintessence Int. 2013 Jul;44(7):499-512</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23616977</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):e128-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23748331</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Dec;24(12):1332-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22934611</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Biomater. 2014 Feb;10(2):557-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24211734</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Mar 1;88(3):581-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18306318</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2012 Apr;21(2):124-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22382750</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):982-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24056224</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):1-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17944964</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomaterials. 2013 May;34(16):4027-37</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23465831</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):937-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20701620</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):424-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23527344</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24(2):217-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22469026</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 1991 Jun 22;170(12):439-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2069829</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S59-68</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17618935</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:638348</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23586052</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 (2):197-204</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21732984</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;1(2):107-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21165264</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):63-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20209188</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):233-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18177427</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Dec;39(12):1183-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23151294</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2004 Jul;83(7):529-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15218041</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jun;115(6):e24-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23706924</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:172-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19663964</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Dec;8(6):442-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9555202</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4231373</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Anodic oxidation; BMP; fluoride; functional peptide; hydrophilicity; implant surface; SLA; surface modification.</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25400716</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.2174/1874120701408010114</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">TOBEJ-8-114</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4231373</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B27 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000B27 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25400716
|texte= Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25400716" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |