Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.
Identifieur interne : 000A54 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A53; suivant : 000A55Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.
Auteurs : Selda Yildiz [Oman] ; Gurkan Rasit Bayar ; Inanc Guvenc ; Necdet Kocabiyik ; Ayhan Cömert ; Fatih YazarSource :
- Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA [ 1279-8517 ] ; 2015.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- anatomie et histologie : Mandibule.
- imagerie diagnostique : Mandibule.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Cadavre, Humains, Implants dentaires, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- anatomy & histology : Mandible.
- diagnostic imaging : Mandible.
- methods : Tomography, Spiral Computed.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Humans, Middle Aged.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the morphology of submandibular fossae at edentulous posterior regions of dried mandibles and to determine a safe range for proper lingual angulation during the placement of a dental implant in the posterior mandibular region, with a computerized tomographic scan study. Spiral computed tomographic images of 77 dry adult human mandibles were evaluated to determine the deepest area in the submandibular fossa. Then, the proper lingual angulations for the placement of a dental implant at these regions were measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to show the relation between the depths of submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations. "Paired t test" was used for differences between the lingual implant angulations and the depths of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandibles. Depths of the submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations were varied between 1.1 and 4.6 mm: 62°-84° on right side of the mandibles, and 1.1-4.5 mm, 65°-83° on left side of the mandibles. There were statistically medium negative correlations between the degree of lingual implant angulations and the depth of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandible (r = -0.44, p < 0.001, and r = -0.38, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the right and left sides of the mandibles in terms of the depth of submandibular fossa (p = 0.01). Within the limits of this study, the depth of submandibular fossa was measured as ≥ 2 mm in around 71.5 % of examined regions, and lingual implant angulations were between 62° and 84°. These results may be considered by clinicians who are planning the dental implant placement in posterior mandible to avoid potential risk of lingual cortical plate perforation.
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1
PubMed: 25078676
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A54
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25078676Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.</title><author><name sortKey="Yildiz, Selda" sort="Yildiz, Selda" uniqKey="Yildiz S" first="Selda" last="Yildiz">Selda Yildiz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey, aksoyselda@yahoo.com.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Oman</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bayar, Gurkan Rasit" sort="Bayar, Gurkan Rasit" uniqKey="Bayar G" first="Gurkan Rasit" last="Bayar">Gurkan Rasit Bayar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guvenc, Inanc" sort="Guvenc, Inanc" uniqKey="Guvenc I" first="Inanc" last="Guvenc">Inanc Guvenc</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kocabiyik, Necdet" sort="Kocabiyik, Necdet" uniqKey="Kocabiyik N" first="Necdet" last="Kocabiyik">Necdet Kocabiyik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Comert, Ayhan" sort="Comert, Ayhan" uniqKey="Comert A" first="Ayhan" last="Cömert">Ayhan Cömert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yazar, Fatih" sort="Yazar, Fatih" uniqKey="Yazar F" first="Fatih" last="Yazar">Fatih Yazar</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25078676</idno><idno type="pmid">25078676</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A54</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A54</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.</title><author><name sortKey="Yildiz, Selda" sort="Yildiz, Selda" uniqKey="Yildiz S" first="Selda" last="Yildiz">Selda Yildiz</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey, aksoyselda@yahoo.com.</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Oman</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bayar, Gurkan Rasit" sort="Bayar, Gurkan Rasit" uniqKey="Bayar G" first="Gurkan Rasit" last="Bayar">Gurkan Rasit Bayar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guvenc, Inanc" sort="Guvenc, Inanc" uniqKey="Guvenc I" first="Inanc" last="Guvenc">Inanc Guvenc</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kocabiyik, Necdet" sort="Kocabiyik, Necdet" uniqKey="Kocabiyik N" first="Necdet" last="Kocabiyik">Necdet Kocabiyik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Comert, Ayhan" sort="Comert, Ayhan" uniqKey="Comert A" first="Ayhan" last="Cömert">Ayhan Cömert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yazar, Fatih" sort="Yazar, Fatih" uniqKey="Yazar F" first="Fatih" last="Yazar">Fatih Yazar</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA</title><idno type="eISSN">1279-8517</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mandible (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Tomography, Spiral Computed (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule (anatomie et histologie)</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomie et histologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Tomography, Spiral Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Cadavre</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tomodensitométrie hélicoïdale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to examine the morphology of submandibular fossae at edentulous posterior regions of dried mandibles and to determine a safe range for proper lingual angulation during the placement of a dental implant in the posterior mandibular region, with a computerized tomographic scan study. Spiral computed tomographic images of 77 dry adult human mandibles were evaluated to determine the deepest area in the submandibular fossa. Then, the proper lingual angulations for the placement of a dental implant at these regions were measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to show the relation between the depths of submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations. "Paired t test" was used for differences between the lingual implant angulations and the depths of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandibles. Depths of the submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations were varied between 1.1 and 4.6 mm: 62°-84° on right side of the mandibles, and 1.1-4.5 mm, 65°-83° on left side of the mandibles. There were statistically medium negative correlations between the degree of lingual implant angulations and the depth of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandible (r = -0.44, p < 0.001, and r = -0.38, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the right and left sides of the mandibles in terms of the depth of submandibular fossa (p = 0.01). Within the limits of this study, the depth of submandibular fossa was measured as ≥ 2 mm in around 71.5 % of examined regions, and lingual implant angulations were between 62° and 84°. These results may be considered by clinicians who are planning the dental implant placement in posterior mandible to avoid potential risk of lingual cortical plate perforation.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25078676</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>26</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1279-8517</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>37</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Surg Radiol Anat</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>167-73</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this study was to examine the morphology of submandibular fossae at edentulous posterior regions of dried mandibles and to determine a safe range for proper lingual angulation during the placement of a dental implant in the posterior mandibular region, with a computerized tomographic scan study. Spiral computed tomographic images of 77 dry adult human mandibles were evaluated to determine the deepest area in the submandibular fossa. Then, the proper lingual angulations for the placement of a dental implant at these regions were measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to show the relation between the depths of submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations. "Paired t test" was used for differences between the lingual implant angulations and the depths of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandibles. Depths of the submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations were varied between 1.1 and 4.6 mm: 62°-84° on right side of the mandibles, and 1.1-4.5 mm, 65°-83° on left side of the mandibles. There were statistically medium negative correlations between the degree of lingual implant angulations and the depth of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandible (r = -0.44, p < 0.001, and r = -0.38, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the right and left sides of the mandibles in terms of the depth of submandibular fossa (p = 0.01). Within the limits of this study, the depth of submandibular fossa was measured as ≥ 2 mm in around 71.5 % of examined regions, and lingual implant angulations were between 62° and 84°. These results may be considered by clinicians who are planning the dental implant placement in posterior mandible to avoid potential risk of lingual cortical plate perforation.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yildiz</LastName><ForeName>Selda</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey, aksoyselda@yahoo.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bayar</LastName><ForeName>Gurkan Rasit</ForeName><Initials>GR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guvenc</LastName><ForeName>Inanc</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kocabiyik</LastName><ForeName>Necdet</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cömert</LastName><ForeName>Ayhan</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yazar</LastName><ForeName>Fatih</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>31</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Surg Radiol Anat</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8608029</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0930-1038</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):631-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15212344</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 Jun;29(3):325-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19537472</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Dec;92(6):597-600</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11740473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 May;35(4):311-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23143074</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):395-402</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20809864</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18046031</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(4):165-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12964796</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Sep;50(3):399-410</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6352924</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):226-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15008935</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomech. 1975;8(6):393-405</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1206042</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2008 Oct;79(10):1833-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18834237</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109 (1):e32-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20123366</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):401-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18315421</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):462-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9922738</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jun;139(6):e523-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21640864</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Fall;5(3):272-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2098330</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2011 Jan;82(1):129-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20653440</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Feb;135(2):168-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15005432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 May;89(5):630-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10807723</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Apr;32(4):343-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19812884</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Nov;23(11):1243-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22432473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2011 Oct;20(5):360-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21811168</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002102" MajorTopicYN="N">Cadaver</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="Y">anatomy & histology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D036542" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, Spiral Computed</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25078676</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A54 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A54 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25078676
|texte= Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25078676" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |