Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.

Identifieur interne : 000A14 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A13; suivant : 000A15

Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.

Auteurs : Shabina Sachdeva [Inde] ; Arvind Tripathi [Inde] ; Pranav Kapoor [Inde]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:25183912

Abstract

Successful rehabilitation of edentulous individuals involves selection and arrangement of artificial teeth in accordance with the patient's original arch form. Various criteria exist for harmonious tooth arrangement but none is accepted universally. Finger and palm prints are unique to an individual and once formed in the sixth week of intra-uterine life, remain constant thereafter. Since dental arches are also formed during the same prenatal period, it is believed that the similar genetic factors may be involved in formation of dental arches and dermal patterns. This study was conducted to identify the association if any between type of dental arch forms and type of dermatoglyphic patterns. If specific dermal characteristics exist in individuals with specific dental arch forms, dermatoglyphic assessment of long standing edentulous subjects may help identify the patients preexisting dental arch form and thus aid in proper tooth arrangement. Ninety dentulous subjects were categorized into three groups on the basis of dental arch form (square, tapering or ovoid) and their finger and palm prints were recorded. The type of fingertip patterns, distribution of palmar patterns, Total Finger Ridge Count and angle atd were assessed. Subjects with square arches demonstrated a significantly high frequency of loops and a large atd angle with palmar patterns being most frequent in I3 region. Subjects with tapering arches showed a high frequency of whorls, a small atd angle and greatest distribution of palmar patterns in I4 region. In ovoid arched subjects, loops were the most common and palmar patterns were mostly observed in I4. Since distinctive dermal patterns were observed in subjects with different dental arch forms, it is believed that dermatoglyphics may be used as a reliable tool for identifying original arch form in edentulous patients.

DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0328-9
PubMed: 25183912

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:25183912

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sachdeva, Shabina" sort="Sachdeva, Shabina" uniqKey="Sachdeva S" first="Shabina" last="Sachdeva">Shabina Sachdeva</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, 110025 India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tripathi, Arvind" sort="Tripathi, Arvind" uniqKey="Tripathi A" first="Arvind" last="Tripathi">Arvind Tripathi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow, India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kapoor, Pranav" sort="Kapoor, Pranav" uniqKey="Kapoor P" first="Pranav" last="Kapoor">Pranav Kapoor</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, ESIC Dental College, New Delhi, India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Orthodontics, ESIC Dental College, New Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25183912</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25183912</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-013-0328-9</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A14</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sachdeva, Shabina" sort="Sachdeva, Shabina" uniqKey="Sachdeva S" first="Shabina" last="Sachdeva">Shabina Sachdeva</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, 110025 India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tripathi, Arvind" sort="Tripathi, Arvind" uniqKey="Tripathi A" first="Arvind" last="Tripathi">Arvind Tripathi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow, India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kapoor, Pranav" sort="Kapoor, Pranav" uniqKey="Kapoor P" first="Pranav" last="Kapoor">Pranav Kapoor</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, ESIC Dental College, New Delhi, India.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Orthodontics, ESIC Dental College, New Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Successful rehabilitation of edentulous individuals involves selection and arrangement of artificial teeth in accordance with the patient's original arch form. Various criteria exist for harmonious tooth arrangement but none is accepted universally. Finger and palm prints are unique to an individual and once formed in the sixth week of intra-uterine life, remain constant thereafter. Since dental arches are also formed during the same prenatal period, it is believed that the similar genetic factors may be involved in formation of dental arches and dermal patterns. This study was conducted to identify the association if any between type of dental arch forms and type of dermatoglyphic patterns. If specific dermal characteristics exist in individuals with specific dental arch forms, dermatoglyphic assessment of long standing edentulous subjects may help identify the patients preexisting dental arch form and thus aid in proper tooth arrangement. Ninety dentulous subjects were categorized into three groups on the basis of dental arch form (square, tapering or ovoid) and their finger and palm prints were recorded. The type of fingertip patterns, distribution of palmar patterns, Total Finger Ridge Count and angle atd were assessed. Subjects with square arches demonstrated a significantly high frequency of loops and a large atd angle with palmar patterns being most frequent in I3 region. Subjects with tapering arches showed a high frequency of whorls, a small atd angle and greatest distribution of palmar patterns in I4 region. In ovoid arched subjects, loops were the most common and palmar patterns were mostly observed in I4. Since distinctive dermal patterns were observed in subjects with different dental arch forms, it is believed that dermatoglyphics may be used as a reliable tool for identifying original arch form in edentulous patients.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">25183912</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0972-4052</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>14</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>281-8</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s13191-013-0328-9</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Successful rehabilitation of edentulous individuals involves selection and arrangement of artificial teeth in accordance with the patient's original arch form. Various criteria exist for harmonious tooth arrangement but none is accepted universally. Finger and palm prints are unique to an individual and once formed in the sixth week of intra-uterine life, remain constant thereafter. Since dental arches are also formed during the same prenatal period, it is believed that the similar genetic factors may be involved in formation of dental arches and dermal patterns. This study was conducted to identify the association if any between type of dental arch forms and type of dermatoglyphic patterns. If specific dermal characteristics exist in individuals with specific dental arch forms, dermatoglyphic assessment of long standing edentulous subjects may help identify the patients preexisting dental arch form and thus aid in proper tooth arrangement. Ninety dentulous subjects were categorized into three groups on the basis of dental arch form (square, tapering or ovoid) and their finger and palm prints were recorded. The type of fingertip patterns, distribution of palmar patterns, Total Finger Ridge Count and angle atd were assessed. Subjects with square arches demonstrated a significantly high frequency of loops and a large atd angle with palmar patterns being most frequent in I3 region. Subjects with tapering arches showed a high frequency of whorls, a small atd angle and greatest distribution of palmar patterns in I4 region. In ovoid arched subjects, loops were the most common and palmar patterns were mostly observed in I4. Since distinctive dermal patterns were observed in subjects with different dental arch forms, it is believed that dermatoglyphics may be used as a reliable tool for identifying original arch form in edentulous patients.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Sachdeva</LastName>
<ForeName>Shabina</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, 110025 India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Tripathi</LastName>
<ForeName>Arvind</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow, India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Kapoor</LastName>
<ForeName>Pranav</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Orthodontics, ESIC Dental College, New Delhi, India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>India</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101255941</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0972-4052</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 Mar;42(2):225-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1119544</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jan-Feb;12(1):51-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10196828</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Indian J Dermatol. 1980 Jul;25(3):21-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7287063</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Lancet. 1967 Feb 11;1(7485):298-300</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4163508</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979 Feb;50(2):259-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">443360</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Indian Dent Assoc. 1982 May;54(5):179-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">6956635</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Indian J Pediatr. 1974 Jul;41(318):249-56</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4426660</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011 Mar;11(1):7-13</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22379299</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int Dent J. 2010 Aug;60(4):300-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20949762</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Angle Orthod. 2001 Oct;71(5):386-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11605873</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Br Dent J. 2000 Jun 24;188(12):660-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11022381</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Br Med Bull. 1961 Sep;17:247-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13715551</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Hum Hered. 1969;19(6):641-53</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5399260</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>N Engl J Med. 1964 Jun 11;270:1268-77</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14133664</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Ann Hum Genet. 1964 Sep;28:87-100</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14204855</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Apr;14(2):74-82</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3457887</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Mar;57(3):315-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3553553</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4148502</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Dental arch form</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Dermatoglyphics</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Fingertip patterns</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">TFRC</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25183912</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s13191-013-0328-9</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">328</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4148502</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A14 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A14 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25183912
   |texte=   Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25183912" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020