Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.
Identifieur interne : 000A05 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A04; suivant : 000A06Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.
Auteurs : Manesh Lahori [Inde] ; A S Kaul [Inde] ; Sidhartha Chandra [Inde] ; Rahul Nagrath [Inde] ; Himanshu Gupta [Inde]Source :
- Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2013.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in periimplant bone quality, crestal bone level and the implant stability (periotest) for mandibular implant retained overdentures with ball attachments using delayed and immediate loading protocols. Ten completely edentulous patients had two alpha bio dental implants placed in the anterior part of the mandible. The loading protocols for the patients was chosen randomly by drawing lots. Five patients were loaded under immediate loading protocols and other five following delayed. Crestal bone loss and bone quality were assessed around each implant. Periotest values were recorded for each implant at 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Two implants were lost and were excluded from the study. However mean crestal bone loss around implants was 0.81 mm from the time of prosthetic loading to 12 months after prosthetic loading was seen and no significant result was found between the two groups for the crestal bone loss and the periotest values. Though the periotest value decreased (indicates increased stability) over the time period. The bone density changes were significant for both the groups at coronal level at all time intervals but at middle level significant only after 12 months of prosthetic loading, although individual variation was high. This study concluded that the changes in crestal bone level and periotest values were insignificant for the two groups. But the implant stability increased over the time and the crestal bone loss was evident with decreased rate over the period of time. There was wide individual variation for the bone density changes but overall increase in the density was seen.
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0240-8
PubMed: 24431720
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A05
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24431720Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.</title><author><name sortKey="Lahori, Manesh" sort="Lahori, Manesh" uniqKey="Lahori M" first="Manesh" last="Lahori">Manesh Lahori</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaul, A S" sort="Kaul, A S" uniqKey="Kaul A" first="A S" last="Kaul">A S Kaul</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chandra, Sidhartha" sort="Chandra, Sidhartha" uniqKey="Chandra S" first="Sidhartha" last="Chandra">Sidhartha Chandra</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nagrath, Rahul" sort="Nagrath, Rahul" uniqKey="Nagrath R" first="Rahul" last="Nagrath">Rahul Nagrath</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gupta, Himanshu" sort="Gupta, Himanshu" uniqKey="Gupta H" first="Himanshu" last="Gupta">Himanshu Gupta</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24431720</idno><idno type="pmid">24431720</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0240-8</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A05</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A05</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A05</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A05</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.</title><author><name sortKey="Lahori, Manesh" sort="Lahori, Manesh" uniqKey="Lahori M" first="Manesh" last="Lahori">Manesh Lahori</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kaul, A S" sort="Kaul, A S" uniqKey="Kaul A" first="A S" last="Kaul">A S Kaul</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chandra, Sidhartha" sort="Chandra, Sidhartha" uniqKey="Chandra S" first="Sidhartha" last="Chandra">Sidhartha Chandra</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nagrath, Rahul" sort="Nagrath, Rahul" uniqKey="Nagrath R" first="Rahul" last="Nagrath">Rahul Nagrath</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gupta, Himanshu" sort="Gupta, Himanshu" uniqKey="Gupta H" first="Himanshu" last="Gupta">Himanshu Gupta</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in periimplant bone quality, crestal bone level and the implant stability (periotest) for mandibular implant retained overdentures with ball attachments using delayed and immediate loading protocols. Ten completely edentulous patients had two alpha bio dental implants placed in the anterior part of the mandible. The loading protocols for the patients was chosen randomly by drawing lots. Five patients were loaded under immediate loading protocols and other five following delayed. Crestal bone loss and bone quality were assessed around each implant. Periotest values were recorded for each implant at 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Two implants were lost and were excluded from the study. However mean crestal bone loss around implants was 0.81 mm from the time of prosthetic loading to 12 months after prosthetic loading was seen and no significant result was found between the two groups for the crestal bone loss and the periotest values. Though the periotest value decreased (indicates increased stability) over the time period. The bone density changes were significant for both the groups at coronal level at all time intervals but at middle level significant only after 12 months of prosthetic loading, although individual variation was high. This study concluded that the changes in crestal bone level and periotest values were insignificant for the two groups. But the implant stability increased over the time and the crestal bone loss was evident with decreased rate over the period of time. There was wide individual variation for the bone density changes but overall increase in the density was seen.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24431720</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0972-4052</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>13</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>113-21</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s13191-012-0240-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in periimplant bone quality, crestal bone level and the implant stability (periotest) for mandibular implant retained overdentures with ball attachments using delayed and immediate loading protocols. Ten completely edentulous patients had two alpha bio dental implants placed in the anterior part of the mandible. The loading protocols for the patients was chosen randomly by drawing lots. Five patients were loaded under immediate loading protocols and other five following delayed. Crestal bone loss and bone quality were assessed around each implant. Periotest values were recorded for each implant at 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Two implants were lost and were excluded from the study. However mean crestal bone loss around implants was 0.81 mm from the time of prosthetic loading to 12 months after prosthetic loading was seen and no significant result was found between the two groups for the crestal bone loss and the periotest values. Though the periotest value decreased (indicates increased stability) over the time period. The bone density changes were significant for both the groups at coronal level at all time intervals but at middle level significant only after 12 months of prosthetic loading, although individual variation was high. This study concluded that the changes in crestal bone level and periotest values were insignificant for the two groups. But the implant stability increased over the time and the crestal bone loss was evident with decreased rate over the period of time. There was wide individual variation for the bone density changes but overall increase in the density was seen.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lahori</LastName><ForeName>Manesh</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kaul</LastName><ForeName>A S</ForeName><Initials>AS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chandra</LastName><ForeName>Sidhartha</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nagrath</LastName><ForeName>Rahul</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gupta</LastName><ForeName>Himanshu</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, K. D. Dental College, Mathura, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>27</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>India</Country><MedlineTA>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101255941</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0972-4052</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 1997 Jun;1(2):81-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9552823</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):603-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12519334</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Mar;69(3):276-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8445558</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3(4):185-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11887655</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):537-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11516001</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 1995 Aug;22(8):661-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7472740</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):463-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16335163</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):491-501</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9922740</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):1028-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20862419</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):371-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12175374</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17974108</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Jul-Aug;13(4):539-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9714961</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S126-37</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17618927</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Radiol. 2001 Sep;56(9):700-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11585392</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Feb;87(2):173-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11854674</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3634939</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Crestal bone</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Implant stability</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Overdenture</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Periotest</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24431720</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0240-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">240</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3634939</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A05 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A05 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24431720
|texte= Comparative evaluation of bone in mandibular implant retained overdentures using delayed and immediate loading protocol: an in-vivo study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24431720" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |