Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
Identifieur interne : 000911 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000910; suivant : 000912Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
Auteurs : Eugenio Romeo ; Stefano Storelli ; Giuseppe Casano ; Massimo Scanferla ; Daniele BotticelliSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (), Maxillaire (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Ostéo-intégration (physiologie), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résorption alvéolaire (), Résultat thérapeutique, Stomatite (étiologie), Sujet âgé, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- physiologie : Ostéo-intégration.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- étiologie : Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Stomatite.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâle, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résorption alvéolaire, Résultat thérapeutique, Sujet âgé, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (classification), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration (physiology), Stomatitis (etiology), Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- classification : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- etiology : Stomatitis.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- physiology : Osseointegration.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
To compare the clinical outcome of 6-mm and 10-mm long implants in partially edentulous posterior areas.
PubMed: 25422825
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000911
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25422825Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Romeo, Eugenio" sort="Romeo, Eugenio" uniqKey="Romeo E" first="Eugenio" last="Romeo">Eugenio Romeo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Storelli, Stefano" sort="Storelli, Stefano" uniqKey="Storelli S" first="Stefano" last="Storelli">Stefano Storelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Casano, Giuseppe" sort="Casano, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Casano G" first="Giuseppe" last="Casano">Giuseppe Casano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scanferla, Massimo" sort="Scanferla, Massimo" uniqKey="Scanferla M" first="Massimo" last="Scanferla">Massimo Scanferla</name></author><author><name sortKey="Botticelli, Daniele" sort="Botticelli, Daniele" uniqKey="Botticelli D" first="Daniele" last="Botticelli">Daniele Botticelli</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25422825</idno><idno type="pmid">25422825</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000911</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000911</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000911</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000911</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Romeo, Eugenio" sort="Romeo, Eugenio" uniqKey="Romeo E" first="Eugenio" last="Romeo">Eugenio Romeo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Storelli, Stefano" sort="Storelli, Stefano" uniqKey="Storelli S" first="Stefano" last="Storelli">Stefano Storelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Casano, Giuseppe" sort="Casano, Giuseppe" uniqKey="Casano G" first="Giuseppe" last="Casano">Giuseppe Casano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scanferla, Massimo" sort="Scanferla, Massimo" uniqKey="Scanferla M" first="Massimo" last="Scanferla">Massimo Scanferla</name></author><author><name sortKey="Botticelli, Daniele" sort="Botticelli, Daniele" uniqKey="Botticelli D" first="Daniele" last="Botticelli">Daniele Botticelli</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (classification)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term><term>Stomatitis (etiology)</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéo-intégration (physiologie)</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation)</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire ()</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Stomatite (étiologie)</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Stomatitis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ostéo-intégration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Osseointegration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Stomatite</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the clinical outcome of 6-mm and 10-mm long implants in partially edentulous posterior areas.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25422825</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Season>Winter</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>371-81</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the clinical outcome of 6-mm and 10-mm long implants in partially edentulous posterior areas.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty-four patients, with a partially edentulous area in the jaws with a height and width allowing the positioning of 2 to 3 adjacent 10 × 4.1 mm implants without any augmentation procedure, were randomly allocated according to a parallel group design to receive 6-mm long or 10-mm long implants. A total of 54 implants were placed (26 × 6 mm and 28 × 10 mm implants). Patients were restored 8 weeks after surgery and were followed for 5 years. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant survival, as well as marginal bone level changes and complications.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">After 5 years, 18 patients were available. One 6 mm implant failed during the healing period and its related prosthesis could not be placed. No implants were lost after loading. The 6 mm group registered 5 complications (1 mucositis, 3 prosthesis decementations and 1 chipping), while only 3 were registered in the 10 mm group (2 decementations and 1 chipping). The difference in complications between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.39). Marginal bone loss at 5 years was 0.43 and 0.24 mm with the 6 mm and 10 mm groups, respectively (not statistically significant; difference between the two groups 0.19 mm; SD 0.23 mm; 95% CI -0.34;0.73; t test P = 0.42).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Implant and prosthetic survival and success rates were similar between prostheses supported by 6-mm or 10-mm long implants.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Romeo</LastName><ForeName>Eugenio</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Storelli</LastName><ForeName>Stefano</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Casano</LastName><ForeName>Giuseppe</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scanferla</LastName><ForeName>Massimo</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Botticelli</LastName><ForeName>Daniele</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013280" MajorTopicYN="N">Stomatitis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25422825</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">33131</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000911 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000911 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25422825
|texte= Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25422825" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |