Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.
Identifieur interne : 000367 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000366; suivant : 000368Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.
Auteurs : Carol C. Guarnizo-Herre O [Royaume-Uni] ; Georgios Tsakos ; Aubrey Sheiham ; Richard G. WattSource :
- European journal of oral sciences [ 1600-0722 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic : Europe, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries.
- prevention & control : Tooth Loss.
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Cross-Sectional Studies, European Union, Humans, Oral Health, Politics, Social Welfare, Young Adult.
Abstract
Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data from Eurobarometer wave 72.3, a cross-sectional survey of 31 European countries carried out in 2009. We evaluated three self-reported oral health outcomes: edentulousness, no functional dentition (<20 natural teeth), and oral impacts on daily living. Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for each country and for each welfare state regime. The Scandinavian regime showed lower prevalence rates for all outcomes. For edentulousness and no functional dentition, there were higher prevalence rates in the Eastern regime but no significant differences between Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern regimes. The Southern regime presented a higher prevalence of oral impacts on daily living. Results by country indicated that Sweden had the lowest prevalences for edentulousness and no functional dentition, and Denmark had the lowest prevalence for oral impacts. The results suggest that Scandinavian welfare states, with more redistributive and universal welfare policies, had better population oral health. Future research should provide further insights about the potential mechanisms through which welfare-state regimes would influence oral health.
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12049
PubMed: 23659239
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000367
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23659239Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.</title><author><name sortKey="Guarnizo Herre O, Carol C" sort="Guarnizo Herre O, Carol C" uniqKey="Guarnizo Herre O C" first="Carol C" last="Guarnizo-Herre O">Carol C. Guarnizo-Herre O</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. c.guarnizo-herreno.11@ucl.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsakos, Georgios" sort="Tsakos, Georgios" uniqKey="Tsakos G" first="Georgios" last="Tsakos">Georgios Tsakos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name></author><author><name sortKey="Watt, Richard G" sort="Watt, Richard G" uniqKey="Watt R" first="Richard G" last="Watt">Richard G. Watt</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23659239</idno><idno type="pmid">23659239</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/eos.12049</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000367</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000367</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000367</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000367</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.</title><author><name sortKey="Guarnizo Herre O, Carol C" sort="Guarnizo Herre O, Carol C" uniqKey="Guarnizo Herre O C" first="Carol C" last="Guarnizo-Herre O">Carol C. Guarnizo-Herre O</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. c.guarnizo-herreno.11@ucl.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tsakos, Georgios" sort="Tsakos, Georgios" uniqKey="Tsakos G" first="Georgios" last="Tsakos">Georgios Tsakos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name></author><author><name sortKey="Watt, Richard G" sort="Watt, Richard G" uniqKey="Watt R" first="Richard G" last="Watt">Richard G. Watt</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral sciences</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0722</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Activities of Daily Living</term><term>Adult</term><term>Cross-Cultural Comparison</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Europe</term><term>European Union</term><term>Humans</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Politics</term><term>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</term><term>Social Welfare</term><term>Tooth Loss (prevention & control)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Activités de la vie quotidienne</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Comparaison interculturelle</term><term>Europe</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Organismes d'aide sociale</term><term>Pays nordiques et scandinaves</term><term>Perte dentaire ()</term><term>Politique</term><term>Santé buccodentaire</term><term>Union européenne</term><term>Études transversales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Europe</term><term>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Tooth Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Activities of Daily Living</term><term>Adult</term><term>Cross-Cultural Comparison</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>European Union</term><term>Humans</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Politics</term><term>Social Welfare</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Activités de la vie quotidienne</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Comparaison interculturelle</term><term>Europe</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Organismes d'aide sociale</term><term>Pays nordiques et scandinaves</term><term>Perte dentaire</term><term>Politique</term><term>Santé buccodentaire</term><term>Union européenne</term><term>Études transversales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data from Eurobarometer wave 72.3, a cross-sectional survey of 31 European countries carried out in 2009. We evaluated three self-reported oral health outcomes: edentulousness, no functional dentition (<20 natural teeth), and oral impacts on daily living. Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for each country and for each welfare state regime. The Scandinavian regime showed lower prevalence rates for all outcomes. For edentulousness and no functional dentition, there were higher prevalence rates in the Eastern regime but no significant differences between Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern regimes. The Southern regime presented a higher prevalence of oral impacts on daily living. Results by country indicated that Sweden had the lowest prevalences for edentulousness and no functional dentition, and Denmark had the lowest prevalence for oral impacts. The results suggest that Scandinavian welfare states, with more redistributive and universal welfare policies, had better population oral health. Future research should provide further insights about the potential mechanisms through which welfare-state regimes would influence oral health.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23659239</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>26</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0722</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>121</Volume><Issue>3 Pt 1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral sciences</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur. J. Oral Sci.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>169-75</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/eos.12049</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data from Eurobarometer wave 72.3, a cross-sectional survey of 31 European countries carried out in 2009. We evaluated three self-reported oral health outcomes: edentulousness, no functional dentition (<20 natural teeth), and oral impacts on daily living. Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for each country and for each welfare state regime. The Scandinavian regime showed lower prevalence rates for all outcomes. For edentulousness and no functional dentition, there were higher prevalence rates in the Eastern regime but no significant differences between Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern regimes. The Southern regime presented a higher prevalence of oral impacts on daily living. Results by country indicated that Sweden had the lowest prevalences for edentulousness and no functional dentition, and Denmark had the lowest prevalence for oral impacts. The results suggest that Scandinavian welfare states, with more redistributive and universal welfare policies, had better population oral health. Future research should provide further insights about the potential mechanisms through which welfare-state regimes would influence oral health.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2013 Eur J Oral Sci.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guarnizo-Herreño</LastName><ForeName>Carol C</ForeName><Initials>CC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. c.guarnizo-herreno.11@ucl.ac.uk</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tsakos</LastName><ForeName>Georgios</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sheiham</LastName><ForeName>Aubrey</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Watt</LastName><ForeName>Richard G</ForeName><Initials>RG</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>19</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9504563</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0909-8836</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):99-127</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22137444</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1561-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21982631</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 May;66(5):397-409</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22080814</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jul;66(7):e23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21880645</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Jul;34(6):858-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22497661</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Bratisl Lek Listy. 2013;114(2):45-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23331196</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Health Soc Behav. 2000 Dec;41(4):465-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11198569</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(1):1-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11271636</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Community Dent Health. 2001 Dec;18(4):209-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11789697</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):6-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14533742</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(1):41-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14572920</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(3):419-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14582869</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;32(5):363-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15341621</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):306-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15563585</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(3):829-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16574291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(2):309-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16878395</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 2006 Sep 16;368(9540):1033-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16980120</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Nov;33(11):850-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17002745</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Health Policy. 2007 Feb;80(2):328-39</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16678294</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;35(1):1-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17244132</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;35(2):81-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17331149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Jul;61(7):571-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17568046</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):658-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17630361</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Health Soc Behav. 2007 Sep;48(3):239-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17982866</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec;61(12):1098-102</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18000134</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Jan;62(1):3-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18079325</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Health Policy. 2008 Apr;86(1):119-28</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18035447</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Apr;62(4):282-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18339817</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Sociol Health Illn. 2008 May;30(4):565-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18298629</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(11):2281-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18314241</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1105-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18467378</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1633-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18994660</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):593-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18927186</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jan;63(1):38-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18768570</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Feb;63(2):92-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18930981</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Public Health Dent. 2009 Winter;69(1):1-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18662257</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(2):321-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19492628</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Jul;63(7):569-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19351621</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;117(3):286-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19583757</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Aug;36(8):601-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19604320</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Aug;117(4):413-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19627353</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1468-75</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19765876</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:152-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19474091</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Health Policy. 2010 Jan;94(1):45-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19748149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):399-420</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20799668</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2011 Jun;90(6):724-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21508433</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;39(4):361-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21219373</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Sep;65(9):746-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21282147</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Sep;33(6):946-64</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21899562</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Public Health. 2011 Oct;101(10):1892-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21852627</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 2012 Jan 14;379(9811):181-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22014678</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000203" MajorTopicYN="Y">Activities of Daily Living</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003431" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Cultural Comparison</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005060" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Europe</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005062" MajorTopicYN="N">European Union</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009909" MajorTopicYN="Y">Oral Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011057" MajorTopicYN="Y">Politics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012537" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012946" MajorTopicYN="Y">Social Welfare</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016388" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4255683</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23659239</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/eos.12049</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4255683</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000367 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000367 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23659239
|texte= Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23659239" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |