Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.
Identifieur interne : 000003 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000002; suivant : 000004Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.
Auteurs : A M Shelley [Royaume-Uni] ; A-M Glenny ; M. Goodwin ; P. Brunton ; K. HornerSource :
- Dento maxillo facial radiology [ 0250-832X ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle (), Implants dentaires, Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Overdenture, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Tomodensitométrie ().
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Patient Care Planning, Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods), Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Overlay, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The objectives for this systematic review were to determine if the pre-operative availability of cross-sectional imaging, such as cone beam CT, has a diagnostic impact, therapeutic impact or impact on patients' outcome when placing two dental implants in the anterior mandible to support an overdenture. The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE® and Embase were searched up to, and including, February 2013. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they compared the impact of conventional and cross-sectional imaging when placing dental implants in sites including the anterior mandible. An adapted quality assessment tool was used for the assessment of the risk of bias in included studies. Pooled quantitative analysis was not possible and, therefore, synthesis was qualitative. Of 2374 potentially eligible papers, 5 studies were included. Little can be determined from a synthesis of these studies because of their small number, clinical diversity and high risks of bias. Notwithstanding, it may be tentatively inferred that cross-sectional imaging has a therapeutic impact in the more challenging cases. In terms of impact, this review has found no evidence to support any specific imaging modality when planning dental implant placement in any region of the mouth. Therefore, those who argue that cross-sectional imaging should be used for the assessment of all dental implant sites are unsupported by evidence.
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130321
PubMed: 24271462
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000003
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24271462Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Shelley, A M" sort="Shelley, A M" uniqKey="Shelley A" first="A M" last="Shelley">A M Shelley</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dental Practice, Denton, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Practice, Denton</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Glenny, A M" sort="Glenny, A M" uniqKey="Glenny A" first="A-M" last="Glenny">A-M Glenny</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goodwin, M" sort="Goodwin, M" uniqKey="Goodwin M" first="M" last="Goodwin">M. Goodwin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Brunton, P" sort="Brunton, P" uniqKey="Brunton P" first="P" last="Brunton">P. Brunton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Horner, K" sort="Horner, K" uniqKey="Horner K" first="K" last="Horner">K. Horner</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24271462</idno><idno type="pmid">24271462</idno><idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20130321</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000003</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000003</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000003</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000003</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Shelley, A M" sort="Shelley, A M" uniqKey="Shelley A" first="A M" last="Shelley">A M Shelley</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dental Practice, Denton, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Dental Practice, Denton</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Glenny, A M" sort="Glenny, A M" uniqKey="Glenny A" first="A-M" last="Glenny">A-M Glenny</name></author><author><name sortKey="Goodwin, M" sort="Goodwin, M" uniqKey="Goodwin M" first="M" last="Goodwin">M. Goodwin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Brunton, P" sort="Brunton, P" uniqKey="Brunton P" first="P" last="Brunton">P. Brunton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Horner, K" sort="Horner, K" uniqKey="Horner K" first="K" last="Horner">K. Horner</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Dento maxillo facial radiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (methods)</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle ()</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objectives for this systematic review were to determine if the pre-operative availability of cross-sectional imaging, such as cone beam CT, has a diagnostic impact, therapeutic impact or impact on patients' outcome when placing two dental implants in the anterior mandible to support an overdenture. The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE® and Embase were searched up to, and including, February 2013. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they compared the impact of conventional and cross-sectional imaging when placing dental implants in sites including the anterior mandible. An adapted quality assessment tool was used for the assessment of the risk of bias in included studies. Pooled quantitative analysis was not possible and, therefore, synthesis was qualitative. Of 2374 potentially eligible papers, 5 studies were included. Little can be determined from a synthesis of these studies because of their small number, clinical diversity and high risks of bias. Notwithstanding, it may be tentatively inferred that cross-sectional imaging has a therapeutic impact in the more challenging cases. In terms of impact, this review has found no evidence to support any specific imaging modality when planning dental implant placement in any region of the mouth. Therefore, those who argue that cross-sectional imaging should be used for the assessment of all dental implant sites are unsupported by evidence.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24271462</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0250-832X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>43</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Dento maxillo facial radiology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>20130321</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1259/dmfr.20130321</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The objectives for this systematic review were to determine if the pre-operative availability of cross-sectional imaging, such as cone beam CT, has a diagnostic impact, therapeutic impact or impact on patients' outcome when placing two dental implants in the anterior mandible to support an overdenture. The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE® and Embase were searched up to, and including, February 2013. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they compared the impact of conventional and cross-sectional imaging when placing dental implants in sites including the anterior mandible. An adapted quality assessment tool was used for the assessment of the risk of bias in included studies. Pooled quantitative analysis was not possible and, therefore, synthesis was qualitative. Of 2374 potentially eligible papers, 5 studies were included. Little can be determined from a synthesis of these studies because of their small number, clinical diversity and high risks of bias. Notwithstanding, it may be tentatively inferred that cross-sectional imaging has a therapeutic impact in the more challenging cases. In terms of impact, this review has found no evidence to support any specific imaging modality when planning dental implant placement in any region of the mouth. Therefore, those who argue that cross-sectional imaging should be used for the assessment of all dental implant sites are unsupported by evidence.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shelley</LastName><ForeName>A M</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dental Practice, Denton, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Glenny</LastName><ForeName>A-M</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Goodwin</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brunton</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Horner</LastName><ForeName>K</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>22</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7609576</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0250-832X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 May;89(5):630-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10807723</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Nov;23(11):1243-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22432473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>JAMA. 2001 Aug 15;286(7):821-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11497536</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Oct;92(4):458-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11598584</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Dec;92(6):597-600</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11740473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>SADJ. 2002 Feb;57(2):64-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11921640</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gerodontology. 2002 Jul;19(1):3-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12164236</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2002 Nov;6(6):442-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12447658</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):566-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12674118</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(4):165-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12964796</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Feb;135(2):168-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15005432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2004 May;75(5):631-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15212344</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):490-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15248885</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978 Jul;131(1):1-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">97957</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Quintessenz. 1986 Jun;37(6):1003-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3489246</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Feb;48(2):201-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2299461</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Nov;121(5):599-600</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2229738</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Decis Making. 1991 Apr-Jun;11(2):88-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1907710</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(3):329-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8225469</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Dec;5(4):229-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7640337</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Radiol. 1995 Aug;50(8):513-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7656516</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 1997 Jul 19;350(9072):185-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9250191</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):558-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9274086</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Nov;55(11):1328-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9371130</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Jan;87(1):2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9927070</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jan;28(1):37-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10202477</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 May-Jun;14(3):379-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10379111</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Aug;88(2):239-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10468470</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Mar;28(2):105-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10522199</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2005 Jun;14(2):117-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15968182</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):198-204</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21477064</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2006 Sep 23;201(6):337-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16990883</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;35(10):961-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16829038</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):410-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17082331</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):289-300</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17465355</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2007 Jun;16(2):131-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17563503</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):81-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17956572</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jan;37(1):18-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18195250</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):249-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18237315</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):401-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18315421</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(18):iii-iv, ix-163</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18462577</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;12(4):223-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18825423</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):150-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19123719</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2009 Jan 24;206(2):67-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19165260</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19152699</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dent Update. 2008 Dec;35(10):689-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19192691</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 May;38(4):187-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19372107</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):216-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19492636</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19696851</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Dec;13(4):375-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19221809</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):67-75</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21239568</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Mar;38(3):208-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20678100</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):424-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21054555</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2012 Apr;21(2):78-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22382748</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):817-26</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22668710</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontol. 2000 Dec;71(12):1893-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11156047</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4064657</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">comparison systematic review</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implant</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">radiography</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24271462</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">dmfr.20130321</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1259/dmfr.20130321</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4064657</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000003 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000003 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24271462
|texte= Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: a systematic review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24271462" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |