EdenteV1, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 000B94

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

Identifieur interne : 000B94 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000B93; suivant : 000B95

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

Auteurs : Marco Cicciu ; Ennio Bramanti ; Giada Matacena ; Eugenio Guglielmino ; Giacomo Risitano

Source :

International journal of clinical and experimental medicine [ 1940-5901 ] ; 2014.

RBID : pubmed:24955150

Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.

PubMed: 24955150

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:24955150

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Cicciu, Marco" sort="Cicciu, Marco" uniqKey="Cicciu M" first="Marco" last="Cicciu">Marco Cicciu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bramanti, Ennio" sort="Bramanti, Ennio" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="Ennio" last="Bramanti">Ennio Bramanti</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Matacena, Giada" sort="Matacena, Giada" uniqKey="Matacena G" first="Giada" last="Matacena">Giada Matacena</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Guglielmino, Eugenio" sort="Guglielmino, Eugenio" uniqKey="Guglielmino E" first="Eugenio" last="Guglielmino">Eugenio Guglielmino</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Risitano, Giacomo" sort="Risitano, Giacomo" uniqKey="Risitano G" first="Giacomo" last="Risitano">Giacomo Risitano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24955150</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24955150</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000B94</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Cicciu, Marco" sort="Cicciu, Marco" uniqKey="Cicciu M" first="Marco" last="Cicciu">Marco Cicciu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bramanti, Ennio" sort="Bramanti, Ennio" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="Ennio" last="Bramanti">Ennio Bramanti</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Matacena, Giada" sort="Matacena, Giada" uniqKey="Matacena G" first="Giada" last="Matacena">Giada Matacena</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Guglielmino, Eugenio" sort="Guglielmino, Eugenio" uniqKey="Guglielmino E" first="Eugenio" last="Guglielmino">Eugenio Guglielmino</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Risitano, Giacomo" sort="Risitano, Giacomo" uniqKey="Risitano G" first="Giacomo" last="Risitano">Giacomo Risitano</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">International journal of clinical and experimental medicine</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1940-5901</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24955150</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1940-5901</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2014</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>International journal of clinical and experimental medicine</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Int J Clin Exp Med</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>817-25</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cicciu</LastName>
<ForeName>Marco</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Human Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bramanti</LastName>
<ForeName>Ennio</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Matacena</LastName>
<ForeName>Giada</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Messina ME, IT.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guglielmino</LastName>
<ForeName>Eugenio</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Risitano</LastName>
<ForeName>Giacomo</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Electronic Engineering, Chemistry and Industrial Engineering, University of Messina ME, IT.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Int J Clin Exp Med</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101471010</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1940-5901</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Minerva Stomatol. 2009 Jan-Feb;58(1-2):9-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19234433</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Nov;75(2):457-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16041789</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Med Eng Technol. 1997 Nov-Dec;21(6):233-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9429133</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Sep;33(9):690-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16922743</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):303-13</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18081871</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):40-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18254739</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Jan;80(1):247-56</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17078047</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Minerva Stomatol. 2008 Apr;57(4):167-79</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18427361</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomech. 2003 Nov;36(11):1649-58</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14522206</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Biomech. 2000 Nov;33(11):1489-95</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10940408</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2006 Aug;9(4):257-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17132532</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Mar;24(3):138-43</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18364274</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2013 Jun;22(3):263-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23619750</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;28(3 - 4):411-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11108208</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;28(3 - 4):405-10</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11108207</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Mater Eng. 2013;23(5):317-27</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23988704</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Implant Dent. 2012 Jun;21(3):220-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22513501</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4057829</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">FEM analysis</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone tissue</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implant</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">load</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>07</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24955150</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4057829</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B94 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B94 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:24955150
   |texte=   FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24955150" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis.

Source :

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki