Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?
Identifieur interne : 000A47 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A46; suivant : 000A48Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?
Auteurs : Rogeria Acedo Vieira ; Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo ; Lucimara A. Budel ; Josiane Cristina Gama ; Ivete Aparecida De Mattias Sartori ; Geninho ThoméSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Dental Implants (psychology), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mastication (physiology), Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (psychology), Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Oral Health, Oral Hygiene, Pain Measurement, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Visual Analog Scale.
- MESH :
- chemical , psychology : Dental Implants.
- physiology : Mastication.
- psychology : Mouth, Edentulous.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oral Health, Oral Hygiene, Pain Measurement, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Visual Analog Scale.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the index of satisfaction and masticatory function of edentulous patients before and after rehabilitation and to evaluate if patients' perception of the changes in their oral health status is in agreement with the results of masticatory performance test. Fourteen edentulous patients were rehabilitated with lower implant-supported fixed prosthesis and upper removable dentures. Index of satisfaction and masticatory capacity (subjective analysis) and performance test (objective analysis) were evaluated before and 20 days and 8 months after rehabilitation. The patients were asked to respond a yes/no masticatory capacity questionnaire and to rate their oral satisfaction on a 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Masticatory performance test comprised the ability of the individual to pulverize an artificial test food (Optocal), after 20 and 40 masticatory strokes. When baseline answers were compared to answers 8 months after treatment, all questions, excepting the ones that considered pain and social disability, were statistically different. Wilcoxon test was used to compare index of satisfaction before and after treatment. All answers showed statistically significant differences, excluding the one that referred to ease of cleaning the prostheses. Considering the masticatory performance test, Student t test (normally distributed) and Wilcoxon test (non-normally distributed) were used to test the null hypothesis that the weight of the particles of the test food left in sieves were equal in all times of evaluation. In the larger sieve with 20 cycles, statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and 8 months, 20 days and 8 months. With 40 strokes, baseline and 20 days, baseline and 8 months and 20 days and 8 months showed significant differences. It was concluded that oral rehabilitation leads to better masticatory function in edentulous patients and there is a coincidence between patient perception and real improvement on masticatory function.
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00208
PubMed: 24914912
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24914912Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?</title><author><name sortKey="Vieira, Rogeria Acedo" sort="Vieira, Rogeria Acedo" uniqKey="Vieira R" first="Rogeria Acedo" last="Vieira">Rogeria Acedo Vieira</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education, Curitiba, Brazil.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Melo, Ana Claudia Moreira" sort="Melo, Ana Claudia Moreira" uniqKey="Melo A" first="Ana Cláudia Moreira" last="Melo">Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Budel, Lucimara A" sort="Budel, Lucimara A" uniqKey="Budel L" first="Lucimara A" last="Budel">Lucimara A. Budel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gama, Josiane Cristina" sort="Gama, Josiane Cristina" uniqKey="Gama J" first="Josiane Cristina" last="Gama">Josiane Cristina Gama</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida" sort="De Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida" uniqKey="De Mattias Sartori I" first="Ivete Aparecida" last="De Mattias Sartori">Ivete Aparecida De Mattias Sartori</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thome, Geninho" sort="Thome, Geninho" uniqKey="Thome G" first="Geninho" last="Thomé">Geninho Thomé</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24914912</idno><idno type="pmid">24914912</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00208</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A47</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?</title><author><name sortKey="Vieira, Rogeria Acedo" sort="Vieira, Rogeria Acedo" uniqKey="Vieira R" first="Rogeria Acedo" last="Vieira">Rogeria Acedo Vieira</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education, Curitiba, Brazil.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Melo, Ana Claudia Moreira" sort="Melo, Ana Claudia Moreira" uniqKey="Melo A" first="Ana Cláudia Moreira" last="Melo">Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Budel, Lucimara A" sort="Budel, Lucimara A" uniqKey="Budel L" first="Lucimara A" last="Budel">Lucimara A. Budel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gama, Josiane Cristina" sort="Gama, Josiane Cristina" uniqKey="Gama J" first="Josiane Cristina" last="Gama">Josiane Cristina Gama</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida" sort="De Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida" uniqKey="De Mattias Sartori I" first="Ivete Aparecida" last="De Mattias Sartori">Ivete Aparecida De Mattias Sartori</name></author><author><name sortKey="Thome, Geninho" sort="Thome, Geninho" uniqKey="Thome G" first="Geninho" last="Thomé">Geninho Thomé</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Dental Implants (psychology)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Health Status</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mastication (physiology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (psychology)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Pain Measurement</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Visual Analog Scale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mastication</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Health Status</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Pain Measurement</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Visual Analog Scale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study aimed to compare the index of satisfaction and masticatory function of edentulous patients before and after rehabilitation and to evaluate if patients' perception of the changes in their oral health status is in agreement with the results of masticatory performance test. Fourteen edentulous patients were rehabilitated with lower implant-supported fixed prosthesis and upper removable dentures. Index of satisfaction and masticatory capacity (subjective analysis) and performance test (objective analysis) were evaluated before and 20 days and 8 months after rehabilitation. The patients were asked to respond a yes/no masticatory capacity questionnaire and to rate their oral satisfaction on a 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Masticatory performance test comprised the ability of the individual to pulverize an artificial test food (Optocal), after 20 and 40 masticatory strokes. When baseline answers were compared to answers 8 months after treatment, all questions, excepting the ones that considered pain and social disability, were statistically different. Wilcoxon test was used to compare index of satisfaction before and after treatment. All answers showed statistically significant differences, excluding the one that referred to ease of cleaning the prostheses. Considering the masticatory performance test, Student t test (normally distributed) and Wilcoxon test (non-normally distributed) were used to test the null hypothesis that the weight of the particles of the test food left in sieves were equal in all times of evaluation. In the larger sieve with 20 cycles, statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and 8 months, 20 days and 8 months. With 40 strokes, baseline and 20 days, baseline and 8 months and 20 days and 8 months showed significant differences. It was concluded that oral rehabilitation leads to better masticatory function in edentulous patients and there is a coincidence between patient perception and real improvement on masticatory function.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24914912</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>40</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>263-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00208</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This study aimed to compare the index of satisfaction and masticatory function of edentulous patients before and after rehabilitation and to evaluate if patients' perception of the changes in their oral health status is in agreement with the results of masticatory performance test. Fourteen edentulous patients were rehabilitated with lower implant-supported fixed prosthesis and upper removable dentures. Index of satisfaction and masticatory capacity (subjective analysis) and performance test (objective analysis) were evaluated before and 20 days and 8 months after rehabilitation. The patients were asked to respond a yes/no masticatory capacity questionnaire and to rate their oral satisfaction on a 0 to 10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Masticatory performance test comprised the ability of the individual to pulverize an artificial test food (Optocal), after 20 and 40 masticatory strokes. When baseline answers were compared to answers 8 months after treatment, all questions, excepting the ones that considered pain and social disability, were statistically different. Wilcoxon test was used to compare index of satisfaction before and after treatment. All answers showed statistically significant differences, excluding the one that referred to ease of cleaning the prostheses. Considering the masticatory performance test, Student t test (normally distributed) and Wilcoxon test (non-normally distributed) were used to test the null hypothesis that the weight of the particles of the test food left in sieves were equal in all times of evaluation. In the larger sieve with 20 cycles, statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and 8 months, 20 days and 8 months. With 40 strokes, baseline and 20 days, baseline and 8 months and 20 days and 8 months showed significant differences. It was concluded that oral rehabilitation leads to better masticatory function in edentulous patients and there is a coincidence between patient perception and real improvement on masticatory function.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vieira</LastName><ForeName>Rogeria Acedo</ForeName><Initials>RA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Latin American Institute of Dental Research and Education, Curitiba, Brazil.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Melo</LastName><ForeName>Ana Cláudia Moreira</ForeName><Initials>AC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Budel</LastName><ForeName>Lucimara A</ForeName><Initials>LA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gama</LastName><ForeName>Josiane Cristina</ForeName><Initials>JC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Mattias Sartori</LastName><ForeName>Ivete Aparecida</ForeName><Initials>IA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Thomé</LastName><ForeName>Geninho</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006304" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Status</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009909" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009910" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Hygiene</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010147" MajorTopicYN="N">Pain Measurement</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D064232" MajorTopicYN="N">Visual Analog Scale</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">oral rehabilitation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">quality of life</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24914912</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00208</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24914912
|texte= Benefits of rehabilitation with implants in masticatory function: is patient perception of change in accordance with the real improvement?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24914912" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |