Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Identifieur interne : 000894 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000893; suivant : 000895

Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Auteurs : Thiyaneswaran Nesappan ; Padma Ariga

Source :

RBID : pubmed:25302267

Abstract

This study was formulated to evaluate and compare stresses around endosseous implants in various normal and fibula reconstructed mandibular models using finite element analysis method.

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9147.4764
PubMed: 25302267

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:25302267

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nesappan, Thiyaneswaran" sort="Nesappan, Thiyaneswaran" uniqKey="Nesappan T" first="Thiyaneswaran" last="Nesappan">Thiyaneswaran Nesappan</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ariga, Padma" sort="Ariga, Padma" uniqKey="Ariga P" first="Padma" last="Ariga">Padma Ariga</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Professor and H.O.D, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25302267</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25302267</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.7860/JCDR/2014/9147.4764</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000894</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000894</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nesappan, Thiyaneswaran" sort="Nesappan, Thiyaneswaran" uniqKey="Nesappan T" first="Thiyaneswaran" last="Nesappan">Thiyaneswaran Nesappan</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ariga, Padma" sort="Ariga, Padma" uniqKey="Ariga P" first="Padma" last="Ariga">Padma Ariga</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Professor and H.O.D, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">2249-782X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study was formulated to evaluate and compare stresses around endosseous implants in various normal and fibula reconstructed mandibular models using finite element analysis method.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">25302267</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">2249-782X</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>8</Volume>
<Issue>8</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Aug</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Clin Diagn Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>ZC45-50</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.7860/JCDR/2014/9147.4764</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">This study was formulated to evaluate and compare stresses around endosseous implants in various normal and fibula reconstructed mandibular models using finite element analysis method.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">CT scan data of a completely edentulous patient and a fibula reconstructed patient was made and the Dicom images were used to design 3-D mandibular models using software. Based on the information from the scan data, various types of reconstructed FEA models were made. Implants (fixtures) and superstructures were then embedded in each model and Von Mises stress around the neck of each implant under a vertical loading of 200 N and Horizontal load of 50 N was calculated using finite element structural analysis software. The results were compared between the reconstructed mandible and their respective normal mandible.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Higher stress values were obtained for all the reconstructed types under horizontal loading and in reconstructed models involving larger area of reconstruction the stress were more. In the models involving smaller area of reconstruction like symphysis alone or body alone there is no significant change in the stress values on vertical loading.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Stresses were comparatively smaller in mandibles involving a smaller area of reconstruction. Hence, fixed prosthesis could be advised and a bar retained over denture for reconstruction for larger area of reconstruction.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Nesappan</LastName>
<ForeName>Thiyaneswaran</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Ariga</LastName>
<ForeName>Padma</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Professor and H.O.D, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University , Velappanchavadi, Chennai, India .</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>India</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Clin Diagn Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101488993</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0973-709X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jul;84(1):71-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2734406</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):80-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15642034</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Jan;56(1):38-44</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9437980</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2008;34(5):248-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19170290</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Oct;96(4):289-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17052474</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Scand J Dent Res. 1977 Mar;85(3):200-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">265612</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Feb;91(2):144-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14970760</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Jul;92 (1):23-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11458242</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):585-98</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11404759</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):103-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12562372</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):254-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15127996</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Spring;4(1):55-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2689336</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Dent. 2002 Sep-Nov;30(7-8):271-82</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12554107</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;30(3):170-77</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12220996</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 2000;26(2):77-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11831334</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Apr;17(2):220-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16584419</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):96-102</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1403929</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jul;34(5):290-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16781160</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jan;91(1):20-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14739889</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Feb;20(2):196-200</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19191796</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Apr;25(4):299-303</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9610858</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4190793</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Fibula graft</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Finite element analysis</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible reconstruction</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible rehabilitation</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Von mises stress</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25302267</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.7860/JCDR/2014/9147.4764</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4190793</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000894 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000894 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25302267
   |texte=   Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25302267" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020