Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.
Identifieur interne : 000731 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000730; suivant : 000732Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.
Auteurs : Marc O. Klein ; Eik Schiegnitz ; Bilal Al-NawasSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Restoration Failure.
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Weight-Bearing.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the survival and success rates of narrow-diameter implants (NDI) in different clinical indications compared to standard diameter implants.
PubMed: 24660189
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24660189Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Klein, Marc O" sort="Klein, Marc O" uniqKey="Klein M" first="Marc O" last="Klein">Marc O. Klein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schiegnitz, Eik" sort="Schiegnitz, Eik" uniqKey="Schiegnitz E" first="Eik" last="Schiegnitz">Eik Schiegnitz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Al Nawas, Bilal" sort="Al Nawas, Bilal" uniqKey="Al Nawas B" first="Bilal" last="Al-Nawas">Bilal Al-Nawas</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24660189</idno><idno type="pmid">24660189</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000731</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000731</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Klein, Marc O" sort="Klein, Marc O" uniqKey="Klein M" first="Marc O" last="Klein">Marc O. Klein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schiegnitz, Eik" sort="Schiegnitz, Eik" uniqKey="Schiegnitz E" first="Eik" last="Schiegnitz">Eik Schiegnitz</name></author><author><name sortKey="Al Nawas, Bilal" sort="Al Nawas, Bilal" uniqKey="Al Nawas B" first="Bilal" last="Al-Nawas">Bilal Al-Nawas</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this systematic review was to determine the survival and success rates of narrow-diameter implants (NDI) in different clinical indications compared to standard diameter implants.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24660189</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>29 Suppl</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>43-54</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.3</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of this systematic review was to determine the survival and success rates of narrow-diameter implants (NDI) in different clinical indications compared to standard diameter implants.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Implant diameters were categorized into categories 1 (< 3.0 mm), 2 (3.00 to 3.25 mm), and 3 (3.30 to 3.50 mm). Retro- and prospective studies with more than 10 patients and a follow-up time of 1 year or more were included.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A literature search from 1995 to 2012 revealed 10 articles reporting on implant diameters < 3 mm (Category 1), 12 articles reporting on implant diameters 3 to 3.25 mm (Category 2), and 16 articles reporting on implant diameters 3.3 to 3.5 mm (Category 3). The quality of the studies was mostly low with a high risk of bias. Dental implants < 3.0 mm (mini-implants) were one-piece in the edentulous arch and non-loaded frontal region with survival rates between 90.9% and 100%. For dental implants with a diameter between 3.0 and 3.25 mm, most were two-piece implants inserted into narrow tooth gaps without loading and in the frontal region. Survival rates for these implants ranged between 93.8% and 100%. Implants of 3.3 to 3.5 mm were two-piece and were also used in the load-bearing posterior region. Survival rates were between 88.9% and 100%, and success rates ranged between 91.4% and 97.6%. A meta-analysis was conducted for NDI (3.3 to 3.5 mm), which showed no statistically significant difference in implant survival compared to conventional implants with an odds ratio of 1.16 (0.7 to 1.69).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Narrow-diameter implants of 3.3 to 3.5 mm are well documented in all indications including load-bearing posterior regions. Smaller implants of 3.0 to 3.25 mm in diameter are well documented only for single-tooth non-load-bearing regions. Mini-implants < 3.0 mm in diameter are only documented for the edentulous arch and single-tooth non-load-bearing regions, and success rates are not available. Long-term follow-up times > 1 year and information on patient specific risk factors (bruxism, restoration type) are also missing.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Klein</LastName><ForeName>Marc O</ForeName><Initials>MO</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schiegnitz</LastName><ForeName>Eik</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Al-Nawas</LastName><ForeName>Bilal</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016474" MajorTopicYN="N">Weight-Bearing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24660189</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000731 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000731 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24660189
|texte= Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24660189" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |