Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Identifieur interne : 000301 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000300; suivant : 000302Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Auteurs : Azin Parsa ; Norliza Ibrahim ; Bassam Hassan ; Paul Van Der Stelt ; Daniel WismeijerSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Algorithms, Bone Density, Cadaver, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Multidetector Computed Tomography (methods), Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, X-Ray Microtomography (methods).
- MESH :
Abstract
The first purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and calibrated radiographic bone density Hounsfield units (HU) in human jaws, derived from micro-CT and multislice computed tomography (MSCT), respectively. The second aim was to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in evaluating trabecular bone density and microstructure using MSCT and micro-CT, respectively, as reference gold standards.
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12315
PubMed: 24325572
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24325572Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.</title><author><name sortKey="Parsa, Azin" sort="Parsa, Azin" uniqKey="Parsa A" first="Azin" last="Parsa">Azin Parsa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, Department of General and Specialized Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ibrahim, Norliza" sort="Ibrahim, Norliza" uniqKey="Ibrahim N" first="Norliza" last="Ibrahim">Norliza Ibrahim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hassan, Bassam" sort="Hassan, Bassam" uniqKey="Hassan B" first="Bassam" last="Hassan">Bassam Hassan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Stelt, Paul" sort="Van Der Stelt, Paul" uniqKey="Van Der Stelt P" first="Paul" last="Van Der Stelt">Paul Van Der Stelt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniel" last="Wismeijer">Daniel Wismeijer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24325572</idno><idno type="pmid">24325572</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12315</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000301</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000301</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.</title><author><name sortKey="Parsa, Azin" sort="Parsa, Azin" uniqKey="Parsa A" first="Azin" last="Parsa">Azin Parsa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, Department of General and Specialized Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ibrahim, Norliza" sort="Ibrahim, Norliza" uniqKey="Ibrahim N" first="Norliza" last="Ibrahim">Norliza Ibrahim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hassan, Bassam" sort="Hassan, Bassam" uniqKey="Hassan B" first="Bassam" last="Hassan">Bassam Hassan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Stelt, Paul" sort="Van Der Stelt, Paul" uniqKey="Van Der Stelt P" first="Paul" last="Van Der Stelt">Paul Van Der Stelt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Daniel" sort="Wismeijer, Daniel" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Daniel" last="Wismeijer">Daniel Wismeijer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithms</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Multidetector Computed Tomography (methods)</term><term>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Multidetector Computed Tomography</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithms</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Humans</term><term>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The first purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and calibrated radiographic bone density Hounsfield units (HU) in human jaws, derived from micro-CT and multislice computed tomography (MSCT), respectively. The second aim was to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in evaluating trabecular bone density and microstructure using MSCT and micro-CT, respectively, as reference gold standards.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24325572</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>03</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>26</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e1-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/clr.12315</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The first purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and calibrated radiographic bone density Hounsfield units (HU) in human jaws, derived from micro-CT and multislice computed tomography (MSCT), respectively. The second aim was to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in evaluating trabecular bone density and microstructure using MSCT and micro-CT, respectively, as reference gold standards.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty partially edentulous human mandibular cadavers were scanned by three types of CT modalities: MSCT (Philips, Best, the Netherlands), CBCT (3D Accuitomo 170, J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), and micro-CT (SkyScan 1173, Kontich, Belgium). Image analysis was performed using Amira (v4.1, Visage Imaging Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), 3Diagnosis (v5.3.1, 3diemme, Cantu, Italy), Geomagic (studio(®) 2012, Morrisville, NC, USA), and CTAn (v1.11, SkyScan). MSCT, CBCT, and micro-CT scans of each mandible were matched to select the exact region of interest (ROI). MSCT HU, micro-CT BV/TV, and CBCT gray value and bone volume fraction of each ROI were derived. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlations between corresponding measurement parameters.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Strong correlations were observed between CBCT and MSCT density (r = 0.89) and between CBCT and micro-CT BV/TV measurements (r = 0.82). Excellent correlation was observed between MSCT HU and micro-CT BV/TV (r = 0.91). However, significant differences were found between all comparisons pairs (P < 0.001) except for mean measurement between CBCT BV/TV and micro-CT BV/TV (P = 0.147).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">An excellent correlation exists between bone volume fraction and bone density as assessed on micro-CT and MSCT, respectively. This suggests that bone density measurements could be used to estimate bone microstructural parameters. A strong correlation also was found between CBCT gray values and BV/TV and their gold standards, suggesting the potential of this modality in bone quality assessment at implant site.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Parsa</LastName><ForeName>Azin</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Section of Oral Radiology, Department of General and Specialized Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ibrahim</LastName><ForeName>Norliza</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hassan</LastName><ForeName>Bassam</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Stelt</LastName><ForeName>Paul</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wismeijer</LastName><ForeName>Daniel</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000465" MajorTopicYN="N">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="Y">Bone Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002102" MajorTopicYN="N">Cadaver</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054893" MajorTopicYN="N">Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D061330" MajorTopicYN="N">Multidetector Computed Tomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011857" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055114" MajorTopicYN="N">X-Ray Microtomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone density</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">bone volume fraction</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cone beam computed tomography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">dental implants</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">micro-computed tomography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">multislice computed tomography</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24325572</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/clr.12315</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24325572
|texte= Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24325572" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |