Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.
Identifieur interne : 000173 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000172; suivant : 000174Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.
Auteurs : Alberto Monje ; Florencio Monje ; Hsun-Liang Chan ; Fernando Suarez ; Laura Villanueva-Alcojol ; Agustin Garcia-Nogales ; Hom-Lay WangSource :
- The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry [ 1945-3388 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.
- transplantation : Mandible, Skull.
- ultrastructure : Mandible, Skull.
- Adult, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, X-Ray Microtomography, Young Adult.
Abstract
The primary purpose of this clinical study was to compare architectural metric parameters using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) between sites grafted with blocks harvested from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation in the maxilla. The second aim was to compare the primary stability of implants placed in both types of block grafts. Ten consecutive healthy partially edentulous patients requiring extensive horizontal bone reconstruction in the maxilla were included. A total of 14 block grafts (7 each from the mandibular ramus and calvarium) were studied. After 4 to 6 months of healing, 41 implants were placed: 24 implants (58.5%) in calvarial (group 1) and 17 (41.5%) in ramus grafts (group 2). A resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed to test implant stability. Furthermore, two biopsy specimens were randomly selected for histomorphometric analysis. Micro-CT analyses showed no significant difference in the morphometric parametric values analyzed between groups. Furthermore, RFA also showed no difference between groups. However, slightly higher RFA values were noted for implants placed in ramus grafts. Bone quality, as assessed by micro-CT and histomorphometric analyses, was similar in both ramus and calvarial block grafts. In addition, there was no difference in primary implant stability between groups.
PubMed: 24116370
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24116370Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.</title><author><name sortKey="Monje, Alberto" sort="Monje, Alberto" uniqKey="Monje A" first="Alberto" last="Monje">Alberto Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monje, Florencio" sort="Monje, Florencio" uniqKey="Monje F" first="Florencio" last="Monje">Florencio Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chan, Hsun Liang" sort="Chan, Hsun Liang" uniqKey="Chan H" first="Hsun-Liang" last="Chan">Hsun-Liang Chan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suarez, Fernando" sort="Suarez, Fernando" uniqKey="Suarez F" first="Fernando" last="Suarez">Fernando Suarez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Villanueva Alcojol, Laura" sort="Villanueva Alcojol, Laura" uniqKey="Villanueva Alcojol L" first="Laura" last="Villanueva-Alcojol">Laura Villanueva-Alcojol</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garcia Nogales, Agustin" sort="Garcia Nogales, Agustin" uniqKey="Garcia Nogales A" first="Agustin" last="Garcia-Nogales">Agustin Garcia-Nogales</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2013 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24116370</idno><idno type="pmid">24116370</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000173</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000173</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.</title><author><name sortKey="Monje, Alberto" sort="Monje, Alberto" uniqKey="Monje A" first="Alberto" last="Monje">Alberto Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monje, Florencio" sort="Monje, Florencio" uniqKey="Monje F" first="Florencio" last="Monje">Florencio Monje</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chan, Hsun Liang" sort="Chan, Hsun Liang" uniqKey="Chan H" first="Hsun-Liang" last="Chan">Hsun-Liang Chan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suarez, Fernando" sort="Suarez, Fernando" uniqKey="Suarez F" first="Fernando" last="Suarez">Fernando Suarez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Villanueva Alcojol, Laura" sort="Villanueva Alcojol, Laura" uniqKey="Villanueva Alcojol L" first="Laura" last="Villanueva-Alcojol">Laura Villanueva-Alcojol</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garcia Nogales, Agustin" sort="Garcia Nogales, Agustin" uniqKey="Garcia Nogales A" first="Agustin" last="Garcia-Nogales">Agustin Garcia-Nogales</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Hom Lay" sort="Wang, Hom Lay" uniqKey="Wang H" first="Hom-Lay" last="Wang">Hom-Lay Wang</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry</title><idno type="eISSN">1945-3388</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (transplantation)</term><term>Mandible (ultrastructure)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Skull (transplantation)</term><term>Skull (ultrastructure)</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transplantation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Skull</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ultrastructure" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Skull</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>X-Ray Microtomography</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The primary purpose of this clinical study was to compare architectural metric parameters using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) between sites grafted with blocks harvested from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation in the maxilla. The second aim was to compare the primary stability of implants placed in both types of block grafts. Ten consecutive healthy partially edentulous patients requiring extensive horizontal bone reconstruction in the maxilla were included. A total of 14 block grafts (7 each from the mandibular ramus and calvarium) were studied. After 4 to 6 months of healing, 41 implants were placed: 24 implants (58.5%) in calvarial (group 1) and 17 (41.5%) in ramus grafts (group 2). A resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed to test implant stability. Furthermore, two biopsy specimens were randomly selected for histomorphometric analysis. Micro-CT analyses showed no significant difference in the morphometric parametric values analyzed between groups. Furthermore, RFA also showed no difference between groups. However, slightly higher RFA values were noted for implants placed in ramus grafts. Bone quality, as assessed by micro-CT and histomorphometric analyses, was similar in both ramus and calvarial block grafts. In addition, there was no difference in primary implant stability between groups.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24116370</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1945-3388</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>33</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2013 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e153-61</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/prd.1664</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The primary purpose of this clinical study was to compare architectural metric parameters using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) between sites grafted with blocks harvested from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation in the maxilla. The second aim was to compare the primary stability of implants placed in both types of block grafts. Ten consecutive healthy partially edentulous patients requiring extensive horizontal bone reconstruction in the maxilla were included. A total of 14 block grafts (7 each from the mandibular ramus and calvarium) were studied. After 4 to 6 months of healing, 41 implants were placed: 24 implants (58.5%) in calvarial (group 1) and 17 (41.5%) in ramus grafts (group 2). A resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed to test implant stability. Furthermore, two biopsy specimens were randomly selected for histomorphometric analysis. Micro-CT analyses showed no significant difference in the morphometric parametric values analyzed between groups. Furthermore, RFA also showed no difference between groups. However, slightly higher RFA values were noted for implants placed in ramus grafts. Bone quality, as assessed by micro-CT and histomorphometric analyses, was similar in both ramus and calvarial block grafts. In addition, there was no difference in primary implant stability between groups.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Monje</LastName><ForeName>Alberto</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Monje</LastName><ForeName>Florencio</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chan</LastName><ForeName>Hsun-Liang</ForeName><Initials>HL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Suarez</LastName><ForeName>Fernando</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Villanueva-Alcojol</LastName><ForeName>Laura</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Garcia-Nogales</LastName><ForeName>Agustin</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Hom-Lay</ForeName><Initials>HL</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8200894</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0198-7569</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000637" MajorTopicYN="N">transplantation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000648" MajorTopicYN="Y">ultrastructure</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012886" MajorTopicYN="N">Skull</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000637" MajorTopicYN="N">transplantation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000648" MajorTopicYN="Y">ultrastructure</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055114" MajorTopicYN="N">X-Ray Microtomography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24116370</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000173 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000173 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24116370
|texte= Comparison of microstructures between block grafts from the mandibular ramus and calvarium for horizontal bone augmentation of the maxilla: a case series study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24116370" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |