Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.

Identifieur interne : 000127 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000126; suivant : 000128

A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.

Auteurs : Jins John ; V. Rangarajan ; Ravindra C. Savadi ; K S Satheesh Kumar ; Preeti Satheesh Kumar

Source :

RBID : pubmed:23450217

Abstract

Today implant dentistry has made great inroads into the treatment modalities that are available in treating an edentulous patient. Popularity of a two implant retained overdenture has created a necessity to examine the various attachment systems being used and the stresses that are transmitted to the alveolar bone. Hence a Three dimensional Finite Element Analysis was done to analyze the stress distribution in the mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture having Ball/O-ring and Magnet attachments of different diameters. A segment of the anterior region of the mandible was modeled with implant and the overdenture. Four different models were generated having Ball/O-Ring and Magnet Attachments. Forces of 10 N, 35 N and 70 N were applied from the horizontal, vertical and oblique directions respectively and the stress distribution studied. It was concluded that the greatest stress concentrations were seen at the crest of the cortical bone and could be reduced by using smaller sized attachments for implant supported-overdenture.

DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0
PubMed: 23450217

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:23450217

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="John, Jins" sort="John, Jins" uniqKey="John J" first="Jins" last="John">Jins John</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>The Oxford Dental College, Bangalore, 560 068 India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rangarajan, V" sort="Rangarajan, V" uniqKey="Rangarajan V" first="V" last="Rangarajan">V. Rangarajan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Savadi, Ravindra C" sort="Savadi, Ravindra C" uniqKey="Savadi R" first="Ravindra C" last="Savadi">Ravindra C. Savadi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Satheesh Kumar, K S" sort="Satheesh Kumar, K S" uniqKey="Satheesh Kumar K" first="K S" last="Satheesh Kumar">K S Satheesh Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Satheesh Kumar, Preeti" sort="Satheesh Kumar, Preeti" uniqKey="Satheesh Kumar P" first="Preeti" last="Satheesh Kumar">Preeti Satheesh Kumar</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23450217</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23450217</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000127</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000127</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="John, Jins" sort="John, Jins" uniqKey="John J" first="Jins" last="John">Jins John</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>The Oxford Dental College, Bangalore, 560 068 India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rangarajan, V" sort="Rangarajan, V" uniqKey="Rangarajan V" first="V" last="Rangarajan">V. Rangarajan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Savadi, Ravindra C" sort="Savadi, Ravindra C" uniqKey="Savadi R" first="Ravindra C" last="Savadi">Ravindra C. Savadi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Satheesh Kumar, K S" sort="Satheesh Kumar, K S" uniqKey="Satheesh Kumar K" first="K S" last="Satheesh Kumar">K S Satheesh Kumar</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Satheesh Kumar, Preeti" sort="Satheesh Kumar, Preeti" uniqKey="Satheesh Kumar P" first="Preeti" last="Satheesh Kumar">Preeti Satheesh Kumar</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Today implant dentistry has made great inroads into the treatment modalities that are available in treating an edentulous patient. Popularity of a two implant retained overdenture has created a necessity to examine the various attachment systems being used and the stresses that are transmitted to the alveolar bone. Hence a Three dimensional Finite Element Analysis was done to analyze the stress distribution in the mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture having Ball/O-ring and Magnet attachments of different diameters. A segment of the anterior region of the mandible was modeled with implant and the overdenture. Four different models were generated having Ball/O-Ring and Magnet Attachments. Forces of 10 N, 35 N and 70 N were applied from the horizontal, vertical and oblique directions respectively and the stress distribution studied. It was concluded that the greatest stress concentrations were seen at the crest of the cortical bone and could be reduced by using smaller sized attachments for implant supported-overdenture.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">23450217</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0972-4052</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>12</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>Mar</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>37-44</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Today implant dentistry has made great inroads into the treatment modalities that are available in treating an edentulous patient. Popularity of a two implant retained overdenture has created a necessity to examine the various attachment systems being used and the stresses that are transmitted to the alveolar bone. Hence a Three dimensional Finite Element Analysis was done to analyze the stress distribution in the mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture having Ball/O-ring and Magnet attachments of different diameters. A segment of the anterior region of the mandible was modeled with implant and the overdenture. Four different models were generated having Ball/O-Ring and Magnet Attachments. Forces of 10 N, 35 N and 70 N were applied from the horizontal, vertical and oblique directions respectively and the stress distribution studied. It was concluded that the greatest stress concentrations were seen at the crest of the cortical bone and could be reduced by using smaller sized attachments for implant supported-overdenture.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>John</LastName>
<ForeName>Jins</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>The Oxford Dental College, Bangalore, 560 068 India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Rangarajan</LastName>
<ForeName>V</ForeName>
<Initials>V</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Savadi</LastName>
<ForeName>Ravindra C</ForeName>
<Initials>RC</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Satheesh Kumar</LastName>
<ForeName>K S</ForeName>
<Initials>KS</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Satheesh Kumar</LastName>
<ForeName>Preeti</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>India</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101255941</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0972-4052</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Oct;86(4):434-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11677540</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Gerodontology. 2002 Jul;19(1):3-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12164236</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Implantol. 1998;24(3):147-51</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9893521</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Mar-Apr;4(2):175-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1781881</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):152-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18546771</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Feb;91(2):144-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14970760</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):675-84</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14579955</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthodont. 2005 Mar;14(1):3-11</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15733129</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Dent Res. 2002 Mar;81(3):170-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11881630</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Nov;23(11):757-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8953480</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):585-98</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11404759</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):203-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8329099</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):137-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11514799</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Biomech. 1988;21(7):563-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3410859</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):507-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17323731</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):271-5</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18081872</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Jan;79(1):66-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9474544</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):128-34</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12737242</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):229-35</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17499093</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Jun;96(3):235-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3293189</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Br Dent J. 1995 Nov 11;179(9):329-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7495628</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):559-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9813806</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jul;68(1):96-102</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1403929</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Dent Res. 1983 Feb;62(2):155-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">6571869</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Aug;106(2):78-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21821161</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Apr;73(4):354-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7783014</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3332316</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Finite element analysis</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Implant</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mandibular</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Overdenture</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2012</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>2</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>2</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>2</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23450217</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0114-0</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">114</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3332316</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000127 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000127 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23450217
   |texte=   A finite element analysis of stress distribution in the bone, around the implant supporting a mandibular overdenture with ball/o ring and magnetic attachment.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23450217" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020