Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
Identifieur interne : 000D09 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000D08; suivant : 000D10Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
Auteurs : Panos Papaspyridakos ; Chun-Jung Chen ; German O. Gallucci ; Asterios Doukoudakis ; Hans-Peter Weber ; Vasilios ChronopoulosSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- standards : Computer-Aided Design, Dental Impression Technique.
- Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mouth, Edentulous.
Abstract
To compare the accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques for partially and completely edentulous patients and to determine the effect of different variables on the accuracy outcomes.
PubMed: 25032763
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25032763Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Chun Jung" sort="Chen, Chun Jung" uniqKey="Chen C" first="Chun-Jung" last="Chen">Chun-Jung Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Doukoudakis, Asterios" sort="Doukoudakis, Asterios" uniqKey="Doukoudakis A" first="Asterios" last="Doukoudakis">Asterios Doukoudakis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" sort="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" uniqKey="Chronopoulos V" first="Vasilios" last="Chronopoulos">Vasilios Chronopoulos</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25032763</idno><idno type="pmid">25032763</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000665</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000665</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000665</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000665</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000665</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000665</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Chun Jung" sort="Chen, Chun Jung" uniqKey="Chen C" first="Chun-Jung" last="Chen">Chun-Jung Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Doukoudakis, Asterios" sort="Doukoudakis, Asterios" uniqKey="Doukoudakis A" first="Asterios" last="Doukoudakis">Asterios Doukoudakis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" sort="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" uniqKey="Chronopoulos V" first="Vasilios" last="Chronopoulos">Vasilios Chronopoulos</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design (standards)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (standards)</term><term>Humans</term><term>In Vitro Techniques</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Conception assistée par ordinateur (normes)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (normes)</term><term>Techniques in vitro</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Conception assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>In Vitro Techniques</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Techniques in vitro</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques for partially and completely edentulous patients and to determine the effect of different variables on the accuracy outcomes.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25032763</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>29</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>836-45</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.3625</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques for partially and completely edentulous patients and to determine the effect of different variables on the accuracy outcomes.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">An electronic and manual search was conducted to identify studies reporting on the accuracy of implant impressions. Pooled data were descriptively analyzed. Factors affecting the accuracy were identified, and their impact on accuracy outcomes was assessed.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The 76 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria featured 4 clinical studies and 72 in vitro studies. Studies were grouped according to edentulism; 41 reported on completely edentulous and 35 on partially edentulous patients. For completely edentulous patients, most in vitro studies and all three clinical studies demonstrated better accuracy with the splinted vs the nonsplinted technique (15 studies, splint; 1, nonsplint; 9, no difference). One clinical study and half of the in vitro studies reported better accuracy with the open-tray vs the closed-tray technique (10 studies, open-tray; 1, closed-tray; 10, no difference). For partially edentulous patients, one clinical study and most in vitro studies showed better accuracy with the splinted vs the nonsplinted technique (8 studies, splint; 2, nonsplint; 3, no difference). The majority of in vitro studies showed better accuracy with the open-tray vs the closed-tray technique (10 studies, open-tray; 1, closed-tray; 7, no difference), but the only clinical study reported no difference.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The splinted impression technique is more accurate for both partially and completely edentulous patients. The open-tray technique is more accurate than the closed-tray for completely edentulous patients, but for partially edentulous patients there seems to be no difference. The impression material (polyether or polyvinylsiloxane) has no effect on the accuracy. The implant angulation affects the accuracy of implant impressions, while there are insufficient studies for the effect of implant connection type. Further accuracy studies are needed regarding digital implant impressions.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Papaspyridakos</LastName><ForeName>Panos</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chen</LastName><ForeName>Chun-Jung</ForeName><Initials>CJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gallucci</LastName><ForeName>German O</ForeName><Initials>GO</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Doukoudakis</LastName><ForeName>Asterios</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weber</LastName><ForeName>Hans-Peter</ForeName><Initials>HP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Chronopoulos</LastName><ForeName>Vasilios</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D066298" MajorTopicYN="N">In Vitro Techniques</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="Y">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="Y">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25032763</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Chen, Chun Jung" sort="Chen, Chun Jung" uniqKey="Chen C" first="Chun-Jung" last="Chen">Chun-Jung Chen</name><name sortKey="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" sort="Chronopoulos, Vasilios" uniqKey="Chronopoulos V" first="Vasilios" last="Chronopoulos">Vasilios Chronopoulos</name><name sortKey="Doukoudakis, Asterios" sort="Doukoudakis, Asterios" uniqKey="Doukoudakis A" first="Asterios" last="Doukoudakis">Asterios Doukoudakis</name><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D09 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000D09 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25032763
|texte= Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25032763" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |