Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.
Identifieur interne : 000A52 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000A51; suivant : 000A53Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.
Auteurs : M. Dhanraj [Inde] ; S. Anand [Inde] ; Padma Ariga [Inde]Source :
- Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2013.
Abstract
Microbial colonization in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth receiving all ceramic retainers with subgingival margins need to be studied to assess the prognosis of periodontal health, which determine the eventual success of fixed partial dentures. This prospective observational study was done to evaluate the quantitative alteration in the microbial flora in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth adjacent to the edentulous space prior and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively. Twenty, healthy partially edentulous patients, aged 20-50 years with single missing central incisor were selected for this prospective observational study and their microbial samples were collected from the gingival sulci of abutments adjacent to edentulous space with sterile paper points and cultured and the estimated values for microflora served as controls. The same abutments were prepared to receive all ceramic retainers with subgingival heavy chamfer marginal finish lines. The patients were recalled after 1 week, 1 month, 2 months intervals during which the collected subgingival microbial samples were cultured and the corresponding quantitative microbial alteration in the restored gingival sulci was recorded. The obtained data was statistically analysed using the student t test and repeated analysis of variance test. The results of the study inferred student t test expressed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) progressive increase in gingival sulcular microbial colonisation in the abutment teeth before [M = 2.52 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml] and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week [M = 3.25 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml], 1 month [M = 4.64 ± SD 1.13(10(6)) CFU/ml] and 2 months [M = 4.75 ± SD 1.16(10(6)) CFU/ml] respectively. The result of repeated analysis of variance test inferred that there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the subgingival microfloral count between the pre operative and post operative samples at 1 week, 1 month and 2 months. Subgingivally placed all-ceramic retainers with heavy chamfer finish lines in the abutment teeth demonstrated a statistically significant increase in sulcular microbial colonization over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively and this may affect periodontal health of abutment teeth progressively.
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0165-2
PubMed: 24431702
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24431702Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.</title><author><name sortKey="Dhanraj, M" sort="Dhanraj, M" uniqKey="Dhanraj M" first="M" last="Dhanraj">M. Dhanraj</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Anand, S" sort="Anand, S" uniqKey="Anand S" first="S" last="Anand">S. Anand</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ariga, Padma" sort="Ariga, Padma" uniqKey="Ariga P" first="Padma" last="Ariga">Padma Ariga</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24431702</idno><idno type="pmid">24431702</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0165-2</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000B51</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000B51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000B51</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000B51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000B51</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.</title><author><name sortKey="Dhanraj, M" sort="Dhanraj, M" uniqKey="Dhanraj M" first="M" last="Dhanraj">M. Dhanraj</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Anand, S" sort="Anand, S" uniqKey="Anand S" first="S" last="Anand">S. Anand</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ariga, Padma" sort="Ariga, Padma" uniqKey="Ariga P" first="Padma" last="Ariga">Padma Ariga</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Chennai</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Microbial colonization in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth receiving all ceramic retainers with subgingival margins need to be studied to assess the prognosis of periodontal health, which determine the eventual success of fixed partial dentures. This prospective observational study was done to evaluate the quantitative alteration in the microbial flora in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth adjacent to the edentulous space prior and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively. Twenty, healthy partially edentulous patients, aged 20-50 years with single missing central incisor were selected for this prospective observational study and their microbial samples were collected from the gingival sulci of abutments adjacent to edentulous space with sterile paper points and cultured and the estimated values for microflora served as controls. The same abutments were prepared to receive all ceramic retainers with subgingival heavy chamfer marginal finish lines. The patients were recalled after 1 week, 1 month, 2 months intervals during which the collected subgingival microbial samples were cultured and the corresponding quantitative microbial alteration in the restored gingival sulci was recorded. The obtained data was statistically analysed using the student t test and repeated analysis of variance test. The results of the study inferred student t test expressed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) progressive increase in gingival sulcular microbial colonisation in the abutment teeth before [M = 2.52 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml] and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week [M = 3.25 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml], 1 month [M = 4.64 ± SD 1.13(10(6)) CFU/ml] and 2 months [M = 4.75 ± SD 1.16(10(6)) CFU/ml] respectively. The result of repeated analysis of variance test inferred that there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the subgingival microfloral count between the pre operative and post operative samples at 1 week, 1 month and 2 months. Subgingivally placed all-ceramic retainers with heavy chamfer finish lines in the abutment teeth demonstrated a statistically significant increase in sulcular microbial colonization over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively and this may affect periodontal health of abutment teeth progressively.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24431702</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0972-4052</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>13</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>19-23</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s13191-012-0165-2</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Microbial colonization in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth receiving all ceramic retainers with subgingival margins need to be studied to assess the prognosis of periodontal health, which determine the eventual success of fixed partial dentures. This prospective observational study was done to evaluate the quantitative alteration in the microbial flora in the gingival sulci of abutment teeth adjacent to the edentulous space prior and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively. Twenty, healthy partially edentulous patients, aged 20-50 years with single missing central incisor were selected for this prospective observational study and their microbial samples were collected from the gingival sulci of abutments adjacent to edentulous space with sterile paper points and cultured and the estimated values for microflora served as controls. The same abutments were prepared to receive all ceramic retainers with subgingival heavy chamfer marginal finish lines. The patients were recalled after 1 week, 1 month, 2 months intervals during which the collected subgingival microbial samples were cultured and the corresponding quantitative microbial alteration in the restored gingival sulci was recorded. The obtained data was statistically analysed using the student t test and repeated analysis of variance test. The results of the study inferred student t test expressed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) progressive increase in gingival sulcular microbial colonisation in the abutment teeth before [M = 2.52 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml] and after receiving all ceramic retainers over varying time intervals of 1 week [M = 3.25 ± SD 1.21(10(6)) CFU/ml], 1 month [M = 4.64 ± SD 1.13(10(6)) CFU/ml] and 2 months [M = 4.75 ± SD 1.16(10(6)) CFU/ml] respectively. The result of repeated analysis of variance test inferred that there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the subgingival microfloral count between the pre operative and post operative samples at 1 week, 1 month and 2 months. Subgingivally placed all-ceramic retainers with heavy chamfer finish lines in the abutment teeth demonstrated a statistically significant increase in sulcular microbial colonization over varying time intervals of 1 week, 1 month and 2 months respectively and this may affect periodontal health of abutment teeth progressively.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dhanraj</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Anand</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ariga</LastName><ForeName>Padma</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, 600077 India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>03</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>India</Country><MedlineTA>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101255941</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0972-4052</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Sep;62(3):264-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2681694</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Infect Immun. 2011 Nov;79(11):4730-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21859855</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989;9(3):197-205</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2700985</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1998 Feb;13(1):1-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9573815</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 1988 Mar;67(3):588-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3170897</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontal Res. 1977 Mar;12(2):120-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">138729</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Sep;80(3):280-301</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9760360</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Scand J Dent Res. 1976 Jan;84(1):1-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1061986</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2003 Feb;18(1):37-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12588457</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Dent. 2010;21(4):96-100</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21269037</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Nov;43(11):5721-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16272510</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 1983 Nov;10(6):563-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6581173</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Periodontal Res. 1976 Feb;11(1):1-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">130475</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9(1):54-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9488248</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Dec;56(6):666-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3464748</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Jul;13(6):563-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3462203</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2001 May;28(5):377-88</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11350499</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Mar-Apr;138(3-4):143-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20499492</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2011;90(3):40-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21716237</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jun;28(6):499-507</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11350516</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1975 Feb;33(2):178-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1054412</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Oral Sci. 2004 Sep;46(3):157-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15508748</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3602532</OtherID><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">All-ceramic restorations</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Subgingival margins</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Subgingival microflora</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24431702</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0165-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">165</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3602532</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Inde</li></country></list><tree><country name="Inde"><noRegion><name sortKey="Dhanraj, M" sort="Dhanraj, M" uniqKey="Dhanraj M" first="M" last="Dhanraj">M. Dhanraj</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Anand, S" sort="Anand, S" uniqKey="Anand S" first="S" last="Anand">S. Anand</name><name sortKey="Ariga, Padma" sort="Ariga, Padma" uniqKey="Ariga P" first="Padma" last="Ariga">Padma Ariga</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A52 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000A52 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24431702
|texte= Evaluation of subgingival microflora in all ceramic restorations with subgingival heavy chamfer finish lines.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24431702" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |