Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.
Identifieur interne : 000995 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000994; suivant : 000996Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.
Auteurs : M A P G. Visconti [Brésil] ; F S Verner ; N M S P. Assis ; K L DevitoSource :
- International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 1399-0020 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle (), Mandibule (anatomie et histologie), Maxillaire (anatomie et histologie), Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire, Positionnement du patient (), Positionnement du patient (instrumentation), Radiographie dentaire (), Radiographie dentaire (instrumentation), Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique ().
- MESH :
- anatomie et histologie : Mandibule, Maxillaire.
- imagerie diagnostique : Mâchoire édentée.
- instrumentation : Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire, Positionnement du patient, Radiographie dentaire, Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods), Dental Implantation, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (anatomy & histology), Maxilla (anatomy & histology), Patient Care Planning, Patient Positioning (instrumentation), Patient Positioning (methods), Radiography, Dental (instrumentation), Radiography, Dental (methods).
- MESH :
- anatomy & histology : Mandible, Maxilla.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous.
- instrumentation : Patient Positioning, Radiography, Dental.
- methods : Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Patient Positioning, Radiography, Dental.
- Dental Implantation, Humans, Patient Care Planning.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of changes in maxillomandibular positioning during cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging on the planning of dental implants. Ten skulls were marked bilaterally with metal spheres in four regions: incisors, canine, premolars, and molars. CBCT scans were obtained in seven positions: standard position (SP), displacements of 10° and 20° above and below the SP, and lateral displacements of 10° and 20° from the SP. Subsequently, bilateral measurements of the height and width of the maxilla and mandible were performed on all images. The results showed that the position with a displacement of 20° above the SP presented the greatest differences in the measurements of bone height and width. In the bilateral comparisons, the maxillary bone width showed the greatest differences, especially for the regions of the premolars and molars. It is concluded that alterations of positioning during the acquisition of CBCT images can lead to alterations in the measurements of bone height and width, which may result in errors in implant planning and cause damage to anatomical structures.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.001
PubMed: 23566433
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23566433Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.</title><author><name sortKey="Visconti, M A P G" sort="Visconti, M A P G" uniqKey="Visconti M" first="M A P G" last="Visconti">M A P G. Visconti</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Minas Gerais</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verner, F S" sort="Verner, F S" uniqKey="Verner F" first="F S" last="Verner">F S Verner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Assis, N M S P" sort="Assis, N M S P" uniqKey="Assis N" first="N M S P" last="Assis">N M S P. Assis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Devito, K L" sort="Devito, K L" uniqKey="Devito K" first="K L" last="Devito">K L Devito</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23566433</idno><idno type="pmid">23566433</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.001</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000597</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000597</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000597</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000597</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000597</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000597</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.</title><author><name sortKey="Visconti, M A P G" sort="Visconti, M A P G" uniqKey="Visconti M" first="M A P G" last="Visconti">M A P G. Visconti</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Minas Gerais</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Verner, F S" sort="Verner, F S" uniqKey="Verner F" first="F S" last="Verner">F S Verner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Assis, N M S P" sort="Assis, N M S P" uniqKey="Assis N" first="N M S P" last="Assis">N M S P. Assis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Devito, K L" sort="Devito, K L" uniqKey="Devito K" first="K L" last="Devito">K L Devito</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><idno type="eISSN">1399-0020</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods)</term><term>Dental Implantation</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Maxilla (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Patient Positioning (instrumentation)</term><term>Patient Positioning (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Dental (instrumentation)</term><term>Radiography, Dental (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle ()</term><term>Mandibule (anatomie et histologie)</term><term>Maxillaire (anatomie et histologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire</term><term>Positionnement du patient ()</term><term>Positionnement du patient (instrumentation)</term><term>Radiographie dentaire ()</term><term>Radiographie dentaire (instrumentation)</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomie et histologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Patient Positioning</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Patient Positioning</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire</term><term>Positionnement du patient</term><term>Radiographie dentaire</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of changes in maxillomandibular positioning during cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging on the planning of dental implants. Ten skulls were marked bilaterally with metal spheres in four regions: incisors, canine, premolars, and molars. CBCT scans were obtained in seven positions: standard position (SP), displacements of 10° and 20° above and below the SP, and lateral displacements of 10° and 20° from the SP. Subsequently, bilateral measurements of the height and width of the maxilla and mandible were performed on all images. The results showed that the position with a displacement of 20° above the SP presented the greatest differences in the measurements of bone height and width. In the bilateral comparisons, the maxillary bone width showed the greatest differences, especially for the regions of the premolars and molars. It is concluded that alterations of positioning during the acquisition of CBCT images can lead to alterations in the measurements of bone height and width, which may result in errors in implant planning and cause damage to anatomical structures.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23566433</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1399-0020</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>42</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>880-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.001</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0901-5027(13)00109-4</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of changes in maxillomandibular positioning during cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging on the planning of dental implants. Ten skulls were marked bilaterally with metal spheres in four regions: incisors, canine, premolars, and molars. CBCT scans were obtained in seven positions: standard position (SP), displacements of 10° and 20° above and below the SP, and lateral displacements of 10° and 20° from the SP. Subsequently, bilateral measurements of the height and width of the maxilla and mandible were performed on all images. The results showed that the position with a displacement of 20° above the SP presented the greatest differences in the measurements of bone height and width. In the bilateral comparisons, the maxillary bone width showed the greatest differences, especially for the regions of the premolars and molars. It is concluded that alterations of positioning during the acquisition of CBCT images can lead to alterations in the measurements of bone height and width, which may result in errors in implant planning and cause damage to anatomical structures.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Visconti</LastName><ForeName>M A P G</ForeName><Initials>MA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Verner</LastName><ForeName>F S</ForeName><Initials>FS</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Assis</LastName><ForeName>N M S P</ForeName><Initials>NM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Devito</LastName><ForeName>K L</ForeName><Initials>KL</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8605826</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0901-5027</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054893" MajorTopicYN="N">Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003757" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="Y">anatomy & histology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="Y">anatomy & histology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D056888" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Positioning</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011861" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Dental</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23566433</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0901-5027(13)00109-4</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.001</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Brésil</li></country><region><li>Minas Gerais</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Assis, N M S P" sort="Assis, N M S P" uniqKey="Assis N" first="N M S P" last="Assis">N M S P. Assis</name><name sortKey="Devito, K L" sort="Devito, K L" uniqKey="Devito K" first="K L" last="Devito">K L Devito</name><name sortKey="Verner, F S" sort="Verner, F S" uniqKey="Verner F" first="F S" last="Verner">F S Verner</name></noCountry><country name="Brésil"><region name="Minas Gerais"><name sortKey="Visconti, M A P G" sort="Visconti, M A P G" uniqKey="Visconti M" first="M A P G" last="Visconti">M A P G. Visconti</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000995 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000995 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23566433
|texte= Influence of maxillomandibular positioning in cone beam computed tomography for implant planning.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23566433" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |