Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?
Identifieur interne : 000986 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000985; suivant : 000987Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?
Auteurs : M. Cassetta [Italie] ; A. Di Mambro ; M. Giansanti ; L V Stefanelli ; E. BarbatoSource :
- International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery [ 1399-0020 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle (), Mandibule (), Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Maxillaire (), Maxillaire (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâle, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation), Résultat thérapeutique, Tomodensitométrie, Traitement d'image par ordinateur (), Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mandibule, Maxillaire.
- instrumentation : Adulte, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Résultat thérapeutique, Tomodensitométrie, Traitement d'image par ordinateur, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted (methods), Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (surgery), Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Mandible, Maxilla.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
When using a stereolithographic surgical guide, a potentially clinically relevant error may be the mechanical error caused by the bur guide cylinder gap due to the presence of a rotational allowance of drills in the tubes. The aim of the present study was to determine if it is possible to reduce the total error by limiting the tolerance among the mechanical components and to evaluate its clinical incidence. Sixty implants were inserted in eight totally edentate subjects using the External Hex Safe(®) system with mechanical components modified to minimize the tolerance. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography images were compared, and the angular deviation was calculated between the planned and the placed implants. The mean angular deviation was 2.02° (range 0.81-3.48°; standard deviation 0.87). The results of the present study show that by limiting the error that originates from mechanical components, the total error could be significantly reduced.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.011
PubMed: 23428893
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23428893Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?</title><author><name sortKey="Cassetta, M" sort="Cassetta, M" uniqKey="Cassetta M" first="M" last="Cassetta">M. Cassetta</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. michele.cassetta@uniroma1.it</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Mambro, A" sort="Di Mambro, A" uniqKey="Di Mambro A" first="A" last="Di Mambro">A. Di Mambro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giansanti, M" sort="Giansanti, M" uniqKey="Giansanti M" first="M" last="Giansanti">M. Giansanti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stefanelli, L V" sort="Stefanelli, L V" uniqKey="Stefanelli L" first="L V" last="Stefanelli">L V Stefanelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barbato, E" sort="Barbato, E" uniqKey="Barbato E" first="E" last="Barbato">E. Barbato</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23428893</idno><idno type="pmid">23428893</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.011</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000603</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000603</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?</title><author><name sortKey="Cassetta, M" sort="Cassetta, M" uniqKey="Cassetta M" first="M" last="Cassetta">M. Cassetta</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. michele.cassetta@uniroma1.it</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Rome</settlement><region nuts="2">Latium</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Di Mambro, A" sort="Di Mambro, A" uniqKey="Di Mambro A" first="A" last="Di Mambro">A. Di Mambro</name></author><author><name sortKey="Giansanti, M" sort="Giansanti, M" uniqKey="Giansanti M" first="M" last="Giansanti">M. Giansanti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stefanelli, L V" sort="Stefanelli, L V" uniqKey="Stefanelli L" first="L V" last="Stefanelli">L V Stefanelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barbato, E" sort="Barbato, E" uniqKey="Barbato E" first="E" last="Barbato">E. Barbato</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><idno type="eISSN">1399-0020</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted (methods)</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle ()</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Maxillaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur ()</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term><term>Traitement d'image par ordinateur</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">When using a stereolithographic surgical guide, a potentially clinically relevant error may be the mechanical error caused by the bur guide cylinder gap due to the presence of a rotational allowance of drills in the tubes. The aim of the present study was to determine if it is possible to reduce the total error by limiting the tolerance among the mechanical components and to evaluate its clinical incidence. Sixty implants were inserted in eight totally edentate subjects using the External Hex Safe(®) system with mechanical components modified to minimize the tolerance. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography images were compared, and the angular deviation was calculated between the planned and the placed implants. The mean angular deviation was 2.02° (range 0.81-3.48°; standard deviation 0.87). The results of the present study show that by limiting the error that originates from mechanical components, the total error could be significantly reduced.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23428893</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1399-0020</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>42</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>887-90</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.011</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0901-5027(13)00030-1</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>When using a stereolithographic surgical guide, a potentially clinically relevant error may be the mechanical error caused by the bur guide cylinder gap due to the presence of a rotational allowance of drills in the tubes. The aim of the present study was to determine if it is possible to reduce the total error by limiting the tolerance among the mechanical components and to evaluate its clinical incidence. Sixty implants were inserted in eight totally edentate subjects using the External Hex Safe(®) system with mechanical components modified to minimize the tolerance. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography images were compared, and the angular deviation was calculated between the planned and the placed implants. The mean angular deviation was 2.02° (range 0.81-3.48°; standard deviation 0.87). The results of the present study show that by limiting the error that originates from mechanical components, the total error could be significantly reduced.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cassetta</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. michele.cassetta@uniroma1.it</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Di Mambro</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Giansanti</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stefanelli</LastName><ForeName>L V</ForeName><Initials>LV</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Barbato</LastName><ForeName>E</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>18</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8605826</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0901-5027</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007091" MajorTopicYN="N">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23428893</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0901-5027(13)00030-1</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.011</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li></country><region><li>Latium</li></region><settlement><li>Rome</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Barbato, E" sort="Barbato, E" uniqKey="Barbato E" first="E" last="Barbato">E. Barbato</name><name sortKey="Di Mambro, A" sort="Di Mambro, A" uniqKey="Di Mambro A" first="A" last="Di Mambro">A. Di Mambro</name><name sortKey="Giansanti, M" sort="Giansanti, M" uniqKey="Giansanti M" first="M" last="Giansanti">M. Giansanti</name><name sortKey="Stefanelli, L V" sort="Stefanelli, L V" uniqKey="Stefanelli L" first="L V" last="Stefanelli">L V Stefanelli</name></noCountry><country name="Italie"><region name="Latium"><name sortKey="Cassetta, M" sort="Cassetta, M" uniqKey="Cassetta M" first="M" last="Cassetta">M. Cassetta</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000986 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000986 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23428893
|texte= Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23428893" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |