Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.
Identifieur interne : 000923 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000922; suivant : 000924Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.
Auteurs : Subash M. Reddy ; Chenthil Arun Mohan ; D. Vijitha ; R. Balasubramanian ; A. Satish ; Mahendira KumarSource :
- Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2013.
Abstract
Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2
PubMed: 24431783
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24431783Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Reddy, Subash M" sort="Reddy, Subash M" uniqKey="Reddy S" first="Subash M" last="Reddy">Subash M. Reddy</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" sort="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" uniqKey="Mohan C" first="Chenthil Arun" last="Mohan">Chenthil Arun Mohan</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vijitha, D" sort="Vijitha, D" uniqKey="Vijitha D" first="D" last="Vijitha">D. Vijitha</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Balasubramanian, R" sort="Balasubramanian, R" uniqKey="Balasubramanian R" first="R" last="Balasubramanian">R. Balasubramanian</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Satish, A" sort="Satish, A" uniqKey="Satish A" first="A" last="Satish">A. Satish</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kumar, Mahendira" sort="Kumar, Mahendira" uniqKey="Kumar M" first="Mahendira" last="Kumar">Mahendira Kumar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24431783</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24431783</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000C06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000C06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000C06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000C06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000C06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000C06</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Reddy, Subash M" sort="Reddy, Subash M" uniqKey="Reddy S" first="Subash M" last="Reddy">Subash M. Reddy</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" sort="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" uniqKey="Mohan C" first="Chenthil Arun" last="Mohan">Chenthil Arun Mohan</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vijitha, D" sort="Vijitha, D" uniqKey="Vijitha D" first="D" last="Vijitha">D. Vijitha</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Balasubramanian, R" sort="Balasubramanian, R" uniqKey="Balasubramanian R" first="R" last="Balasubramanian">R. Balasubramanian</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Satish, A" sort="Satish, A" uniqKey="Satish A" first="A" last="Satish">A. Satish</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kumar, Mahendira" sort="Kumar, Mahendira" uniqKey="Kumar M" first="Mahendira" last="Kumar">Mahendira Kumar</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</nlm:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">608002 Tamil Nadu India</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24431783</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0972-4052</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>13</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>Dec</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>509-12</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reddy</LastName>
<ForeName>Subash M</ForeName>
<Initials>SM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mohan</LastName>
<ForeName>Chenthil Arun</ForeName>
<Initials>CA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vijitha</LastName>
<ForeName>D</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Balasubramanian</LastName>
<ForeName>R</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Satish</LastName>
<ForeName>A</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kumar</LastName>
<ForeName>Mahendira</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College & Hospital, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 608002 Tamil Nadu India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>India</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Indian Prosthodont Soc</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101255941</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0972-4052</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Dec;46(6):610-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7028974</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep;11(3):155-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12237795</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):95-101</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16650009</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1951 Jul;1(4):472-91</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14851324</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 1969 Oct;22(4):400-13</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4898313</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):570-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15211300</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dent Clin North Am. 1970 Jul;14(3):453-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4912039</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3792318</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Impression material</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Impression pressure</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Residual alveolar ridge</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Strain gauge</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Tray design</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24431783</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">201</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3792318</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Balasubramanian, R" sort="Balasubramanian, R" uniqKey="Balasubramanian R" first="R" last="Balasubramanian">R. Balasubramanian</name>
<name sortKey="Kumar, Mahendira" sort="Kumar, Mahendira" uniqKey="Kumar M" first="Mahendira" last="Kumar">Mahendira Kumar</name>
<name sortKey="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" sort="Mohan, Chenthil Arun" uniqKey="Mohan C" first="Chenthil Arun" last="Mohan">Chenthil Arun Mohan</name>
<name sortKey="Reddy, Subash M" sort="Reddy, Subash M" uniqKey="Reddy S" first="Subash M" last="Reddy">Subash M. Reddy</name>
<name sortKey="Satish, A" sort="Satish, A" uniqKey="Satish A" first="A" last="Satish">A. Satish</name>
<name sortKey="Vijitha, D" sort="Vijitha, D" uniqKey="Vijitha D" first="D" last="Vijitha">D. Vijitha</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000923 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000923 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:24431783 |texte= Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24431783" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |