Inclusive fitness in agriculture
Identifieur interne : 000797 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000796; suivant : 000798Inclusive fitness in agriculture
Auteurs : E. Toby Kiers ; R. Ford DenisonSource :
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences [ 0962-8436 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
Trade-offs between individual fitness and the collective performance of crop and below-ground symbiont communities are common in agriculture. Plant competitiveness for light and soil resources is key to individual fitness, but higher investments in stems and roots by a plant community to compete for those resources ultimately reduce crop yields. Similarly, rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi may increase their individual fitness by diverting resources to their own reproduction, even if they could have benefited collectively by providing their shared crop host with more nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Past selection for inclusive fitness (benefits to others, weighted by their relatedness) is unlikely to have favoured community performance over individual fitness. The limited evidence for kin recognition in plants and microbes changes this conclusion only slightly. We therefore argue that there is still ample opportunity for human-imposed selection to improve cooperation among crop plants and their symbionts so that they use limited resources more efficiently. This evolutionarily informed approach will require a better understanding of how interactions among crops, and interactions with their symbionts, affected their inclusive fitness in the past and what that implies for current interactions.
Url:
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0367
PubMed: 24686938
PubMed Central: 3982668
Links to Exploration step
PMC:3982668Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Inclusive fitness in agriculture</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kiers, E Toby" sort="Kiers, E Toby" uniqKey="Kiers E" first="E. Toby" last="Kiers">E. Toby Kiers</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1"><addr-line>Institute of Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences</addr-line>
,<institution>Vrije Universiteit</institution>
,<addr-line>De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam</addr-line>
,<country>The Netherlands</country>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Denison, R Ford" sort="Denison, R Ford" uniqKey="Denison R" first="R. Ford" last="Denison">R. Ford Denison</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2"><addr-line>Ecology Evolution and Behavior</addr-line>
,<institution>University of Minnesota</institution>
,<addr-line>St Paul, MN 55108</addr-line>
,<country>USA</country>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24686938</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3982668</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3982668</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3982668</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2013.0367</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000797</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000797</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Inclusive fitness in agriculture</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kiers, E Toby" sort="Kiers, E Toby" uniqKey="Kiers E" first="E. Toby" last="Kiers">E. Toby Kiers</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af1"><addr-line>Institute of Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences</addr-line>
,<institution>Vrije Universiteit</institution>
,<addr-line>De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam</addr-line>
,<country>The Netherlands</country>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Denison, R Ford" sort="Denison, R Ford" uniqKey="Denison R" first="R. Ford" last="Denison">R. Ford Denison</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af2"><addr-line>Ecology Evolution and Behavior</addr-line>
,<institution>University of Minnesota</institution>
,<addr-line>St Paul, MN 55108</addr-line>
,<country>USA</country>
</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-8436</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1471-2970</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>Trade-offs between individual fitness and the collective performance of crop and below-ground symbiont communities are common in agriculture. Plant competitiveness for light and soil resources is key to individual fitness, but higher investments in stems and roots by a plant community to compete for those resources ultimately reduce crop yields. Similarly, rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi may increase their individual fitness by diverting resources to their own reproduction, even if they could have benefited collectively by providing their shared crop host with more nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Past selection for inclusive fitness (benefits to others, weighted by their relatedness) is unlikely to have favoured community performance over individual fitness. The limited evidence for kin recognition in plants and microbes changes this conclusion only slightly. We therefore argue that there is still ample opportunity for human-imposed selection to improve cooperation among crop plants and their symbionts so that they use limited resources more efficiently. This evolutionarily informed approach will require a better understanding of how interactions among crops, and interactions with their symbionts, affected their inclusive fitness in the past and what that implies for current interactions.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="review-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RSTB</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">royptb</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0962-8436</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1471-2970</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>The Royal Society</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24686938</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3982668</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2013.0367</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">rstb20130367</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="hwp-journal-coll"><subject>60</subject>
<subject>70</subject>
<subject>204</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="leader"><subject>Review Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Inclusive fitness in agriculture</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="short">Agricultural Evolution</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kiers</surname>
<given-names>E. Toby</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Denison</surname>
<given-names>R. Ford</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2">2</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1"><label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences</addr-line>
,<institution>Vrije Universiteit</institution>
,<addr-line>De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam</addr-line>
,<country>The Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<aff id="af2"><label>2</label>
<addr-line>Ecology Evolution and Behavior</addr-line>
,<institution>University of Minnesota</institution>
,<addr-line>St Paul, MN 55108</addr-line>
,<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<author-notes><corresp id="cor1">e-mail: <email>toby.kiers@vu.nl</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other"><p>One contribution of 14 to a Theme Issue ‘<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1642.toc">Inclusive fitness: 50 years on</ext-link>
’.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>19</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>369</volume>
<issue>1642</issue>
<issue-title>Theme Issue ‘Inclusive fitness: 50 years on’ compiled and edited by Andy Gardner and Stuart A. West</issue-title>
<elocation-id>20130367</elocation-id>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="rstb20130367.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract><p>Trade-offs between individual fitness and the collective performance of crop and below-ground symbiont communities are common in agriculture. Plant competitiveness for light and soil resources is key to individual fitness, but higher investments in stems and roots by a plant community to compete for those resources ultimately reduce crop yields. Similarly, rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi may increase their individual fitness by diverting resources to their own reproduction, even if they could have benefited collectively by providing their shared crop host with more nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Past selection for inclusive fitness (benefits to others, weighted by their relatedness) is unlikely to have favoured community performance over individual fitness. The limited evidence for kin recognition in plants and microbes changes this conclusion only slightly. We therefore argue that there is still ample opportunity for human-imposed selection to improve cooperation among crop plants and their symbionts so that they use limited resources more efficiently. This evolutionarily informed approach will require a better understanding of how interactions among crops, and interactions with their symbionts, affected their inclusive fitness in the past and what that implies for current interactions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd>breeding</kwd>
<kwd>cooperation</kwd>
<kwd>Darwinian agriculture</kwd>
<kwd>Hamilton</kwd>
<kwd>symbiosis</kwd>
<kwd>tragedy of the commons</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>cover-date</meta-name>
<meta-value>May 19, 2014</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000797 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000797 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV1 |flux= Pmc |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= PMC:3982668 |texte= Inclusive fitness in agriculture }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24686938" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |