Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study
Identifieur interne : 000064 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000063; suivant : 000065Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study
Auteurs : S. Rao ; R. ChowdharySource :
- The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2014.
Abstract
To evaluate the fracture toughness of cement-retained implant-supported metal–ceramic molar crown with that of all-ceramic crowns, fabricated using IPS Empress 2 and yttria-stabilized zirconia copings. An dental implant and abutment was embedded in a clear polymethyl methacrylate model. A wax pattern reproducing the anatomy and dimension of a mandibular molar was made using inlay wax. Copings were made from the manufacturers guidelines for zirconia, metal ceramic and empress crown, in total of 21 copings, which were built for the crowns with metal layering ceramics specified by the manufacturers. The polymethylmethacrylate block-implant abutment complex was mounted on universal testing machine, and a static continuos vertical compressive load with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min was applied. The breaking load and the peak load (in kilo Newtons) were recorded. The fractures for group I (zirconia–ceramic) and group II (metal–ceramic) occurred on the mesio-buccal aspect of the crowns involving the veneered ceramic layer while the catastrophic/bulk fracture was not observed. The mean value of breaking load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 3.4335, 3.071 and 1.0673 kN respectively. The mean value of peak load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 4.7365, 3.2757 and 1.566 kN respectively. It can be concluded that the zirconia–ceramic crown with the fracture toughness of 4.7365 ± 2.2676 kN has sufficient strength to allow clinical testing of these crowns as an alternative for metal–ceramic crowns (3.2757 ± 0.4681 kN).
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0347-6
PubMed: 25489165
PubMed Central: 4257933
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4257933Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rao, S" sort="Rao, S" uniqKey="Rao S" first="S." last="Rao">S. Rao</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, 585105 India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chowdhary, R" sort="Chowdhary, R" uniqKey="Chowdhary R" first="R." last="Chowdhary">R. Chowdhary</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, 585105 India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25489165</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4257933</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257933</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4257933</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s13191-013-0347-6</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000064</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000064</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Rao, S" sort="Rao, S" uniqKey="Rao S" first="S." last="Rao">S. Rao</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, 585105 India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chowdhary, R" sort="Chowdhary, R" uniqKey="Chowdhary R" first="R." last="Chowdhary">R. Chowdhary</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, 585105 India</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1998-4057</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>To evaluate the fracture toughness of cement-retained implant-supported metal–ceramic molar crown with that of all-ceramic crowns, fabricated using IPS Empress 2 and yttria-stabilized zirconia copings. An dental implant and abutment was embedded in a clear polymethyl methacrylate model. A wax pattern reproducing the anatomy and dimension of a mandibular molar was made using inlay wax. Copings were made from the manufacturers guidelines for zirconia, metal ceramic and empress crown, in total of 21 copings, which were built for the crowns with metal layering ceramics specified by the manufacturers. The polymethylmethacrylate block-implant abutment complex was mounted on universal testing machine, and a static continuos vertical compressive load with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min was applied. The breaking load and the peak load (in kilo Newtons) were recorded. The fractures for group I (zirconia–ceramic) and group II (metal–ceramic) occurred on the mesio-buccal aspect of the crowns involving the veneered ceramic layer while the catastrophic/bulk fracture was not observed. The mean value of breaking load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 3.4335, 3.071 and 1.0673 kN respectively. The mean value of peak load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 4.7365, 3.2757 and 1.566 kN respectively. It can be concluded that the zirconia–ceramic crown with the fracture toughness of 4.7365 ± 2.2676 kN has sufficient strength to allow clinical testing of these crowns as an alternative for metal–ceramic crowns (3.2757 ± 0.4681 kN).</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0972-4052</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1998-4057</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Springer India</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25489165</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4257933</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">347</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13191-013-0347-6</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Chowdhary</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<address><email>drramc@yahoo.com</email>
</address>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="Aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, 585105 India</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>12</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>408</fpage>
<lpage>414</lpage>
<history><date date-type="received"><day>9</day>
<month>7</month>
<year>2013</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2013</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2014</copyright-statement>
</permissions>
<abstract id="Abs1"><p>To evaluate the fracture toughness of cement-retained implant-supported metal–ceramic molar crown with that of all-ceramic crowns, fabricated using IPS Empress 2 and yttria-stabilized zirconia copings. An dental implant and abutment was embedded in a clear polymethyl methacrylate model. A wax pattern reproducing the anatomy and dimension of a mandibular molar was made using inlay wax. Copings were made from the manufacturers guidelines for zirconia, metal ceramic and empress crown, in total of 21 copings, which were built for the crowns with metal layering ceramics specified by the manufacturers. The polymethylmethacrylate block-implant abutment complex was mounted on universal testing machine, and a static continuos vertical compressive load with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min was applied. The breaking load and the peak load (in kilo Newtons) were recorded. The fractures for group I (zirconia–ceramic) and group II (metal–ceramic) occurred on the mesio-buccal aspect of the crowns involving the veneered ceramic layer while the catastrophic/bulk fracture was not observed. The mean value of breaking load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 3.4335, 3.071 and 1.0673 kN respectively. The mean value of peak load for zirconia–ceramic, metal–ceramic and IPS-empress 2 was 4.7365, 3.2757 and 1.566 kN respectively. It can be concluded that the zirconia–ceramic crown with the fracture toughness of 4.7365 ± 2.2676 kN has sufficient strength to allow clinical testing of these crowns as an alternative for metal–ceramic crowns (3.2757 ± 0.4681 kN).</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Implant crown</kwd>
<kwd>Zirconia</kwd>
<kwd>Implant occlusion</kwd>
<kwd>Metal ceramic</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name>
<meta-value>© Indian Prosthodontic Society 2014</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000064 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000064 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV1 |flux= Pmc |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= PMC:4257933 |texte= Comparison of Fracture Toughness of All-Ceramic and Metal–Ceramic Cement Retained Implant Crowns: An In Vitro Study }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25489165" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |