Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Identifieur interne : 000334 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000333; suivant : 000335

Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Auteurs : Maria Sonia Oliveira ; Alvaro Henrique Borges ; Fernanda Zanol Mattos ; Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove Semenoff ; Alex Semenoff Segundo ; Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ; Matheus Coêlho Bandeca ; Alessandra Nogueira Porto

Source :

RBID : PMC:4109235

Abstract

Background:The present study aimed to evaluate the different methods for removing oral biofilm in combination with 0.12% chlorhexidine, in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the General University Hospital. Materials and Methods:Initially, the patients were included in the study and underwent periodontal evaluation by means of the visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI). The removal of visible biofilm, by a professional, was carried out using a toothbrush and dental floss, followed by the application of a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution. The patients were included in this randomized and controlled study into four groups (total n = 48), as follows: Chlorhexidine and gauze 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and gauze 24/24 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 24/24 h. The patients underwent the biofilm removal protocol for 7 days and then were subjected to a new clinical evaluation as to VPI and GBI. Data analysis was performed through stratification and arrangement of the records, in order to carry out the associations with health indicators used in the study, and the statistical tests used were Kappa and t-test for independent and paired samples. Results:A decrease in the VPI and GBI values when comparing baseline to the final evaluation for all groups was observed. Conclusion:Based on the methodology, it was possible to concluded that chlorhexidine associated with the mechanical action of the toothbrush or gauze in the times 12 h and 24 h in the ICU environment presented the same results as regards amount of visible biofilm. How to cite the article:Oliveira MS, Borges AH, Mattos FZ, Semenoff TA, Segundo AS, Tonetto MR, Bandeca MC, Porto AN. Evaluation of different methods for removing oral biofilm in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):61-4.


Url:
PubMed: 25083034
PubMed Central: 4109235


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:4109235

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" sort="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" uniqKey="Oliveira M" first="Maria Sonia" last="Oliveira">Maria Sonia Oliveira</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" sort="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" uniqKey="Borges A" first="Alvaro Henrique" last="Borges">Alvaro Henrique Borges</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" sort="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" uniqKey="Mattos F" first="Fernanda Zanol" last="Mattos">Fernanda Zanol Mattos</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" sort="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" uniqKey="Semenoff T" first="Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" last="Semenoff">Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove Semenoff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" sort="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" uniqKey="Segundo A" first="Alex Semenoff" last="Segundo">Alex Semenoff Segundo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" sort="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" uniqKey="Tonetto M" first="Mateus Rodrigues" last="Tonetto">Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" sort="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" uniqKey="Bandeca M" first="Matheus Coêlho" last="Bandeca">Matheus Coêlho Bandeca</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" sort="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" uniqKey="Porto A" first="Alessandra Nogueira" last="Porto">Alessandra Nogueira Porto</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25083034</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4109235</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109235</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4109235</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000356</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000356</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000356</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000356</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000334</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000334</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" sort="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" uniqKey="Oliveira M" first="Maria Sonia" last="Oliveira">Maria Sonia Oliveira</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" sort="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" uniqKey="Borges A" first="Alvaro Henrique" last="Borges">Alvaro Henrique Borges</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" sort="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" uniqKey="Mattos F" first="Fernanda Zanol" last="Mattos">Fernanda Zanol Mattos</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" sort="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" uniqKey="Semenoff T" first="Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" last="Semenoff">Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove Semenoff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" sort="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" uniqKey="Segundo A" first="Alex Semenoff" last="Segundo">Alex Semenoff Segundo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" sort="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" uniqKey="Tonetto M" first="Mateus Rodrigues" last="Tonetto">Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" sort="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" uniqKey="Bandeca M" first="Matheus Coêlho" last="Bandeca">Matheus Coêlho Bandeca</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" sort="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" uniqKey="Porto A" first="Alessandra Nogueira" last="Porto">Alessandra Nogueira Porto</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0976-7428</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">0976-1799</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<bold>Background:</bold>
The present study aimed to evaluate the different methods for removing oral biofilm in combination with 0.12% chlorhexidine, in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the General University Hospital.
<bold>Materials and Methods:</bold>
Initially, the patients were included in the study and underwent periodontal evaluation by means of the visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI). The removal of visible biofilm, by a professional, was carried out using a toothbrush and dental floss, followed by the application of a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution. The patients were included in this randomized and controlled study into four groups (total n = 48), as follows: Chlorhexidine and gauze 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and gauze 24/24 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 24/24 h. The patients underwent the biofilm removal protocol for 7 days and then were subjected to a new clinical evaluation as to VPI and GBI. Data analysis was performed through stratification and arrangement of the records, in order to carry out the associations with health indicators used in the study, and the statistical tests used were Kappa and t-test for independent and paired samples.
<bold>Results:</bold>
A decrease in the VPI and GBI values when comparing baseline to the final evaluation for all groups was observed.
<bold>Conclusion:</bold>
Based on the methodology, it was possible to concluded that chlorhexidine associated with the mechanical action of the toothbrush or gauze in the times 12 h and 24 h in the ICU environment presented the same results as regards amount of visible biofilm.
<bold>
<italic>How to cite the article:</italic>
</bold>
Oliveira MS, Borges AH, Mattos FZ, Semenoff TA, Segundo AS, Tonetto MR, Bandeca MC, Porto AN. Evaluation of different methods for removing oral biofilm in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):61-4. </p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Int Oral Health</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Int Oral Health</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JIOH</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0976-7428</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">0976-1799</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25083034</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4109235</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Public Health Dentistry</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>Maria Sonia</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Nursing, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Borges</surname>
<given-names>Alvaro Henrique</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mattos</surname>
<given-names>Fernanda Zanol</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Periodontology, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Semenoff</surname>
<given-names>Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Segundo</surname>
<given-names>Alex Semenoff</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tonetto</surname>
<given-names>Mateus Rodrigues</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bandeca</surname>
<given-names>Matheus Coêlho</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Porto</surname>
<given-names>Alessandra Nogueira</given-names>
</name>
<role>Professor</role>
<aff>Department of Post-Graduate in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, MT, Brazil</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">Dr. Borges AH. Rua Manoel Ferreira Mendonça, 149, Bairro Bandeirantes, Cuiabá, MT, 78010-160, Brazil. Phone: +55-(0)65-6240177. Email:
<email>aleporto@terra.com.br</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>6</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>6</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>61</fpage>
<lpage>64</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2013</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>4</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2014</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>J. Int Oral Health 2014</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Background:</bold>
The present study aimed to evaluate the different methods for removing oral biofilm in combination with 0.12% chlorhexidine, in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the General University Hospital.
<bold>Materials and Methods:</bold>
Initially, the patients were included in the study and underwent periodontal evaluation by means of the visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI). The removal of visible biofilm, by a professional, was carried out using a toothbrush and dental floss, followed by the application of a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution. The patients were included in this randomized and controlled study into four groups (total n = 48), as follows: Chlorhexidine and gauze 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and gauze 24/24 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 24/24 h. The patients underwent the biofilm removal protocol for 7 days and then were subjected to a new clinical evaluation as to VPI and GBI. Data analysis was performed through stratification and arrangement of the records, in order to carry out the associations with health indicators used in the study, and the statistical tests used were Kappa and t-test for independent and paired samples.
<bold>Results:</bold>
A decrease in the VPI and GBI values when comparing baseline to the final evaluation for all groups was observed.
<bold>Conclusion:</bold>
Based on the methodology, it was possible to concluded that chlorhexidine associated with the mechanical action of the toothbrush or gauze in the times 12 h and 24 h in the ICU environment presented the same results as regards amount of visible biofilm.
<bold>
<italic>How to cite the article:</italic>
</bold>
Oliveira MS, Borges AH, Mattos FZ, Semenoff TA, Segundo AS, Tonetto MR, Bandeca MC, Porto AN. Evaluation of different methods for removing oral biofilm in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):61-4. </p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
<label>
<bold>Key words:</bold>
  </label>
<kwd>Chlorhexidine</kwd>
<kwd>dental plaque</kwd>
<kwd>intensive care</kwd>
<kwd>oral hygiene</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" sort="Bandeca, Matheus Coelho" uniqKey="Bandeca M" first="Matheus Coêlho" last="Bandeca">Matheus Coêlho Bandeca</name>
<name sortKey="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" sort="Borges, Alvaro Henrique" uniqKey="Borges A" first="Alvaro Henrique" last="Borges">Alvaro Henrique Borges</name>
<name sortKey="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" sort="Mattos, Fernanda Zanol" uniqKey="Mattos F" first="Fernanda Zanol" last="Mattos">Fernanda Zanol Mattos</name>
<name sortKey="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" sort="Oliveira, Maria Sonia" uniqKey="Oliveira M" first="Maria Sonia" last="Oliveira">Maria Sonia Oliveira</name>
<name sortKey="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" sort="Porto, Alessandra Nogueira" uniqKey="Porto A" first="Alessandra Nogueira" last="Porto">Alessandra Nogueira Porto</name>
<name sortKey="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" sort="Segundo, Alex Semenoff" uniqKey="Segundo A" first="Alex Semenoff" last="Segundo">Alex Semenoff Segundo</name>
<name sortKey="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" sort="Semenoff, Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" uniqKey="Semenoff T" first="Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove" last="Semenoff">Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove Semenoff</name>
<name sortKey="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" sort="Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues" uniqKey="Tonetto M" first="Mateus Rodrigues" last="Tonetto">Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000334 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000334 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4109235
   |texte=   Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing Oral
Biofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25083034" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020