Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts
Identifieur interne : 000359 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000358; suivant : 000360Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts
Auteurs : M. D. GrossSource :
- Australian Dental Journal [ 0045-0421 ] ; 2008.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Today the clinician is faced with widely varying concepts regarding the number, location, distribution and inclination of implants required to support the functional and parafunctional demands of occlusal loading. Primary clinical dilemmas of planning for maximal or minimal numbers of implants, their axial inclination, lengths and required volume and quality of supporting bone remain largely unanswered by adequate clinical outcome research. Planning and executing optimal occlusion schemes is an integral part of implant supported restorations. In its wider sense this includes considerations of multiple inter-relating factors of ensuring adequate bone support, implant location number, length, distribution and inclination, splinting, vertical dimension aesthetics, static and dynamic occlusal schemes and more. Current concepts and research on occlusal loading and overloading are reviewed together with clinical outcome and biomechanical studies and their clinical relevance discussed. A comparison between teeth and implants regarding their proprioceptive properties and mechanisms of supporting functional and parafunctional loading is made and clinical applications made regarding current concepts in restoring the partially edentulous dentition. The relevance of occlusal traumatism and fatigue microdamage alone or in combination with periodontal or peri-implant inflammation is reviewed and applied to clinical considerations regarding splinting of adjacent implants and teeth, posterior support and eccentric guidance schemes. Occlusal restoration of the natural dentition has classically been divided into considerations of planning for sufficient posterior support, occlusal vertical dimension and eccentric guidance to provide comfort and aesthetics. Mutual protection and anterior disclusion have come to be considered as acceptable therapeutic modalities. These concepts have been transferred to the restoration of implant-supported restoration largely by default. However, in light of differences in the supporting mechanisms of implants and teeth many questions remain unanswered regarding the suitability of these modalities for implant supported restorations. These will be discussed and an attempt made to provide some current clinical axioms based where possible on the best available evidence.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 08-0331280 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts |
| AU : | GROSS (M. D.); KLINEBERG (Iven); BARTOLD (P. Mark) |
| AF : | Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University/Israël (1 aut.); Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health/Westmead/Australie (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Australian Dental Journal; ISSN 0045-0421; Australie; Da. 2008; Vol. 53; No. SUP1; S60-S68; Bibl. 20 ref. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Today the clinician is faced with widely varying concepts regarding the number, location, distribution and inclination of implants required to support the functional and parafunctional demands of occlusal loading. Primary clinical dilemmas of planning for maximal or minimal numbers of implants, their axial inclination, lengths and required volume and quality of supporting bone remain largely unanswered by adequate clinical outcome research. Planning and executing optimal occlusion schemes is an integral part of implant supported restorations. In its wider sense this includes considerations of multiple inter-relating factors of ensuring adequate bone support, implant location number, length, distribution and inclination, splinting, vertical dimension aesthetics, static and dynamic occlusal schemes and more. Current concepts and research on occlusal loading and overloading are reviewed together with clinical outcome and biomechanical studies and their clinical relevance discussed. A comparison between teeth and implants regarding their proprioceptive properties and mechanisms of supporting functional and parafunctional loading is made and clinical applications made regarding current concepts in restoring the partially edentulous dentition. The relevance of occlusal traumatism and fatigue microdamage alone or in combination with periodontal or peri-implant inflammation is reviewed and applied to clinical considerations regarding splinting of adjacent implants and teeth, posterior support and eccentric guidance schemes. Occlusal restoration of the natural dentition has classically been divided into considerations of planning for sufficient posterior support, occlusal vertical dimension and eccentric guidance to provide comfort and aesthetics. Mutual protection and anterior disclusion have come to be considered as acceptable therapeutic modalities. These concepts have been transferred to the restoration of implant-supported restoration largely by default. However, in light of differences in the supporting mechanisms of implants and teeth many questions remain unanswered regarding the suitability of these modalities for implant supported restorations. These will be discussed and an attempt made to provide some current clinical axioms based where possible on the best available evidence. |
| CC : | 002B25I; 002B10C02 |
| FD : | Prothèse; Plan traitement; Occlusion; Implant; Dentisterie; Revue bibliographique; Déterminant; Dent |
| ED : | Prosthesis; Treatment planning; Occlusion; Implant; Dentistry; Bibliographic review; Determinant; Tooth |
| SD : | Prótesis; Plan tratamiento; Oclusión; Implante; Odontología; Revista bibliográfica; Determinante; Diente |
| LO : | INIST-16492.354000197850480080 |
| ID : | 08-0331280 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:08-0331280Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts</title><author><name sortKey="Gross, M D" sort="Gross, M D" uniqKey="Gross M" first="M. D." last="Gross">M. D. Gross</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University</s1><s3>ISR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">08-0331280</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 08-0331280 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:08-0331280</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000359</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts</title><author><name sortKey="Gross, M D" sort="Gross, M D" uniqKey="Gross M" first="M. D." last="Gross">M. D. Gross</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University</s1><s3>ISR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Aust. Dent. J.</title><idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno><imprint><date when="2008">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Aust. Dent. J.</title><idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bibliographic review</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Determinant</term><term>Implant</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Treatment planning</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Prothèse</term><term>Plan traitement</term><term>Occlusion</term><term>Implant</term><term>Dentisterie</term><term>Revue bibliographique</term><term>Déterminant</term><term>Dent</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Today the clinician is faced with widely varying concepts regarding the number, location, distribution and inclination of implants required to support the functional and parafunctional demands of occlusal loading. Primary clinical dilemmas of planning for maximal or minimal numbers of implants, their axial inclination, lengths and required volume and quality of supporting bone remain largely unanswered by adequate clinical outcome research. Planning and executing optimal occlusion schemes is an integral part of implant supported restorations. In its wider sense this includes considerations of multiple inter-relating factors of ensuring adequate bone support, implant location number, length, distribution and inclination, splinting, vertical dimension aesthetics, static and dynamic occlusal schemes and more. Current concepts and research on occlusal loading and overloading are reviewed together with clinical outcome and biomechanical studies and their clinical relevance discussed. A comparison between teeth and implants regarding their proprioceptive properties and mechanisms of supporting functional and parafunctional loading is made and clinical applications made regarding current concepts in restoring the partially edentulous dentition. The relevance of occlusal traumatism and fatigue microdamage alone or in combination with periodontal or peri-implant inflammation is reviewed and applied to clinical considerations regarding splinting of adjacent implants and teeth, posterior support and eccentric guidance schemes. Occlusal restoration of the natural dentition has classically been divided into considerations of planning for sufficient posterior support, occlusal vertical dimension and eccentric guidance to provide comfort and aesthetics. Mutual protection and anterior disclusion have come to be considered as acceptable therapeutic modalities. These concepts have been transferred to the restoration of implant-supported restoration largely by default. However, in light of differences in the supporting mechanisms of implants and teeth many questions remain unanswered regarding the suitability of these modalities for implant supported restorations. These will be discussed and an attempt made to provide some current clinical axioms based where possible on the best available evidence.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0045-0421</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Aust. Dent. J.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>53</s2></fA05><fA06><s3>SUP1</s3></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts</s1></fA08><fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Oral implant rehabilitation: a state-of-the art overview of case management</s1></fA09><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GROSS (M. D.)</s1></fA11><fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KLINEBERG (Iven)</s1><s9>ed.</s9></fA12><fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BARTOLD (P. Mark)</s1><s9>limin.</s9></fA12><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University</s1><s3>ISR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA15 i1="01"><s1>Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health</s1><s2>Westmead</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA15><fA20><s2>S60-S68</s2></fA20><fA21><s1>2008</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>16492</s2><s5>354000197850480080</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>20 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0331280</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Australian Dental Journal</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>AUS</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Today the clinician is faced with widely varying concepts regarding the number, location, distribution and inclination of implants required to support the functional and parafunctional demands of occlusal loading. Primary clinical dilemmas of planning for maximal or minimal numbers of implants, their axial inclination, lengths and required volume and quality of supporting bone remain largely unanswered by adequate clinical outcome research. Planning and executing optimal occlusion schemes is an integral part of implant supported restorations. In its wider sense this includes considerations of multiple inter-relating factors of ensuring adequate bone support, implant location number, length, distribution and inclination, splinting, vertical dimension aesthetics, static and dynamic occlusal schemes and more. Current concepts and research on occlusal loading and overloading are reviewed together with clinical outcome and biomechanical studies and their clinical relevance discussed. A comparison between teeth and implants regarding their proprioceptive properties and mechanisms of supporting functional and parafunctional loading is made and clinical applications made regarding current concepts in restoring the partially edentulous dentition. The relevance of occlusal traumatism and fatigue microdamage alone or in combination with periodontal or peri-implant inflammation is reviewed and applied to clinical considerations regarding splinting of adjacent implants and teeth, posterior support and eccentric guidance schemes. Occlusal restoration of the natural dentition has classically been divided into considerations of planning for sufficient posterior support, occlusal vertical dimension and eccentric guidance to provide comfort and aesthetics. Mutual protection and anterior disclusion have come to be considered as acceptable therapeutic modalities. These concepts have been transferred to the restoration of implant-supported restoration largely by default. However, in light of differences in the supporting mechanisms of implants and teeth many questions remain unanswered regarding the suitability of these modalities for implant supported restorations. These will be discussed and an attempt made to provide some current clinical axioms based where possible on the best available evidence.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25I</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prothèse</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prosthesis</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prótesis</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plan traitement</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment planning</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Plan tratamiento</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Occlusion</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Occlusion</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oclusión</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Revue bibliographique</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bibliographic review</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Revista bibliográfica</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Déterminant</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Determinant</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Determinante</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>210</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 08-0331280 INIST</NO><ET>Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts</ET><AU>GROSS (M. D.); KLINEBERG (Iven); BARTOLD (P. Mark)</AU><AF>Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University/Israël (1 aut.); Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health/Westmead/Australie (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Australian Dental Journal; ISSN 0045-0421; Australie; Da. 2008; Vol. 53; No. SUP1; S60-S68; Bibl. 20 ref.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Today the clinician is faced with widely varying concepts regarding the number, location, distribution and inclination of implants required to support the functional and parafunctional demands of occlusal loading. Primary clinical dilemmas of planning for maximal or minimal numbers of implants, their axial inclination, lengths and required volume and quality of supporting bone remain largely unanswered by adequate clinical outcome research. Planning and executing optimal occlusion schemes is an integral part of implant supported restorations. In its wider sense this includes considerations of multiple inter-relating factors of ensuring adequate bone support, implant location number, length, distribution and inclination, splinting, vertical dimension aesthetics, static and dynamic occlusal schemes and more. Current concepts and research on occlusal loading and overloading are reviewed together with clinical outcome and biomechanical studies and their clinical relevance discussed. A comparison between teeth and implants regarding their proprioceptive properties and mechanisms of supporting functional and parafunctional loading is made and clinical applications made regarding current concepts in restoring the partially edentulous dentition. The relevance of occlusal traumatism and fatigue microdamage alone or in combination with periodontal or peri-implant inflammation is reviewed and applied to clinical considerations regarding splinting of adjacent implants and teeth, posterior support and eccentric guidance schemes. Occlusal restoration of the natural dentition has classically been divided into considerations of planning for sufficient posterior support, occlusal vertical dimension and eccentric guidance to provide comfort and aesthetics. Mutual protection and anterior disclusion have come to be considered as acceptable therapeutic modalities. These concepts have been transferred to the restoration of implant-supported restoration largely by default. However, in light of differences in the supporting mechanisms of implants and teeth many questions remain unanswered regarding the suitability of these modalities for implant supported restorations. These will be discussed and an attempt made to provide some current clinical axioms based where possible on the best available evidence.</EA><CC>002B25I; 002B10C02</CC><FD>Prothèse; Plan traitement; Occlusion; Implant; Dentisterie; Revue bibliographique; Déterminant; Dent</FD><ED>Prosthesis; Treatment planning; Occlusion; Implant; Dentistry; Bibliographic review; Determinant; Tooth</ED><SD>Prótesis; Plan tratamiento; Oclusión; Implante; Odontología; Revista bibliográfica; Determinante; Diente</SD><LO>INIST-16492.354000197850480080</LO><ID>08-0331280</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000359 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000359 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:08-0331280
|texte= Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |