Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies
Identifieur interne : 000357 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000356; suivant : 000358Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies
Auteurs : L. Sennerby ; J. GottlowSource :
- Australian Dental Journal [ 0045-0421 ] ; 2008.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
Abstract
Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.1,2 The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 08-0331307 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies |
| AU : | SENNERBY (L.); GOTTLOW (J.); KLINEBERG (Iven); BARTOLD (P. Mark) |
| AF : | Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut.); Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health/Westmead/Australie (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Australian Dental Journal; ISSN 0045-0421; Australie; Da. 2008; Vol. 53; No. SUP1; S82-S88; Bibl. 16 ref. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.1,2 The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants. |
| CC : | 002B10C02 |
| FD : | Pronostic; Evolution; Précoce; Dent; Implant; Revue bibliographique; Article synthèse; Dentisterie |
| ED : | Prognosis; Evolution; Early; Tooth; Implant; Bibliographic review; Review; Dentistry |
| SD : | Pronóstico; Evolución; Precoz; Diente; Implante; Revista bibliográfica; Artículo síntesis; Odontología |
| LO : | INIST-16492.354000197850480100 |
| ID : | 08-0331307 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:08-0331307Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies</title><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" sort="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="L." last="Sennerby">L. Sennerby</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University</s1><s3>SWE</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gottlow, J" sort="Gottlow, J" uniqKey="Gottlow J" first="J." last="Gottlow">J. Gottlow</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University</s1><s3>SWE</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">08-0331307</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 08-0331307 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:08-0331307</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000357</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies</title><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, L" sort="Sennerby, L" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="L." last="Sennerby">L. Sennerby</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University</s1><s3>SWE</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gottlow, J" sort="Gottlow, J" uniqKey="Gottlow J" first="J." last="Gottlow">J. Gottlow</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University</s1><s3>SWE</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Aust. Dent. J.</title><idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno><imprint><date when="2008">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Aust. Dent. J.</title><idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bibliographic review</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Early</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Implant</term><term>Prognosis</term><term>Review</term><term>Tooth</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pronostic</term><term>Evolution</term><term>Précoce</term><term>Dent</term><term>Implant</term><term>Revue bibliographique</term><term>Article synthèse</term><term>Dentisterie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.<sup>1,2</sup> The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0045-0421</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Aust. Dent. J.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>53</s2></fA05><fA06><s3>SUP1</s3></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies</s1></fA08><fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Oral implant rehabilitation: a state-of-the art overview of case management</s1></fA09><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SENNERBY (L.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GOTTLOW (J.)</s1></fA11><fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KLINEBERG (Iven)</s1><s9>ed.</s9></fA12><fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BARTOLD (P. Mark)</s1><s9>limin.</s9></fA12><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University</s1><s3>SWE</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA15 i1="01"><s1>Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health</s1><s2>Westmead</s2><s3>AUS</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA15><fA20><s2>S82-S88</s2></fA20><fA21><s1>2008</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>16492</s2><s5>354000197850480100</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2008 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>16 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>08-0331307</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Australian Dental Journal</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>AUS</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.<sup>1,2</sup> The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pronostic</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prognosis</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pronóstico</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evolution</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evolution</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evolución</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Précoce</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Early</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Precoz</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Revue bibliographique</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bibliographic review</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Revista bibliográfica</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Article synthèse</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Review</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Artículo síntesis</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>210</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 08-0331307 INIST</NO><ET>Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies</ET><AU>SENNERBY (L.); GOTTLOW (J.); KLINEBERG (Iven); BARTOLD (P. Mark)</AU><AF>Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University/Suède (1 aut., 2 aut.); Nobel Biocare Chair of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Westmead Centre of oral Health/Westmead/Australie (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Australian Dental Journal; ISSN 0045-0421; Australie; Da. 2008; Vol. 53; No. SUP1; S82-S88; Bibl. 16 ref.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Two previous reviews have evaluated the clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants based on studies published until 2005.<sup>1,2</sup> The aim of the present paper was to review controlled clinical studies on the subject published since 2005 including at least 10 patients in each group followed for at least one year in function. Six comparative studies were found and none of these showed any differences in survival rates or marginal bone loss after one to five years. Most authors used specified inclusion criteria to avoid known risk factors such as soft bone, short implants and bruxism. Data from one randomized study in the edentulous maxilla showed no differences between early and delayed loading in consecutive clinical routine cases including short implants and soft bone. Three additional studies comparing different surfaces or implant designs under immediate loading were reviewed. No differences between implants with a moderately rough or smooth surface topography were observed. The data add to the previous bulk of evidence that various designs of implants can be loaded shortly after their placement in both the mandible and the maxilla. However, one study reported on marginal bone loss around a novel one-piece implant design leading to implant failure which was not seen for control two-piece implants.</EA><CC>002B10C02</CC><FD>Pronostic; Evolution; Précoce; Dent; Implant; Revue bibliographique; Article synthèse; Dentisterie</FD><ED>Prognosis; Evolution; Early; Tooth; Implant; Bibliographic review; Review; Dentistry</ED><SD>Pronóstico; Evolución; Precoz; Diente; Implante; Revista bibliográfica; Artículo síntesis; Odontología</SD><LO>INIST-16492.354000197850480100</LO><ID>08-0331307</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000357 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000357 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:08-0331307
|texte= Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |