Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation

Identifieur interne : 000188 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000187; suivant : 000189

Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation

Auteurs : Antonio Scarano ; Adriano Piattelli ; Bartolomeo Assenza ; Alessandro Quaranta ; Vittoria Perrotti ; Maurizio Piattelli ; Giovanna Iezzi

Source :

RBID : Pascal:10-0388603

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0278-2391
A02 01      @0 JOMSDA
A03   1    @0 J. oral maxillofac. surg.
A05       @2 68
A06       @2 8
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation
A11 01  1    @1 SCARANO (Antonio)
A11 02  1    @1 PIATTELLI (Adriano)
A11 03  1    @1 ASSENZA (Bartolomeo)
A11 04  1    @1 QUARANTA (Alessandro)
A11 05  1    @1 PERROTTI (Vittoria)
A11 06  1    @1 PIATTELLI (Maurizio)
A11 07  1    @1 IEZZI (Giovanna)
A14 01      @1 Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara @2 Chieti @3 ITA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut. @Z 7 aut.
A14 02      @1 Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome @2 Rome @3 ITA @Z 4 aut.
A20       @1 1869-1873
A21       @1 2010
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000193916310240
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 19 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 10-0388603
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie @5 04
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Surgery @5 04
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía @5 04
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Animal @5 07
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Animal @5 07
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Animal @5 07
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Porc @5 08
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Pig @5 08
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Cerdo @5 08
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Os @5 09
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Bone @5 09
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Hueso @5 09
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Stomatologie @5 13
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Stomatology @5 13
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Estomatología @5 13
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 30
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 30
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 30
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Artiodactyla @2 NS
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Artiodactyla @2 NS
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Artiodactyla @2 NS
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Ungulata @2 NS
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Ungulata @2 NS
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Ungulata @2 NS
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
N21       @1 249
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 10-0388603 INIST
ET : Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation
AU : SCARANO (Antonio); PIATTELLI (Adriano); ASSENZA (Bartolomeo); QUARANTA (Alessandro); PERROTTI (Vittoria); PIATTELLI (Maurizio); IEZZI (Giovanna)
AF : Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara/Chieti/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut.); Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome/Rome/Italie (4 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 68; No. 8; Pp. 1869-1873; Bibl. 19 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.
CC : 002B10
FD : Chirurgie; Animal; Porc; Os; Stomatologie; Traitement
FG : Artiodactyla; Ungulata; Mammalia; Vertebrata
ED : Surgery; Animal; Pig; Bone; Stomatology; Treatment
EG : Artiodactyla; Ungulata; Mammalia; Vertebrata
SD : Cirugía; Animal; Cerdo; Hueso; Estomatología; Tratamiento
LO : INIST-3005.354000193916310240
ID : 10-0388603

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0388603

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scarano, Antonio" sort="Scarano, Antonio" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="Antonio" last="Scarano">Antonio Scarano</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Assenza, Bartolomeo" sort="Assenza, Bartolomeo" uniqKey="Assenza B" first="Bartolomeo" last="Assenza">Bartolomeo Assenza</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quaranta, Alessandro" sort="Quaranta, Alessandro" uniqKey="Quaranta A" first="Alessandro" last="Quaranta">Alessandro Quaranta</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Perrotti, Vittoria" sort="Perrotti, Vittoria" uniqKey="Perrotti V" first="Vittoria" last="Perrotti">Vittoria Perrotti</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Piattelli, Maurizio" sort="Piattelli, Maurizio" uniqKey="Piattelli M" first="Maurizio" last="Piattelli">Maurizio Piattelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Iezzi, Giovanna" sort="Iezzi, Giovanna" uniqKey="Iezzi G" first="Giovanna" last="Iezzi">Giovanna Iezzi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0388603</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0388603 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0388603</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000188</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scarano, Antonio" sort="Scarano, Antonio" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="Antonio" last="Scarano">Antonio Scarano</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Assenza, Bartolomeo" sort="Assenza, Bartolomeo" uniqKey="Assenza B" first="Bartolomeo" last="Assenza">Bartolomeo Assenza</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quaranta, Alessandro" sort="Quaranta, Alessandro" uniqKey="Quaranta A" first="Alessandro" last="Quaranta">Alessandro Quaranta</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Perrotti, Vittoria" sort="Perrotti, Vittoria" uniqKey="Perrotti V" first="Vittoria" last="Perrotti">Vittoria Perrotti</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Piattelli, Maurizio" sort="Piattelli, Maurizio" uniqKey="Piattelli M" first="Maurizio" last="Piattelli">Maurizio Piattelli</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Iezzi, Giovanna" sort="Iezzi, Giovanna" uniqKey="Iezzi G" first="Giovanna" last="Iezzi">Giovanna Iezzi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Bone</term>
<term>Pig</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Porc</term>
<term>Os</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>68</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>SCARANO (Antonio)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>PIATTELLI (Adriano)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>ASSENZA (Bartolomeo)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>QUARANTA (Alessandro)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>PERROTTI (Vittoria)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>PIATTELLI (Maurizio)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1">
<s1>IEZZI (Giovanna)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara</s1>
<s2>Chieti</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome</s1>
<s2>Rome</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1869-1873</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000193916310240</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>19 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0388603</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Porc</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Pig</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cerdo</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Os</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Bone</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hueso</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Artiodactyla</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Artiodactyla</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Artiodactyla</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Ungulata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Ungulata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ungulata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>249</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 10-0388603 INIST</NO>
<ET>Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation</ET>
<AU>SCARANO (Antonio); PIATTELLI (Adriano); ASSENZA (Bartolomeo); QUARANTA (Alessandro); PERROTTI (Vittoria); PIATTELLI (Maurizio); IEZZI (Giovanna)</AU>
<AF>Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara/Chieti/Italie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut.); Dental School, "Sapienza" University of Rome/Rome/Italie (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 68; No. 8; Pp. 1869-1873; Bibl. 19 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants often represents a clinical challenge because of the insufficient bone volume resulting from pneumatization of the maxillary sinus and crestal bone resorption. The aim of this study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus augmentation using porcine bone. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-one healthy patients with a noncontributory medical history were included in this study. All patients underwent sinus augmentation procedures with porcine bone. After a 4- to 6-month healing period, sandblasted and acid-etched implants were inserted. Results: All grafted sinuses healed without major complications, except for 2 that showed no regeneration at the time of implant placement. A total of 21 implants were lost, 8 after the second-stage surgery and 13 in the 5 years' follow-up after loading. The cumulative survival rate was 92% after a mean loading time of 5 years. Only minor peri-implant marginal bone resorption was found. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, porcine bone can be used with success in sinus augmentation procedures, and rougher-surfaced implants are probably preferable.</EA>
<CC>002B10</CC>
<FD>Chirurgie; Animal; Porc; Os; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<FG>Artiodactyla; Ungulata; Mammalia; Vertebrata</FG>
<ED>Surgery; Animal; Pig; Bone; Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Artiodactyla; Ungulata; Mammalia; Vertebrata</EG>
<SD>Cirugía; Animal; Cerdo; Hueso; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000193916310240</LO>
<ID>10-0388603</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0388603
   |texte=   Porcine Bone Used in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinical Evaluation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020