The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices
Identifieur interne : 000171 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000170; suivant : 000172The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices
Auteurs : Nicholas J. Toscano ; Dan Holtzclaw ; Paul S. RosenSource :
- Journal of periodontology [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background: The lateral window approach to maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-accepted treatment option in implant dentistry. The most frequent complication reported with traditional techniques has been the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane, with perforation rates ranging from 11% to 56%. The purpose of this retrospective, consecutive case series from two private practices was to report on the rate of Schneiderian membrane perforations and arterial lacerations when a piezoelectric surgical unit was used in conjunction with hand instrumentation to perform lateral window sinus elevations. Methods: Clinical data (Schneiderian membrane perforation, Underwood septa, and laceration of the lateral arterial blood supply to the maxillary sinus) were obtained retrospectively from two private practices and pooled for analysis. The information was collated after an exhaustive chart review. Fifty-six consecutively treated lateral window sinus lifts were performed on 50 partially or completely edentate patients. Results: Zero perforations of the Schneiderian membrane occurred during the piezoelectric preparation of the lateral antrostomies, whereas two perforations were noted during subsequent membrane elevations using hand instrumentation. In both instances, membrane perforations were associated with sinus septa. The overall sinus perforation rate was 3.6%. Arterial branches of the posterior superior alveolar artery were encountered in 35 cases, and there were zero instances of arterial laceration. Conclusions: This retrospective case series from clinical private practices confirmed that a lateral window approach to sinus elevation incorporating piezoelectric technology in conjunction with hand instrumentation was an effective means to achieve sinus elevation while minimizing the potential for intraoperative complications. Further prospective and randomized controlled studies are warranted to qualify these observations.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0114867Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices</title><author><name sortKey="Toscano, Nicholas J" sort="Toscano, Nicholas J" uniqKey="Toscano N" first="Nicholas J." last="Toscano">Nicholas J. Toscano</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holtzclaw, Dan" sort="Holtzclaw, Dan" uniqKey="Holtzclaw D" first="Dan" last="Holtzclaw">Dan Holtzclaw</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul S" sort="Rosen, Paul S" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul S." last="Rosen">Paul S. Rosen</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">10-0114867</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0114867 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0114867</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000235</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000466</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000171</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000171</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices</title><author><name sortKey="Toscano, Nicholas J" sort="Toscano, Nicholas J" uniqKey="Toscano N" first="Nicholas J." last="Toscano">Nicholas J. Toscano</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Holtzclaw, Dan" sort="Holtzclaw, Dan" uniqKey="Holtzclaw D" first="Dan" last="Holtzclaw">Dan Holtzclaw</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul S" sort="Rosen, Paul S" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul S." last="Rosen">Paul S. Rosen</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry>no AF</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno><imprint><date when="2010">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of periodontology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. periodontol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone</term><term>Complication</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Increase</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Professional practice</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Tooth alveolus</term><term>Transplantation</term><term>Treatment</term><term>Use</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Traitement</term><term>Utilisation</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Rétrospective</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Pratique professionnelle</term><term>Alvéole dentaire</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Os</term><term>Transplantation</term><term>Complication</term><term>Sinus maxillaire</term><term>Dentisterie</term><term>Implant dentaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: The lateral window approach to maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-accepted treatment option in implant dentistry. The most frequent complication reported with traditional techniques has been the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane, with perforation rates ranging from 11% to 56%. The purpose of this retrospective, consecutive case series from two private practices was to report on the rate of Schneiderian membrane perforations and arterial lacerations when a piezoelectric surgical unit was used in conjunction with hand instrumentation to perform lateral window sinus elevations. Methods: Clinical data (Schneiderian membrane perforation, Underwood septa, and laceration of the lateral arterial blood supply to the maxillary sinus) were obtained retrospectively from two private practices and pooled for analysis. The information was collated after an exhaustive chart review. Fifty-six consecutively treated lateral window sinus lifts were performed on 50 partially or completely edentate patients. Results: Zero perforations of the Schneiderian membrane occurred during the piezoelectric preparation of the lateral antrostomies, whereas two perforations were noted during subsequent membrane elevations using hand instrumentation. In both instances, membrane perforations were associated with sinus septa. The overall sinus perforation rate was 3.6%. Arterial branches of the posterior superior alveolar artery were encountered in 35 cases, and there were zero instances of arterial laceration. Conclusions: This retrospective case series from clinical private practices confirmed that a lateral window approach to sinus elevation incorporating piezoelectric technology in conjunction with hand instrumentation was an effective means to achieve sinus elevation while minimizing the potential for intraoperative complications. Further prospective and randomized controlled studies are warranted to qualify these observations.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3492</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. periodontol.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>81</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>1</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>TOSCANO (Nicholas J.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>HOLTZCLAW (Dan)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>ROSEN (Paul S.)</s1></fA11><fA20><s1>167-171</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2010</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>874</s2><s5>354000180963300200</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>33 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0114867</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1><s3>EC</s3></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of periodontology</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: The lateral window approach to maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-accepted treatment option in implant dentistry. The most frequent complication reported with traditional techniques has been the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane, with perforation rates ranging from 11% to 56%. The purpose of this retrospective, consecutive case series from two private practices was to report on the rate of Schneiderian membrane perforations and arterial lacerations when a piezoelectric surgical unit was used in conjunction with hand instrumentation to perform lateral window sinus elevations. Methods: Clinical data (Schneiderian membrane perforation, Underwood septa, and laceration of the lateral arterial blood supply to the maxillary sinus) were obtained retrospectively from two private practices and pooled for analysis. The information was collated after an exhaustive chart review. Fifty-six consecutively treated lateral window sinus lifts were performed on 50 partially or completely edentate patients. Results: Zero perforations of the Schneiderian membrane occurred during the piezoelectric preparation of the lateral antrostomies, whereas two perforations were noted during subsequent membrane elevations using hand instrumentation. In both instances, membrane perforations were associated with sinus septa. The overall sinus perforation rate was 3.6%. Arterial branches of the posterior superior alveolar artery were encountered in 35 cases, and there were zero instances of arterial laceration. Conclusions: This retrospective case series from clinical private practices confirmed that a lateral window approach to sinus elevation incorporating piezoelectric technology in conjunction with hand instrumentation was an effective means to achieve sinus elevation while minimizing the potential for intraoperative complications. Further prospective and randomized controlled studies are warranted to qualify these observations.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B25C02</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Utilisation</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Use</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Uso</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perforation</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perforation</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Perforación</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétrospective</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Retrospective</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retrospectiva</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Evaluation</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pratique professionnelle</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Professional practice</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Práctica profesional</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Alvéole dentaire</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth alveolus</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Alvéolo dental</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Augmentation</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Increase</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aumentación</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Os</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bone</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hueso</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Transplantation</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Transplantation</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trasplantación</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0><s5>19</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sinus maxillaire</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary sinus</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Seno maxilar</s0><s5>20</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant dentaire</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental implant</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Greffe</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Graft</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Injerto</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>075</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard></inist><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Holtzclaw, Dan" sort="Holtzclaw, Dan" uniqKey="Holtzclaw D" first="Dan" last="Holtzclaw">Dan Holtzclaw</name><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul S" sort="Rosen, Paul S" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul S." last="Rosen">Paul S. Rosen</name><name sortKey="Toscano, Nicholas J" sort="Toscano, Nicholas J" uniqKey="Toscano N" first="Nicholas J." last="Toscano">Nicholas J. Toscano</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000171 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000171 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:10-0114867
|texte= The Effect of Piezoelectric Use on Open Sinus Lift Perforation: A Retrospective Evaluation of 56 Consecutively Treated Cases From Private Practices
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |