Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
Identifieur interne : 000F74 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 000F73; suivant : 000F75Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
Auteurs : Mirza Rustum BaigSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , standards : Dental Impression Materials.
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- standards : Dental Impression Technique.
- Dental Models, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Mouth, Edentulous.
Abstract
Because there is a paucity of clear-cut evidence regarding which materials and techniques are most accurate for complete-arch, multiple-implant impressions, the current study sought to analyze the data and draw useful conclusions based on the evidence for application in clinical practice.
PubMed: 25032767
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000831
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000831
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000831
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25032767Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Baig, Mirza Rustum" sort="Baig, Mirza Rustum" uniqKey="Baig M" first="Mirza Rustum" last="Baig">Mirza Rustum Baig</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25032767</idno><idno type="pmid">25032767</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000831</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000F74</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Baig, Mirza Rustum" sort="Baig, Mirza Rustum" uniqKey="Baig M" first="Mirza Rustum" last="Baig">Mirza Rustum Baig</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Impression Materials (standards)</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (standards)</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire (normes)</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (normes)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Materials</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Because there is a paucity of clear-cut evidence regarding which materials and techniques are most accurate for complete-arch, multiple-implant impressions, the current study sought to analyze the data and draw useful conclusions based on the evidence for application in clinical practice.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25032767</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>29</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2014 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>869-80</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.3233</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Because there is a paucity of clear-cut evidence regarding which materials and techniques are most accurate for complete-arch, multiple-implant impressions, the current study sought to analyze the data and draw useful conclusions based on the evidence for application in clinical practice.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Relevant studies published between 1990 and December 2012 were included in the review. The articles were located through PubMed and manually through reviewing references in the literature. Papers examining implant impression accuracy in completely edentulous arches (three or more implants) were included. Clinical case reports, technique articles, abstracts, and review papers were excluded.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">One of the 34 studies selected for evaluation was clinical; the remaining 33 were in vitro investigations. Ten studies compared polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) and polyether (PE); eight found that these were statistically equal in terms of impression accuracy. The splint effect was examined by 24 studies; 10 failed to observe any differences between splinted and nonsplinted impressions, whereas 7 (> 25%) showed that the splinted technique was better than the nonsplinted technique. Thirteen studies investigated the differences between pickup and transfer impression techniques; six favored pickup over transfer, and five found insignificant differences between the techniques. The effect of nonparallel implants on edentulous multiple-implant impression accuracy was examined by only two studies. Significant differences in accuracy were observed for 15 degrees of angulation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Most of the evidence supports PVS and PE as the most accurate impression materials for edentulous multiple-implant situations, with no clear advantage of either. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the most accurate impression technique (splinted/nonsplinted, pickup/transfer), and no clear recommendation can be made. Inadequate research exists regarding several other factors that might affect edentulous implant impression accuracy. There is a lack of clinical research to support in vitro findings.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Baig</LastName><ForeName>Mirza Rustum</ForeName><Initials>MR</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003760">Dental Impression Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003760" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Materials</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="Y">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25032767</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Baig, Mirza Rustum" sort="Baig, Mirza Rustum" uniqKey="Baig M" first="Mirza Rustum" last="Baig">Mirza Rustum Baig</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F74 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000F74 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25032767
|texte= Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25032767" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |