A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants
Identifieur interne : 001B63 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 001B62; suivant : 001B64A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants
Auteurs : G. K. Thapliyal [Inde] ; V. R. Pawar [Inde]Source :
- Medical Journal, Armed Forces India [ 0377-1237 ] ; 2012.
Abstract
With the trend of shortening the treatment time and reducing patient discomfort/inconveniences immediate loading of implants has emerged as an alternative approach for replacing missing natural teeth. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of immediate implant loading protocol over conventional implant loading protocol in partially edentulous mandible.
Twenty patients were selected from out patients department who needed the replacement of one of the missing mandibular first molar. They were divided into two groups. In Group A patients implants were loaded with immediate implant loading protocol, whereas in Group B they were loaded with conventional loading protocol. Periimplant bone loss and soft tissue health were measured and compared using OPG and IOPA radiographs 06 and 12 months after implant placement.
One implant failed in immediate loading group (Group A), whereas all implants survived in conventional loading group (Group B). The average periimplant bone loss after 6 months and 1 year for Group A were 0.69 mm and 1.09 mm respectively, whereas it was 0.74 mm and 1.13 mm respectively for Group B. The difference in the bone loss between Group A and B was not statistically significant.
Immediate implant loading protocol has a highly acceptable clinical success rate in partially edentulous lower jaw although implant survival rate is slightly inferior to conventional loading protocol.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2011.11.002
PubMed: 24532933
PubMed Central: 3862756
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000361
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000361
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 000804
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000A62
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000A62
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000A62
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000965
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000965
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000965
Links to Exploration step
PMC:3862756Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants</title><author><name sortKey="Thapliyal, G K" sort="Thapliyal, G K" uniqKey="Thapliyal G" first="G. K." last="Thapliyal">G. K. Thapliyal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Commandant and Command Dental Adviser, Command Military Dental Centre (WC), India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Commandant and Command Dental Adviser, Command Military Dental Centre (WC)</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Command Military Dental Centre (WC)</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pawar, V R" sort="Pawar, V R" uniqKey="Pawar V" first="V. R." last="Pawar">V. R. Pawar</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff3">Consultant (Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics), Command Military Dental Centre (SC), India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Consultant (Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics), Command Military Dental Centre (SC)</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Command Military Dental Centre (SC)</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24532933</idno><idno type="pmc">3862756</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862756</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3862756</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.mjafi.2011.11.002</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000361</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000361</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000361</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000361</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000804</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000804</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000A62</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000965</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000965</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000965</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0377-1237:2012:Thapliyal G:a:comparative:analysis</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001B63</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants</title><author><name sortKey="Thapliyal, G K" sort="Thapliyal, G K" uniqKey="Thapliyal G" first="G. K." last="Thapliyal">G. K. Thapliyal</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Commandant and Command Dental Adviser, Command Military Dental Centre (WC), India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Commandant and Command Dental Adviser, Command Military Dental Centre (WC)</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Command Military Dental Centre (WC)</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pawar, V R" sort="Pawar, V R" uniqKey="Pawar V" first="V. R." last="Pawar">V. R. Pawar</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff3">Consultant (Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics), Command Military Dental Centre (SC), India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Consultant (Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics), Command Military Dental Centre (SC)</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Command Military Dental Centre (SC)</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Medical Journal, Armed Forces India</title><idno type="ISSN">0377-1237</idno><imprint><date when="2012">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title><p>With the trend of shortening the treatment time and reducing patient discomfort/inconveniences immediate loading of implants has emerged as an alternative approach for replacing missing natural teeth. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of immediate implant loading protocol over conventional implant loading protocol in partially edentulous mandible.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Twenty patients were selected from out patients department who needed the replacement of one of the missing mandibular first molar. They were divided into two groups. In Group A patients implants were loaded with immediate implant loading protocol, whereas in Group B they were loaded with conventional loading protocol. Periimplant bone loss and soft tissue health were measured and compared using OPG and IOPA radiographs 06 and 12 months after implant placement.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>One implant failed in immediate loading group (Group A), whereas all implants survived in conventional loading group (Group B). The average periimplant bone loss after 6 months and 1 year for Group A were 0.69 mm and 1.09 mm respectively, whereas it was 0.74 mm and 1.13 mm respectively for Group B. The difference in the bone loss between Group A and B was not statistically significant.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Immediate implant loading protocol has a highly acceptable clinical success rate in partially edentulous lower jaw although implant survival rate is slightly inferior to conventional loading protocol.</p></sec></div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B63 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001B63 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:3862756
|texte= A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24532933" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |