Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté (maquette)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships

Identifieur interne : 000741 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000740; suivant : 000742

Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships

Auteurs : A. Pullinger

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6

English descriptors

Abstract

Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function is a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on TM joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance, R2, predicting normals from pooled TMJ patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between TM joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between TMJ osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of TM derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12032

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pullinger, A" sort="Pullinger, A" uniqKey="Pullinger A" first="A." last="Pullinger">A. Pullinger</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>UCLA School of Dentistry, CA, Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12032</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000741</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000741</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I:
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
joint anatomic relationships</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pullinger, A" sort="Pullinger, A" uniqKey="Pullinger A" first="A." last="Pullinger">A. Pullinger</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>UCLA School of Dentistry, CA, Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="296">296</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="318">318</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">23</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2013-04">2013-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adaptation demand</term>
<term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Angle orthod</term>
<term>Anterior</term>
<term>Anterior disc displacement</term>
<term>Anterior position</term>
<term>Anteriorly</term>
<term>Articular</term>
<term>Articular disc</term>
<term>Articular eminence</term>
<term>Asymmetry</term>
<term>Asymptomatic</term>
<term>Asymptomatic normals</term>
<term>Asymptomatic volunteers</term>
<term>Available sample size</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Centric</term>
<term>Centric relation</term>
<term>Clinical illustration</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Concentric</term>
<term>Conceptual model</term>
<term>Condylar</term>
<term>Condylar position</term>
<term>Condyle</term>
<term>Condyle position</term>
<term>Condyle positions</term>
<term>Craniofacial</term>
<term>Crossbite</term>
<term>Crossbites</term>
<term>Deeper fossae</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental morphology</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Dentofacial</term>
<term>Derangement</term>
<term>Disc</term>
<term>Disc derangement</term>
<term>Disc derangements</term>
<term>Disc displacement</term>
<term>Disc displacements</term>
<term>Disc position</term>
<term>Disc shape</term>
<term>Disk displacement</term>
<term>Dysfunction</term>
<term>Eminence</term>
<term>Entry variables</term>
<term>False negatives</term>
<term>False positives</term>
<term>Fossa</term>
<term>Fossa depth</term>
<term>Fossa shape</term>
<term>Fossa width</term>
<term>Imaging</term>
<term>Increase risk</term>
<term>Intercuspal position</term>
<term>Internal derangement</term>
<term>Joint function</term>
<term>Joint loading</term>
<term>Joint space</term>
<term>Largest group</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral pterygoid muscle</term>
<term>Logistic</term>
<term>Logistic regression</term>
<term>Logistic regression models</term>
<term>Magnetic resonance imaging</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular condyle position</term>
<term>Mandibular growth</term>
<term>Medial</term>
<term>Morphology</term>
<term>Multifactor</term>
<term>Multifactor analyses</term>
<term>Multifactor analysis</term>
<term>Multifactor models</term>
<term>Multifactor studies</term>
<term>Multifactorial</term>
<term>Normal function</term>
<term>Normals model</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Occlusion</term>
<term>Optimum temporomandibular</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Orofac pain</term>
<term>Orthod</term>
<term>Orthod dentofac orthop</term>
<term>Orthod dentofacial orthop</term>
<term>Orthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Orthop</term>
<term>Orthopaedic</term>
<term>Osseous</term>
<term>Osteoarthrosis</term>
<term>Physiological adaptation demand</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Posterior condyle position</term>
<term>Posterior crossbite</term>
<term>Posterior position</term>
<term>Posteriorly</term>
<term>Process height</term>
<term>Progression</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Pterygoid</term>
<term>Pullinger</term>
<term>Radiol</term>
<term>Radiol endod</term>
<term>Reduction group</term>
<term>Reduction joints</term>
<term>Regression model</term>
<term>Relative risk</term>
<term>Remodelling</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seligman</term>
<term>Subgroup</term>
<term>Subset</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Symptom progression</term>
<term>Symptomatic patients</term>
<term>Temporomandibular</term>
<term>Temporomandibular disorders</term>
<term>Temporomandibular joints</term>
<term>Tomograms</term>
<term>Tomographic</term>
<term>Tree analysis</term>
<term>Unilateral</term>
<term>Unilateral crossbite</term>
<term>Univariate</term>
<term>Univariate analysis</term>
<term>Variance</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acta odontol scand</term>
<term>Adaptation demand</term>
<term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Angle orthod</term>
<term>Anterior</term>
<term>Anterior disc displacement</term>
<term>Anterior position</term>
<term>Anteriorly</term>
<term>Articular</term>
<term>Articular disc</term>
<term>Articular eminence</term>
<term>Asymmetry</term>
<term>Asymptomatic</term>
<term>Asymptomatic normals</term>
<term>Asymptomatic volunteers</term>
<term>Available sample size</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Centric</term>
<term>Centric relation</term>
<term>Clinical illustration</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Concentric</term>
<term>Conceptual model</term>
<term>Condylar</term>
<term>Condylar position</term>
<term>Condyle</term>
<term>Condyle position</term>
<term>Condyle positions</term>
<term>Craniofacial</term>
<term>Crossbite</term>
<term>Crossbites</term>
<term>Deeper fossae</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental morphology</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Dentition</term>
<term>Dentofacial</term>
<term>Derangement</term>
<term>Disc</term>
<term>Disc derangement</term>
<term>Disc derangements</term>
<term>Disc displacement</term>
<term>Disc displacements</term>
<term>Disc position</term>
<term>Disc shape</term>
<term>Disk displacement</term>
<term>Dysfunction</term>
<term>Eminence</term>
<term>Entry variables</term>
<term>False negatives</term>
<term>False positives</term>
<term>Fossa</term>
<term>Fossa depth</term>
<term>Fossa shape</term>
<term>Fossa width</term>
<term>Imaging</term>
<term>Increase risk</term>
<term>Intercuspal position</term>
<term>Internal derangement</term>
<term>Joint function</term>
<term>Joint loading</term>
<term>Joint space</term>
<term>Largest group</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral pterygoid muscle</term>
<term>Logistic</term>
<term>Logistic regression</term>
<term>Logistic regression models</term>
<term>Magnetic resonance imaging</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular condyle position</term>
<term>Mandibular growth</term>
<term>Medial</term>
<term>Morphology</term>
<term>Multifactor</term>
<term>Multifactor analyses</term>
<term>Multifactor analysis</term>
<term>Multifactor models</term>
<term>Multifactor studies</term>
<term>Multifactorial</term>
<term>Normal function</term>
<term>Normals model</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Occlusion</term>
<term>Optimum temporomandibular</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Organisation</term>
<term>Orofac pain</term>
<term>Orthod</term>
<term>Orthod dentofac orthop</term>
<term>Orthod dentofacial orthop</term>
<term>Orthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Orthop</term>
<term>Orthopaedic</term>
<term>Osseous</term>
<term>Osteoarthrosis</term>
<term>Physiological adaptation demand</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Posterior condyle position</term>
<term>Posterior crossbite</term>
<term>Posterior position</term>
<term>Posteriorly</term>
<term>Process height</term>
<term>Progression</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Pterygoid</term>
<term>Pullinger</term>
<term>Radiol</term>
<term>Radiol endod</term>
<term>Reduction group</term>
<term>Reduction joints</term>
<term>Regression model</term>
<term>Relative risk</term>
<term>Remodelling</term>
<term>Sample size</term>
<term>Seligman</term>
<term>Subgroup</term>
<term>Subset</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Symptom progression</term>
<term>Symptomatic patients</term>
<term>Temporomandibular</term>
<term>Temporomandibular disorders</term>
<term>Temporomandibular joints</term>
<term>Tomograms</term>
<term>Tomographic</term>
<term>Tree analysis</term>
<term>Unilateral</term>
<term>Unilateral crossbite</term>
<term>Univariate</term>
<term>Univariate analysis</term>
<term>Variance</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function is a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on TM joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance, R2, predicting normals from pooled TMJ patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between TM joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between TMJ osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of TM derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>condyle</json:string>
<json:string>temporomandibular</json:string>
<json:string>fossa</json:string>
<json:string>disc displacement</json:string>
<json:string>orthod</json:string>
<json:string>condyle position</json:string>
<json:string>occlusal</json:string>
<json:string>pullinger</json:string>
<json:string>multifactor</json:string>
<json:string>crossbite</json:string>
<json:string>condylar</json:string>
<json:string>derangement</json:string>
<json:string>organisation</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell publishing</json:string>
<json:string>articular</json:string>
<json:string>orthopaedic</json:string>
<json:string>asymptomatic</json:string>
<json:string>orthop</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>temporomandibular disorders</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet</json:string>
<json:string>subset</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular</json:string>
<json:string>pterygoid</json:string>
<json:string>joint space</json:string>
<json:string>univariate</json:string>
<json:string>orthod dentofacial orthop</json:string>
<json:string>dysfunction</json:string>
<json:string>dentofacial</json:string>
<json:string>anteriorly</json:string>
<json:string>condylar position</json:string>
<json:string>disc</json:string>
<json:string>surg</json:string>
<json:string>tree analysis</json:string>
<json:string>posterior condyle position</json:string>
<json:string>lateral</json:string>
<json:string>seligman</json:string>
<json:string>angle orthod</json:string>
<json:string>occlusion</json:string>
<json:string>orthodontic treatment</json:string>
<json:string>multifactorial</json:string>
<json:string>radiol</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
<json:string>normal function</json:string>
<json:string>mandible</json:string>
<json:string>oral surg</json:string>
<json:string>craniofacial</json:string>
<json:string>disk displacement</json:string>
<json:string>tomograms</json:string>
<json:string>remodelling</json:string>
<json:string>lateral pterygoid muscle</json:string>
<json:string>tomographic</json:string>
<json:string>posteriorly</json:string>
<json:string>fossa shape</json:string>
<json:string>entry variables</json:string>
<json:string>medial</json:string>
<json:string>dentition</json:string>
<json:string>subgroup</json:string>
<json:string>osteoarthrosis</json:string>
<json:string>crossbites</json:string>
<json:string>variance</json:string>
<json:string>oral pathol</json:string>
<json:string>centric relation</json:string>
<json:string>asymptomatic volunteers</json:string>
<json:string>centric</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>articular eminence</json:string>
<json:string>temporomandibular joints</json:string>
<json:string>joint function</json:string>
<json:string>anterior disc displacement</json:string>
<json:string>disc position</json:string>
<json:string>disc derangements</json:string>
<json:string>asymptomatic normals</json:string>
<json:string>oral rehabil</json:string>
<json:string>internal derangement</json:string>
<json:string>multifactor models</json:string>
<json:string>joint loading</json:string>
<json:string>regression model</json:string>
<json:string>process height</json:string>
<json:string>fossa width</json:string>
<json:string>available sample size</json:string>
<json:string>anatomic</json:string>
<json:string>intercuspal position</json:string>
<json:string>orthod dentofac orthop</json:string>
<json:string>logistic regression</json:string>
<json:string>acta odontol scand</json:string>
<json:string>optimum temporomandibular</json:string>
<json:string>orofac pain</json:string>
<json:string>unilateral crossbite</json:string>
<json:string>posterior position</json:string>
<json:string>fossa depth</json:string>
<json:string>articular disc</json:string>
<json:string>condyle positions</json:string>
<json:string>disc derangement</json:string>
<json:string>radiol endod</json:string>
<json:string>posterior crossbite</json:string>
<json:string>clinical practice</json:string>
<json:string>largest group</json:string>
<json:string>concentric</json:string>
<json:string>posterior</json:string>
<json:string>logistic</json:string>
<json:string>imaging</json:string>
<json:string>asymmetry</json:string>
<json:string>osseous</json:string>
<json:string>clinical illustration</json:string>
<json:string>deeper fossae</json:string>
<json:string>univariate analysis</json:string>
<json:string>reduction joints</json:string>
<json:string>multifactor analyses</json:string>
<json:string>false positives</json:string>
<json:string>conceptual model</json:string>
<json:string>symptomatic patients</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular growth</json:string>
<json:string>dental morphology</json:string>
<json:string>symptom progression</json:string>
<json:string>increase risk</json:string>
<json:string>anterior position</json:string>
<json:string>normals model</json:string>
<json:string>magnetic resonance imaging</json:string>
<json:string>adaptation demand</json:string>
<json:string>disc displacements</json:string>
<json:string>physiological adaptation demand</json:string>
<json:string>multifactor studies</json:string>
<json:string>false negatives</json:string>
<json:string>reduction group</json:string>
<json:string>multifactor analysis</json:string>
<json:string>relative risk</json:string>
<json:string>logistic regression models</json:string>
<json:string>sample size</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular condyle position</json:string>
<json:string>disc shape</json:string>
<json:string>anterior</json:string>
<json:string>unilateral</json:string>
<json:string>eminence</json:string>
<json:string>blackwell</json:string>
<json:string>morphology</json:string>
<json:string>progression</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>A. Pullinger</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>UCLA School of Dentistry, CA, Los Angeles, USA</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>temporomandibular joint</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>anatomic</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>relationships</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>multifactor</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>models</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>prediction</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>function</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>derangement</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>normal</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>abnormal</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>JOOR12032</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XHX5PFX4-H</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>reviewArticle</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function is a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on TM joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance, R2, predicting normals from pooled TMJ patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between TM joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between TMJ osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of TM derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>10</score>
<pdfWordCount>12402</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>83725</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>23</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>254</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1771</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>10</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships</title>
<pmid>
<json:string>23489248</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre>
<json:string>review-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>0305-182X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1365-2842</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>JOOR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>40</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<pages>
<first>296</first>
<last>318</last>
<total>23</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject>
<json:item>
<value>Review Article</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>2013-01-12</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>The Academy of prosthodontics</json:string>
<json:string>American Dental Association Guidelines</json:string>
<json:string>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Donald Seligman</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>China</json:string>
<json:string>USA</json:string>
<json:string>CA</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>McNamara et al.</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XHX5PFX4-H</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2013</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/joor.12032</json:string>
</doi>
<id>C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I:
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
joint anatomic relationships</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<availability>
<licence>© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2013-04"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="review-article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I:
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
joint anatomic relationships</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp">
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Pullinger</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>
<orgName>UCLA School of Dentistry</orgName>
<address>
<settlement type="city">Los Angeles</settlement>
<region>CA</region>
<country key="US">USA</country>
</address>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>Correspondence: Andrew Pullinger, UCLA School of Dentistry, CHS 43‐045, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90024‐1668, USA. E‐mail: apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XHX5PFX4-H</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12032</idno>
<idno type="unit">JOOR12032</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12032.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-4</idno>
<idno type="product">JOOR</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="296">296</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="318">318</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">23</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2013-04"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="joor12032-abs-0001">
<head>Summary</head>
<p>Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (
<hi rend="fc">TMJ</hi>
) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function
<hi rend="italic">is</hi>
a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance,
<hi rend="italic">R</hi>
<hi rend="superscript">2</hi>
, predicting normals from pooled
<hi rend="fc">TMJ</hi>
patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between
<hi rend="fc">TMJ</hi>
osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of
<hi rend="fc">TM</hi>
derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0001">temporomandibular joint</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0002">anatomic</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0003">relationships</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0004">multifactor</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0005">models</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0006">prediction</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0007">function</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0008">derangement</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0009">normal</term>
<term xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0010">abnormal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="articleCategory">
<term>Review Article</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Review Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12032" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi>
<issn type="print">0305-182X</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="JOOR"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="04104">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-4</doi>
<copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering number="40" type="journalVolume">40</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue">4</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2013-04">April 2013</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" position="70" status="forIssue" type="reviewArticle">
<doi>10.1111/joor.12032</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="JOOR12032"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count number="23" type="pageTotal"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="articleCategory">Review Article</title>
<title type="tocHeading1">Review Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event date="2013-01-03" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event>
<event agent="SPS" date="2013-01-12" type="xmlCreated"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-03-12"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2013-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst">296</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast">318</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>Correspondence: Andrew Pullinger, UCLA School of Dentistry, CHS 43‐045, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90024‐1668, USA. E‐mail:
<email>apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12032.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I:
<fc>TM</fc>
joint anatomic relationships</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">A. Pullinger</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator affiliationRef="#joor12032-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12032-cr-0001">
<personName>
<givenNames>A.</givenNames>
<familyName>Pullinger</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="joor12032-aff-0001">
<orgName>UCLA School of Dentistry</orgName>
<address>
<city>Los Angeles</city>
<countryPart>CA</countryPart>
<country>USA</country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup type="author">
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0001">temporomandibular joint</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0002">anatomic</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0003">relationships</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0004">multifactor</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0005">models</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0006">prediction</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0007">function</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0008">derangement</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0009">normal</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="joor12032-kwd-0010">abnormal</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12032-abs-0001" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Summary</title>
<p>Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (
<fc>TMJ</fc>
) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function
<i>is</i>
a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on
<fc>TM</fc>
joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance,
<i>R</i>
<sup>2</sup>
, predicting normals from pooled
<fc>TMJ</fc>
patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between
<fc>TM</fc>
joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between
<fc>TMJ</fc>
osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of
<fc>TM</fc>
derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pullinger</namePart>
<affiliation>UCLA School of Dentistry, CA, Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: apullinger@dentistry.ucla.edu</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04</dateIssued>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-01-12</dateCreated>
<dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-01-03</dateValid>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Belief in and rejection of a relationship of occlusion and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyle–fossa position with normal and abnormal function are still contentious issues. Clinical opinions can be strong, but support in most published data (mostly univariate) is problematic. Distribution overlap, low sensitivity and specificity are a common basis to reject any useful prediction value. Notwithstanding, a relationship of form with function is a basic tenet of biology. These are multifactor problems, but the questions mostly have not been analysed as such. This review moves the question forward by focusing on TM joint anatomic organisation as the multifactor system it is expected to be in a closed system like a synovial joint. Multifactor analysis allows the data to speak for itself and reduces bias. Classification tree analysis revealed useful prediction values and usable clinical models which are illustrated, backed up by stepwise logistic regression. Explained variance, R2, predicting normals from pooled TMJ patients was 32·6%, sensitivity 67·9%, specificity 85·7%; 37% versus disc displacement with reduction; and 28·8% versus disc displacement without reduction. Significant osseous organisational differences between TM joints with clicking and locking suggest that this is not necessarily a single disease continuum. However, a subset of joints with clicking contained characteristics of joints with locking that might contribute to symptom progression versus resistance. Moderately strong models confirm there is a relationship between TMJ osseous organisation and function, but it should not be overstated. More than one model of normals and of TM derangement organisation is revealed. The implications to clinical decision‐making are discussed.</abstract>
<subject>
<genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>temporomandibular joint</topic>
<topic>anatomic</topic>
<topic>relationships</topic>
<topic>multifactor</topic>
<topic>models</topic>
<topic>prediction</topic>
<topic>function</topic>
<topic>derangement</topic>
<topic>normal</topic>
<topic>abnormal</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>J Oral Rehabil</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<subject>
<genre>article-category</genre>
<topic>Review Article</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier>
<part>
<date>2013</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>40</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>296</start>
<end>318</end>
<total>23</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XHX5PFX4-H</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12032</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12032</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000741 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000741 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:C2C5BA1F95EB9A7D0E495EF0FF328BCAED5D23C6
   |texte=   Establishing better biological models to understand occlusion. I: TM joint anatomic relationships
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Dec 4 11:02:15 2017. Site generation: Tue Sep 29 19:14:38 2020