Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature
Identifieur interne : 000503 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000502; suivant : 000504Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature
Auteurs : Carlos Brito ; Howard C. Tenenbaum ; Benjamin K. C. Wong ; Christian Schmitt ; Getulio Nogueira-FilhoSource :
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials [ 1552-4973 ] ; 2014-04.
Abstract
The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33042
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCBLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title><author><name sortKey="Brito, Carlos" sort="Brito, Carlos" uniqKey="Brito C" first="Carlos" last="Brito">Carlos Brito</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tenenbaum, Howard C" sort="Tenenbaum, Howard C" uniqKey="Tenenbaum H" first="Howard C." last="Tenenbaum">Howard C. Tenenbaum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wong, Benjamin K C" sort="Wong, Benjamin K C" uniqKey="Wong B" first="Benjamin K. C." last="Wong">Benjamin K. C. Wong</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Christian" sort="Schmitt, Christian" uniqKey="Schmitt C" first="Christian" last="Schmitt">Christian Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nogueira Ilho, Getulio" sort="Nogueira Ilho, Getulio" uniqKey="Nogueira Ilho G" first="Getulio" last="Nogueira-Filho">Getulio Nogueira-Filho</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/jbm.b.33042</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000503</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000503</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title><author><name sortKey="Brito, Carlos" sort="Brito, Carlos" uniqKey="Brito C" first="Carlos" last="Brito">Carlos Brito</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tenenbaum, Howard C" sort="Tenenbaum, Howard C" uniqKey="Tenenbaum H" first="Howard C." last="Tenenbaum">Howard C. Tenenbaum</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wong, Benjamin K C" sort="Wong, Benjamin K C" uniqKey="Wong B" first="Benjamin K. C." last="Wong">Benjamin K. C. Wong</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitt, Christian" sort="Schmitt, Christian" uniqKey="Schmitt C" first="Christian" last="Schmitt">Christian Schmitt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nogueira Ilho, Getulio" sort="Nogueira Ilho, Getulio" uniqKey="Nogueira Ilho G" first="Getulio" last="Nogueira-Filho">Getulio Nogueira-Filho</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B: APPLIED BIOMATERIALS</title><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno><idno type="eISSN">1552-4981</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">102</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="643">643</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="650">650</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-04">2014-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1552-4973</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Carlos Brito</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Howard C. Tenenbaum</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Benjamin K. C. Wong</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christian Schmitt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Getulio Nogueira‐Filho</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</json:string><json:string>E-mail: getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gingiva</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>review</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maintenance</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JBMB33042</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-BR058ZH2-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>206</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1352</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>8.918</score><pdfWordCount>4446</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>29241</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 809.972 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1552-4973</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1552-4981</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JBM</json:string></publisherId><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>643</first><last>650</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Review Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-BR058ZH2-R</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/jbm.b.33042</json:string></doi><id>85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title><title level="a" type="short">Is Keratinized Mucosa Indispensable To Maintain Peri‐Implant Health?</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Carlos</forename><surname>Brito</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Preventive</orgName><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region>Ontario</region><country key="CA">Canada</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Howard C.</forename><surname>Tenenbaum</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Periodontology</orgName><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region>Ontario</region><country key="CA">Canada</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Benjamin K. C.</forename><surname>Wong</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Preventive</orgName><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region>Ontario</region><country key="CA">Canada</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Christian</forename><surname>Schmitt</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Erlangen</settlement><country key="DE">Germany</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Getulio</forename><surname>Nogueira‐Filho</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Preventive</orgName><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region>Ontario</region><country key="CA">Canada</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence to: G. Nogueira (e‐mail: getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca)</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BR058ZH2-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/jbm.b.33042</idno><idno type="unit">JBMB33042</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JBM.JBMB33042.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B: APPLIED BIOMATERIALS</title><idno type="pISSN">1552-4973</idno><idno type="eISSN">1552-4981</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/jbm.b.v102.3</idno><idno type="product">JBM</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">102</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="643">643</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="650">650</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0001">gingiva</term><term xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0002">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0003">review</term><term xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0004">dental implants</term><term xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0005">maintenance</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Review Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Review Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en" xml:id="jbmb33042"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981</doi><issn type="print">1552-4973</issn><issn type="electronic">1552-4981</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JBM"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B: APPLIED BIOMATERIALS">Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title><title type="short">J. Biomed. Mater. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="30"><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.v102.3</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="102">102</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-04">April 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="250" type="reviewArticle" status="forIssue"><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.33042</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JBMB33042"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Review Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Review Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2013-04-15"></event><event type="manuscriptRevised" date="2013-08-19"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2013-08-28"></event><event type="xmlCreated" agent="Cenveo Publisher Services" date="2013-09-23"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.3.0 mode:FullText" date="2014-03-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-10-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-09"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">643</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">650</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to</b>: G. Nogueira (e‐mail: <email>getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca</email>)</correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation xml:id="jbmb33042-cit-0048" type="self"><b>How to cite this article:</b>
<author><familyName>Brito</familyName> <givenNames>C.</givenNames></author>,
<author><familyName>Tenenbaum</familyName> <givenNames>H. C.</givenNames></author>,
<author><familyName>Benjamin</familyName> <givenNames>K. C. Wong</givenNames></author>,
<author><familyName>Schmitt</familyName> <givenNames>C.</givenNames></author>,
<author><familyName>Nogueira‐Filho</familyName> <givenNames>G</givenNames></author>. <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>. <articleTitle>Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2014:</journalTitle> <vol>102B</vol>: <pageFirst>643</pageFirst>–<pageLast>650</pageLast>.
</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JBM.JBMB33042.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title><title type="short">Is Keratinized Mucosa Indispensable To Maintain Peri‐Implant Health?</title><title type="shortAuthors">Brito et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#jbmb33042-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jbmb33042-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Carlos</givenNames><familyName>Brito</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jbmb33042-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jbmb33042-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Howard C.</givenNames><familyName>Tenenbaum</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jbmb33042-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jbmb33042-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Benjamin K. C.</givenNames><familyName>Wong</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jbmb33042-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jbmb33042-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Christian</givenNames><familyName>Schmitt</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jbmb33042-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jbmb33042-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>Getulio</givenNames><familyName>Nogueira‐Filho</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="CA" type="organization" xml:id="jbmb33042-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Preventive</orgDiv><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><city>Toronto</city><countryPart>Ontario</countryPart><country>Canada</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="CA" type="organization" xml:id="jbmb33042-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Periodontology</orgDiv><orgName>University of Toronto</orgName><address><city>Toronto</city><countryPart>Ontario</countryPart><country>Canada</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="jbmb33042-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgDiv><orgName>University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg</orgName><address><city>Erlangen</city><country>Germany</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0001">gingiva</keyword><keyword xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0002">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0003">review</keyword><keyword xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0004">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="jbmb33042-kwd-0005">maintenance</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Is Keratinized Mucosa Indispensable To Maintain Peri‐Implant Health?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Carlos</namePart><namePart type="family">Brito</namePart><affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Howard C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Tenenbaum</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Benjamin K. C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wong</namePart><affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christian</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmitt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Erlangen‐Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Getulio</namePart><namePart type="family">Nogueira‐Filho</namePart><affiliation>Department of Preventive, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: getulio.nogueira@dentistry.utoronto.ca</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-04</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-09-23</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-15</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08-28</dateValid><edition>How to cite this article: Brito C., Tenenbaum H. C., Benjamin K. C. Wong, Schmitt C., Nogueira‐Filho G. 2014. Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2014: 102B: 643–650.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The significance of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants is still not well explained and has been controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the importance of KM around dental implants. The electronic databases Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases were utilized to search original articles from 2006 to March 2013. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select the articles were: (1) Human studies published in the English language; (2) Study published in international peer‐viewed journals; (3) Studies evaluated the association between KM width and the peri‐implant tissue health; (4) Studies that have follow up of greater than 12 months; (5) Publication of studies not older than 10 years. The searches retrieved 285 citations. Seven articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Out of these, three studies were ranked as presenting high methodological quality, and four were judged to be of moderate quality. This systematic review concludes that the presence of an adequate zone of keratinized tissue may be necessary because it was shown to be related to better peri‐implant tissue health. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to support this statement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 643–650, 2014.</abstract><note type="funding">Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>gingiva</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>maintenance</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J. Biomed. Mater. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Review Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1552-4973</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1552-4981</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JBM</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>102</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>643</start><end>650</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BR058ZH2-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/jbm.b.33042</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JBMB33042</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000503 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000503 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:85EF9E64F56F1C5102E4C39A3C3942B25FBACBCB
|texte= Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri‐implant health? A systematic review of the literature
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |