Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Identifieur interne : 000478 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000477; suivant : 000479Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Auteurs : Marcelo L. De Brandão ; Mario V. Vettore ; Guaracilei M. Vidigal JúniorSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2013-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aalam, Abutment, Anemark, Anterior mandible, Biocare, Bone loss, Cementretained prostheses, Clinical study, Data extraction, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Different studies, Direct comparison, Drago, Exclusion criteria, Glauser, Gothenburg, Henriksson, Henriksson jemt, Implant, Implant design, Implant systems, Implants nobel biocare, Implants research, Indirect comparison, Internal connections, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Palm beach gardens, Partial denture, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis retention system, Publication bias, Radiographic, Randomized, Screwretained, Screwretained prostheses, Standard deviation, Steenberghe, Surgical, Surgical steps, Survival rate, Survival success, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Vigolo.
- Teeft :
- Aalam, Abutment, Anemark, Anterior mandible, Biocare, Bone loss, Cementretained prostheses, Clinical study, Data extraction, Dental implants, Dentistry, Denture, Different studies, Direct comparison, Drago, Exclusion criteria, Glauser, Gothenburg, Henriksson, Henriksson jemt, Implant, Implant design, Implant systems, Implants nobel biocare, Implants research, Indirect comparison, Internal connections, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofacial implants, Other studies, Palm beach gardens, Partial denture, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis retention system, Publication bias, Radiographic, Randomized, Screwretained, Screwretained prostheses, Standard deviation, Steenberghe, Surgical, Surgical steps, Survival rate, Survival success, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Vigolo.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12041
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCCLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author><name sortKey="De Brandao, Marcelo L" sort="De Brandao, Marcelo L" uniqKey="De Brandao M" first="Marcelo L." last="De Brandão">Marcelo L. De Brandão</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implantology Department, INOVI, Vitória, ES, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implantology Department, ABO/ES, ES, Vitória, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marcelolievore@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vettore, Mario V" sort="Vettore, Mario V" uniqKey="Vettore M" first="Mario V." last="Vettore">Mario V. Vettore</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vidigal Junior, Guaracilei M" sort="Vidigal Junior, Guaracilei M" uniqKey="Vidigal Junior G" first="Guaracilei M." last="Vidigal Júnior">Guaracilei M. Vidigal Júnior</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jcpe.12041</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000478</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000478</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author><name sortKey="De Brandao, Marcelo L" sort="De Brandao, Marcelo L" uniqKey="De Brandao M" first="Marcelo L." last="De Brandão">Marcelo L. De Brandão</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implantology Department, INOVI, Vitória, ES, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Implantology Department, ABO/ES, ES, Vitória, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Address:.E‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marcelolievore@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vettore, Mario V" sort="Vettore, Mario V" uniqKey="Vettore M" first="Mario V." last="Vettore">Mario V. Vettore</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vidigal Junior, Guaracilei M" sort="Vidigal Junior, Guaracilei M" uniqKey="Vidigal Junior G" first="Guaracilei M." last="Vidigal Júnior">Guaracilei M. Vidigal Júnior</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="287">287</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="295">295</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-03">2013-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aalam</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Anemark</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cementretained prostheses</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Data extraction</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different studies</term><term>Direct comparison</term><term>Drago</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Glauser</term><term>Gothenburg</term><term>Henriksson</term><term>Henriksson jemt</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants nobel biocare</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Indirect comparison</term><term>Internal connections</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Palm beach gardens</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis retention system</term><term>Publication bias</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Screwretained</term><term>Screwretained prostheses</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical steps</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival success</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Vigolo</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aalam</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Anemark</term><term>Anterior mandible</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cementretained prostheses</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Data extraction</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different studies</term><term>Direct comparison</term><term>Drago</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Glauser</term><term>Gothenburg</term><term>Henriksson</term><term>Henriksson jemt</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants nobel biocare</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Indirect comparison</term><term>Internal connections</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Other studies</term><term>Palm beach gardens</term><term>Partial denture</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis retention system</term><term>Publication bias</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Screwretained</term><term>Screwretained prostheses</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical steps</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival success</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Vigolo</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>vigolo</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>henriksson</json:string><json:string>henriksson jemt</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>aalam</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>screwretained</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>glauser</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>drago</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>gothenburg</json:string><json:string>screwretained prostheses</json:string><json:string>surgical steps</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>anemark</json:string><json:string>implants nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>indirect comparison</json:string><json:string>palm beach gardens</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>publication bias</json:string><json:string>prosthesis retention system</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>cementretained prostheses</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>posterior mandible</json:string><json:string>other studies</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>internal connections</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>anterior mandible</json:string><json:string>survival success</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>different studies</json:string><json:string>direct comparison</json:string><json:string>partial denture</json:string><json:string>systematic reviews</json:string><json:string>data extraction</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Marcelo L. de Brandão</name><affiliations><json:string>Implantology Department, INOVI, Vitória, ES, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Implantology Department, ABO/ES, ES, Vitória, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Address:.E‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marcelolievore@hotmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mario V. Vettore</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Guaracilei M. Vidigal Júnior</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cement‐retained prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>meta‐analysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implant bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>screw‐retained prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>systematic review</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE12041</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-7XXWRSG5-V</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.15</score><pdfWordCount>4886</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35119</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>22</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>151</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><pmid><json:string>23297703</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>287</first><last>295</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Systematic Review</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1217</json:string><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2012-11-24</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Biocare</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio</json:string><json:string>Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal</json:string><json:string>Implantology Department, ABO/ ES, Vitoria, ES, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Federal University</json:string><json:string>Institute of Studies</json:string><json:string>Stata Corporation</json:string><json:string>Prosthodontics, International Journal</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Systematic</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>To</json:string><json:string>Case</json:string><json:string>Marcelo L. de Brandao</json:string><json:string>Mario V. Vettore</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>TX</json:string><json:string>College Station</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Drago 2003</json:string><json:string>Egger et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al. (2004, 2006)</json:string><json:string>Alderson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Henriksson & Jemt 2003</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Aalam et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>March and June 2012</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Bae et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Egger et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Aalam et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Bae et al. (2008)</json:string><json:string>Begg & Mazumdar 1994</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al. 2004, 2006</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al.</json:string><json:string>Vigolo et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Van Steenberghe et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Keith et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. (2004)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-7XXWRSG5-V</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/jcpe.12041</json:string></doi><id>80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="review-article" source="reviewArticle" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="review-article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Marcelo L.</forename><surname>de Brandão</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Implantology Department</orgName><orgName>INOVI</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Vitória</settlement><region>ES</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation><orgName>Implantology Department</orgName><orgName>ABO/ES</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Vitória</settlement><region>ES</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Address: Marcelo Lievore de Brandão, Av. Nossa Senhora da Penha, no 570 sl 502/503. Praia do Canto – Vitória/ES – Brazil 29055‐912 E‐mail: marcelolievore@hotmail.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Mario V.</forename><surname>Vettore</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Institute of Studies in Public Health</orgName><orgName>Federal University of Rio de Janeiro</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Rio de Janeiro</settlement><region>RJ</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Guaracilei M.</forename><surname>Vidigal Júnior</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral Implantology</orgName><orgName>School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Rio de Janeiro</settlement><region>RJ</region><country key="BR">Brazil</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7XXWRSG5-V</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12041</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE12041</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE12041.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/jcpe.2013.40.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="287">287</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="295">295</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="jcpe12041-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.</p>
Material and Methods
<p>Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement‐ and/or screw‐retained prostheses. Two reviewers independently conducted the article selection and data extraction. Random‐effects models were used to obtain estimates of peri‐implant marginal bone loss [mean, 95% confidence intervals (<hi rend="fc">CI</hi>)].</p>
Results
<p>Of the 1217 identified studies, nine finally met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies included both cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses, three assessed only screw‐retained prostheses, and four evaluated only cement‐retained prostheses. Pooled mean marginal bone loss was 0.53 mm (<hi rend="fc">CI</hi> 95%, 0.31–0.76 mm) for cement‐retained prostheses and 0.89 mm (<hi rend="fc">CI</hi> 95%, 0.45–1.33 mm) for screw‐retained prostheses.</p>
Conclusion
<p>There is no evidence to support differences in the marginal bone loss through indirect comparison between cement and screw‐retained restorations.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0001">cement‐retained prosthesis</term><term xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0002">meta‐analysis</term><term xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0003">peri‐implant bone loss</term><term xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0004">screw‐retained prosthesis</term><term xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0005">systematic review</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Systematic Review</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Implant Therapy</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="jcpe12041" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title type="short">J Clin Periodontol</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="30"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcpe.2013.40.issue-3</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="40">40</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-03">March 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="90" status="forIssue" type="reviewArticle"><doi>10.1111/jcpe.12041</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE12041"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Systematic Review</title><title type="tocHeading1">Implant Therapy</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-08-27" type="manuscriptReceived"></event><event date="2012-10-12" type="manuscriptRevised"></event><event date="2012-11-01" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-11-24" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAccepted" date="2012-11-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-01-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-02-05"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-01-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">287</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">295</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line>Address:</line><line><i>Marcelo Lievore de Brandão,</i></line><line><i>Av. Nossa Senhora da Penha, no 570 sl 502/503</i>.</line><line><i>Praia do Canto – Vitória/ES – Brazil 29055‐912</i></line><line>E‐mail: <email>marcelolievore@hotmail.com</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="jcpe12041-cit-1001"><author><givenNames>Brandão</givenNames> <familyName>ML</familyName></author> , <author><givenNames>Vettore</givenNames> <familyName>MV</familyName></author> , <author><givenNames>Vidigal Júnior</givenNames> <familyName>GM</familyName></author> .<journalTitle>J Clin Periodontol</journalTitle><pubYear year="2012">2012</pubYear>;<vol>00</vol>:<pageFirst>000</pageFirst>–<pageLast>000</pageLast>.<articleTitle>Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: systematic review and meta‐analysis</articleTitle><accessionId ref="info:doi/10.1111/jcpe.12041">10.1111/jcpe.12041</accessionId></citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE12041.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title type="shortAuthors">de Brandão et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12041-aff-0001 #jcpe12041-aff-0002" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12041-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Marcelo L.</givenNames> <familyName>de Brandão</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12041-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12041-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Mario V.</givenNames> <familyName>Vettore</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#jcpe12041-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="jcpe12041-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Guaracilei M.</givenNames> <familyName>Vidigal Júnior</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12041-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Implantology Department</orgDiv> <orgName>INOVI</orgName> <address><city>Vitória</city> <countryPart>ES</countryPart><country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12041-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Implantology Department</orgDiv> <orgName>ABO/ES</orgName> <address><city>Vitória</city> <countryPart>ES</countryPart><country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12041-aff-0003"><orgDiv>Institute of Studies in Public Health</orgDiv> <orgName>Federal University of Rio de Janeiro</orgName> <address><city>Rio de Janeiro</city> <countryPart>RJ</countryPart><country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="BR" type="organization" xml:id="jcpe12041-aff-0004"><orgDiv>Department of Oral Implantology</orgDiv> <orgName>School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO</orgName> <address><city>Rio de Janeiro</city> <countryPart>RJ</countryPart><country>Brazil</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0001">cement‐retained prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0002">meta‐analysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0003">peri‐implant bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0004">screw‐retained prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="jcpe12041-kwd-0005">systematic review</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="jcpe12041-abs-0001" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="jcpe12041-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12041-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and Methods</title><p>Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement‐ and/or screw‐retained prostheses. Two reviewers independently conducted the article selection and data extraction. Random‐effects models were used to obtain estimates of peri‐implant marginal bone loss [mean, 95% confidence intervals (<fc>CI</fc>)].</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12041-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Of the 1217 identified studies, nine finally met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies included both cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses, three assessed only screw‐retained prostheses, and four evaluated only cement‐retained prostheses. Pooled mean marginal bone loss was 0.53 mm (<fc>CI</fc> 95%, 0.31–0.76 mm) for cement‐retained prostheses and 0.89 mm (<fc>CI</fc> 95%, 0.45–1.33 mm) for screw‐retained prostheses.</p></section><section xml:id="jcpe12041-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>There is no evidence to support differences in the marginal bone loss through indirect comparison between cement and screw‐retained restorations.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup xml:id="jcpe12041-ntgp-0001"><note numbered="no" xml:id="jcpe12041-note-0001"><p><b>Conflict of interest and sources of funding statement</b></p><p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. There was no external funding and all authors were supported by their institutions.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marcelo L.</namePart><namePart type="family">de Brandão</namePart><affiliation>Implantology Department, INOVI, Vitória, ES, Brazil</affiliation><affiliation>Implantology Department, ABO/ES, ES, Vitória, Brazil</affiliation><affiliation>Address:.E‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marcelolievore@hotmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mario V.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vettore</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Guaracilei M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vidigal Júnior</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry University of Grande Rio – UNIGRANRIO, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-L5L7X3NF-P">review-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-11-24</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08-27</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-11-01</dateValid><edition>Brandão ML , Vettore MV , Vidigal Júnior GM .J Clin Periodontol2012;00:000–000.Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: systematic review and meta‐analysis10.1111/jcpe.12041</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess and compare peri‐implant marginal bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses.</abstract><abstract>Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement‐ and/or screw‐retained prostheses. Two reviewers independently conducted the article selection and data extraction. Random‐effects models were used to obtain estimates of peri‐implant marginal bone loss [mean, 95% confidence intervals (CI)].</abstract><abstract>Of the 1217 identified studies, nine finally met the inclusion criteria. Only two studies included both cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses, three assessed only screw‐retained prostheses, and four evaluated only cement‐retained prostheses. Pooled mean marginal bone loss was 0.53 mm (CI 95%, 0.31–0.76 mm) for cement‐retained prostheses and 0.89 mm (CI 95%, 0.45–1.33 mm) for screw‐retained prostheses.</abstract><abstract>There is no evidence to support differences in the marginal bone loss through indirect comparison between cement and screw‐retained restorations.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>cement‐retained prosthesis</topic><topic>meta‐analysis</topic><topic>peri‐implant bone loss</topic><topic>screw‐retained prosthesis</topic><topic>systematic review</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Clin Periodontol</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Systematic Review</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>40</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>287</start><end>295</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7XXWRSG5-V</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/jcpe.12041</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE12041</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000478 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000478 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:80786BBCD23486FDDB0F7C030B8499AA192C6DCC
|texte= Peri‐implant bone loss in cement‐ and screw‐retained prostheses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |