A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record
Identifieur interne : 000269 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000268; suivant : 000270A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record
Auteurs : Cassandra C. GilmoreSource :
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology [ 0002-9483 ] ; 2013-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Agei, Alveolar bone, American journal, Amtl, Amtl frequencies, Antemortem, Antemortem tooth loss, Anthropol, Average times, Baboon, Bayesian, Behavioral differences, Binary, Caries, Chimpanzee, Contemporary humans, Cuozzo, Dental senescence, Eruption, Evol, Fossil, Fossil hominins, Genus, Gilmore, Hominin, Hominins, Human behaviors, Human populations, Important contributor, Interaction effects, Interaction model, Interaction models, Larsen, Late pleistocene, Lebel, Lemur, Lemur catta, Life history, Main effects model, Malei, Miles method, Modern humans, Molar, Natural history, Neanderthal, Nonhuman primates, Orangutan, Papio, Pathological conditions, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Phys, Phys anthropol, Physical anthropology, Pleistocene, Pongo, Predictive modeling, Predictor, Premolar, Primate, Primates, Proc natl acad, Random effect, Resorption, Sauther, Senescence, Socket, Standard deviation, Summary statistics, Theoretical association, Tooth, Tooth class, Tooth loss, Wild lemurs, Younger individuals.
- Teeft :
- Agei, Alveolar bone, American journal, Amtl, Amtl frequencies, Antemortem, Antemortem tooth loss, Anthropol, Average times, Baboon, Bayesian, Behavioral differences, Binary, Caries, Chimpanzee, Contemporary humans, Cuozzo, Dental senescence, Eruption, Evol, Fossil, Fossil hominins, Genus, Gilmore, Hominin, Hominins, Human behaviors, Human populations, Important contributor, Interaction effects, Interaction model, Interaction models, Larsen, Late pleistocene, Lebel, Lemur, Lemur catta, Life history, Main effects model, Malei, Miles method, Modern humans, Molar, Natural history, Neanderthal, Nonhuman primates, Orangutan, Papio, Pathological conditions, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Phys, Phys anthropol, Physical anthropology, Pleistocene, Pongo, Predictive modeling, Predictor, Premolar, Primate, Primates, Proc natl acad, Random effect, Resorption, Sauther, Senescence, Socket, Standard deviation, Summary statistics, Theoretical association, Tooth, Tooth class, Tooth loss, Wild lemurs, Younger individuals.
Abstract
Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22275
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title><author><name sortKey="Gilmore, Cassandra C" sort="Gilmore, Cassandra C" uniqKey="Gilmore C" first="Cassandra C." last="Gilmore">Cassandra C. Gilmore</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Anthropology, University of California, CA, 95616, Davis</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/ajpa.22275</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000269</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000269</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title><author><name sortKey="Gilmore, Cassandra C" sort="Gilmore, Cassandra C" uniqKey="Gilmore C" first="Cassandra C." last="Gilmore">Cassandra C. Gilmore</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Anthropology, University of California, CA, 95616, Davis</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title><title level="j" type="alt">AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-8644</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">151</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="252">252</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="264">264</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0002-9483</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agei</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>American journal</term><term>Amtl</term><term>Amtl frequencies</term><term>Antemortem</term><term>Antemortem tooth loss</term><term>Anthropol</term><term>Average times</term><term>Baboon</term><term>Bayesian</term><term>Behavioral differences</term><term>Binary</term><term>Caries</term><term>Chimpanzee</term><term>Contemporary humans</term><term>Cuozzo</term><term>Dental senescence</term><term>Eruption</term><term>Evol</term><term>Fossil</term><term>Fossil hominins</term><term>Genus</term><term>Gilmore</term><term>Hominin</term><term>Hominins</term><term>Human behaviors</term><term>Human populations</term><term>Important contributor</term><term>Interaction effects</term><term>Interaction model</term><term>Interaction models</term><term>Larsen</term><term>Late pleistocene</term><term>Lebel</term><term>Lemur</term><term>Lemur catta</term><term>Life history</term><term>Main effects model</term><term>Malei</term><term>Miles method</term><term>Modern humans</term><term>Molar</term><term>Natural history</term><term>Neanderthal</term><term>Nonhuman primates</term><term>Orangutan</term><term>Papio</term><term>Pathological conditions</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Phys</term><term>Phys anthropol</term><term>Physical anthropology</term><term>Pleistocene</term><term>Pongo</term><term>Predictive modeling</term><term>Predictor</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Primate</term><term>Primates</term><term>Proc natl acad</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Sauther</term><term>Senescence</term><term>Socket</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Summary statistics</term><term>Theoretical association</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth class</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Wild lemurs</term><term>Younger individuals</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Agei</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>American journal</term><term>Amtl</term><term>Amtl frequencies</term><term>Antemortem</term><term>Antemortem tooth loss</term><term>Anthropol</term><term>Average times</term><term>Baboon</term><term>Bayesian</term><term>Behavioral differences</term><term>Binary</term><term>Caries</term><term>Chimpanzee</term><term>Contemporary humans</term><term>Cuozzo</term><term>Dental senescence</term><term>Eruption</term><term>Evol</term><term>Fossil</term><term>Fossil hominins</term><term>Genus</term><term>Gilmore</term><term>Hominin</term><term>Hominins</term><term>Human behaviors</term><term>Human populations</term><term>Important contributor</term><term>Interaction effects</term><term>Interaction model</term><term>Interaction models</term><term>Larsen</term><term>Late pleistocene</term><term>Lebel</term><term>Lemur</term><term>Lemur catta</term><term>Life history</term><term>Main effects model</term><term>Malei</term><term>Miles method</term><term>Modern humans</term><term>Molar</term><term>Natural history</term><term>Neanderthal</term><term>Nonhuman primates</term><term>Orangutan</term><term>Papio</term><term>Pathological conditions</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Phys</term><term>Phys anthropol</term><term>Physical anthropology</term><term>Pleistocene</term><term>Pongo</term><term>Predictive modeling</term><term>Predictor</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Primate</term><term>Primates</term><term>Proc natl acad</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Sauther</term><term>Senescence</term><term>Socket</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Summary statistics</term><term>Theoretical association</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth class</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Wild lemurs</term><term>Younger individuals</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>amtl</json:string><json:string>baboon</json:string><json:string>anthropol</json:string><json:string>antemortem</json:string><json:string>chimpanzee</json:string><json:string>orangutan</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>caries</json:string><json:string>phys</json:string><json:string>tooth class</json:string><json:string>primates</json:string><json:string>main effects model</json:string><json:string>evol</json:string><json:string>hominins</json:string><json:string>genus</json:string><json:string>lemur</json:string><json:string>pleistocene</json:string><json:string>american journal</json:string><json:string>binary</json:string><json:string>physical anthropology</json:string><json:string>fossil</json:string><json:string>molar</json:string><json:string>agei</json:string><json:string>antemortem tooth loss</json:string><json:string>hominin</json:string><json:string>modern humans</json:string><json:string>premolar</json:string><json:string>papio</json:string><json:string>pongo</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>lebel</json:string><json:string>life history</json:string><json:string>malei</json:string><json:string>bayesian</json:string><json:string>sauther</json:string><json:string>cuozzo</json:string><json:string>neanderthal</json:string><json:string>senescence</json:string><json:string>larsen</json:string><json:string>predictor</json:string><json:string>primate</json:string><json:string>socket</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>interaction models</json:string><json:string>random effect</json:string><json:string>gilmore</json:string><json:string>proc natl acad</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>fossil hominins</json:string><json:string>late pleistocene</json:string><json:string>miles method</json:string><json:string>interaction effects</json:string><json:string>amtl frequencies</json:string><json:string>pathological conditions</json:string><json:string>phys anthropol</json:string><json:string>behavioral differences</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>lemur catta</json:string><json:string>eruption</json:string><json:string>predictive modeling</json:string><json:string>theoretical association</json:string><json:string>average times</json:string><json:string>human behaviors</json:string><json:string>summary statistics</json:string><json:string>younger individuals</json:string><json:string>human populations</json:string><json:string>wild lemurs</json:string><json:string>interaction model</json:string><json:string>natural history</json:string><json:string>important contributor</json:string><json:string>dental senescence</json:string><json:string>contemporary humans</json:string><json:string>nonhuman primates</json:string><json:string>tooth</json:string><json:string>humans</json:string><json:string>anterior teeth</json:string><json:string>hamadryas baboons</json:string><json:string>antemortem tooth loss table</json:string><json:string>orangutan sample</json:string><json:string>carious lesion</json:string><json:string>central california</json:string><json:string>older individuals</json:string><json:string>third molar</json:string><json:string>primate samples</json:string><json:string>gilmore table</json:string><json:string>postcranial elements</json:string><json:string>cranial sutures</json:string><json:string>alveolar resorption scores</json:string><json:string>amtl proportions</json:string><json:string>other genera</json:string><json:string>binomial regression models</json:string><json:string>measurement error</json:string><json:string>more amtl</json:string><json:string>modern behavior</json:string><json:string>cooking technology</json:string><json:string>amtl increases</json:string><json:string>governmental affairs</json:string><json:string>individual risk</json:string><json:string>ordinal resorption scores</json:string><json:string>human distribution</json:string><json:string>leakey foundation</json:string><json:string>different relationships</json:string><json:string>experience tooth loss</json:string><json:string>positive correlation</json:string><json:string>tooth class interaction model</json:string><json:string>highest frequencies</json:string><json:string>closest genus</json:string><json:string>binomial models</json:string><json:string>posterior teeth</json:string><json:string>premolar teeth</json:string><json:string>human females</json:string><json:string>wiley periodicals</json:string><json:string>amtl experience</json:string><json:string>human behavior</json:string><json:string>normal senescence</json:string><json:string>density plots</json:string><json:string>tooth class interaction</json:string><json:string>interaction model dics</json:string><json:string>ancient hominin species</json:string><json:string>posterior tooth class</json:string><json:string>uninformative nature</json:string><json:string>higher frequency</json:string><json:string>frequency estimates</json:string><json:string>several variables</json:string><json:string>human characteristics</json:string><json:string>more representative sample</json:string><json:string>little support</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>frequency analyses</json:string><json:string>human population</json:string><json:string>second molar eruption ages</json:string><json:string>eruption schedules</json:string><json:string>yellow baboons</json:string><json:string>precocious evolution</json:string><json:string>hominin specimens</json:string><json:string>ancient populations</json:string><json:string>phys anthropol clarke</json:string><json:string>dental anthropology</json:string><json:string>antemortem loss</json:string><json:string>dental caries</json:string><json:string>behavioral evolution</json:string><json:string>evol cuozzo</json:string><json:string>behavioral modernity</json:string><json:string>evol anthropol</json:string><json:string>smithsonian institution press</json:string><json:string>olive baboons</json:string><json:string>middle pleistocene</json:string><json:string>dental caries rates</json:string><json:string>older people</json:string><json:string>great britain</json:string><json:string>commun dent</json:string><json:string>biol whittaker</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Cassandra C. Gilmore</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Anthropology, University of California, CA, 95616, Davis</json:string><json:string>E-mail: ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>conspecific care</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>longevity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Aubesier</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Dmanisi</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Neanderthal</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AJPA22275</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-1XHP9X1L-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.796</score><pdfWordCount>10013</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>63195</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 809.972 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>233</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1581</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title><pmid><json:string>23640546</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0002-9483</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1096-8644</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>AJPA</json:string></publisherId><volume>151</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>252</first><last>264</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>18th Century</json:string><json:string>2013-04-05</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Sacramento</json:string><json:string>San</json:string><json:string>Franscisco</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>National Diet and Nutrition</json:string><json:string>Institute of Governmental Affairs, UC Davis</json:string><json:string>and American Journal of Physical Anthropology</json:string><json:string>American Museum of Natural History, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Institut</json:string><json:string>American Journal of Physical Anthropology COMPARING ANTEMORTEM TOOTH LOSS</json:string><json:string>Awash National Park</json:string><json:string>Harvard University</json:string><json:string>Gombe National Park, Tanzania</json:string><json:string>American Journal of Physical Anthropology Schultz AH</json:string><json:string>Leakey Foundation, the University of California, Davis, Department of Anthropology Summer Fellowships, and the UC Davis Institute of Governmental Affairs</json:string><json:string>Kibale National Park, Uganda</json:string><json:string>University of California</json:string><json:string>Wiley-Liss Inc</json:string><json:string>Lovejoy CO.</json:string><json:string>National Museum of Natural History</json:string><json:string>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</json:string><json:string>Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis</json:string><json:string>Awash National Park, Ethiopia</json:string><json:string>WILEY PERIODICALS, INC</json:string><json:string>Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Josh Gaydosh</json:string><json:string>La Chapelle</json:string><json:string>Logic</json:string><json:string>Mark Grote</json:string><json:string>Smith Inst</json:string><json:string>Main Effects</json:string><json:string>A. Knopf</json:string><json:string>Tim Weaver</json:string><json:string>Bay Area</json:string><json:string>Phoebe A. Hearst</json:string><json:string>Teresa Steele</json:string><json:string>Researchers</json:string><json:string>Cassandra Gilmore</json:string><json:string>Museum</json:string><json:string>Eric</json:string><json:string>Henry McHenry</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Leipzig</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Ann Arbor</json:string><json:string>Ethiopia</json:string><json:string>Australia</json:string><json:string>Mexico</json:string><json:string>Norway</json:string><json:string>Washington</json:string><json:string>DC</json:string><json:string>Oslo</json:string><json:string>Kenya</json:string><json:string>London</json:string><json:string>Algeria</json:string><json:string>Europe</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>Berkeley</json:string><json:string>San Francisco</json:string><json:string>Lahti</json:string><json:string>Lancaster</json:string><json:string>York</json:string><json:string>MI</json:string><json:string>Iraq</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Guinea</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Otani et al., 1996</json:string><json:string>Parner et al., 2002</json:string><json:string>Lebel and Trinkaus, 2002</json:string><json:string>Stoner (1995)</json:string><json:string>Ahn and Shin, 2008</json:string><json:string>Bronikowski et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Lieverse et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Cuozzo and Sauther, 2006</json:string><json:string>Steinburg et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Kaplan et al., 2001</json:string><json:string>Struhsaker et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Gilbert et al., 2004</json:string><json:string>Wich et al., 2004</json:string><json:string>Tappen, 1985</json:string><json:string>Gilmore and Grote, 2012</json:string><json:string>Banks et al., 2008</json:string><json:string>Dettwyler, 1991</json:string><json:string>Levers and Darling, 1983</json:string><json:string>Dunbar, 1988</json:string><json:string>Baggaley et al., 2012</json:string><json:string>Hujoel et al., 1998</json:string><json:string>Waldron, 1991</json:string><json:string>Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994</json:string><json:string>Lebel and Trinkaus (2002)</json:string><json:string>Key et al., 1994</json:string><json:string>Murdock, 1967</json:string><json:string>DeGusta, 2002</json:string><json:string>Phillips-Conroy and Jolly, 2002</json:string><json:string>Hill et al., 2009</json:string><json:string>Stoner, 1995</json:string><json:string>Clements et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Bartelink, 2006</json:string><json:string>Whittaker et al., 1985, 1990</json:string><json:string>Richards et al., 2000</json:string><json:string>Sheiham et al., 1999, 2001</json:string><json:string>following Buikstra and Ubelaker, 1994</json:string><json:string>Groves, 2001</json:string><json:string>Costa, 1980</json:string><json:string>Jolly, 1993</json:string><json:string>Rainey and Ralph, 1959</json:string><json:string>Kahumbu and Eley, 1991</json:string><json:string>Miles, 2001</json:string><json:string>Mays, 1998</json:string><json:string>Osterberg and Steen, 1982</json:string><json:string>Lordkipanidze et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>Clarke and Hirsche, 1991</json:string><json:string>Jolly, 1970</json:string><json:string>Schultz, 1969</json:string><json:string>Ragir, 2000</json:string><json:string>Shea, 2007</json:string><json:string>Klein, 2000</json:string><json:string>Milliken et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Kahumbu and Eley (1991)</json:string><json:string>Brandes, 1939</json:string><json:string>d’Errico, 2003</json:string><json:string>Rudney et al., 1983</json:string><json:string>Bar-Yosef, 2002</json:string><json:string>Lebel et al., 2001</json:string><json:string>Millette et al., 2012</json:string><json:string>Whittaker and Molleson, 1996</json:string><json:string>Altmann, 1974</json:string><json:string>Hildebolt and Molnar, 1991</json:string><json:string>Meindl and Lovejoy, 1985</json:string><json:string>Lykou and Ntzoufras, 2011</json:string><json:string>McBrearty and Brooks, 2000</json:string><json:string>Cuozzo et al., 2010</json:string><json:string>Lukacs, 2008</json:string><json:string>Solecki, 1960</json:string><json:string>Cuozzo and Sauther, 2004, 2006</json:string><json:string>King et al., 2005</json:string><json:string>De Vore and Hall, 1965</json:string><json:string>Larsen, 1995</json:string><json:string>Hillson, 2001</json:string><json:string>Mellars, 1989</json:string><json:string>reviewed in Spradley and Jantz, 2011</json:string><json:string>Dirks et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Millard and Gowland, 2002</json:string><json:string>as in Fooden and Izor, 1983</json:string><json:string>Buck et al., 1993</json:string><json:string>Brace, 1979</json:string><json:string>Sauther et al., 2002</json:string><json:string>Jolly and Plog, 1982</json:string><json:string>Lunn et al., 2000, 2009</json:string><json:string>Cucina and Tiesler, 2003</json:string><json:string>Nowjack-Raymer and Sheiham, 2003</json:string><json:string>Smith et al., 2007</json:string><json:string>Clarke, 1986, 1990</json:string><json:string>Steele et al., 2004</json:string><json:string>Froehle and Churchill, 2009</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-1XHP9X1L-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - anthropology</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - evolutionary biology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>2 - historical studies</json:string><json:string>3 - anthropology</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Anthropology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Anatomy</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/ajpa.22275</json:string></doi><id>4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title><title level="a" type="short">Comparing Antemortem Tooth Loss</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Cassandra C.</forename><surname>Gilmore</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Anthropology</orgName><orgName>University of California</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Davis</settlement><postCode>95616</postCode><region>CA</region><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence to: Cassandra Gilmore, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. E‐mail:ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1XHP9X1L-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/ajpa.22275</idno><idno type="unit">AJPA22275</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:AJPA.AJPA22275.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title><title level="j" type="alt">AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0002-9483</idno><idno type="eISSN">1096-8644</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/ajpa.v151.2</idno><idno type="product">AJPA</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">151</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="252">252</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="264">264</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0001">conspecific care</term><term xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0002">longevity</term><term xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0003">Aubesier</term><term xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0004">Dmanisi</term><term xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0005">Neanderthal</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Research Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en" xml:id="ajpa22275"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644</doi><issn type="print">0002-9483</issn><issn type="electronic">1096-8644</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AJPA"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY">American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title><title type="short">Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="20"><doi>10.1002/ajpa.v151.2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="151">151</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-06">June 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="80" type="article" status="forIssue"><doi>10.1002/ajpa.22275</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AJPA22275"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="manuscriptReceived" date="2012-09-15"></event><event type="manuscriptAccepted" date="2013-03-15"></event><event type="xmlCreated" agent="Cenveo Publisher Services" date="2013-04-05"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-05-02"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-05-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-05-17"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">252</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">264</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Correspondence to: Cassandra Gilmore, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. E‐mail:<email>ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</email></correspondenceTo><objectNameGroup><objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName></objectNameGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AJPA.AJPA22275.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title><title type="short">Comparing Antemortem Tooth Loss</title><title type="shortAuthors">C.C. Gilmore</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#ajpa22275-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="ajpa22275-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Cassandra C.</givenNames><familyName>Gilmore</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="ajpa22275-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Anthropology</orgDiv><orgName>University of California</orgName><address><city>Davis</city><countryPart>CA</countryPart><postCode>95616</postCode></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0001">conspecific care</keyword><keyword xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0002">longevity</keyword><keyword xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0003">Aubesier</keyword><keyword xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0004">Dmanisi</keyword><keyword xml:id="ajpa22275-kwd-0005">Neanderthal</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Leakey Foundation; Institute of Governmental Affairs, UC Davis</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><supportingInformation><p>Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.</p><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="application" href="urn-x:wiley:00029483:media:ajpa22275:ajpa22275-sup-0001-suppinfo"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting Information Fig. 1</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="application" href="urn-x:wiley:00029483:media:ajpa22275:ajpa22275-sup-0002-suppinfo"></mediaResource><caption>Supporting Information Fig. 2</caption></supportingInfoItem><supportingInfoItem><mediaResource alt="application" href="urn-x:wiley:00029483:media:ajpa22275:ajpa22275-sup-0003-suppinfo"></mediaResource><caption>Supplementary Table 1 Composition of non‐human primate samples.</caption></supportingInfoItem></supportingInformation><abstractGroup><abstract type="main"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Comparing Antemortem Tooth Loss</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Cassandra C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Gilmore</namePart><affiliation>Department of Anthropology, University of California, CA, 95616, Davis</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: ccbrown@ucdavis.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-05</dateCreated><dateCaptured encoding="w3cdtf">2012-09-15</dateCaptured><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03-15</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil hominin specimens with severe antemortem tooth loss are often regarded as evidence for the precocious evolution of human‐like behaviors, such as conspecific care or cooking, in ancient hominin species. The goal of this project was to ask whether the theoretical association between antemortem tooth loss and uniquely human behaviors is supported empirically in a large skeletal sample of human hunter‐gatherers, chimpanzees, orangutans, and baboons. Binomial regression modeling in a Bayesian framework allows for the investigation of the effects of tooth class, genus, age, and sex on the likelihood of tooth loss. The results strongly suggest that modern humans experience more antemortem tooth loss than non‐human primates and identify age in years as an important predictor. Once age is accounted for, the difference between the humans and the closest non‐human genus (chimpanzees) is less pronounced; humans are still more likely on average to experience antemortem tooth loss though 95% uncertainty envelopes around the average prediction for each genus show some overlap. These analyses support theoretical links between antemortem tooth loss and modern human characteristics; humans' significantly longer life history and a positive correlation between age and antemortem tooth loss explain, in part, the reason why humans are more likely to experience tooth loss than non‐human primates, but the results do not exclude behavioral differences as a contributing factor. Am J Phys Anthropol 151:252–264, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><note type="funding">Leakey Foundation; Institute of Governmental Affairs, UC Davis</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>conspecific care</topic><topic>longevity</topic><topic>Aubesier</topic><topic>Dmanisi</topic><topic>Neanderthal</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>American Journal of Physical Anthropology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><note type="content"> Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.Supporting Info Item: Supporting Information Fig. 1 - Supporting Information Fig. 2 - Supplementary Table 1 Composition of non‐human primate samples. - </note><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0002-9483</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1096-8644</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AJPA</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>151</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>252</start><end>264</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1XHP9X1L-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/ajpa.22275</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AJPA22275</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:4A513321034559943D49704B68A53F819D1D8591
|texte= A comparison of antemortem tooth loss in human hunter‐gatherers and non‐human catarrhines: Implications for the identification of behavioral evolution in the human fossil record
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |