Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial
Identifieur interne : 000134 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000133; suivant : 000135Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial
Auteurs : Felix Guljé ; Ingemar Abrahamsson ; Stephen Chen ; Clark Stanford ; Homayoun Zadeh ; Richard PalmerSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2013-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adverse device effects, Adverse events, Anatomical crown height, Astra, Astra tech, Bone augmentation procedures, Bone gain, Bone height, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone volume, Categorical data, Chlorhexidine rinse, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Clinical photographs, Clinical trials, Continuous data, Crestal bone loss, Crown height, Deeper placement, Dental implants, Early loss, Exact test, Exclusion criteria, Felix gulje, Future randomized, Grondahl, Gulje, Healing caps, Healing period, Impl, Implant, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant reference point, Implant rehabilitation, Implant research, Implant site, Implant stability, Implant survival, Implants research, Inclusion criteria, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, John wiley sons gulje, Limited bone height, Mandible, Marginal bone gain, Marginal bone level alteration, Marginal bone level change, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofacial implants, Multicenter, Multicenter randomized, Multicenter trial, Nonsplinted restorations, Oral examination, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Plaque, Posterior area implants, Posterior maxilla, Posterior region, Predictable treatment alternative, Present study, Primary implant stability, Private practice, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Provisional prosthesis, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic examination, Randomized, Reference point, Renouard nisand, Retrospective study, Short implants, Shorter implants, Soft tissue behavior, Soft tissue evaluation, Study area, Study centers, Survival rate, Systematic review, Temporary restoration, Time point, Time points, Tissue evaluation, Wilcoxon rank.
- Teeft :
- Adverse device effects, Adverse events, Anatomical crown height, Astra, Astra tech, Bone augmentation procedures, Bone gain, Bone height, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone volume, Categorical data, Chlorhexidine rinse, Clin, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Clinical photographs, Clinical trials, Continuous data, Crestal bone loss, Crown height, Deeper placement, Dental implants, Early loss, Exact test, Exclusion criteria, Felix gulje, Future randomized, Grondahl, Gulje, Healing caps, Healing period, Impl, Implant, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant reference point, Implant rehabilitation, Implant research, Implant site, Implant stability, Implant survival, Implants research, Inclusion criteria, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, John wiley sons gulje, Limited bone height, Mandible, Marginal bone gain, Marginal bone level alteration, Marginal bone level change, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofacial implants, Multicenter, Multicenter randomized, Multicenter trial, Nonsplinted restorations, Oral examination, Oral hygiene, Oral impl, Plaque, Posterior area implants, Posterior maxilla, Posterior region, Predictable treatment alternative, Present study, Primary implant stability, Private practice, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Provisional prosthesis, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic examination, Randomized, Reference point, Renouard nisand, Retrospective study, Short implants, Shorter implants, Soft tissue behavior, Soft tissue evaluation, Study area, Study centers, Survival rate, Systematic review, Temporary restoration, Time point, Time points, Tissue evaluation, Wilcoxon rank.
Abstract
In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12001
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><author><name sortKey="Gulje, Felix" sort="Gulje, Felix" uniqKey="Gulje F" first="Felix" last="Guljé">Felix Guljé</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice “de Mondhoek”, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>, DDSPrivate practice “de Mondhoek”ApeldoornThe NetherlandsTel.: +31 (0)555212277Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" sort="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" uniqKey="Abrahamsson I" first="Ingemar" last="Abrahamsson">Ingemar Abrahamsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Stephen" sort="Chen, Stephen" uniqKey="Chen S" first="Stephen" last="Chen">Stephen Chen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Melbourne, Vic., Melbourne, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stanford, Clark" sort="Stanford, Clark" uniqKey="Stanford C" first="Clark" last="Stanford">Clark Stanford</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Iowa, Iowa, Iowa City, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zadeh, Homayoun" sort="Zadeh, Homayoun" uniqKey="Zadeh H" first="Homayoun" last="Zadeh">Homayoun Zadeh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard" sort="Palmer, Richard" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard" last="Palmer">Richard Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>King's College London, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12001</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000134</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000134</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><author><name sortKey="Gulje, Felix" sort="Gulje, Felix" uniqKey="Gulje F" first="Felix" last="Guljé">Felix Guljé</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice “de Mondhoek”, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>, DDSPrivate practice “de Mondhoek”ApeldoornThe NetherlandsTel.: +31 (0)555212277Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" sort="Abrahamsson, Ingemar" uniqKey="Abrahamsson I" first="Ingemar" last="Abrahamsson">Ingemar Abrahamsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chen, Stephen" sort="Chen, Stephen" uniqKey="Chen S" first="Stephen" last="Chen">Stephen Chen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Melbourne, Vic., Melbourne, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stanford, Clark" sort="Stanford, Clark" uniqKey="Stanford C" first="Clark" last="Stanford">Clark Stanford</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Iowa, Iowa, Iowa City, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zadeh, Homayoun" sort="Zadeh, Homayoun" uniqKey="Zadeh H" first="Homayoun" last="Zadeh">Homayoun Zadeh</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmer, Richard" sort="Palmer, Richard" uniqKey="Palmer R" first="Richard" last="Palmer">Richard Palmer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>King's College London, London, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1325">1325</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1331">1331</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-12">2013-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adverse device effects</term><term>Adverse events</term><term>Anatomical crown height</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone augmentation procedures</term><term>Bone gain</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Categorical data</term><term>Chlorhexidine rinse</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical photographs</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Continuous data</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Crown height</term><term>Deeper placement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Early loss</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Felix gulje</term><term>Future randomized</term><term>Grondahl</term><term>Gulje</term><term>Healing caps</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant reference point</term><term>Implant rehabilitation</term><term>Implant research</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons gulje</term><term>Limited bone height</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone gain</term><term>Marginal bone level alteration</term><term>Marginal bone level change</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter randomized</term><term>Multicenter trial</term><term>Nonsplinted restorations</term><term>Oral examination</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Posterior area implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Predictable treatment alternative</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary implant stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Provisional prosthesis</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Renouard nisand</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Shorter implants</term><term>Soft tissue behavior</term><term>Soft tissue evaluation</term><term>Study area</term><term>Study centers</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Temporary restoration</term><term>Time point</term><term>Time points</term><term>Tissue evaluation</term><term>Wilcoxon rank</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adverse device effects</term><term>Adverse events</term><term>Anatomical crown height</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Bone augmentation procedures</term><term>Bone gain</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Categorical data</term><term>Chlorhexidine rinse</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical photographs</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Continuous data</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Crown height</term><term>Deeper placement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Early loss</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Exclusion criteria</term><term>Felix gulje</term><term>Future randomized</term><term>Grondahl</term><term>Gulje</term><term>Healing caps</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant reference point</term><term>Implant rehabilitation</term><term>Implant research</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons gulje</term><term>Limited bone height</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone gain</term><term>Marginal bone level alteration</term><term>Marginal bone level change</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter randomized</term><term>Multicenter trial</term><term>Nonsplinted restorations</term><term>Oral examination</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Posterior area implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Predictable treatment alternative</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary implant stability</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Provisional prosthesis</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Renouard nisand</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Shorter implants</term><term>Soft tissue behavior</term><term>Soft tissue evaluation</term><term>Study area</term><term>Study centers</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Temporary restoration</term><term>Time point</term><term>Time points</term><term>Tissue evaluation</term><term>Wilcoxon rank</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>gulje</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>provisional prosthesis</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>grondahl</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>posterior area implants</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>implant research</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>adverse events</json:string><json:string>adverse device effects</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>tissue evaluation</json:string><json:string>exclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>soft tissue evaluation</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>exact test</json:string><json:string>marginal bone gain</json:string><json:string>soft tissue behavior</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level change</json:string><json:string>bone augmentation procedures</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>bone gain</json:string><json:string>limited bone height</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>oral examination</json:string><json:string>inclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons gulje</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>renouard nisand</json:string><json:string>implant site</json:string><json:string>primary implant stability</json:string><json:string>time points</json:string><json:string>healing caps</json:string><json:string>clinical photographs</json:string><json:string>study area</json:string><json:string>felix gulje</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>study centers</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level alteration</json:string><json:string>crestal bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant reference point</json:string><json:string>shorter implants</json:string><json:string>time point</json:string><json:string>anatomical crown height</json:string><json:string>continuous data</json:string><json:string>categorical data</json:string><json:string>wilcoxon rank</json:string><json:string>implant rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>chlorhexidine rinse</json:string><json:string>bone volume</json:string><json:string>clinical trials</json:string><json:string>early loss</json:string><json:string>future randomized</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>crown height</json:string><json:string>temporary restoration</json:string><json:string>predictable treatment alternative</json:string><json:string>deeper placement</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>nonsplinted restorations</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>multicenter trial</json:string><json:string>posterior region</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>multicenter randomized</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Felix Guljé</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice “de Mondhoek”, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>, DDSPrivate practice “de Mondhoek”ApeldoornThe NetherlandsTel.: +31 (0)555212277Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ingemar Abrahamsson</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stephen Chen</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Melbourne, Vic., Melbourne, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Clark Stanford</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Iowa, Iowa, Iowa City, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Homayoun Zadeh</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Richard Palmer</name><affiliations><json:string>King's College London, London, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>posterior</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>randomized controlled trial</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>short</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR12001</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-SM14X5VG-Z</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.491</score><pdfWordCount>4999</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30272</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>41</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>253</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><pmid><json:string>22938573</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1325</first><last>1331</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1328</json:string><json:string>2012-08-10</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Australia Clark Stanford, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA Homayoun Zadeh, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA Richard Palmer, King</json:string><json:string>Apeldoorn The Netherlands Tel</json:string><json:string>University of Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Radiology</json:string><json:string>UK Corresponding</json:string><json:string>Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>R. Implants</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Chen Clark</json:string><json:string>Felix Gulje</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Stanford</json:string><json:string>Blanes</json:string><json:string>Melbourne</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Cupertino</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>MA</json:string><json:string>Cambridge</json:string><json:string>Apeldoorn</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Anitua & Gorka 2010</json:string><json:string>Fugazzotto et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. (1981)</json:string><json:string>Guichet et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Ten Bruggenkate et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Roos et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Telleman et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Blanes et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Gerritsen et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Pierrisnard et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Pommer et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson & Zarb 1993</json:string><json:string>Annibali et al. 2012</json:string><json:string>Pommer et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Gulje et al.</json:string><json:string>June 2010</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Renouard & Nisand 2005</json:string><json:string>Rossi et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Sunde et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Grondahl et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Telleman et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>November 2007</json:string><json:string>Brocard et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Lekholm et al. 1985</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-SM14X5VG-Z</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/clr.12001</json:string></doi><id>289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Felix</forename><surname>Guljé</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private practice “de Mondhoek”</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Apeldoorn</settlement><country key="NL">The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Felix Guljé, DDS Private practice “de Mondhoek” Apeldoorn The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)555212277 Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217 e‐mail: f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Ingemar</forename><surname>Abrahamsson</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>University of Gothenburg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Gothenburg</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Stephen</forename><surname>Chen</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>University of Melbourne</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Melbourne</settlement><region>Vic.</region><country key="AU">Australia</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Clark</forename><surname>Stanford</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>University of Iowa</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Iowa City</settlement><region>Iowa</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Homayoun</forename><surname>Zadeh</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>University of Southern California</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Los Angeles</settlement><region>California</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Richard</forename><surname>Palmer</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>King's College London</orgName><address><settlement type="city">London</settlement><country key="GB">UK</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SM14X5VG-Z</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12001</idno><idno type="unit">CLR12001</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR12001.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1325">1325</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1331">1331</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr12001-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Background and aim
<p>In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</p>
Materials and methods
<p>In this multicenter trial (six study sites), 95 subjects were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to receiving implants with lengths of either 6 or 11 mm both with a diameter of 4 mm (<hi rend="fc">O</hi>sseo<hi rend="fc">S</hi>peed<hi rend="superscript">™</hi> 4.0 <hi rend="fc">S</hi>;<hi rend="fc"> A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech <hi rend="fc">AB</hi>; Mölndal, Sweden). In all cases, there had to be sufficient bone height to allow placement of an implant of at least 11 mm in length. Two or three implants were placed per subject using one‐stage surgery with a 42–48 days' healing period before loading. They were restored with a screw‐retained splinted fixed prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively, postsurgery, at loading, and 6 and 12 months after prosthesis placement.</p>
Results
<p>A total of 208 implants were inserted in 49 subjects receiving 6‐mm implants (test) and in 46 subjects receiving 11 mm implants (control). Two 6‐mm implants failed before loading and one 6 and 11 mm implants failed before 1‐year evaluation. From loading to the 12 months' follow‐up, a mean marginal bone gain of 0.06 mm in the 6 mm group and 0.02 mm in the 11 mm group was found (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.478). Soft tissue behavior was equal in both groups (Bleeding and plaque [<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 1.0] probing depth [<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.91]).</p>
Conclusion
<p>One‐year data indicate that treatment with the 6 mm implants is as reliable as treatment with the 11 mm implants. This provides a good treatment option in situations with limited bone height in the premolar and molar regions. Whether or not short implants provide a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation procedures remains to be investigated in the future randomized controlled clinical trials.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0001">implant</term><term xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0002">marginal bone loss</term><term xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0003">posterior</term><term xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0004">randomized controlled trial</term><term xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0005">short</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr12001" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="120"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-12</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-12">December 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="70" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/clr.12001</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR12001"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="7" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-07-16" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-08-10" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.2.6 mode:FullText" date="2013-10-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-09-03"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-09-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-10-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1325</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1331</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Felix Guljé</i>, DDS</line><line>Private practice “de Mondhoek”</line><line>Apeldoorn</line><line>The Netherlands</line><line>Tel.: +31 (0)555212277</line><line>Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217</line><line>e‐mail: <email>f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr12001-cit-1001"><b>To cite this article:</b> <author><familyName>Guljé</familyName> <givenNames>F</givenNames></author> , <author><familyName>Abrahamsson</familyName> <givenNames>I</givenNames></author> , <author><familyName>Chen</familyName> <givenNames>S</givenNames></author> , <author><familyName>Stanford</familyName> <givenNames>C</givenNames></author> , <author><familyName>Zadeh</familyName> <givenNames>H</givenNames></author> , <author><familyName>Palmer</familyName> <givenNames>R</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>24</vol>, <pubYear year="2013">2013</pubYear>, <pageFirst>1325</pageFirst>–<pageLast>1331</pageLast></citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR12001.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title><title type="shortAuthors">Guljé et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Felix</givenNames> <familyName>Guljé</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Ingemar</givenNames> <familyName>Abrahamsson</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Stephen</givenNames> <familyName>Chen</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Clark</givenNames> <familyName>Stanford</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0005" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>Homayoun</givenNames> <familyName>Zadeh</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12001-aff-0006" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12001-cr-0006"><personName><givenNames>Richard</givenNames> <familyName>Palmer</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="NL" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0001"><orgName>Private practice “de Mondhoek”</orgName> <address><city>Apeldoorn</city> <country>The Netherlands</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="SE" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0002"><orgName>University of Gothenburg</orgName> <address><city>Gothenburg</city> <country>Sweden</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="AU" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0003"><orgName>University of Melbourne</orgName> <address><city>Melbourne</city> <countryPart>Vic.</countryPart> <country>Australia</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0004"><orgName>University of Iowa</orgName> <address><city>Iowa City</city> <countryPart>Iowa</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0005"><orgName>University of Southern California</orgName> <address><city>Los Angeles</city> <countryPart>California</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="GB" type="organization" xml:id="clr12001-aff-0006"><orgName>King's College London</orgName> <address><city>London</city> <country>UK</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0001">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0002">marginal bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0003">posterior</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0004">randomized controlled trial</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12001-kwd-0005">short</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr12001-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr12001-sec-0001"><title type="main">Background and aim</title><p>In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12001-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and methods</title><p>In this multicenter trial (six study sites), 95 subjects were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to receiving implants with lengths of either 6 or 11 mm both with a diameter of 4 mm (<fc>O</fc>sseo<fc>S</fc>peed<sup>™</sup> 4.0 <fc>S</fc>;<fc> A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech <fc>AB</fc>; Mölndal, Sweden). In all cases, there had to be sufficient bone height to allow placement of an implant of at least 11 mm in length. Two or three implants were placed per subject using one‐stage surgery with a 42–48 days' healing period before loading. They were restored with a screw‐retained splinted fixed prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively, postsurgery, at loading, and 6 and 12 months after prosthesis placement.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12001-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>A total of 208 implants were inserted in 49 subjects receiving 6‐mm implants (test) and in 46 subjects receiving 11 mm implants (control). Two 6‐mm implants failed before loading and one 6 and 11 mm implants failed before 1‐year evaluation. From loading to the 12 months' follow‐up, a mean marginal bone gain of 0.06 mm in the 6 mm group and 0.02 mm in the 11 mm group was found (<i>P</i> = 0.478). Soft tissue behavior was equal in both groups (Bleeding and plaque [<i>P</i> = 1.0] probing depth [<i>P</i> = 0.91]).</p></section><section xml:id="clr12001-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>One‐year data indicate that treatment with the 6 mm implants is as reliable as treatment with the 11 mm implants. This provides a good treatment option in situations with limited bone height in the premolar and molar regions. Whether or not short implants provide a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation procedures remains to be investigated in the future randomized controlled clinical trials.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Felix</namePart><namePart type="family">Guljé</namePart><affiliation>Private practice “de Mondhoek”, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands</affiliation><affiliation>, DDSPrivate practice “de Mondhoek”ApeldoornThe NetherlandsTel.: +31 (0)555212277Fax: +31 (0)55 5786217e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: f.gulje@mondhoek.nl</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ingemar</namePart><namePart type="family">Abrahamsson</namePart><affiliation>University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephen</namePart><namePart type="family">Chen</namePart><affiliation>University of Melbourne, Vic., Melbourne, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Clark</namePart><namePart type="family">Stanford</namePart><affiliation>University of Iowa, Iowa, Iowa City, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Homayoun</namePart><namePart type="family">Zadeh</namePart><affiliation>University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard</namePart><namePart type="family">Palmer</namePart><affiliation>King's College London, London, UK</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-12</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08-10</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-07-16</dateValid><edition>To cite this article: Guljé F , Abrahamsson I , Chen S , Stanford C , Zadeh H , Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 24, 2013, 1325–1331</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>In cases with limited bone height, short implants could be a good alternative to augmentation procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical performance of implants of 6 mm or 11 mm in length in the posterior region.</abstract><abstract>In this multicenter trial (six study sites), 95 subjects were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to receiving implants with lengths of either 6 or 11 mm both with a diameter of 4 mm (OsseoSpeed™ 4.0 S; Astra Tech AB; Mölndal, Sweden). In all cases, there had to be sufficient bone height to allow placement of an implant of at least 11 mm in length. Two or three implants were placed per subject using one‐stage surgery with a 42–48 days' healing period before loading. They were restored with a screw‐retained splinted fixed prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed preoperatively, postsurgery, at loading, and 6 and 12 months after prosthesis placement.</abstract><abstract>A total of 208 implants were inserted in 49 subjects receiving 6‐mm implants (test) and in 46 subjects receiving 11 mm implants (control). Two 6‐mm implants failed before loading and one 6 and 11 mm implants failed before 1‐year evaluation. From loading to the 12 months' follow‐up, a mean marginal bone gain of 0.06 mm in the 6 mm group and 0.02 mm in the 11 mm group was found (P = 0.478). Soft tissue behavior was equal in both groups (Bleeding and plaque [P = 1.0] probing depth [P = 0.91]).</abstract><abstract>One‐year data indicate that treatment with the 6 mm implants is as reliable as treatment with the 11 mm implants. This provides a good treatment option in situations with limited bone height in the premolar and molar regions. Whether or not short implants provide a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation procedures remains to be investigated in the future randomized controlled clinical trials.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant</topic><topic>marginal bone loss</topic><topic>posterior</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>short</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1325</start><end>1331</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-SM14X5VG-Z</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12001</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR12001</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000134 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000134 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:289B7E0CF46EABB1E962AB58AFDDC2FBD1E6896C
|texte= Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1‐year multicenter randomized controlled trial
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |