Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years
Identifieur interne : 000023 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000022; suivant : 000024Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years
Auteurs : Nils Ravald ; Simon Dahlgren ; Anders Teiwik ; Kerstin GröndahlSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2013-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech group, Astra tech implant, Astra tech implants, Astra tech tioblast implants, Astrand, Baseline, Bone level, Bone level changes, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark group, Branemark implants, Branemark patients, Branemark system, Branemark system implants, Bridge connection, Clin, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Comparative study, Dentistry, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Engquist, Fracture, Fransson, Gold alloy, Grondahl, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant system, Implant systems, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons ravald, Life table analysis, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Ndings, Nemark, Nemark implants, Nemark implants ravald, Nobel biocare, Observation period, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Periodontal disease, Periodontology, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Ravald, Retrospective study, Sunden pikner, Tech, Tioblast, Titanium, Titanium implants, Xture installation.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech group, Astra tech implant, Astra tech implants, Astra tech tioblast implants, Astrand, Baseline, Bone level, Bone level changes, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark group, Branemark implants, Branemark patients, Branemark system, Branemark system implants, Bridge connection, Clin, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Comparative study, Dentistry, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Engquist, Fracture, Fransson, Gold alloy, Grondahl, Impl, Implant, Implant failure, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant system, Implant systems, Implant treatment, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons ravald, Life table analysis, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone loss, Ndings, Nemark, Nemark implants, Nemark implants ravald, Nobel biocare, Observation period, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Periodontal disease, Periodontology, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic, Ravald, Retrospective study, Sunden pikner, Tech, Tioblast, Titanium, Titanium implants, Xture installation.
Abstract
To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either Astra Tech TiOblast or Brånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title><author><name sortKey="Ravald, Nils" sort="Ravald, Nils" uniqKey="Ravald N" first="Nils" last="Ravald">Nils Ravald</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>:Centre for Oral RehabilitationSE‐58185 LinköpingSwedenTel.: +46 10 10388 56Fax: +46 10 10388 47e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: nils.ravald@lio.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dahlgren, Simon" sort="Dahlgren, Simon" uniqKey="Dahlgren S" first="Simon" last="Dahlgren">Simon Dahlgren</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teiwik, Anders" sort="Teiwik, Anders" uniqKey="Teiwik A" first="Anders" last="Teiwik">Anders Teiwik</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grondahl, Kerstin" sort="Grondahl, Kerstin" uniqKey="Grondahl K" first="Kerstin" last="Gröndahl">Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000023</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000023</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term evaluation of <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech and <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title><author><name sortKey="Ravald, Nils" sort="Ravald, Nils" uniqKey="Ravald N" first="Nils" last="Ravald">Nils Ravald</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>:Centre for Oral RehabilitationSE‐58185 LinköpingSwedenTel.: +46 10 10388 56Fax: +46 10 10388 47e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: nils.ravald@lio.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dahlgren, Simon" sort="Dahlgren, Simon" uniqKey="Dahlgren S" first="Simon" last="Dahlgren">Simon Dahlgren</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Teiwik, Anders" sort="Teiwik, Anders" uniqKey="Teiwik A" first="Anders" last="Teiwik">Anders Teiwik</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grondahl, Kerstin" sort="Grondahl, Kerstin" uniqKey="Grondahl K" first="Kerstin" last="Gröndahl">Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1144">1144</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1151">1151</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10">2013-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech group</term><term>Astra tech implant</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Astra tech tioblast implants</term><term>Astrand</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark group</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Branemark patients</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Bridge connection</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Engquist</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fransson</term><term>Gold alloy</term><term>Grondahl</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons ravald</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Ndings</term><term>Nemark</term><term>Nemark implants</term><term>Nemark implants ravald</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Ravald</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sunden pikner</term><term>Tech</term><term>Tioblast</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Xture installation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech group</term><term>Astra tech implant</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Astra tech tioblast implants</term><term>Astrand</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone level changes</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark group</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Branemark patients</term><term>Branemark system</term><term>Branemark system implants</term><term>Bridge connection</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Comparative study</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Engquist</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fransson</term><term>Gold alloy</term><term>Grondahl</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons ravald</term><term>Life table analysis</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Ndings</term><term>Nemark</term><term>Nemark implants</term><term>Nemark implants ravald</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontology</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Ravald</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sunden pikner</term><term>Tech</term><term>Tioblast</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Xture installation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either Astra Tech TiOblast or Brånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>branemark implants</json:string><json:string>astrand</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>grondahl</json:string><json:string>ravald</json:string><json:string>periodontology</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>ndings</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>engquist</json:string><json:string>branemark group</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>nemark</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>tioblast</json:string><json:string>fransson</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>astra tech group</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>gold alloy</json:string><json:string>implant loss</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>branemark patients</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>branemark system implants</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>sunden pikner</json:string><json:string>different implant systems</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons ravald</json:string><json:string>branemark system</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>astra tech implant</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>xture installation</json:string><json:string>bridge connection</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>life table analysis</json:string><json:string>nemark implants</json:string><json:string>bone level changes</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>comparative study</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>nemark implants ravald</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>astra tech tioblast implants</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>tech</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Nils Ravald</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</json:string><json:string>:Centre for Oral RehabilitationSE‐58185 LinköpingSwedenTel.: +46 10 10388 56Fax: +46 10 10388 47e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: nils.ravald@lio.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Simon Dahlgren</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anders Teiwik</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kerstin Gröndahl</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Astra Tech implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Brånemark system turned implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>comparative study</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>endosseous implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>marginal bone level</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>success rate</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival rate</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2524</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-8K8PLXL4-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either Astra Tech TiOblast or Brånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>36</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>236</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount><score>7.432</score><pdfWordCount>5031</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33134</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title><pmid><json:string>22762251</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>1144</first><last>1151</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Research</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>12</json:string><json:string>5</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>period August 1993 to December 1995</json:string><json:string>2012-07-02</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Sweden Tel</json:string><json:string>Linkoping University</json:string><json:string>Research Council of Public</json:string><json:string>Ethics Committee of the University of Linkoping</json:string><json:string>Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jonkoping, Sweden</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Anders Teiwik</json:string><json:string>Carin Hostner</json:string><json:string>Branemark</json:string><json:string>Upper</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Median</json:string><json:string>Per Astrand</json:string><json:string>Nils Ravald</json:string><json:string>Ulla</json:string><json:string>Mean</json:string><json:string>Simon Dahlgren</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Jansaker et al. 2006c</json:string><json:string>Pikner et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Albrektsson 2008</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansaker et al. 2006b</json:string><json:string>Balshe et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Bozini et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Ravald et al</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Rasmusson et al.</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al.</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansaker et al. 2006a</json:string><json:string>Dierens et al. (2012)</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Engquist et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Berglundh 2008</json:string><json:string>Rinke et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Rocci et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 1999, 2004</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Jungner et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981, 1990</json:string><json:string>Wennstrom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Lindquist et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Van de Velde et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Rasmusson et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Alsaadi et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Aglietta et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Glauser et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Astrand et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Wennerberg et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Roos-Jansaker et al. 2006c</json:string><json:string>Ekelund et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Fransson et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Hallman et al. 2005</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-8K8PLXL4-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x</json:string></doi><id>081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term evaluation of <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech and <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term evaluation of <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech and <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Nils</forename><surname>Ravald</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Medical and Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Linköping</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Dr Nils Ravald Centre for Oral Rehabilitation SE‐58185 Linköping Sweden Tel.: +46 10 10388 56 Fax: +46 10 10388 47 e‐mail: nils.ravald@lio.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Simon</forename><surname>Dahlgren</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Medical and Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Linköping</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Anders</forename><surname>Teiwik</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Medical and Health Sciences</orgName><orgName>Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Linköping</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Kerstin</forename><surname>Gröndahl</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</orgName><orgName>The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Jönköping</settlement><country key="SE">Sweden</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8K8PLXL4-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2524</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2524.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1144">1144</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1151">1151</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2524-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech Ti<hi rend="fc">O</hi>blast or <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.</p>
Material and methods
<p>Edentulous patients treated with either <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech Ti<hi rend="fc">O</hi>blast surface or <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark turned implants were recalled for examination after 12–15 years. Out of initially 66 patients 46 were available for examination. Intra‐oral radiographs were taken for bone level assessments. Clinical prosthetic conditions, number of surviving implants, implant stability, plaque scores, probing pocket depths, bleeding and pus after probing were recorded. Analyses of bone level changes during the total observation period were performed.</p>
Results
<p>Three patients in the <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech group lost totally eight implants and five patients in the <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark group lost 10 implants during the total observation period. No statistically significant difference in implant loss or bone level change was found. Sixteen per cent of <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech and 29% of <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark patients showed at least one implant with ≥2 mm bone loss after the first year in function. The corresponding prevalence on implant level was 6% and 5% respectively. No significant differences were found between the other examined variables. Two patients showed prosthetic complications of the supra construction in need of repair. Seven bridges had minor ceramic chippings.</p>
Conclusion
<p>Treatment with <hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech Ti<hi rend="fc">O</hi>blast implants and <hi rend="fc">B</hi>rånemark turned implants supporting full‐arch bridges showed generally good clinical results with low numbers of implants with marginal bone loss indicative of peri‐implantitis. No significant differences were found between the implant systems after 12–15 years in function.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0001"><hi rend="fc">A</hi>stra <hi rend="fc">T</hi>ech implant</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0002">Brånemark system turned implants</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0003">comparative study</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0004">endosseous implants</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0005">marginal bone level</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0006">success rate</term><term xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0007">survival rate</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Research</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2524" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="100"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-10</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-10">October 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="120" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2524"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Research</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-05-31" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-07-02" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-07-04"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-07-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-09-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1144</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1151</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author</b>:</line><line><i>Dr Nils Ravald</i></line><line>Centre for Oral Rehabilitation</line><line>SE‐58185 Linköping</line><line>Sweden</line><line>Tel.: +46 10 10388 56</line><line>Fax: +46 10 10388 47</line><line>e‐mail: <email>nils.ravald@lio.se</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2524-cit-0042">Ravald N, Dahlgren S, Teiwik A, Gröndahl K. Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>., <b>24</b> 2013, 1144–1151</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2524.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐term evaluation of <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech and <fc>B</fc>rånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title><title type="shortAuthors">Ravald et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2524-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2524-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Nils</givenNames> <familyName>Ravald</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2524-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2524-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Simon</givenNames> <familyName>Dahlgren</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2524-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2524-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Anders</givenNames> <familyName>Teiwik</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2524-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2524-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Kerstin</givenNames> <familyName>Gröndahl</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="SE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2524-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Medical and Health Sciences</orgDiv> <orgName>Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland</orgName> <address><city>Linköping</city> <country>Sweden</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="SE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2524-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology</orgDiv> <orgName>The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education</orgName> <address><city>Jönköping</city> <country>Sweden</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0001"><fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0002">Brånemark system turned implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0003">comparative study</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0004">endosseous implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0005">marginal bone level</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0006">success rate</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2524-kwd-0007">survival rate</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Research Council of Public Dental Service</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2524-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2524-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech Ti<fc>O</fc>blast or <fc>B</fc>rånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2524-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>Edentulous patients treated with either <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech Ti<fc>O</fc>blast surface or <fc>B</fc>rånemark turned implants were recalled for examination after 12–15 years. Out of initially 66 patients 46 were available for examination. Intra‐oral radiographs were taken for bone level assessments. Clinical prosthetic conditions, number of surviving implants, implant stability, plaque scores, probing pocket depths, bleeding and pus after probing were recorded. Analyses of bone level changes during the total observation period were performed.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2524-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Three patients in the <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech group lost totally eight implants and five patients in the <fc>B</fc>rånemark group lost 10 implants during the total observation period. No statistically significant difference in implant loss or bone level change was found. Sixteen per cent of <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech and 29% of <fc>B</fc>rånemark patients showed at least one implant with ≥2 mm bone loss after the first year in function. The corresponding prevalence on implant level was 6% and 5% respectively. No significant differences were found between the other examined variables. Two patients showed prosthetic complications of the supra construction in need of repair. Seven bridges had minor ceramic chippings.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2524-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>Treatment with <fc>A</fc>stra <fc>T</fc>ech Ti<fc>O</fc>blast implants and <fc>B</fc>rånemark turned implants supporting full‐arch bridges showed generally good clinical results with low numbers of implants with marginal bone loss indicative of peri‐implantitis. No significant differences were found between the implant systems after 12–15 years in function.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nils</namePart><namePart type="family">Ravald</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>:Centre for Oral RehabilitationSE‐58185 LinköpingSwedenTel.: +46 10 10388 56Fax: +46 10 10388 47e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: nils.ravald@lio.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Simon</namePart><namePart type="family">Dahlgren</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anders</namePart><namePart type="family">Teiwik</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Centre for Oral Rehabilitation, Public Dental Service of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kerstin</namePart><namePart type="family">Gröndahl</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Jönköping, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-07-02</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-31</dateValid><edition>Ravald N, Dahlgren S, Teiwik A, Gröndahl K. Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years. Clin. Oral Impl. Res., 24 2013, 1144–1151</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To study the long‐term outcome of implant survival rate, soft and hard tissue conditions and prosthetic status in a group of individuals treated with either Astra Tech TiOblast or Brånemark turned implants supporting a full‐arch bridge.</abstract><abstract>Edentulous patients treated with either Astra Tech TiOblast surface or Brånemark turned implants were recalled for examination after 12–15 years. Out of initially 66 patients 46 were available for examination. Intra‐oral radiographs were taken for bone level assessments. Clinical prosthetic conditions, number of surviving implants, implant stability, plaque scores, probing pocket depths, bleeding and pus after probing were recorded. Analyses of bone level changes during the total observation period were performed.</abstract><abstract>Three patients in the Astra Tech group lost totally eight implants and five patients in the Brånemark group lost 10 implants during the total observation period. No statistically significant difference in implant loss or bone level change was found. Sixteen per cent of Astra Tech and 29% of Brånemark patients showed at least one implant with ≥2 mm bone loss after the first year in function. The corresponding prevalence on implant level was 6% and 5% respectively. No significant differences were found between the other examined variables. Two patients showed prosthetic complications of the supra construction in need of repair. Seven bridges had minor ceramic chippings.</abstract><abstract>Treatment with Astra Tech TiOblast implants and Brånemark turned implants supporting full‐arch bridges showed generally good clinical results with low numbers of implants with marginal bone loss indicative of peri‐implantitis. No significant differences were found between the implant systems after 12–15 years in function.</abstract><note type="funding">Research Council of Public Dental Service</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Astra Tech implant</topic><topic>Brånemark system turned implants</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>endosseous implants</topic><topic>marginal bone level</topic><topic>success rate</topic><topic>survival rate</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Research</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1144</start><end>1151</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-8K8PLXL4-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2524</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:081EFAE9848464CB316FA8C91307776FBF4D1677
|texte= Long‐term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full‐arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |