The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants
Identifieur interne : 000009 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000008; suivant : 000010The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants
Auteurs : Rainier A. Urdaneta ; Joseph Leary ; Kimberly M. Panetta ; Sung-Kiang ChuangSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2014-02.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12087
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668ACLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title><author><name sortKey="Urdaneta, Rainier A" sort="Urdaneta, Rainier A" uniqKey="Urdaneta R" first="Rainier A." last="Urdaneta">Rainier A. Urdaneta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Implant Dentistry Centre, MA, Boston, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>, D.M.D.25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USATel.: 617 4619125Fax: 617 390 0043e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: rainieru@yahoo.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leary, Joseph" sort="Leary, Joseph" uniqKey="Leary J" first="Joseph" last="Leary">Joseph Leary</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, MA, Norwood, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Panetta, Kimberly M" sort="Panetta, Kimberly M" uniqKey="Panetta K" first="Kimberly M." last="Panetta">Kimberly M. Panetta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, MA, Norwood, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chuang, Sung Iang" sort="Chuang, Sung Iang" uniqKey="Chuang S" first="Sung-Kiang" last="Chuang">Sung-Kiang Chuang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine, MA, Boston, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC</idno><date when="2014" year="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/clr.12087</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000009</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000009</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title><author><name sortKey="Urdaneta, Rainier A" sort="Urdaneta, Rainier A" uniqKey="Urdaneta R" first="Rainier A." last="Urdaneta">Rainier A. Urdaneta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Implant Dentistry Centre, MA, Boston, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>, D.M.D.25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USATel.: 617 4619125Fax: 617 390 0043e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: rainieru@yahoo.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leary, Joseph" sort="Leary, Joseph" uniqKey="Leary J" first="Joseph" last="Leary">Joseph Leary</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private practice, MA, Norwood, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Panetta, Kimberly M" sort="Panetta, Kimberly M" uniqKey="Panetta K" first="Kimberly M." last="Panetta">Kimberly M. Panetta</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, MA, Norwood, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chuang, Sung Iang" sort="Chuang, Sung Iang" uniqKey="Chuang S" first="Sung-Kiang" last="Chuang">Sung-Kiang Chuang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine, MA, Boston, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e179">e179</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e188">e188</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02">2014-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rainier A. Urdaneta</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Implant Dentistry Centre, MA, Boston, USA</json:string><json:string>, D.M.D.25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USATel.: 617 4619125Fax: 617 390 0043e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: rainieru@yahoo.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Joseph Leary</name><affiliations><json:string>Private practice, MA, Norwood, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kimberly M. Panetta</name><affiliations><json:string>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, MA, Norwood, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sung‐Kiang Chuang</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine, MA, Boston, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>crestal bone</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>opposing structures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>risk factors</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single‐implant crowns</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR12087</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-FGNT4NXB-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.168</score><pdfWordCount>7459</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>51257</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>14</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>98</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>e179</first><last>e188</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-FGNT4NXB-T</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2014</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2014</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/clr.12087</json:string></doi><id>024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Rainier A.</forename><surname>Urdaneta</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private Practice</orgName><orgName>Implant Dentistry Centre</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Boston</settlement><region>MA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Rainier A. Urdaneta, D.M.D. 25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USA Tel.: 617 4619125 Fax: 617 390 0043 e‐mail: rainieru@yahoo.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Joseph</forename><surname>Leary</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Private practice</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Norwood</settlement><region>MA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Kimberly M.</forename><surname>Panetta</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Norwood</settlement><region>Boston, MA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Sung‐Kiang</forename><surname>Chuang</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgName><orgName>Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Boston</settlement><region>MA</region><country key="US">USA</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FGNT4NXB-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12087</idno><idno type="unit">CLR12087</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR12087.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="e179">e179</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="e188">e188</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><date type="published" when="2014-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr12087-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Objectives
<p>To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.</p>
Materials and methods
<p>A retrospective cohort study design was conducted. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multifactor mixed‐effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient were utilized to evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels after insertion of single‐tooth replacements.</p>
Results
<p>Eighty‐one subjects who received 320 <hi rend="fc">B</hi>icon implants were included in the present study. Two hundred and thirty‐one implant restorations were opposing natural teeth, 75 implants were opposing implant‐supported restorations, 10 implants had no opposing structure and four implants were opposed by a complete denture. The average change in crestal bone levels overtime (Av<hi rend="fc">BL</hi>) on implants opposing natural teeth and implant‐supported restorations was −0.20 and −0.62 mm, respectively. Hydroxyapatite‐coated (<hi rend="fc">HA</hi>) mandibular implants opposing natural teeth demonstrated Av<hi rend="fc">BL</hi> of +0.01 (indicating bone gain), whereas titanium‐plasma sprayed (<hi rend="fc">TPS</hi>)‐coated mandibular implants opposing implants restored with composite abutment bases demonstrated Av<hi rend="fc">BL</hi> of −1.95 mm. When the structure opposing an <hi rend="fc">HA</hi>‐coated mandibular implant was a natural tooth, it was a predictor of peri‐implant bone gain (<hi rend="italic">P </hi>=<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0.007). While <hi rend="fc">TPS</hi>‐coated mandibular implants, which had been restored with composite abutment bases, were correlated with peri‐implant bone loss when opposed by implant‐supported restorations (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.003).</p>
Conclusions
<p>This study suggests that the type of opposing structure plays a significant role in mandibular crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants following crown insertion but this effect differ around implants with dissimilar surface coatings and can be exacerbated by local irritating factors.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0001">crestal bone</term><term xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0002">dental implants</term><term xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0003">opposing structures</term><term xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0004">risk factors</term><term xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0005">single‐implant crowns</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr12087" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="20"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2014.25.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="25">25</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2014-02">February 2014</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="440" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/clr.12087</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR12087"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="10" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-10-30" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-11-21" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.2.9 mode:FullText" date="2014-01-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-12-20"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-12-20"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2014-01-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-06"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">e179</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">e188</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>Rainier A. Urdaneta</i>, D.M.D.</line><line>25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USA</line><line>Tel.: 617 4619125</line><line>Fax: 617 390 0043</line><line>e‐mail: <email>rainieru@yahoo.com</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr12087-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Urdaneta</familyName> <givenNames>RA</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Leary</familyName> <givenNames>J</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Panetta</familyName> <givenNames>KM</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Chuang</familyName> <givenNames>S‐K</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</journalTitle> <vol>25</vol>, <pubYear year="2014">2014</pubYear>, <pageFirst>e179</pageFirst>–<pageLast>e188</pageLast></citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR12087.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Urdaneta et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr12087-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12087-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Rainier A.</givenNames> <familyName>Urdaneta</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12087-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12087-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Joseph</givenNames> <familyName>Leary</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12087-aff-0003" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12087-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Kimberly M.</givenNames> <familyName>Panetta</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr12087-aff-0004" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr12087-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Sung‐Kiang</givenNames> <familyName>Chuang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12087-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Private Practice</orgDiv> <orgName>Implant Dentistry Centre</orgName> <address><city>Boston</city> <countryPart>MA</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12087-aff-0002"><orgName>Private practice</orgName> <address><city>Norwood</city> <countryPart>MA</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12087-aff-0003"><orgName>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre</orgName> <address><city>Norwood</city> <countryPart>Boston, MA</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="US" type="organization" xml:id="clr12087-aff-0004"><orgDiv>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</orgDiv> <orgName>Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine</orgName> <address><city>Boston</city> <countryPart>MA</countryPart> <country>USA</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0001">crestal bone</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0002">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0003">opposing structures</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0004">risk factors</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr12087-kwd-0005">single‐implant crowns</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr12087-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr12087-sec-0001"><title type="main">Objectives</title><p>To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12087-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and methods</title><p>A retrospective cohort study design was conducted. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multifactor mixed‐effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient were utilized to evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels after insertion of single‐tooth replacements.</p></section><section xml:id="clr12087-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Eighty‐one subjects who received 320 <fc>B</fc>icon implants were included in the present study. Two hundred and thirty‐one implant restorations were opposing natural teeth, 75 implants were opposing implant‐supported restorations, 10 implants had no opposing structure and four implants were opposed by a complete denture. The average change in crestal bone levels overtime (Av<fc>BL</fc>) on implants opposing natural teeth and implant‐supported restorations was −0.20 and −0.62 mm, respectively. Hydroxyapatite‐coated (<fc>HA</fc>) mandibular implants opposing natural teeth demonstrated Av<fc>BL</fc> of +0.01 (indicating bone gain), whereas titanium‐plasma sprayed (<fc>TPS</fc>)‐coated mandibular implants opposing implants restored with composite abutment bases demonstrated Av<fc>BL</fc> of −1.95 mm. When the structure opposing an <fc>HA</fc>‐coated mandibular implant was a natural tooth, it was a predictor of peri‐implant bone gain (<i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.007). While <fc>TPS</fc>‐coated mandibular implants, which had been restored with composite abutment bases, were correlated with peri‐implant bone loss when opposed by implant‐supported restorations (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p></section><section xml:id="clr12087-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusions</title><p>This study suggests that the type of opposing structure plays a significant role in mandibular crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants following crown insertion but this effect differ around implants with dissimilar surface coatings and can be exacerbated by local irritating factors.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rainier A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Urdaneta</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Implant Dentistry Centre, MA, Boston, USA</affiliation><affiliation>, D.M.D.25 Prairie Ave, Auburndale, MA 2466, USATel.: 617 4619125Fax: 617 390 0043e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: rainieru@yahoo.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joseph</namePart><namePart type="family">Leary</namePart><affiliation>Private practice, MA, Norwood, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kimberly M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Panetta</namePart><affiliation>Dental Hygienist, Implant Dentistry Centre, Boston, MA, Norwood, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sung‐Kiang</namePart><namePart type="family">Chuang</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard School of Dental Medicine, MA, Boston, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2014-02</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-11-21</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10-30</dateValid><edition>Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Panetta KM, Chuang S‐K. The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 25, 2014, e179–e188</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2014</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>To evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels around single‐tooth implants.</abstract><abstract>A retrospective cohort study design was conducted. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multifactor mixed‐effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient were utilized to evaluate the effect of opposing structures in crestal bone levels after insertion of single‐tooth replacements.</abstract><abstract>Eighty‐one subjects who received 320 Bicon implants were included in the present study. Two hundred and thirty‐one implant restorations were opposing natural teeth, 75 implants were opposing implant‐supported restorations, 10 implants had no opposing structure and four implants were opposed by a complete denture. The average change in crestal bone levels overtime (AvBL) on implants opposing natural teeth and implant‐supported restorations was −0.20 and −0.62 mm, respectively. Hydroxyapatite‐coated (HA) mandibular implants opposing natural teeth demonstrated AvBL of +0.01 (indicating bone gain), whereas titanium‐plasma sprayed (TPS)‐coated mandibular implants opposing implants restored with composite abutment bases demonstrated AvBL of −1.95 mm. When the structure opposing an HA‐coated mandibular implant was a natural tooth, it was a predictor of peri‐implant bone gain (P = 0.007). While TPS‐coated mandibular implants, which had been restored with composite abutment bases, were correlated with peri‐implant bone loss when opposed by implant‐supported restorations (P = 0.003).</abstract><abstract>This study suggests that the type of opposing structure plays a significant role in mandibular crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants following crown insertion but this effect differ around implants with dissimilar surface coatings and can be exacerbated by local irritating factors.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>crestal bone</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>opposing structures</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>single‐implant crowns</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2014</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>e179</start><end>e188</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-FGNT4NXB-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/clr.12087</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR12087</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:024AA09B2267885130E9CEACC9ABB28D341668AC
|texte= The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |