Serveur d'exploration Covid

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspective

Identifieur interne : 001244 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001243; suivant : 001245

Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspective

Auteurs : Euan M. Macphail [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:EB61FEF99882D411D8493DABE711191337FAE232

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: The work of behavioural pharmacologists has concentrated on small animals, such as rodents and pigeons. The validity of extrapolation of their findings to humans depends upon the existence of parallels in both physiology and psychology between these animals and humans. This paper considers the question whether there are in fact substantial cognitive parallels between, first, different non-human groups of vertebrates and, second, non-humans and humans. Behavioural data from ‘simple’ tasks, such as habituation and conditioning, do not point to species differences among vertebrates. Using examples that concentrate on the performance of rodents and birds, it is argued that, similarly, data from more complex tasks (learning-set formation, transitive inference, and spatial memory serve as examples) reveal few if any cognitive differences amongst non-human vertebrates. This conclusion supports the notion that association formation may be the critical problem-solving process available to non-human animals; associative mechanisms are assumed to have evolved to detect causal links between events, and would therefore be relevant in all ecological niches. In agreement with this view, recent advances in comparative neurology show striking parallels in functional organisation of mammalian and avian telecephalon. Finally, it is argued that although the peculiarly human capacity for language marks a large cognitive contrast between humans and non-humans, there is good evidence - in particular, from work on implicit learning - that the learning mechanisms available to non-humans are present and do play an important role in human cognition.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(96)00013-4


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspective</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Macphail, Euan M" sort="Macphail, Euan M" uniqKey="Macphail E" first="Euan M." last="Macphail">Euan M. Macphail</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EB61FEF99882D411D8493DABE711191337FAE232</idno>
<date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0926-6410(96)00013-4</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-JJQ718VD-L/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000783</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000783</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000763</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000422</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000422</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0926-6410:1996:Macphail E:cognitive:function:in</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001259</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001244</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001244</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspective</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Macphail, Euan M" sort="Macphail, Euan M" uniqKey="Macphail E" first="Euan M." last="Macphail">Euan M. Macphail</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Psychology, University of York at Heslington, York Y01 5DD</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>York Y01 5DD</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Cognitive Brain Research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">BRESC</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0926-6410</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1996">1996</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3–4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="279">279</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="290">290</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0926-6410</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0926-6410</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Academic press</term>
<term>Archistriatal lesions</term>
<term>Artificial grammar</term>
<term>Association formation</term>
<term>Associative</term>
<term>Associative mechanisms</term>
<term>Avian</term>
<term>Avian brain</term>
<term>Behav</term>
<term>Bitterman</term>
<term>Brain behav</term>
<term>Brain research</term>
<term>Brain size</term>
<term>Cebus monkeys</term>
<term>Central importance</term>
<term>Clarendon press</term>
<term>Classical conditioning</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Cognitive</term>
<term>Cognitive brain research</term>
<term>Cognitive capacities</term>
<term>Cognitive difference</term>
<term>Cognitive differences</term>
<term>Cognitive function</term>
<term>Cognitive processes</term>
<term>Columba livia</term>
<term>Comparative psychologists</term>
<term>Comparative psychology</term>
<term>Complex tasks</term>
<term>Component processes</term>
<term>Conditioning procedures</term>
<term>Contemporary animal</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Contextual variables</term>
<term>Contingency</term>
<term>Contrast effect</term>
<term>Convincing demonstration</term>
<term>Crespi effect</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Different groups</term>
<term>Different processes</term>
<term>Dopaminergic innervation</term>
<term>Early studies</term>
<term>Ecological</term>
<term>Ecological niche</term>
<term>Efficient performance</term>
<term>Experimental support</term>
<term>Explicit processing</term>
<term>First choice</term>
<term>Food resources</term>
<term>Functional organisation</term>
<term>Functional parallels</term>
<term>General notion</term>
<term>Good evidence</term>
<term>Habituation</term>
<term>Human intelligence</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Instrumental conditioning</term>
<term>Language acquisition</term>
<term>Lesion</term>
<term>Macphail</term>
<term>Mammal</term>
<term>Mammalian</term>
<term>Mammalian brain</term>
<term>Mammalian hippocampus</term>
<term>Mammalian neocortex</term>
<term>Mammalian prefrontal cortex</term>
<term>Maze</term>
<term>Neural biol</term>
<term>Olton</term>
<term>Other animals</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other species</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Paleostriatal lesions</term>
<term>Pigeon</term>
<term>Poor performance</term>
<term>Prefrontal cortex</term>
<term>Prima facie evidence</term>
<term>Primates</term>
<term>Proc</term>
<term>Psychol</term>
<term>Psychological processes</term>
<term>Qualitative difference</term>
<term>Quantitative difference</term>
<term>Radial maze</term>
<term>Rat</term>
<term>Reber</term>
<term>Small animals</term>
<term>Spatial locations</term>
<term>Spatial memory</term>
<term>Species differences</term>
<term>Specific proposals</term>
<term>Standard conditioning paradigms</term>
<term>Successful performance</term>
<term>Such variables</term>
<term>Superior performance</term>
<term>Tacit knowledge</term>
<term>Target response</term>
<term>Transitive</term>
<term>Transitive inference</term>
<term>Unintelligent animals</term>
<term>Unintelligent species</term>
<term>Vertebrate</term>
<term>Vertebrate species</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The work of behavioural pharmacologists has concentrated on small animals, such as rodents and pigeons. The validity of extrapolation of their findings to humans depends upon the existence of parallels in both physiology and psychology between these animals and humans. This paper considers the question whether there are in fact substantial cognitive parallels between, first, different non-human groups of vertebrates and, second, non-humans and humans. Behavioural data from ‘simple’ tasks, such as habituation and conditioning, do not point to species differences among vertebrates. Using examples that concentrate on the performance of rodents and birds, it is argued that, similarly, data from more complex tasks (learning-set formation, transitive inference, and spatial memory serve as examples) reveal few if any cognitive differences amongst non-human vertebrates. This conclusion supports the notion that association formation may be the critical problem-solving process available to non-human animals; associative mechanisms are assumed to have evolved to detect causal links between events, and would therefore be relevant in all ecological niches. In agreement with this view, recent advances in comparative neurology show striking parallels in functional organisation of mammalian and avian telecephalon. Finally, it is argued that although the peculiarly human capacity for language marks a large cognitive contrast between humans and non-humans, there is good evidence - in particular, from work on implicit learning - that the learning mechanisms available to non-humans are present and do play an important role in human cognition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Macphail, Euan M" sort="Macphail, Euan M" uniqKey="Macphail E" first="Euan M." last="Macphail">Euan M. Macphail</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/CovidV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001244 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001244 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    CovidV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:EB61FEF99882D411D8493DABE711191337FAE232
   |texte=   Cognitive function in mammals: the evolutionary perspective
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Fri Mar 27 18:14:15 2020. Site generation: Sun Jan 31 15:15:08 2021