The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.
Identifieur interne : 000135 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000134; suivant : 000136The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.
Auteurs : Carmen Sanchez ; David DunningSource :
- Journal of applied social psychology [ 0021-9029 ] ; 2021.
Abstract
Across three studies, we investigated who expresses concern for COVID-19, or coronavirus, and engages in behaviors that are consistent with slowing the spread of COVID-19. In Studies 1 and 2 (n = 415, n = 199), those with warmer feelings toward scientists were more concerned and engaged in greater COVID-preventative behaviors, regardless of partisanship. That is, an anti-scientists bias was related to lessened concern and toward less preventive behaviors. Furthermore, those who were the most optimistic about hydroxychloroquine, a purported but unproven treatment against the virus, were less likely to engage in behaviors designed to decrease the spread of COVID-19. In Study 3 (n = 259), asking participants to watch a scientist discuss hydroxychloroquine on Fox News led people to greater endorsement of COVID behaviors. In short, positive feelings toward scientists, rather than political attitudes or knowledge, related to who was concerned and those willing to engage in pandemic reducing behaviors. These behaviors were not immutable and can be changed by scientific out-reach.
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12748
PubMed: 33821031
PubMed Central: PMC8013646
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:33821031Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.</title><author><name sortKey="Sanchez, Carmen" sort="Sanchez, Carmen" uniqKey="Sanchez C" first="Carmen" last="Sanchez">Carmen Sanchez</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Gies College of Business University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Champaign IL USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dunning, David" sort="Dunning, David" uniqKey="Dunning D" first="David" last="Dunning">David Dunning</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Psychology Department University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2021">2021</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:33821031</idno><idno type="pmid">33821031</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/jasp.12748</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC8013646</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000135</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000135</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.</title><author><name sortKey="Sanchez, Carmen" sort="Sanchez, Carmen" uniqKey="Sanchez C" first="Carmen" last="Sanchez">Carmen Sanchez</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Gies College of Business University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Champaign IL USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dunning, David" sort="Dunning, David" uniqKey="Dunning D" first="David" last="Dunning">David Dunning</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Psychology Department University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of applied social psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0021-9029</idno><imprint><date when="2021" type="published">2021</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Across three studies, we investigated who expresses concern for COVID-19, or coronavirus, and engages in behaviors that are consistent with slowing the spread of COVID-19. In Studies 1 and 2 (<i>n</i> = 415, <i>n</i> = 199), those with warmer feelings toward scientists were more concerned and engaged in greater COVID-preventative behaviors, regardless of partisanship. That is, an anti-scientists bias was related to lessened concern and toward less preventive behaviors. Furthermore, those who were the most optimistic about hydroxychloroquine, a purported but unproven treatment against the virus, were less likely to engage in behaviors designed to decrease the spread of COVID-19. In Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 259), asking participants to watch a scientist discuss hydroxychloroquine on Fox News led people to greater endorsement of COVID behaviors. In short, positive feelings toward scientists, rather than political attitudes or knowledge, related to who was concerned and those willing to engage in pandemic reducing behaviors. These behaviors were not immutable and can be changed by scientific out-reach.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">33821031</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0021-9029</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><PubDate><Year>2021</Year><Month>Feb</Month><Day>16</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of applied social psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Appl Soc Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/jasp.12748</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Across three studies, we investigated who expresses concern for COVID-19, or coronavirus, and engages in behaviors that are consistent with slowing the spread of COVID-19. In Studies 1 and 2 (<i>n</i> = 415, <i>n</i> = 199), those with warmer feelings toward scientists were more concerned and engaged in greater COVID-preventative behaviors, regardless of partisanship. That is, an anti-scientists bias was related to lessened concern and toward less preventive behaviors. Furthermore, those who were the most optimistic about hydroxychloroquine, a purported but unproven treatment against the virus, were less likely to engage in behaviors designed to decrease the spread of COVID-19. In Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 259), asking participants to watch a scientist discuss hydroxychloroquine on Fox News led people to greater endorsement of COVID behaviors. In short, positive feelings toward scientists, rather than political attitudes or knowledge, related to who was concerned and those willing to engage in pandemic reducing behaviors. These behaviors were not immutable and can be changed by scientific out-reach.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sanchez</LastName><ForeName>Carmen</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-1851</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Gies College of Business University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Champaign IL USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dunning</LastName><ForeName>David</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Psychology Department University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2021</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>16</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Appl Soc Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0321050</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0021-9029</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2020</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2021</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>24</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2021</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>50</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2021</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2021</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33821031</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/jasp.12748</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">JASP12748</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC8013646</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><pmc-dir>pmcsd</pmc-dir>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 May;36(5):655-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20371797</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Emotion. 2021 Mar 18;:</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33734738</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29935897</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Justice Res. 2008 Sep;21(3):263-396</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24052687</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 1;10(1):10722</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32612260</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19379034</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:109-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27184821</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3397865</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32205204</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychol Rep. 1970 Aug;27(1):105-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">4247727</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/CovidChloroV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000135 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000135 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= CovidChloroV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:33821031
|texte= The anti-scientists bias: The role of feelings about scientists in COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:33821031" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a CovidChloroV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |